Sleeping
00:24:772 (1,2,3,4) - Just a sort of idea here: If you like symmetry you can maybe arrang these objects to get a neat symmetrical pattern.
I'm wasnt planing to make it symmetric
00:42:172 (6) - Move the last anchor point to 400|210 and resnap 00:43:372 (1) - so that (6) points onto (1) which would create a smoother movement here.It's already pointing there, when I try to fix just messes up
01:13:672 (1) - Hm, nothing you have to change but I think it would be a nice touch if this would be placed higher for a zigzag movement. That would feel more intuitive to me. I prefer like this
01:30:172 (6) - I don't know if it's just me but I think this feels really unintuitive due to the really wide movement to the right. I'd rather go in an oval back to the left or upwards. Maybe you could try to replace (6) with a flipped version :/ Hehe, is more intuitive my way, since the cursor moves in the same line~
01:58:972 (4,1,2) - Woohoo, messed up spacing q-q Also consider using "Create Polygon Circles" for perfect squares. These just look messy. Maybe it's due to the DS issues though. No need to mark this as unrankable, is not even perceptible ^^" Moved the notes a lil bit to make a better square
Your whole 1/2 Spacing is messed up. It varies between 1,50 (e.g. 00:14:572 (1) - ) where the circles are just slightly touching and 1,70 (e.g. 00:40:672 (4) - ) which is really weird since it has no real pattern and is used completely random as it seems to me. The reason why it looks so random is that it is used really unreasonable. You've used all kinds of different DS in the same pattern for example which makes it completely weird. Please resnap everything like that with a constant DS for better playability, readability and consistency throughout the whole map.I dont want notes to overlap so it looks cleaner for newbies, 2 or 3 grids of difference aren't noticeble and I bet you wouldn't notice in game-play only
I dunno if this is just my whole personal opinion but I found the rhythm in the Kiais to be really tricky. I've actually missed due to the red tick polarity. Well, that's probably just me having a problem with reading that lol (even though I'm a pretty experineced player)
I'm trying to not make the diff too 1/1 so is not boring, also so the hitsounds are consistent. If more ppl tell me about it I'll change it.

Walking

00:25:372 (3) - Maybe you could make some adjustments here. The spacing looks really uneven. Didn't see a problem here
01:11:572 (6) - Consider rotating this about 35° Selection Centre so that it points onto (1) in order to get an oval-ish movement here. That would improve the flow here because you avoid that rapid turn upwards with that. I'll keep this
01:20:572 (3,4,1) - Maybe it's just me but it seems as this would play better if they were placed in a line so that the player can follow it more fluently. The wavy movement felt a bit to fast at this point of the map to me. Wanted to make it like 01:19:372 (1,2,3) - is not that hard ><
01:45:172 (5,6,1) - I just want to comment here that this looks weird ingame due to the stacking of 01:45:772 (1,1,1) - . I don't really know how you could change this without lowering the stack leniency, which you really shouldn't do here, but maybe you could come up with something cool as I think a line isn't the perfect choice here due to these messes up distances because of the stacking. I want to keep this, so it matches the other patterns on stacking on the chorus parts (of all diffs)
01:49:972 (5,6,1) - This looks a bit untidy in my eyes due to the big gap between (5) and (1) which is a pretty uncommen structure in this map since verything is so low spaced next to each other. An equal triangle would be pretty neat here if you ask me. I want to keep it the same, don't see the problem with it

Dancing
00:32:572 (5,1) - Maybe it's just me but the gap here felt weird to play due to the polarity issue and the fact that they are sound you could map in the instruments. I'd either go for a similiar rhythm as you've done at 00:27:772 (4,5,6,7) - since the beat is kinda similiar here or you just simply put a circle at 00:33:472 - . Tried adding some notes, but didnt like it, will keep it like this for now
Screenshot
00:43:372 (1,2,3) - I feel that that kind of zigzag movement between these circles plays a bit weird due (3) pointing so much left so that's a pretty fast rapid turn here. Placing them in a line would increase the playability here a lot imo (: Changed the curve to the other side so is more smoothy ( didnt like the straight line)
00:55:372 (1,2,3) - This feels out of place to me. You never stack Slider -> Circle -> Slider before or do this ever again in this map. I'd rather space this out because I didn't really expect this coming. (Also if you don't want to change this move at least 00:55:822 (2) - so that it's properly stacked because it looks kinda messy due to it being 1/4) Wanted to create the mirror sliders pattern here http://puu.sh/bPwQn/523203c0c6.jpg but also wanted the notes to follow better the rhythm
01:09:772 (1,2,3,4) - As far as I can tell this seems to be a 120°-Rotation pattern which creates a triangle out of the tails of the Sliders. Please move 01:09:772 (1,2,3,4) - somewhere around 100|276 in order to get a more equal triangle here. That would also improve the flow from (1) into (2) due to it being higher now which is better aimable since (1)'s Tail points more upwards which is better for a wider instead of a lower movement to the left. Not sure what's wrong here
01:31:372 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I don't know, maybe that's really just my personal opinion but this pattern looks so random in fact that there's not such a giant emphasis on these notes that he pattern has to go all over the Screen. I'd rather go for a tweaked version of this with lower spacing or for similiar zigzag pattern as for the previous one. I want to keep this, because is like a double note pattern like i did 01:16:972 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - I really think it fits and gives variety to the map
01:48:172 (1,2,3,4) - Is there a special reason for the spacing increase from Slider to Slider? I can't hear any sort of increase in the music so I don't really understand what you try to emphasize with this. (Also it wouldn't be consistent with 01:43:372 (1,2,3,4) - since it's basically the same but doesn't feature these increases in terms of spacing) If it isn't on purpose, please make the spacing constant here. Especially between 01:49:372 (3,4) - where the spacing is so high that it doesn't play that well anymore due to the lower spacing to 01:50:572 (1) - slowing the player down :/ In term of spacing is the same in both you mentioned and I've being doing it in the whole map, just that in different position, maybe in this one is more noticeable because of the pattern but i s the same thing as others
01:50:572 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - The whole pattern here feels messy to me due to big spacing inconsistencies and the lack of structure. What I mean is basically that the Circles and Heads of each Slider should for a line with an equal spacing in order to make it just simply feel more structured. Also the decreasing spacing here looks rather weird which is pretty noticeable in-game (which is the reason I list this). This could be much more improved and would also read better with a better structure imo. I've put you a code below where I've fixed that! (: I'll fix on my own, thanks ^^: (I made the spacing more even, but kept the pattern, just like the rest
02:29:353 - Ignoring the downbeat here feels a bit weird to me since it's so loud and strong telling me that it wants to be clicked ;_; I'd split this into Circle + 1/2 Slider. I really like this pattern, so I will keep it for now, also is a soft section, wont sound bad without it

Tarrasky wrote:

General

/wiki/Ranking_Criteria
MAPSET
"A difficulty's name must indicate its level of difficulty, with the exception of the hardest level of difficulty in a set. The mapset's hardest difficulty may use an appropriate custom difficulty name, unrelated to a username. Mapsets may also use a complete set of custom difficulty names that clearly indicate their level of difficulty to the player. Marathon maps with a single difficulty may use free naming."
Im not sure if "Walking" "Sleeping" "Dancing" sounds good, if you like the mapset maybe is acceptable, but if you look like some "Playerxxx is playing Taylor Swift - Stay Stay Stay [Walking]" sounds like this is a extra diff or something. Ask some bat if this namediff sounds good. was very creative ;D
These are fine, I've talked about it before and I have another set ranked after that rule with the same difficulty names

Sleeping

00:36:772 - you dont need stop the rhythm here, you can add something like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2362811, "oh, but this is overmap", no, have guitar sound and the rhythm is more adorable Haha, yeah I'll keep it
00:52:972 (1,2,3,4) - this is a bit hard for Easy, agree? in all the distance snap is 1,60x and is 1/4 tape For that reason I used sliders and don't wanted the whole diff to be 1/1
01:05:872 (3) - this circle in this position improves the flow https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2362839 I keep the arc shape with the notes and sliders head here
01:05:872 (3,1) - stack For the same reason as above will keep it

Walking

00:13:372 (3) - better angle, i think https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/2362869 The end of the slider would be too high
01:12:172 (1,2,3,4) - it is tiring to play x.x, rotate this in 20º 01:14:572 (3,4) - anti-clockwise I want a repetitive parttern here, like the music

Dancing

01:14:272 (8,1) - this jump is really high and does not match the time Is to mark the down beat here, there is a louder sound
01:34:672 (10,11) - /\ Here is focusing on the high vocal
01:32:572 (5) - add new combo I'll keep this one, because I don't like cutting the pattern with a new combo

The rest is all fixed

Nice map, i love
Your style is really fun to play ^^
+1 star and good luck

Static Noise Bird wrote:

I'm sorry for a lame, small mod, but this is pretty much flawless. Just what we could expect from a highly experienced mapper, anyway.
Also, Taylor Swift <3

[Sleeping]
00:42:172 (6) - This could be nice: http://puu.sh/dCHeE/f9bb80e4a9.png I'll keep this the same
02:00:172 (1,2,3,4) - I don't think a change of direction would be a good choice, I'd personally rather just put the second round perhaps 15~25 degrees off, but in the same direction. Ok, will keep it in the same direcction, but wont rotate so it doesnt mess up spacing

[Walking]
00:16:372 (4) - Open it up a little bit. Would look nicer if it wasn't so compressed, and properly blanketed the previous slider-end. Done
01:38:572 (1) - Rotate by 11 degrees and move to x:488 y:304 for better flow. ok

[Dancing]
00:48:172 (1,2) - I think (1) could be rotated a bit upwards and (2) a little downwards for smoother flow. I'll keep it, cuz I want them to look something like a mirror
01:24:172 (5) - New combo? ok
01:33:772 (9) - ^ ok
02:28:672 (5) - ^ I'll keep this one

Good stuff, and good luck.

1. Desactiva el letterbox realmente se ven demasiado mal esas barras en los breks ya que tapan algunas flores en el BG.

1. 00:37:972 - x) 00:38:122 - x) Estas lineas están siendo inutilizadas así que te recomiendo quitarlas ya que prácticamente no hacen nada.
2. 01:59:572 - x) 01:59:722 - x) ^
3. 02:04:372 - x) 02:04:522 - x) ^
4. 02:29:572 - x) ^
5. 00:16:972 (3,4) - Me dirás que soy muy nazi y eso pero que te parece mover ambos sliders a X: 278 Y: 180 para que la distancia entre 1 & 2 sea la misma para estos también.
6. 00:34:972 (2,1) - No soy muy fan de los apilamientos en dificultades menores, que te parece mover este circulo a otro lugar un poco mas retirado de este slider para evitar algún tipo de confusión a los nuevos jugadores.
7. 00:51:772 (6) - Que te parece mover este slider a X: 79 Y: 83 para crear un mejor blanket con el anterior slider, recuerda que si haces esto no olvides mover un poco las siguientes notas.
8. 00:54:772 (4,5) - 00:54:772 (4,5) - Considera hacer lo mismo con ambos, algo parecido a esto 01:24:472 (5,6) - x) podría funcionar muy bien.
9. 01:55:372 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Solo algo no muy importante pero que te parece centrar este tipo de patrones en la cuadricula del editor para que sea perfectamente simétrica?
10. 02:09:772 (1) - Tal vez sea yo pero un finish en lugar de un whistle sonaría mejor ya que en el fondo se produce un sonido parecido a el.

1. 02:33:772 (1,2,3,4) - En comparación con la dificultad mas fácil la densidad en esta diff es un tanto elevada es mas demasiados círculos son un poco difíciles para jugadores no experimentados, que te parece cambiarlos por dos sliders?

1. 00:31:372 (4,5) - Me parece que olvidaste añadir un new combo en esta parte y algunos whistles en los comienzos de ambos sliders.
2. 00:55:372 (1,2,3) - Solo es un gusto personal pero al testear esto los stacks se ven un poco raros, que te parece mover 2 a una posición mas visible?
3. 01:24:172 (1) - Este circulo esta tocando la barra de HP así que te recomiendo mover esto un par de grids mas abajo.
4. 02:09:772 (1) - La misma sugerencia que en Sleeping.
5. 02:12:172 (5) - Es curioso que en Walking hayan añadido un cambio de combo aquí y en Dancing lo hayas pasado por alto, que te parece hacer lo mismo aquí?

Gero wrote:

Sleeping

1. 00:34:972 (2,1) - No soy muy fan de los apilamientos en dificultades menores, que te parece mover este circulo a otro lugar un poco mas retirado de este slider para evitar algún tipo de confusión a los nuevos jugadores. Quiero quedarme con esto porque es como representando el "stay" con un stack (O sea, algo así como que la nota se queda en el mismo sitio hehe yo y mis ideas raras lo se), lo hice con las otras dificultades también, y se rompería el combo que esta no lo tenga
2. 01:55:372 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - Solo algo no muy importante pero que te parece centrar este tipo de patrones en la cuadricula del editor para que sea perfectamente simétrica? En realidad no lo pense simetrico ><

Walking

1. 02:33:772 (1,2,3,4) - En comparación con la dificultad mas fácil la densidad en esta diff es un tanto elevada es mas demasiados círculos son un poco difíciles para jugadores no experimentados, que te parece cambiarlos por dos sliders? Cambie a slider (3,4) solamente porque el combo anterior es solo de sliders 1/2 y se iban a ver demasiados para mi gusto

Dancing

1. 00:55:372 (1,2,3) - Solo es un gusto personal pero al testear esto los stacks se ven un poco raros, que te parece mover 2 a una posición mas visible? Quiero mantener la ilusión de mirror sliders aquí ^^'

Todo lo demás está arreglado

Eso es todo, llámame cuando hayas hecho los cambios necesarios.

Albertol wrote:

[Sleeping]
00:19:372 (1) - ¿Que crees de separar un poco esta nota del slider? Fixed
02:44:872 (1) - Pienso que estaría mejor si lo ponemos en y:188 para que este a la par con el siguiente slider (02:45:472 (2) - ) Si hago eso queda muy lejos de la nota anterior

[Walking]
02:24:172 (1,2,3,4) - No se si Darian me frustro tanto con esto de la simetría pero creo que podría quedar mucho mas ordenado de lo que esta. Cualquier cosa me dices para explicarte. Hahaha, es que no lo quiero simetrico =p

02:04:972 - Me encanta como usaste ese sonido para iniciar el break pero considero que es algo importante para dejarlo solo en una hard... ¿Que dices de una nota ahi? (Si no lo haces igual esta perfecto xD) Con la nota no se vería el efecto del sonido y el break
02:14:572 - ^ Igual

[Dancing]
02:04:972 - ^ Igual

Creo que es todo lo que puedo decir, Gero se encargo del resto ya. Buena suerte!

Lust wrote:

Call me when this gets bubbled. I'd like to return an old favor hehe

1. 00:57:772 (1) - Where's the precious normal finish? :'(
2. 01:02:572 (1) - Considers add whistle at the start like you did in 01:40:972 (1).
3. 01:36:172 (1) - Same as 00:57:772 (1).
4. 02:01:372 (2,3,4) - How about Ctrl+Ging these circles to change the pattern to the previous one? To me is kinda monotone go two times in the same direction.
5. 02:52:072 (4) - Add soft finish at the repeat maybe.
6. 03:02:572 (1) - The precious normal finish again, c'mon Lissy is the last part of the chorus.
7. 03:06:472 (4) - Same as 02:52:072 (4)
8. 03:07:372 (1) - Whistle at the start.
9. 03:12:172 (1) - ^

1. 01:02:572 (1) - Whistle?
2. 01:07:372 (1) - ^
3. 01:13:372 (2) - This slider sounds kinda empty, maybe add whistle at the start/end. (I vote to the start)
4. 01:40:972 (1) - Same thing about the whistle.
5. 01:45:772 (1) - I point this just because the whistle fits perfectly in this parts.
6. 02:48:172 (1) - <3

1. 00:55:822 (2,3) - I agree with Gero but is okay if you leave this like you did. Just personal taste I think.
2. 01:02:572 (1) - Here I go again...
3. 01:07:372 (1) - ^
4. 01:40:972 (1) - sowwy for insisting.
5. 01:45:772 (1) - ^
6. 01:46:972 (1) - Here you just skipped.
7. 02:13:372 (2) - How about a drum clap at the end? If you add be sure to add the clap in the others diffs.

Lust wrote:

Call me when this gets bubbled. I'd like to return an old favor hehe

Atrue wrote:

I wanted to stay stay stay...
But I'm sorry sorry sorry...

Reason for disqualification: Pure white combocolor. Refer to this thread: https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/242087/start=0 Especially in kiai, it's really eye-hurting. Also we have techinicall problems in some skins. I don't understand why disqualifying this for a "rule" that is not finalized yet @.@ but I won't make a big deal out of a silly combo color. I hope light pink is alright, was the only one that suits the other combo colors how I want it.

Additional modding:
[Hard]
01:15:772 (3) - NC here because patterns like that have a problem with readability: http://puu.sh/eghex/79621eb9ec.jpg (Aleks719) Instead of cutting the combo pattern, I moved that slider away to avoid confusion
[Easy]
diff has variable spacing 1.6x for 1/2 and 1.2x for rest. Shouldn't be a problem, but doesn't look smooth somewhere.(Aleks719) This is to avoid overlapping on 1/2 notes that would look kinda ugly to my eyes and keep a decent spacing for a Easy diff, also the change is so minimum that is not noticeable in game play, only if you go in editing mode and start messing around with the notes

Sonnyc wrote:

That's still in discussion, should it be followed even it isn't finalized yet?
Well maybe there must've been a problem for this map though...

1. 00:36:172 siento como que te hizo falta un NC aquí, también pienso que seria algo consistente si lo agregas con 00:31:372 (1,2) - , si lo haces también hacelo en 02:28:672 (5) -
2. 01:14:572 (1,2,3) - no un gran problema solo que encuentro raro que tengas este patrón simétrico y no lo ubicaras en el centro o:, luciría mucho mejor.
3. 01:24:772 (3,5) - tal vez solo sea yo pero siento un poco raro que con el primero siguieras los drums y con el otro siguieras el sonido ese que no se que sera xD, me desubique del ritmo un poco cuando lo estaba jugando
4. Me gustaron mucho los pattern y como jugaste con los combos o:

1. 01:07:072 (6,1) - por la stack leniency se hace un feo overlap aquí (solo visible en juego) no se a lo mejor podrías moverlo un poco para evitarlo.
2. 03:02:272 (2,1) - lo mismo que el anterior, no se nota tanto pero igual.

1. la verdad no tengo problema con el cambio de espacio, en efecto se lee mejor así como esta.

Natsu wrote:

Dancing:

1. 00:36:172 siento como que te hizo falta un NC aquí, también pienso que seria algo consistente si lo agregas con 00:31:372 (1,2) - , si lo haces también hacelo en 02:28:672 (5) - Ok, pero en este 02:28:672 (5) - no me gusta como se ve asi que lo dejé igual
2. 01:14:572 (1,2,3) - no un gran problema solo que encuentro raro que tengas este patrón simétrico y no lo ubicaras en el centro o:, luciría mucho mejor. Haha, este no se suponia que era simetrico, pero ya esta simetrico~
3. 01:24:772 (3,5) - tal vez solo sea yo pero siento un poco raro que con el primero siguieras los drums y con el otro siguieras el sonido ese que no se que sera xD, me desubique del ritmo un poco cuando lo estaba jugando Ahora que lo mencionas si se oye raro, lo cambié para seguin el patrón
4. Me gustaron mucho los pattern y como jugaste con los combos o: Thankss <3

Walking:

1. 01:07:072 (6,1) - por la stack leniency se hace un feo overlap aquí (solo visible en juego) no se a lo mejor podrías moverlo un poco para evitarlo. Listo
2. 03:02:272 (2,1) - lo mismo que el anterior, no se nota tanto pero igual. Listo

Sleeping:

1. la verdad no tengo problema con el cambio de espacio, en efecto se lee mejor así como esta. <33

02:24:172 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Hice un pequeño arreglo a estos combos que estaban un poco desorganizados

mandame un pm al foro cuando respondas esto