i guess, since we aren't really a team, u should remove "BA" from this page too o3o https://osu.ppy.sh/wiki/The_Team
i supposeStefan wrote:
The BAT is placed in "User Groups". It's not like osu! alumnis or the Tournament Staff are real teams.
I'm still all for the "Beatmap Nominator" or "Beatmap Approver" sort of thingKibbleru wrote:
i suppose
blah "beatmap appreciator" still sounds meh lol
Well it's not called the osu!Alumni Team or the Tournament Staff Team.Stefan wrote:
The BAT is placed in "User Groups". It's not like osu! alumnis or the Tournament Staff are real teams.
Aren't we basically MATv2BeatofIke wrote:
MAT color please
/runs
I don't like being completely colorless either but I think his point is that being any color at all will have newbies confusing us for staff.Kurokami wrote:
Removing color, rename meh. Beatmap Appreciator is lame as it already said a few times. The given example, Beatmap Nominator sounds way better as we mostly nominate maps as you named the "rank" or "qualify" in the op. About the colors, removing them entirely I think its a really bad idea. Yes, we have no difference from being a normal user but being completely colorless can cause misunderstanding for newbies as they can't differentiate a post of "BATs" from a normal modder. To be honest I think no one reads the title itself, most user makes difference by colors. Its even easier to us "BATs" to find previous "BAT" posts in beatmaps threads while searching (for example) after icons. Color us to pink or purple or whatever but being colorless is just meh.
Nice thing someone finally mentioned it.Okoratu wrote:
Aren't we basically MATv2BeatofIke wrote:
MAT color please
/runs
just
...
without the T
So the CAT doesn't at any time their colour. They don't even have a title at all. But they still bring an important part into osu!. As well the BAT - whetever new or old - does/did. The only difference is that BAT members do not have moderation options anymore for good reasons. None of us here is better because he got this and that colour - just to clarify since it's for some a big deal being orange or black on the webpage. However the point is that what you saidKurokami wrote:
Removing color, rename meh. Beatmap Appreciator is lame as it already said a few times. The given example, Beatmap Nominator sounds way better as we mostly nominate maps as you named the "rank" or "qualify" in the op. About the colors, removing them entirely I think its a really bad idea. Yes, we have no difference from being a normal user but being completely colorless can cause misunderstanding for newbies as they can't differentiate a post of "BATs" from a normal modder. To be honest I think no one reads the title itself, most user makes difference by colors. Its even easier to us "BATs" to find previous "BAT" posts in beatmaps threads while searching (for example) after icons. Color us to pink or purple or whatever but being colorless is just meh.
brings the opposite what you're criticize here. for the most people BATs are still these people who ranks - yeah, ranks and not qualify - Beatmaps and being able to silence. I would agree with you above if you guys had no title. But that isn't the case. You have one - which clearly states out what are you doing. People aren't that dumb to be orientated by colours. They are more used to the old BAT's behaviour. And we finally should get rid of it.Kurokami wrote:
[...] Yes, we have no difference from being a normal user but being completely colorless can cause misunderstanding for newbies as they can't differentiate a post of "BATs" from a normal modder.
Since when is the word "Appreciation" or "Appreciatior" a problem?xxdeathx wrote:
Yeah, Beatmap Nominator sounds more natural.
lol it makes us sound like suck ups :XStefan wrote:
Since when is the word "Appreciation" or "Appreciatior" a problem?xxdeathx wrote:
Yeah, Beatmap Nominator sounds more natural.
I have to agree with Kurokami on this. While I highly support that we aren't 'staff' and we shouldn't be treated as so, having colors to help locate certain users on the fly is extremely helpful. Most of the time when I browse Feature Requests and Technical Support, I never even notice the Chat Moderators because they don't have anything to distinguish themselves with, which is, in my opinion wrong. Being able to identify what position people are in just from a glance is more beneficial to the community. The red name should be removed, but I believe another color should be used. (Purple)BeatofIke wrote:
MAT color please
/runs
Believe it or not but I really suggested to change "Team" into "Group". Then they laughed about the abbreviation... Yeah, BAG. D:Lanturn wrote:
If not, maybe change Team to Group? 3 letter acronyms > 2 letter acronyms since we use "mod" "bat" "qat" all the time for requests.
"Beatmap Nomination Group" / "Beatmap Appreciation Group" ?
This system is more community-driven as opposed to staff-chosen. Maps that will be ranked are the ones the community wants to see. One of the parts of this is indeed a more quantity over quality approach (although the "quality" aspect will be handled by the QATs obviously). The "BAT" as we know it is not longer focused on such attitudes as before.Kurokami wrote:
Yeah, modder score based on kudosu count. The base of this system is already bad. Even I was added to this team because of my activity not my quality (said by Loctav). So instead of a quality based team we became a quantity based one. True, thats nowhere similar to the MAT. At least there were some quality.
That'll just add on tons of more work for the mods (takes ages for a thread to be archived, even). We work as a sort of beta tester for this new system, so its appropriate to have an exclusive board only we can post on to discuss things. Of course this board will be removed when modding v2 rolls around, since there will be more of a focus on the map's threads or whatever. Plus people can just post on map threads at this point anywayKurokami wrote:
By the way then what will be special about this subforum? You should just open it up to everyone since as you said we are just normal users with nomination powers. So every user should be able to post here and tell his/her opinion about a certain mapset. Moderators can come and remove unwanted posts as they usually do at every other part of this forum.
People should still have a list of who has the ability to nominate, just for pestering reasons. Also the way it works now is based off of usergroups, and any usergroup that the public has the ability to access will be listed (that'll change eventually though I guess, the people who have the ability to nominate will get some sort of special list otherwise).Kurokami wrote:
Edit (since I saw Andrea's post): I think that page will be removed as well since as its already said many times, we are not a team and we are just normal users with nomination power.
okLoctav wrote:
I think I can enslave Atrue and IamKwaN for some translation
Afaik the move to this board instead of Trello was because of modding v2.Lust wrote:
Of course this board will be removed when modding v2 rolls around, since there will be more of a focus on the map's threads or whatever. Plus people can just post on map threads at this point anyway
I actually agree with this.Sonnyc wrote:
but the criteria of becoming a QAT is much more mysterious than being promoted to the previous staff BAT.
This won't be possible.Sonnyc wrote:
Possible osu! Alumni for highly contributed BATs
^thisSonnyc wrote:
Also it conflicts with the concept of easy assessible from mappers. If mappers need assistance from an experienced modder, the conventionally best way to ask someone is contacting a colored user, which we call easily assessible. Sure we've got a list of BATs here https://osu.ppy.sh/g/28 , but the need to search for a list is already something hard to assess.
"If mappers need assistance from people who are able to nominate maps"if that's what you meant Sonnyc?
do well and they'll find you, this is so obviousxxdeathx wrote:
You raise some good points Sonnyc, but we don't have the slightest clue how they decide whether somebody can join the staff.