GeneralUntick Letterbox during Breaks, you don't need it when there isn't a Storyboard
Easy00:23:402 (3,4) - you could adjust their positions to make them neater, they look like imperfect blankets now. The best way to do so without changing the shape of 00:23:402 (3) since it's the same as 00:21:688 (2) would be to shift 00:24:688 (4) elsewhere to be like 03:37:117 (3,4) -, something like this:
00:46:973 (2) - rotate it, the current angle doesn't really flow well from the previous object
00:53:830 (2) - finish on start of slider
01:17:830 (2) - ^
01:24:688 (2) - ^
01:46:973 (2) - ^
01:53:830 (2) - ^
01:57:259 (1) - show more of the 1st curve, it defines the shape more:
02:00:688 (2) - finish on start of slider and make the ends of the slider on level plane/y-axis?
02:04:116 (1) - same shape as 01:57:259 (1)
02:07:545 (2) - finish on start of slider
02:14:402 (1) - ^
02:16:116 (2) - ^
02:31:545 (2) - ^
02:38:402 (2) - ^
02:42:473 (1) - object starts quite close to the end of the spinner, the break between them being less than 1 second long, I don't think it's allowed in an Easy, there is not enough rest time there
02:42:473 (1,2) - finish on end of sliders
02:45:902 (3) - ^
02:47:830 (4) - this is quite unexpected in the Easy, and unlike the other sliders with more than 1 repeat, there is not as much time between the repeats as the rest, I suggest you remove this and use some other rhythm with different objects than just 1 slider
02:49:330 (1,2,3) - finish on end of sliders
03:15:259 (1) - finish on middle part of slider
03:17:830 (2) - finish on start of slider
03:21:259 (1) - if you added the finish on the 2nd repeat of this slider, shouldn't you have added that on 02:34:973 (1) and on 01:21:259 (1) and also for similar parts like 01:15:259 (1) and 02:28:973 (1)
03:24:688 (2) - finish on start of slider
03:24:688 (2,4) - avoid touching each other
Normal00:19:545 (3) - finish on all the ends of the slider
00:33:259 (1) - finish
00:38:402 (4) - shift to x: 364 y: 232, make it overlap 00:37:330 (2,3) equally, making it look even
00:40:116 (1) - finish
00:41:830 (1) - ^
00:46:973 (1) - ^
00:53:830 (1) - ^
00:55:545 (1) - ^
01:09:473 (4) - finish on start of slider
01:16:116 (1) - place it at x: 232 y: 236, spacing between the starting ends of 01:15:688 (3,1) would be equal to the spacing between the starting ends of 01:15:259 (2,3)
01:17:830 (1) - shift to x: 320 y: 152 for above reason ^ You can see what it does here:
01:38:402 (1) - finish
01:46:973 (1) - finish on start of slider
01:53:830 (1) - ^
02:00:688 (1) - finish
02:07:545 (1) - ^
02:09:259 (1) - ^
02:16:116 (4) - finish on start of slider
02:23:188 (4) - ^
02:33:259 (1) - finish
02:38:402 (1) - finish on start of slider
02:53:830 (3) - finish
03:16:116 (1) - ^
03:17:830 (1) - finish on start of slider
03:22:973 (4) - ^
03:24:688 (1) - ^
03:33:259 (3) - ^
Hard00:25:973 (3) - finish on end of slider
00:33:259 (1) - finish on start of slider
00:40:116 (1) - ^
00:41:830 (1) - finish
00:46:973 (1) - finish on start of slider
00:53:830 (1) - ^
00:55:545 (1) - finish
01:09:473 (4) - finish on start of slider
01:10:973 (1,2) - ^
01:16:116 (1) - ^
01:22:973 (1) - ^
01:46:116 (5) - clap on end of slider
01:46:973 (1) - finish on start of slider
01:53:830 (1) - ^
01:55:545 (1) - finish
01:59:830 (5) - clap on the end of the slider
02:00:688 (1) - finish on start of slider
02:09:259 (1) - finish
02:17:402 (6,1) - blanket them, would be nice
02:24:688 (1,2) - finish on start of sliders
02:24:688 (1,3) - stack their ends perfectly
02:29:830 (1) - finish
02:33:259 (2) - finish on start of slider
02:36:688 (1) - ^
03:16:116 (1) - finish
03:19:545 (2) - ^
03:22:973 (1) - ^
03:39:687 (3) - finish on end of slider
InsaneSame hitsound suggestions as previous difficulties
01:17:830 (1,2,3) - the flow from the slider to 01:18:045 (2) is just at a weird angle, going sideways like this is never going to be a proper flow, applies to all similar parts. You can split them up, sure, but make sure the flow is not undermined so badly
01:22:545 (4,5,1) - use the similar spacing as 01:15:688 (4,5,1)
02:08:830 (6) - shift to x:492 y:148
03:43:116 (1) - this speed up is unnecessary, nor did you NC 03:43:330 (2) when their sv were different
I generally don't like the generalization of the double beats for the verses at places like 00:35:295 (3,4) - 00:40:438 (3,4) - 00:49:009 (3,4) and 00:54:152 (3,4) and so on so forth because it takes away the connection between the objects and the rhythm of the song, the general triplets are 1/4 too early compared to the rhythm of the vocals at those parts, they should have been like this:
You might have said that there is drum sounds there, but it doesn't change the fact it skews the melody of the song, it doesn't fit wholly to it, as it is just obvious that it doesn't connect with the melody
Good Luck