[Extreme]
02:05:766 (2) - risky object.
IDK acceptable or not.
02:05:766 (2) - risky object.
IDK acceptable or not.
NewRulerNA wrote:
[Extreme]
02:05:766 (2) - risky object.
IDK acceptable or not.
gg wpAka wrote:
NewRulerNA wrote:
[Extreme]
02:05:766 (2) - risky object.
IDK acceptable or not.
not, its offscreen
*summons qat*
what are you talking about, if a note is offscreen by a pixel it's a trash unplayable map with zero signs of qualitynookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
That's why half of the newly ranked beatmaps are TV sizes, and the approved category has been dead since 2013nookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
Now FC it at 1024x768nookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
Approved isnt dead, approved is for marathon maps with a draintime of +5minDefault wrote:
That's why half of the newly ranked beatmaps are TV sizes, and the approved category has been dead since 2013nookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
Which can't get ranked because they have 659559+ notes which need to be moved a pixel to the left/right or whatever. Check the date of the lastest approved map and tell me if it's dead or not.FlobuFlobs wrote:
Approved isnt dead, approved is for marathon maps with a draintime of +5min
Well... Things have changed since 2013, and most people will agree that it didn't change in a good way. So we can somehow say that approval is dead, yes.FlobuFlobs wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
That's why half of the newly ranked beatmaps are TV sizes, and the approved category has been dead since 2013
Approved isnt dead, approved is for marathon maps with a draintime of +5min
There are a couple of approved maps each week. It's just given heart instead of a flame recently, so it shows under ranked rather than approved, as the systems are pretty much the same now excluding that you need 3 nominations rather than 2 to get approved.Default wrote:
Which can't get ranked because they have 659559+ notes which need to be moved a pixel to the left/right or whatever. Check the date of the lastest approved map and tell me if it's dead or not.FlobuFlobs wrote:
Approved isnt dead, approved is for marathon maps with a draintime of +5min
Edit: Damn why am I so whiny anyway t.t I need some sleep, being an active BAT/QAT is probably hard as hell
Uh... Approval now is just for marathon. (as you can see by yourself on the links you posted). They just should have named it "marathon section" instead of giving the old name "approval" to avoid confusion. Because "approval" wasn't always for marathon only.deetz wrote:
[
There are a couple of approved maps each week. It's just given heart instead of a flame recently, so it shows under ranked rather than approved, as the systems are pretty much the same now excluding that you need 3 nominations rather than 2 to get approved.
the ones in qualified right now:
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/270999
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/53342
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/277279
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/253969
yep i understand that lolYales wrote:
Uh... Approval now is just for marathon. (as you can see by yourself on the links you posted). They just should have named it "marathon section" instead of giving the old name "approval" to avoid confusion. Because "approval" wasn't always for marathon only.deetz wrote:
[
There are a couple of approved maps each week. It's just given heart instead of a flame recently, so it shows under ranked rather than approved, as the systems are pretty much the same now excluding that you need 3 nominations rather than 2 to get approved.
the ones in qualified right now:
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/270999
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/53342
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/277279
https://osu.ppy.sh/s/253969
Well, about an offscreen problem it has to be fixed though and I don't get why this talk about marathon for this kind of problem. o.o
lol xd lets rank rabbit jumping styl!!! its fun, playable and coherent 2 me hehe :pnookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
I laughed hard.Mazzerin wrote:
what are you talking about, if a note is offscreen by a pixel it's a trash unplayable map with zero signs of quality
or just dont map offscreen. it's not hard.nookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
nookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
/thread (please?)silmarilen wrote:
or just dont map offscreen. it's not hard.nookls wrote:
Christ I really don't understand all the "perfection" blah blah about the beatmap ranking process. So what if a note is a pixel offscreen, is that really a reason to unrank? If it's fun and doesn't have issues that ruin its playability and/or status as a coherent beatmap i really don't think it matters.
lolaefrogdog wrote:
Why was it unranked?
The gap isn't that huge and this is the peak of the song, don't be silly. Alternatively, make the entire map harder to fix.Asphyxia wrote:
02:14:220 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,4,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - in Second Gonakanau creates a massive difficulty gap within the difficulty itself. You can compare both wkyikawa's Extra and Second Gonkanau from 02:14:220 - to 02:18:584 - , the gap is quite huge. Reducing the spacing to something more suitable is strongly recommended. We don't think it is appropriate in its current state.
Yauxo wrote:
That was to be expected.
Dont even think about mapping objects offscreen, always proof-read (or watch in this case) and dont count on nobody noticing.
Mazzerin wrote:
what are you talking about, if a note is offscreen by a pixel it's a trash unplayable map with zero signs of quality