ByBy_ChAn wrote:

Here's my mod

asdf - nazi or suggestion
asdf - unrankable issue

General

1. Hmm.. Why you not set HP to 6 , CS to 4 and AR to 8 ? Is a marathon and it should be a little harder because the star looks ''N'' instead ''H'' marathon doesn't mean difficulty, and the star rating doesn't really matter. in any case, this is a hard diff
2. The offset fits better on 657 because there the wind starts beating this mean that starts the song . Also , after moving the offset , you should resnap all objects offset is fine
3. Can you use a silenced hitsound for the last spinner ? Because it's too louder there is a calm downbeat at the end of the song nah, 5% is fine as is

Miracle

1. 00:09:869()- Why you not place a note ? You can because you will follow the vocal and the piano much better then before I could, but I want to keep it smooth at least in the beginning of the map; I might add if more people say so
2. 00:14:919(1)- imo place it to x:213 y:239 for a better cursor movement and for a better flow It's an interesting idea, but not sure. I'll think about it
3. 00:16:701(1)- Check space . Is a little far from previous object this is intended
4. 00:19:374()- Add a note for vocal and piano . It will sound much better :3 same as previous situation
5. 00:40:464(1)- Move the last gap to x:29 y:131 to make it curve like (3)- to improve the flow better not the exact values but Estellia- mentioned that previously too so fixed
6. 00:47:889(2)- Here a 1/1 slider don't work good with vocal and piano . Instead delete the slider and put a note on 00:48:186()- and then another note on 00:48:483()- to catch the piano and the vocal nah this is fine
7. 00:51:558(3)- Can you move the middle gap to x:77 y:216 ? For me this slider looks unnestetic imo i likey <3
8. 01:08:979(3,4)- A 1/2 slider and a 1/4 slider don't work with the downbeat . Maybe put at that 1/2 slider 1 reverse and replace that 1/4 slider with a note . It will sounds great :3 i prefer as it is now
9. 01:58:880(3)- Maybe ctrl+g for a better flow this works fine
10. 02:18:186(4)- Maybe you should delete the note because there's downbeat and that note don't fit the downbeat well this note is fine
11. 03:11:355(1)- It will be a good choice if you move the last gap to x:347 y:264 to curve the slider a little bit and then move that 1/2 slider to x:349 y:346 for a blanket with previous slider . It will improve the cursor movement and the flow I guess :3 this is fine as well ><
12. 03:45:216(5)- Why you not snap this slider to 1/2 ? It will fit better the downbeat vocals
13. 04:55:909(2)- Instead to put a 1/4 slider , why you not replace it with 2 notes to fit the downbeat ? i like the slider better
14. 04:57:097(3)- Maybe add NC because new vocals ? I'm not sure 0-0 right, thanks ww

That's all from me ! Good map ! Have my stars ! o/

Good Luck on approval !

Pho wrote:

Why did I google this

Pho wrote:

Why did I google this

Xinely wrote:

metadata confirmation http://kanataro.com/disco_detail/other_ost_saya.html

Yuzu- wrote:

FUCKING KANJI IM NOT JAPANESE

Yuzu- wrote:

I am gonna slap musume if this goes rip again

Yuzu- wrote:

I am gonna slap someone if this goes rip again

Yuzu- wrote:

I am gonna slap someone if this goes rip again

1. 02:41:652 (1,2,3,1) -
2. 02:45:216 (1,2,1,2) -
3. 02:48:781 (1,1,1,2,3,1) -
4. 03:05:415 (1,2,3,1) -
5. 03:54:127 (1,2,3,1) -
6. 04:17:889 (1,2,3,4,1) -
7. 04:36:899 (1,2,3,1) -
8. 04:41:652 (1,2,3,1) -

1. 00:23:831 (1) -
2. 02:44:028 (1) -
3. 02:45:216 (1) -
4. 03:06:008 (3) -
5. 03:46:033 (1) -
6. 03:54:721 (3) -
7. 03:56:503 (1) -
8. 04:37:492 (3) -
9. 04:39:275 (1) -
10. 04:42:246 (3) -
11. 04:44:028 (1) -

1. 01:29:177 (1) - has its tail nearly silenced when there's an audible sound. Why? The correct placement is this: http://puu.sh/fBcCZ/acb2b92716.jpg

Giralda wrote:

I'm gonna break my laptop if this goes rip again

ByBy_ChAn wrote:

Yuzu- wrote:

I am gonna slap someone if this goes rip again

I am gonna kill someone if this goes rip again

TicClick wrote:

I have to return it back to WiP due to poor use of antijumps that make spacing changes barely readable, if not unreadable at all:

1. 02:41:652 (1,2,3,1) -
2. 02:45:216 (1,2,1,2) -
3. 02:48:781 (1,1,1,2,3,1) -
4. 03:05:415 (1,2,3,1) -
5. 03:54:127 (1,2,3,1) -
6. 04:17:889 (1,2,3,4,1) -
7. 04:36:899 (1,2,3,1) -
8. 04:41:652 (1,2,3,1) -

An ideal option would be to remove all antijumps like 00:36:602 (2) at all and instead make something else that plays better and doesn't require maintaining attention on a high level all the time.

The following sliders end on literally nothing and should have their tails snapped appropriately (perhaps you wanted to snap them to 1/2):

1. 00:23:831 (1) -
2. 02:44:028 (1) -
3. 02:45:216 (1) -
4. 03:06:008 (3) -
5. 03:46:033 (1) -
6. 03:54:721 (3) -
7. 03:56:503 (1) -
8. 04:37:492 (3) -
9. 04:39:275 (1) -
10. 04:42:246 (3) -
11. 04:44:028 (1) -

----------

Random find:

1. 01:29:177 (1) - has its tail nearly silenced when there's an audible sound. Why? The correct placement is this: http://puu.sh/fBcCZ/acb2b92716.jpg

Yuzu- wrote:

TicClick wrote:

I have to return it back to WiP due to poor use of antijumps that make spacing changes barely readable, if not unreadable at all:

1. 02:41:652 (1,2,3,1) -
2. 02:45:216 (1,2,1,2) -
3. 02:48:781 (1,1,1,2,3,1) -
4. 03:05:415 (1,2,3,1) -
5. 03:54:127 (1,2,3,1) -
6. 04:17:889 (1,2,3,4,1) -
7. 04:36:899 (1,2,3,1) -
8. 04:41:652 (1,2,3,1) -

An ideal option would be to remove all antijumps like 00:36:602 (2) at all and instead make something else that plays better and doesn't require maintaining attention on a high level all the time.

The following sliders end on literally nothing and should have their tails snapped appropriately (perhaps you wanted to snap them to 1/2):

1. 00:23:831 (1) -
2. 02:44:028 (1) -
3. 02:45:216 (1) -
4. 03:06:008 (3) -
5. 03:46:033 (1) -
6. 03:54:721 (3) -
7. 03:56:503 (1) -
8. 04:37:492 (3) -
9. 04:39:275 (1) -
10. 04:42:246 (3) -
11. 04:44:028 (1) -

----------

Random find:

1. 01:29:177 (1) - has its tail nearly silenced when there's an audible sound. Why? The correct placement is this: http://puu.sh/fBcCZ/acb2b92716.jpg

This is bogus. The only thing I'd fix (which I will) is the last point and it's not something you should unrank this map for.

The antijumps are fine, it's not supposed to be a NORMAL diff and they are NOT unreadable; not one person I spectated playing this map failed to do them.

Regarding the sliders, since when is this something unrankable? All of my sliders that you pointed follow something; it's not the first time something like this is used, and no one - again - had issues with playing this.

I will fix your "random find" and nothing else. Users that have checked this map apparently didn't have one problem with it, so if you or anyone that might agree with you have an issue with my patterns then make sure it's not personal stuff and then return the heart.

@Nozhomi, fixed blankets.

Shiro wrote:

Yuzu- wrote:

This is bogus. The only thing I'd fix (which I will) is the last point and it's not something you should unrank this map for.

The antijumps are fine, it's not supposed to be a NORMAL diff and they are NOT unreadable; not one person I spectated playing this map failed to do them.

Regarding the sliders, since when is this something unrankable? All of my sliders that you pointed follow something; it's not the first time something like this is used, and no one - again - had issues with playing this.

I will fix your "random find" and nothing else. Users that have checked this map apparently didn't have one problem with it, so if you or anyone that might agree with you have an issue with my patterns then make sure it's not personal stuff and then return the heart.

@Nozhomi, fixed blankets.

Hello.

Your use of random spacing and needless antijumps because you are too lazy to come up with something that actually fits is bogus.
Your rhythms are mostly bogus and silencing sliders that end on a strong beat in the song is bogus.
Your comboing is bogus.
Your attitude as a mapper is bogus. If you're not going to fix them, then I can nuke this now and let it rot. What do you choose ? We're not going to waste our time trying to help you make this better if you're not even willing to admit it can be improved.

00:23:831 (1) - This ends on absolutely nothing and is bogus. This alone is unrankable.

The antijumps being readable and playable doesn't make them good. This could go through a lot of improvement, but if you believe you're better than that, then let me nuke this and work on another mapset.

Please contact me with your decision. I'll be waiting.

Ranking Criteria wrote:

...the end of a slider can be silent, but only do it if it makes sense...