forum

Masubuchi Yuuji - Jingle Bells 765 Version [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
29
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on lunes, 29 de diciembre de 2014 at 03:33:53 p.m.

Artist: Masubuchi Yuuji
Title: Jingle Bells 765 Version
Source: 太鼓の達人
Tags: Taiko no Tatsujin Christmas Folk
BPM: 140
Filesize: 2850kb
Play Time: 01:12
Difficulties Available:
  1. Futsuu (1.87 stars, 152 notes)
  2. Kantan (1.11 stars, 85 notes)
  3. Muzukashii (2.72 stars, 257 notes)
  4. Oni (3.29 stars, 374 notes)
Download: Masubuchi Yuuji - Jingle Bells 765 Version
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Star Rating lies.
Blame #taiko for killing 1/4 doubles in the Futsuu. Never forget.

37th mapset, Merry Christmas?

Song featuring in CS7 and Wii4 Taiko no Tatsujin games, any resemblance with authentic charts are mere coincidence, I swear :(

List of lovely people
Kurosanyan
Nwolf
Dainesl
mrdumpling64
cdhsausageboy
_Gezo_
Stefan

Kurosanyan
~~~(=w=)~~~

[General]
  1. 00:03:942 - This timing point isn't necessary, it doesn't change anything. Remove it?
  2. 00:40:370 - Kiai time probably should start here.
[Kantan]
  1. 00:02:978 (4) - Move it to 00:02:871 - ? The current rhythm is a bit awkward to play and 1/4 snap should be avoided for Kantan imo.
  2. 00:57:512 (80) - 01:04:370 (88) - Add finishers on those?
[Futsuu]
  1. 1/4 duplets on Futsuu? D: They seem well used and the diffspread looks good though, so I guess there's no reason to complain. The first one might cause issues though, since this one has no break before it comes.
  2. 00:40:370 (82) - 00:47:227 (98) - 00:57:512 (124) - 01:04:370 (135) - 01:12:941 (155) - Add finishers on those?
  3. 00:45:941 (95,96,97) - kkk to make a variation since it doesn't sound exactly like the previous one?
  4. 01:12:941 (155) - Don, as you did on every other diff.
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:51:512 (189) - k and 00:53:227 (196) - d ? It follows the melody better imo and it makes a good variation to the previous parts.
  2. 00:46:584 (167) - Remove? The combo is a bit too long.
  3. 01:06:941 (242,243,244,245) - I think ddd k or ddd d fits better than d ddd here. ddd k k probably has a better playability than ddd d k.
  4. 01:08:655 (250,251,252,253) - ^
  5. 01:12:941 (272) - Finisher?
[Oni]
  1. 00:02:871 (10,11) - kk? It sounds better imo.
  2. 00:04:584 (15,16,17,18) - and 00:06:298 (25,26,27,28) - should be consistent with 00:11:441 (55,56,57,58) - and 00:13:155 (65,66,67,68) - as you did on Muzukashii.
  3. 00:47:012 (240) - Maybe a d for consistency? Might be fine to let it be a k though.
That's a really solid, good and short mapset so it probably needs almost no mod. inb4 speedrank
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane

Kurosanyan wrote:

~~~(=w=)~~~

[General]
  1. 00:03:942 - This timing point isn't necessary, it doesn't change anything. Remove it? /*The timing point there to avoid a barline to show up, though I could make the first timing point go in a 5/4 signature, I'll ask some people about about this.
  2. 00:40:370 - Kiai time probably should start here. /*I'd want to include the first triple in the song in the kiai :P
[Kantan]
  1. 00:02:978 (4) - Move it to 00:02:871 - ? The current rhythm is a bit awkward to play and 1/4 snap should be avoided for Kantan imo. /*Done.
  2. 00:57:512 (80) - 01:04:370 (88) - Add finishers on those? /*Those are a bit calm beats, so having a big note would kill a bit this calmness.
[Futsuu]
  1. 1/4 duplets on Futsuu? D: They seem well used and the diffspread looks good though, so I guess there's no reason to complain. The first one might cause issues though, since this one has no break before it comes. /*I'd want to keep them, as the map would feel like not following the song in that catchy spots, may change later if there's more people pointing it out.
  2. 00:40:370 (82) - 00:47:227 (98) - 00:57:512 (124) - 01:04:370 (135) - 01:12:941 (155) - Add finishers on those? /*Only added in the final note, as I find the sound of the big note too much for a somehow calm song.
  3. 00:45:941 (95,96,97) - kkk to make a variation since it doesn't sound exactly like the previous one? /*Did kdk instead, as the tone is changing, kkk wouldn feel too nice imo.
  4. 01:12:941 (155) - Don, as you did on every other diff. /*Okay
[Muzukashii]
  1. 00:51:512 (189) - k and 00:53:227 (196) - d ? It follows the melody better imo and it makes a good variation to the previous parts. /*Sounds cool, done, also did something similar in Oni.
  2. 00:46:584 (167) - Remove? The combo is a bit too long. /*Sure.
  3. 01:06:941 (242,243,244,245) - I think ddd k or ddd d fits better than d ddd here. ddd k k probably has a better playability than ddd d k. /*Did d k ddd instead, I don't find the triple being in the start of the pattern too nice, as the stream in the music is more emphasized later.
  4. 01:08:655 (250,251,252,253) - ^ /*^
  5. 01:12:941 (272) - Finisher? /*Done
[Oni]
  1. 00:02:871 (10,11) - kk? It sounds better imo. /*Okay.
  2. 00:04:584 (15,16,17,18) - and 00:06:298 (25,26,27,28) - should be consistent with 00:11:441 (55,56,57,58) - and 00:13:155 (65,66,67,68) - as you did on Muzukashii. /*Oops.
  3. 00:47:012 (240) - Maybe a d for consistency? Might be fine to let it be a k though. /*Though you're right, I'd want to have it as a kat to somehow emphasize this as the music is a bit different in previous beats.
That's a really solid, good and short mapset so it probably needs almost no mod. inb4 speedrank
Everything else was fixed for sure, thanks a lot
(I'll be modding yours in a bit)
Kurosanyan

DakeDekaane wrote:

00:03:942 - This timing point isn't necessary, it doesn't change anything. Remove it? /*The timing point there to avoid a barline to show up, though I could make the first timing point go in a 5/4 signature, I'll ask some people about about this.
Wow, that's a trick I didn't know about. I'll remember this if I have a barline issue one day. :)

About the finishers suggestions, it's because even though the song is calm, it gets more intense when the kiai time comes.
As an example, it would make, on Kantan, a variation between 00:28:370 (38) - which is quiet and 00:57:512 (80) - which is louder.
You might be right that it might be still not intense enough for a finisher though.
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane
Yeah, I tend to use finishers on really strong notes, or parts that require special emphasis.
About the barlines, you have to enable "Omit first bar line" in the special tab, where kiai enable option is (in case you didn't know).
Kurosanyan
Forgot to check the offset and I just noticed it's most likely off! Try -12ms?
Nwolf
woof

[General]

omg so beautiful
love

00:40:370 - Start the kiai here, it looks... well, bad c:

[Kantan]

omg so beautiful
love

00:51:084 (67,69) - I would recommend deleting these so you don't have two 7-plets next to each other. Also gives a bit of rest.

[Futsuu]

00:00:942 - Add a note here to close up the Kantan -> Muzu spread here a bit. Futsuu is hardly different from kantan
00:02:978 (6) - Also delete this note since 1/4 is kinda evil for Futsuu.
00:20:548 (48) - ^
00:22:370 - Should have a note here since uhhm this is quite empty if you look at the Muzu
00:27:405 (60) - blah
00:56:548 (122) - ^
01:03:405 (133) - ^
01:09:084 (146) - why no kat

[Muzukashii]

00:21:727 (74,75,76,81) - Delete these notes to balance Futsuu -> Muzu -> Oni a bit
00:24:512 (85) - Also maybe change this to a big kat cause Oni has one too and it doesn't really add much difficulty
00:28:584 (98,100) - Again moar delete
00:30:084 (104,105) - Change to kat (Futsuu uses 00:30:084 (63,64) - kats 00:31:798 (68,69) - dons and that makes up a nice audible difference. Also suggested in Oni)
00:33:512 (120,121) - 00:34:370 (123,124) - ^
00:57:727 (208,209,210,215) - Same as first suggestion (consistency and stuff)
01:04:584 (232,234) - Same as 104/105

[Oni]

00:10:584 (49,50,51) - Delete to have a break somewhere in this part
00:29:655 (143,144,145,146) - Invert colors (see Muzu for reason) - also compare with 00:33:512 (172,173,174) -
01:00:512 (313,314,315,316) - mfw SR doesn't get screwed by this wow (this is not a mod)
01:05:655 (345,346,347,348) - Invert colors


too pro mappu
Dainesl
this map <3

take all but 96 of my KD lol
kouzuki_karen
Hi from mod queue, sorry for taking a while ._.

Kantan

00:45:941 (58) - I think the music doesn't deepen enough for this note to use a d, suggest change to k.

Futsuu

00:21:512 (50) - 00:24:941 (52) - feels a bit empty note-wise with the melody in the background. Maybe add a k at 00:22:370 (51) - and d in 00:24:084 (53) - ?
00:40:155 (84) - d?
00:45:512 (96) - I think k matches the trumpet at this point better.
00:54:084 (117,119) - you could add finishers at these points to emphasis on the start of the chorus?
01:00:941 (128,130) - ^

Muzukashi

00:02:442 (8) - d?
00:22:798 (79) - I think k fits the instrument better.
00:45:298 (160,161,162) - I think kkk fits the brass better.

Oni

01:00:512 (313,314,315,316) - I think this isn't a very good idea. Because that instrument bit lasts until 01:00:941 (317) - . It would be better if you used 1/4 instead (like this).

I think 3.31 is inaccurate star rating with the multiple streams in there :3

Good luck, starred.
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane
@Kurosanyan: the offset is fine for me, -12 is really early ;_;

Nwolf wrote:

woof

[General]

omg so beautiful
love

00:40:370 - Start the kiai here, it looks... well, bad c: /*Well, for me looks bad beginning in the down beat so, uhm, I'd want to keep this D:

[Kantan]

omg so beautiful
love

00:51:084 (67,69) - I would recommend deleting these so you don't have two 7-plets next to each other. Also gives a bit of rest. /*Done.

[Futsuu]

00:00:942 - Add a note here to close up the Kantan -> Muzu spread here a bit. Futsuu is hardly different from kantan /*Sounds really weird having 1/1 there, idk why :<
00:02:978 (6) - Also delete this note since 1/4 is kinda evil for Futsuu. /*I'm defending this with my big don shield, sounds really weird without the note, I have some large breaks after that to compensate, hope it's enough.
00:20:548 (48) - ^ /*Well, I think I can't defend this as it still sounds good without it.
00:22:370 - Should have a note here since uhhm this is quite empty if you look at the Muzu. /*Put stuff there.
00:27:405 (60) - blah /*'kay
00:56:548 (122) - ^ /*'kay
01:03:405 (133) - ^ /*'kay
01:09:084 (146) - why no kat /*Oops.

[Muzukashii]

00:21:727 (74,75,76,81) - Delete these notes to balance Futsuu -> Muzu -> Oni a bit /*Deleted only 00:21:727 (74,81) - If I delete more it'd sound really empty. Also Oni has colour changes here while in Muzukashii is monocolor so I think spread is not that bad balanced.
00:24:512 (85) - Also maybe change this to a big kat cause Oni has one too and it doesn't really add much difficulty /*Sure
00:28:584 (98,100) - Again moar delete /*Deleted only 00:28:584 (96) -
00:30:084 (104,105) - Change to kat (Futsuu uses 00:30:084 (63,64) - kats 00:31:798 (68,69) - dons and that makes up a nice audible difference. Also suggested in Oni) /*Cool.
00:33:512 (120,121) - 00:34:370 (123,124) - ^ /*Cool.
00:57:727 (208,209,210,215) - Same as first suggestion (consistency and stuff) /*ye
01:04:584 (232,234) - Same as 104/105 /*Ditto

[Oni]

00:10:584 (49,50,51) - Delete to have a break somewhere in this part /*The music has nearly no places for breaks as it's continuous, I could delete triples like 00:05:441 (19,20,21) - , but that'd make this too similar to Muzukashii, so idk if this would be good, lol.
00:29:655 (143,144,145,146) - Invert colors (see Muzu for reason) - also compare with 00:33:512 (172,173,174) - /*Done.
01:00:512 (313,314,315,316) - mfw SR doesn't get screwed by this wow (this is not a mod) /*We all know star rating is broken
01:05:655 (345,346,347,348) - Invert colors /*Done.


too pro mappu

mrdumpling64 wrote:

Hi from mod queue, sorry for taking a while ._.

Kantan

00:45:941 (58) - I think the music doesn't deepen enough for this note to use a d, suggest change to k. /*Tone changes in these triple so I'm keeping it to reflect it.

Futsuu

00:21:512 (50) - 00:24:941 (52) - feels a bit empty note-wise with the melody in the background. Maybe add a k at 00:22:370 (51) - and d in 00:24:084 (53) - ? /*Added some dons there.
00:40:155 (84) - d? /*Tone changes here, having all monocolour here would feel a bit sad.
00:45:512 (96) - I think k matches the trumpet at this point better. /*Yes to this.
00:54:084 (117,119) - you could add finishers at these points to emphasis on the start of the chorus? /*All notes have the same intensity so I don't want to make it different.
01:00:941 (128,130) - ^ /*^

Muzukashi

00:02:442 (8) - d? /*I'd want to keep all notes the same color to keep a bit simple this compared to the Oni.
00:22:798 (79) - I think k fits the instrument better. /*I'd want to keep this part monocolour to have a nice spread in Futsuu -> Muzukashii -> Oni, not like a note would change it, but as this part is relatively calm, a full don pattern would be nice.
00:45:298 (160,161,162) - I think kkk fits the brass better. /*Yup, done.

Oni

01:00:512 (313,314,315,316) - I think this isn't a very good idea. Because that instrument bit lasts until 01:00:941 (317) - . It would be better if you used 1/4 instead (like this). /*You're correct, I put this for the mere gimmick purpose, but put a simple kkk, not the full spread, so the 1/2 pause gives a nice emphasis to the note in 01:00:941 -

I think 3.31 is inaccurate star rating with the multiple streams in there :3 /*Taiko star rating is broken \o/

Good luck, starred.
Thanks for modding, sorry for the delayed answer, but well, I'm here.

Also holy shit, all these stars, thanks a lot Kurosanyan, Dainesl, Nwolf and mrdumpling.
Yuzeyun
shash permissivegezo is here because nwolf asked me to.

[Timing]
00:02:228 - y u no just 5/4 here, would be a bit more correct to me (and wouldn't change anything LOL)

[Kantan]
The kiai appears much intense to me compared to the rest, maybe consider changing 00:43:798 (53,54,55) - to 2/1 - so it gets consistent with the second repeat of the melody rhythm wise.

[Futsuu]
00:02:656 (4,5,6) - I honestly think the pattern is too hard for a futsuu ;_;
00:21:512 (49,50,51,52) - | 00:57:512 (123,124) - Looking at how joyful you are with noting, you might invert the patterns (that means that 4/1 should be at the beginning and 2/1 at the end).

[Muzukashii]
00:16:262 (56,57) - I recommend you to change these notes to kk; one because it's within a pattern and would be pretty close to Oni level and second because the song goes even higher in pitch at that point.

[Oni]
00:04:156 (12) - to 00:17:227 (86) - A bit restless, maybe remove some notes so the difficulty curve is nice and smooth ? We start at 1.5bt pauses in muzu to triplets within these moments. (same goes for the kiai ;_;)
It breaks a bit the spread to me since you have way less breaks in Oni than in Muzu. I'd like to see a bit more so the spread is much much polished wow such rest time so oni much pause. Kind of. But you get the idea. I guess.

/* this is how you comment */ stop forgetting to close rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane

_Gezo_ wrote:

shash permissivegezo is here because nwolf asked me to.

[Timing]
00:02:228 - y u no just 5/4 here, would be a bit more correct to me (and wouldn't change anything LOL) /*Done.*/

[Kantan]
The kiai appears much intense to me compared to the rest, maybe consider changing 00:43:798 (53,54,55) - to 2/1 - so it gets consistent with the second repeat of the melody rhythm wise. /*Ye, forgot to remove that note.*/

[Futsuu]
00:02:656 (4,5,6) - I honestly think the pattern is too hard for a futsuu ;_; /*It's either k k k like Futsuu or this, unless you have another idea to simplify this without sounding awkward.*/
00:21:512 (49,50,51,52) - | 00:57:512 (123,124) - Looking at how joyful you are with noting, you might invert the patterns (that means that 4/1 should be at the beginning and 2/1 at the end). /*Whoopsie.*/

[Muzukashii]
00:16:262 (56,57) - I recommend you to change these notes to kk; one because it's within a pattern and would be pretty close to Oni level and second because the song goes even higher in pitch at that point. /*Done.*/

[Oni]
00:04:156 (12) - to 00:17:227 (86) - A bit restless, maybe remove some notes so the difficulty curve is nice and smooth ? We start at 1.5bt pauses in muzu to triplets within these moments. (same goes for the kiai ;_;)
It breaks a bit the spread to me since you have way less breaks in Oni than in Muzu. I'd like to see a bit more so the spread is much much polished wow such rest time so oni much pause. Kind of. But you get the idea. I guess. /*Kinda saw this coming, removed the triples that weren't in the main melody. I would've like made Muzu harder, but that'd break spread with Futsuu and blah, I hope keeping the kiai as it is isn't a big problem.*/

/* this is how you comment */ stop forgetting to close rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr
Closing my comments only for you. Thanks Gezo.
Yuzeyun
Rechecking.
I WAS RIGHT FOR THE 5/4 YES look at the chart, bar 2 is 5/4

you can perhaps put CS7 and Wii4 for the games it was featured in? (maybe not

[Kantan]
fine

[Futsuu]
fine too

[Muzu]
00:57:512 (205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217) - and similar | I just noticed, but there a kind of large gap at these parts compared to Futsuu. (2/1 => 1/4,1/2,1/1 pattern) while Oni is barely any denser.

[Oni]
pls its not 8* since the original is actually 8* and looks harder lel
01:11:227 (363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379) - wow no originality pls change or nuke jeeukaea *runs* (jk)
the rest seems fine except that I block on the fact that the kiai is still a bit restless ;;
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane

_Gezo_ wrote:

Rechecking.
I WAS RIGHT FOR THE 5/4 YES look at the chart, bar 2 is 5/4

you can perhaps put CS7 and Wii4 for the games it was featured in? (maybe not /*I'll do*/ actually, I'll just put it in Creator's Word instead.

[Kantan]
fine

[Futsuu]
fine too

[Muzu]
00:57:512 (205,206,207,208,209,210,211,212,213,214,215,216,217) - and similar | I just noticed, but there a kind of large gap at these parts compared to Futsuu. (2/1 => 1/4,1/2,1/1 pattern) while Oni is barely any denser. /*hehehehe, Dake always forget to change some parts; I made the Futsuu slightly harder, making this simpler will break the Muzukashii->Oni gap, in Muzukashii is monocolor so it's not that complex and the spread is fine imo.*/

[Oni]
pls its not 8* since the original is actually 8* and looks harder lel /*Haven't looked at the actual chart until now, but still 8* because the dkdkdkkkd patterns and the handswitching long stream kddkk..., though I'm not 100% sure about the ratings, hue*/
01:11:227 (363,364,365,366,367,368,369,370,371,372,373,374,375,376,377,378,379) - wow no originality pls change or nuke jeeukaea *runs* (jk)
the rest seems fine except that I block on the fact that the kiai is still a bit restless ;; /*Changed the 5-note streams ooooo -> o ooo.*/
Yuzeyun
djinn gueule bellz #what

Bubbled as feck.
Next BAT : pls make sure dake is gifted a safe qualification
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane
I don't mind if this stays bubbled until the next Christmas.
Stefan
[Kantan]
00:18:084 (22,23,24,25) - I had the idea to leave (23,25) out and to make (22,24) to emphasize them more. idk, sounds cooler to me since this actually works like the Kiai but without the Kiai thingy but at least to emphasize here more than the rest.
00:24:941 (30,31,32,33) - ^
00:30:084 (38) - Maybe k? yee, I know that d is simplier but 00:33:512 (44) is k too and I find it quite reasoned why. So....?
00:54:084 (69,70,71,72) - See first suggestion. Maybe this could stay since this is much louder than the previous example. Just let me know what you think.
01:00:941 (77,78,79,80) - ayee

[Futsuu]
00:21:941 (47,50,61,124,127,138) - Honestly, they are bad for the reason they play like fillers.. Since these parts are calmer I find less notes are more appropriate.

Adorable Difficulty.


[Muzukashii]
00:35:762 (127,258) - Personal suggestion: I would leave them out because four triplets are quite a lot. As said, just my opinion, not an issue at all.

Another adorable Difficulty.

[Oni]
00:31:370 (141,142) - Switch them, (142) sounds more to be deeper than (141).
01:07:370 (332,333) - ^



This is the best background for a beatmap and I am quite pissed off to not participate on this dinner with meat and cake.... eh, call me back.
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane
So I was debating myself about keeping this bubbled until next December, but I'll go for lolranking on January.

Stefan wrote:

[Kantan]
00:18:084 (22,23,24,25) - I had the idea to leave (23,25) out and to make (22,24) to emphasize them more. idk, sounds cooler to me since this actually works like the Kiai but without the Kiai thingy but at least to emphasize here more than the rest. /*I think I'll just keep the Kantan a bit simpler.
00:24:941 (30,31,32,33) - ^ /*Done
00:30:084 (38) - Maybe k? yee, I know that d is simplier but 00:33:512 (44) is k too and I find it quite reasoned why. So....? /*I'll keep this as a don so the kats in 00:33:512 (40,41) - feels more unique.
00:54:084 (69,70,71,72) - See first suggestion. Maybe this could stay since this is much louder than the previous example. Just let me know what you think. /*Done
01:00:941 (77,78,79,80) - ayee /*Done

[Futsuu]
00:21:941 (47,50,61,124,127,138) - Honestly, they are bad for the reason they play like fillers.. Since these parts are calmer I find less notes are more appropriate. /*Alright.

Adorable Difficulty.


[Muzukashii]
00:35:762 (127,258) - Personal suggestion: I would leave them out because four triplets are quite a lot. As said, just my opinion, not an issue at all. /*Removed some triples but made some the pattern have some colour changes to keep the gap for Oni diff not to high.

Another adorable Difficulty.

[Oni]
00:31:370 (141,142) - Switch them, (142) sounds more to be deeper than (141). /*I'l keep this for the sake of simplicity, also it does still sound fine, imo.
01:07:370 (332,333) - ^ /*Ditto



This is the best background for a beatmap and I am quite pissed off to not participate on this dinner with meat and cake.... eh, call me back.
Additional changes:
Futsuu:
01:12:941 (152) - Removed finisher. This ended up being too loud for me.
Muzukashii:
01:00:512 (212) - Added finisher.
01:12:941 (262) - As in Futsuu.

yay
Stefan
Just one more thing before I can go for Qualify:

00:00:514 - 00:03:085 - This section looks almost 1:1 between Oni and Muzukashii. I suggest removing 00:00:728 (2,5) to make a noticeable difference but without decreasing the Difficulty much. We also have this problem between Kantan and Futsuu, maybe you could put notes on 00:01:585 and 00:01:799, would connect well to Muzukashii afterwards.
Topic Starter
DakeDekaane
In Muzukashii: deleted 00:00:728 (2,3,5,6,8) - having 1/1 would feel really weird there, so I'll keep the notes on the most emphasized beats.
Keeping Futsuu as it is, could go like different patterns for the same tone, but rather have some consistency.

Updated.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply