Flask wrote:
竟然是先吵這個, 我太訝異惹
forum
Natsume Chiaki - Hanairo Biyori
posted
Total Posts
340
早知道我也改个炫酷的
It's hardly understandable why you guys dare to do something like that. lol
'what's wrong?' is the best way to show my thought ._.Melophobia wrote:
It's hardly understandable why you guys dare to do something like that. lol
No offense, but what's wrong with "Awaken's Extra" then? :<Awaken wrote:
'what's wrong?' is the best way to show my thought ._.Melophobia wrote:
It's hardly understandable why you guys dare to do something like that. lol
No anything wrong, they're the same D:Melophobia wrote:
No offense, but what's wrong with "Awaken's Extra" then? :<
You've missed the essence of the rule, how are people supposed to tell it's "Awaken's Extra" just by looking at "Nekawaxtra"?
um understanding is okayMelophobia wrote:
You've missed the essence of the rule, how are people supposed to tell it's "Awaken's Extra" just by looking at "Nekawaxtra"?
also, don't forget there is Creator's Word it can help a lot :d
yeah but I still remember the case with ¨Lauriextra¨and ¨extrazer¨ (Dunno if I typed them well) , but as you should know they was not allowed and this one is pretty similar.Awaken wrote:
um understanding is okayMelophobia wrote:
You've missed the essence of the rule, how are people supposed to tell it's "Awaken's Extra" just by looking at "Nekawaxtra"?
also, don't forget there is Creator's Word it can help a lot :d
just wait 5-6 days
if it gets unqualified, just remember to avoid such things in the future ( which is happening I think :/ )
if not, then gratz for a new ranked map
if it gets unqualified, just remember to avoid such things in the future ( which is happening I think :/ )
if not, then gratz for a new ranked map
Topic Starter
改屁 你又不是最高难度爱Mei wrote:
早知道我也改个炫酷的
你们慢聊 我当新番看;_;(你
When this is unqualified for the diff name, perhaps also consider making the last 5 seconds less of a clusterfuck of tomstars masturbation.
An experienced BAT pointed out both these issues to you:
An experienced BAT pointed out both these issues to you:
Which you dignified with a:TicClick wrote:
Ranking Criteria wrote:
A difficulty's name must indicate its level of difficulty, with the exception of the hardest level of difficulty in a set. The mapset's hardest difficulty may use an appropriate custom difficulty name, unrelated to an username.- Finally, huge jumps spam: 03:08:599 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) -
Awaken wrote:
lol
When this is unqualified for the diff name, perhaps also consider making the last 5 seconds less of a clusterfuck of tomstars masturbation.I'VE FIXED. THE VERSION IS AFTER FIXING
An experienced BAT pointed out both these issues to you:
Don't say anything wrong if you don't know about the map
As for diffname, IT'S A GUESTDIFF I have to mention
Please people, don't be as stupid as I was yesterday.
The sole reason why maps such as ave:new's songs compilation were unranked is because a diff contained something related to the mapset creator's username.
Awaken is not the mapset creator, therefore their difficulty is a guest diff. To be able to know who made this guest diff, we need at least the username in the difficulty name, no matter if it is "Awaken's Extra" "Nekawaxtra" or "super sassy lesbian sunflowers' Extra" as long as we do know or have an idea about who made this guest diff.
And yes, for lazy people, there's the mapper's note which indicates who made which diff to prevent confusion.
The sole reason why maps such as ave:new's songs compilation were unranked is because a diff contained something related to the mapset creator's username.
Awaken is not the mapset creator, therefore their difficulty is a guest diff. To be able to know who made this guest diff, we need at least the username in the difficulty name, no matter if it is "Awaken's Extra" "Nekawaxtra" or "super sassy lesbian sunflowers' Extra" as long as we do know or have an idea about who made this guest diff.
And yes, for lazy people, there's the mapper's note which indicates who made which diff to prevent confusion.
wtf do you all read my post at previous page? :<
Stop this topic please, everything is explained.
Stop this topic please, everything is explained.
mintong89 wrote:
wtf do you all read my post at previous page? :<
Stop this topic please, everything is explained.
Though people seem to miss it, so repeating it at every page seems required. 
Ranking criteria doesn't say "related to the username of the person that submitted the map", it says "a username". Refer to TicClick or Melophobia's posts for more details. Don't make this about the BAT; it's more about the community. You don't have to agree with the rules, you don't have to try to disprove it, but anything breaking rules will be disqualified, if the QAT is doing their job.
p/2962715
p/2962715
peppy wrote:
It can't be a username, or anything related to a username.
The other difficulties should make sense in an increasing scale way, as previously discussed.
isnt the jump from 3,5 stars to 5.1 stars a bit too high?
The problem here was in the misinterpreted difficulty naming rule where a certain type of naming is allowed, but wasn't clarified.
As it is, the current difficulty name "Nekawaxtra" is unrankable, since it is relating to the username of the mapper and does not relate the difficulty correctly. However, the difficulty name "AwakExtrA" would be acceptable, as NameDifficulty or DifficultyName is allowed, with the correct capitalization to emphasize both the mapper's name and the difficulty.
The other significant point to be mentioned is the ending of the same map, 03:08:599 - , where the 1/6 slider jumps are confusing and play very rough, and the high spacing is extremely hard to hit. It's simply unfair to players to put a pattern like this at the very end of a difficult map. I would ask that you please make this more playable; the high spacing is warranted and makes sense, but the patterns are just executed poorly.
This map will be handled by the BAT from here on, however if you have any questions feel free to ask me. Good luck
As it is, the current difficulty name "Nekawaxtra" is unrankable, since it is relating to the username of the mapper and does not relate the difficulty correctly. However, the difficulty name "AwakExtrA" would be acceptable, as NameDifficulty or DifficultyName is allowed, with the correct capitalization to emphasize both the mapper's name and the difficulty.
The other significant point to be mentioned is the ending of the same map, 03:08:599 - , where the 1/6 slider jumps are confusing and play very rough, and the high spacing is extremely hard to hit. It's simply unfair to players to put a pattern like this at the very end of a difficult map. I would ask that you please make this more playable; the high spacing is warranted and makes sense, but the patterns are just executed poorly.
This map will be handled by the BAT from here on, however if you have any questions feel free to ask me. Good luck
我就知道._.
虽然是这么说我也是建议改。。。因为这个diffname第一眼看过去我是感到十分莫名的
恭喜第一次unrank
虽然是这么说我也是建议改。。。因为这个diffname第一眼看过去我是感到十分莫名的
恭喜第一次unrank
Oh gosh, unranked already D:
快改改快re吧
LOLAwaken wrote:
shit
I'm ready that each map will be unrankedMelophobia wrote:
LOLAwaken wrote:
shit
changed diff name, fixed 1/6 rhythm and some other things
rebubbled
rebubbled
rly, i'm going to suggest again and urge greatly that you change to at least OD8.5 or higher (like 9) on Awaken's Challenge for a few reasons
1. players experienced enough with the game to play a map at 6 stars (or higher) should also have enough skill to play the map with good timing, imo
2. the map is very hard, but without a high OD, it will compensate players very little in terms of pp. this is a huge problem with most of the hard no mod maps in the game currently, they get very high star ratings but give very little pp compared to mod scores not because mods are overrated, but because the OD is too low
for example, the reason DT often gives high pp is because OD7 on DT is the equivalent of OD9 and OD8 is ~9.6. most 6+ star maps people play are with DT, so they end up giving a lot of pp for the star rating and for the high OD. but 6+ star no mod maps give nothing because mappers are still stuck with this idea that high OD is too hard to play, or something... honestly it's disgusting ^^;; should just pick an OD that correlates to the difficulty of the map properly.
1. players experienced enough with the game to play a map at 6 stars (or higher) should also have enough skill to play the map with good timing, imo
2. the map is very hard, but without a high OD, it will compensate players very little in terms of pp. this is a huge problem with most of the hard no mod maps in the game currently, they get very high star ratings but give very little pp compared to mod scores not because mods are overrated, but because the OD is too low
for example, the reason DT often gives high pp is because OD7 on DT is the equivalent of OD9 and OD8 is ~9.6. most 6+ star maps people play are with DT, so they end up giving a lot of pp for the star rating and for the high OD. but 6+ star no mod maps give nothing because mappers are still stuck with this idea that high OD is too hard to play, or something... honestly it's disgusting ^^;; should just pick an OD that correlates to the difficulty of the map properly.
Really sorry But I really like od8 more, maybe it's just my personal reason but I really think many people even high rank players will be annoyed for od9 ;~;Silynn wrote:
rly, i'm going to suggest again and urge greatly that you change to at least OD8.5 or higher (like 9) on Awaken's Challenge for a few reasons
1. players experienced enough with the game to play a map at 6 stars (or higher) should also have enough skill to play the map with good timing, imo
2. the map is very hard, but without a high OD, it will compensate players very little in terms of pp. this is a huge problem with most of the hard no mod maps in the game currently, they get very high star ratings but give very little pp compared to mod scores not because mods are overrated, but because the OD is too low
for example, the reason DT often gives high pp is because OD7 on DT is the equivalent of OD9 and OD8 is ~9.6. most 6+ star maps people play are with DT, so they end up giving a lot of pp for the star rating and for the high OD. but 6+ star no mod maps give nothing because mappers are still stuck with this idea that high OD is too hard to play, or something... honestly it's disgusting ^^;; should just pick an OD that correlates to the difficulty of the map properly.
As for pp...
I like how everyone ignored 02:23:764 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) -
^ this[-Cloud-] wrote:
Worst rule ever.
if you have test, you will know how playable it isTicClick wrote:
I like how everyone ignored 02:23:764 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) -
if you're against the rhythm, well
Its playable? xDTicClick wrote:
I like how everyone ignored 02:23:764 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,1) -
WHY DOES NO ONE LISTEN TO SILYNN Q_____________Q
233Zare wrote:
WHY DOES NO ONE LISTEN TO SILYNN Q_____________Q
幾經波折