I have already sold my first born child so im sortedAloha wrote:
>mfw no coins left to play in tourny
I have already sold my first born child so im sortedAloha wrote:
>mfw no coins left to play in tourny
Lets be really fucking honest here. If QLD has daylight savings there wouldn't be an issue in the first place Everything would just be normal and on the same timezone.EmeraldStar82 wrote:
For those who were wondering or not aware:
All matches are in GMT +10.
For all you in AEST and that have their matches on Friday or Saturday, your matches are an hour earlier.
AEDT ends Sunday 3am so on Sunday all you AEST people have their matches at your local time.
But srsly, fuk daylight savings. so confuzzling.
Nahh don't tell us how to live our fken LIFE[Cloud] wrote:
Lets be really fucking honest here. If QLD has daylight savings there wouldn't be an issue in the first place Everything would just be normal and on the same timezone.
M8 im from qldB-] wrote:
Nahh don't tell us how to live our fken LIFE[Cloud] wrote:
Lets be really fucking honest here. If QLD has daylight savings there wouldn't be an issue in the first place Everything would just be normal and on the same timezone.
Thanks for this m8, I was gonna miss the match if you didn't point this out.EmeraldStar82 wrote:
For those who were wondering or not aware:
All matches are in GMT +10.
For all you in AEST and that have their matches on Friday or Saturday, your matches are an hour earlier.
AEDT ends Sunday 3am so on Sunday all you AEST people have their matches at your local time.
But srsly, fuk daylight savings. so confuzzling.
Are we 9:30 melbourne time?Philantropist wrote:
Thanks for this m8, I was gonna miss the match if you didn't point this out.EmeraldStar82 wrote:
For those who were wondering or not aware:
All matches are in GMT +10.
For all you in AEST and that have their matches on Friday or Saturday, your matches are an hour earlier.
AEDT ends Sunday 3am so on Sunday all you AEST people have their matches at your local time.
But srsly, fuk daylight savings. so confuzzling.
Not too sure, since I'm in Sydney. In my timezone its supposed to be 9:30 and I'm pretty sure melborune is in the same timezone.Aloha wrote:
Are we 9:30 melbourne time?
I didn't post it until now because you changed the seeding format at the last second didn't you? I don't expect perfect match ups, but there should be some system to make sure they're not so one-sided there is no point in having the match, like Bauxe vs that 100K guy. I'm not sure what traditional seeding is, but it seems just like it was random. Another idea is to assign every adjacent player from the target on the player pp list a point value, say 20 points for the players next to the target, 19 points of the next two adjacent players etcetera.Happyjon wrote:
Looking at the graph I posted here, you will notice that roughly 70% of all players are between 3000 and 5000pp. These matches in round 1 shouldn't be too one-sided. With such a range of skill levels, it's very hard to have a format that caters to all the outliers. I'm really not sure how your suggested format would be implemented given that we only have 8 players below 3000pp, and even their range of skill levels is quite high. Also, any objections with the tournament format really should have been raised earlier when the thread was first posted, as it is far too late to change anything at this time.
That's a selfish attitude, deprive all other players of fair matches just so the top players can cruise through easily beating their opponents, so they only have to face each other at the end, so there's more suspense or something? Maybe that's your idea of a 'good' tournament, and it may be fun for you, but not for the low ranked players like vawlt pointed out.buny wrote:
a 5 digit rank will pretty much have no chance of winning. I don't see your logic in allowing them to play other low ranks as more deserving players are being knocked out earlier.
seeding is a means of avoiding scenarios like these.
as for your suggestion, this is basically the same as a low rank tournament with its own prize which could be hosted by somebody else
Lol are u fukin seriousB1rd wrote:
That's a selfish attitude, deprive all other players of fair matches just so the top players can cruise through easily beating their opponents, so they only have to face each other at the end, so there's more suspense or something? Maybe that's your idea of a 'good' tournament, and it may be fun for you, but not for the low ranked players like vawlt pointed out.
But if that's the problem, then what was wrong with my suggestion? Here is a modified version. Everyone get's one fair match, and the all the best players last till the end. Seems like it'd be 'fun' and 'good' without compromising.
please stop postingB1rd wrote:
That's a selfish attitude, deprive all other players of fair matches just so the top players can cruise through easily beating their opponents, so they only have to face each other at the end, so there's more suspense or something? Maybe that's your idea of a 'good' tournament, and it may be fun for you, but not for the low ranked players like vawlt pointed out.
But if that's the problem, then what was wrong with my suggestion? Here is a modified version. Everyone get's one fair match, and the all the best players last till the end. Seems like it'd be 'fun' and 'good' without compromising.
Maybe Jesus is trying to send you a messageRewben2 wrote:
Damaged my tablet cord for the first time since I owned it bringing it to a LAN a few days ago, and now the shops are closed for this friday bullshit... rip me. Mouse leggo.
EmeraldStar82 wrote:
Prediction Bracket!
Vote for your favourite or vote for the underdog! \o/
This is only for fun, please don't criticize me :c
you aren't even in this get the f00k outTachibana Rika wrote:
EmeraldStar82 wrote:
Prediction Bracket!
Vote for your favourite or vote for the underdog! \o/
This is only for fun, please don't criticize me :c
Hi my name is tachibana riki
orz
You can do it!!!Hulmy wrote:
"Hulmy 0%"
Gee thanks
I know I have a slim chance, but seeing that is kind of discouraging...
iOniigiri wrote:
I shouldn't have looked at this. ; ______;
hhjkl wrote:
iOniigiri wrote:
I shouldn't have looked at this. ; ______;
;w;
It sure was! Good luck with the rest of the tournament.Aloha wrote:
ggwp Philantropist, was a fun match.
Accuracy is probably my strong point.Philantropist wrote:
It sure was! Good luck with the rest of the tournament.Aloha wrote:
ggwp Philantropist, was a fun match.
still admiring that ss
Because you're the best Australia has c;AusBox wrote:
I have no idea why I have this many votes...