Okay finally I'm here to mod... >_>
Extreme laziness brought here the problem, that the diff has been fixed a bit and my modding for Kantan and Futsuu (Until 00:41:341 (1) - ) has been made several weeks ago. Maybe there would be some lines that have already fixed. My apologies..
Kantan
00:14:481 (2) - d - The finisher is meant to represent the song's emphasis or to fit the crash on songs have drums like this (or w/e it fits). But I hear no crash or legit emphasis here, and it very likely means the finisher doesn't fit. A lot of new-comers tend to make this kinda mistakes. I guess you'll do better in future maps considering it's like your first map
00:22:853 (1) - D - In this case there's crash, so I recommend you to follow the drums.
00:36:807 (1) - d - Following the drums.
00:45:179 (1) - D - ^
00:53:551 (1) - d - ^
01:04:714 (1) - K - ^
01:10:295 (1) - d - ^
01:12:039 - How about adding a note? I guess it would make more sense because it would make better consistency with the very previous pattern 01:08:900 (1,2,3) - k would be fine, considering music's ambience such as drums, vocal's pitch or so. :3
01:16:574 (2) - k - Again, it doesn't really fit the drums. And why I recommend k is, the pitch is gradually becoming higher, so k would be better to represent the song.
01:21:458 (1) - d - Following the drums.
01:29:830 (1) - D - ^
01:38:202 (1) - d - ^
01:39:946 (1) - k - Following the drums again maybe, but hearing the vocal's pitch, it makes song's ambience higher imo, I think k makes more sense.
01:40:993 (1) - K - Following the drums.
01:49:365 (1) - d - ^
02:00:528 (1) - d - ^
02:02:272 (3) - k - Pretty much same as 01:39:946 (1) -
02:08:900 (1) - D - Following the drums.
02:14:481 (1) - D - ^
02:17:272 (1) - K - ^
02:25:644 (1) - K - ^
02:28:434 (1) - D - ^
02:36:807 (1) - D - ^
02:52:155 (1) - d - ^
02:58:434 (2) - k - Same as 01:16:574 (2) - goes for it.
03:03:318 (1) - d - Following the drums.
03:14:481 (1) - d - ^
03:16:225 (2,1,2) - d k k - The piano's pitch becomes lower on 03:16:225 (2) - compared to 03:15:876 (1) - , and it becomes higher on 03:16:574 (1) - .. so yeah ;D
Futsuu
00:10:295 (1) - D - Following the drums.
00:17:272 (1) - D - ^
00:20:062 (1) - D - ^
00:22:853 (1) - D - ^
00:25:295 (2) - k - It follows the song better and, if you look at the white lines on timelines, you'll see here you almostly used k on white lines. So for keeping consistency!
00:27:388 (1) - ^
00:28:434 (1) - D - Following the drums.
00:41:341 (1) - k - In this part 00:40:993 (1,2,1) - , the piano's pitch is going up until 00:41:341 (1) - and just d pattern is not that good way to represent the song.
00:42:388 (1) - D - Following the drums.
00:45:179 (1) - ^
00:55:818 (2,1) - Reverse. There's vocal's pitch going up and also the drum's snare. k d is kinda for the music's ambience going down, but the opposite happens here.
01:01:225 (1,1) - K D - Following the drums. Specifically the K for ride on 01:01:225 (1) - and crash on 01:01:923 (1) -
01:10:295 (1) - d - Following the drums.
01:16:574 (1) - k - ^
01:18:667 (1) - D - ^
01:27:039 (1) - ^
01:35:411 (1) - ^
01:54:946 (1) - K - ^
02:00:528 (1) - d - ^
02:06:109 (1) - D - ^
02:07:155 (1) - k - Because of the vocal's pitch going up.
02:08:900 (1) - K - Following the drums.
02:14:481 (1) - D - ^
02:17:272 (1) - K - ^
02:20:062 (1) - D - ^
02:25:644 (1) - ^
02:28:434 (2) - ^
02:31:225 (1) - ^
02:34:016 (1) - ^
02:36:458 - How about adding a note? There definitely is a sound but there's no note. It feels empty and doesn't really seem to follow the song.
02:36:807 (1) - D - Following the drums.
02:52:155 (1) - k - ^
02:58:434 (1) - Same as 01:16:574 (1) -
03:00:528 (1) - D - Following the drums.
03:06:109 (1) - ^
03:08:900 (1) - ^
03:11:690 (1) - ^
03:13:434 (1,1) - Reverse. The pitch goes up at 03:13:434 (1) - and goes down at 03:13:783 (1) -
Muzukashii
00:10:295 (1) - D - Following the drums.
00:17:272 (1) - ^
00:20:062 (1) - ^
00:22:853 (1) - ^
00:28:434 (1) - ^
00:29:655 (1,1) - Reverse. Seems like you are following the vocal, but it doesn't really fit.
00:39:597 (1) - D - Following the drums.
00:42:388 (1) - ^
00:45:179 (1) - ^
00:49:190 (2,1) - Same as 00:29:655 (1,1) -
00:50:760 (1) - D - Following the drums.
00:56:341 (1) - ^
00:59:132 - How about adding a note? There's clear drums sound in the music, and it kinda feels odd.
01:01:225 (1,1) - Same as Futsuu
01:04:365 (1,1) - Finishers, following the drums.
01:10:295 (1) - d - ^
01:16:574 (1) - k - ^
01:18:667 (2) - D - ^
01:24:248 (1) - ^
01:27:039 (1) - ^
01:29:830 (1) - ^
01:33:841 (2,1) - Same as 00:29:655 (1,1) -
01:35:411 (1) - D - Following the drums.
01:40:993 (1) - K - ^
01:46:574 (1) - D - ^
01:56:167 (3) - K - ^
01:56:865 - How about adding a note here? There's vocal to follow, and would make better flow at 01:56:341 (1,2,1,1) - this part.
02:00:528 (1) - d - Following the drums.
02:08:900 (1) - K - ^
02:14:481 (1) - ^
02:17:272 (1) - D - ^
02:20:062 (1) - K - ^
02:25:644 (1) - D - ^
02:28:434 (2) - ^
02:31:225 (1) - K - ^
02:34:016 (1) - ^
02:36:458 - Same as Futsuu
02:36:807 (1) - D - Following the drums.
02:52:155 (3) - d - ^
03:00:528 (2) - D - ^
03:06:109 (1) - ^
03:08:900 (1) - ^
03:11:690 (1) - D - ^
03:17:272 (1) - ^
03:20:062 (1) - ^
Oni
00:08:725 (1) - d - Having d at both at the start and the end of the piano 7-plet would be nice.
00:10:295 (3) - K - Following the drums.
00:17:272 (1) - D - ^
00:22:853 (1) - D - ^
00:45:179 (1) - K - ^
00:50:760 (1) - D - ^
00:56:341 (1) - D - ^
00:59:132 (1) - D - ^
01:01:225 (1,1) - ^
01:04:365 (1,1) - D K - ^
01:07:504 (1) - D - ^
01:13:086 (1) - K - ^
01:15:876 (1) - D - ^
01:16:923 (1) - k - Come on, even pitch is higher than 01:16:574 (1) - :<
01:27:039 (1) - D - Following the drums.
01:29:830 (1) - D - ^
01:35:411 (1) - ^
01:40:993 (1) - ^
01:46:574 (1) - K - ^
01:52:155 (1) - D - ^
02:03:318 (1) - K - ^
02:06:109 (1) - D - ^
02:07:155 (1) - Same as 01:16:923 (1) -
02:17:272 (1) - D - Following the drums.
02:17:272 (1,1,1,1,1) - I feel like this part could have more density. bunch of 1/2 with 1/4 triplets and suddenly 1/1 part?
02:20:062 (1) - D - Following the drums.
02:25:644 (1) - K - ^
02:25:818 (1) - Move to 02:25:993 - , the drum sound clearly exists here, it can be more emphasizing.
02:28:434 (1) - D - Following the drums.
02:31:225 (1) - ^
02:34:016 (1) - K - ^
02:35:237 (1) - ^
02:36:807 (1) - D - ^
02:54:946 (1) - K - ^
02:57:737 (1) - D - ^
02:58:783 (1) - Same as 01:16:923 (1) -
03:25:411 - Add a note, following the piano sound.
IMT's Oni
00:10:295 (52) - D - Following the drums.
00:27:911 (161,162) - These finishers are kinda pointless. Is there any emphasis in the music?
00:45:179 (266) - K - Following the drums. But if you don't really like ooooX xxxxO - this kind of pattern, just ignore.
01:01:225 (336) - K - pretty much same as above
01:06:109 (362,363) - How about 1/2 d d k k? Following the rhythm.
01:16:748 (425,426,427,428,429) - ddkkd - Because current one doesn't really follow music's ambience. Also the drums.
01:18:667 (439) - K - Following the drums.
01:29:830 (518) - Same as 00:45:179 (266) -
01:33:493 (536) - K - k would be enough. I see why you put K here but, imo, there's no enough emphasis to put finisher.
01:58:260 (651) - d - Here the vocal pitch goes down.
02:20:062 (813) - Same as 00:45:179 (266) -
02:34:016 (914) - ^
03:04:365 (119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127) - This part kinda lacks streams. Especially considering that this is following the piano's pitch.
My suggestion :
03:11:690 (166) - Same as 00:45:179 (266) -
03:15:528 (192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - Same as 03:04:365 (119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127) -
Though I actually found many issues, overall quite nice.
Inner Oni
00:22:853 (1) - D - Following the drums.
00:42:039 (1,1,1) - kkd - You seem to be piano-based mapping. kkd fits the piano's pitch better.
00:45:179 (1) - K - Following the drums.
00:50:760 (1) - D - ^
00:50:760 (1,1,1) - This part is so differently mapped compared with earlier part 00:45:179 (1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1) - . Please keep consistency.
00:56:341 (1) - D - Following the drums.
01:01:225 (1) - ^
01:01:923 (1) - ^
01:13:086 (1) - K - ^
01:29:830 (1) - K - ^
01:35:411 (1) - D - ^
01:40:993 (1) - ^
01:46:574 (1) - K - ^
01:52:155 (1) - D - ^
01:54:946 (1) - K - ^
01:55:295 (1,1) - Reverse. This follows the vocal pitch better.
02:03:318 (1) - K - Following the drums.
02:06:109 (1,1) - D, k - These notes are what I explained likely one billion times in other diffs, I guess I don't really have to explain it again.
02:14:132 (1) - K - Following the drums.
02:34:016 (1) - ^
02:36:807 (1) - ^
02:36:807 ~ 02:45:004 - SV 0.75~0.8, follows song's ambience much better imo.
02:46:225 (1) - k - The pitch is higher than some several previous notes. This would fit
02:49:365 (1) - K - Following the drums.
02:54:946 (1) - ^
02:57:737 (1,1) - Same as 02:06:109 (1,1) -
03:25:411 - Yeah, add a note. I, and also you can clearly hear the drum here.
Hope you enjoy this, sorry for damn laziness ;_;/