1. Due to 15 minutes of Insane marathon it is wise to have a low HP drain (HP6 or HP5) Trust me you didn't want to retry whole map just because you missed some streams after playing long through
2. You mapped this alone? If you don't, better put mappers name on the storyboard.
3. There are some parts of the map where the hitsounds are too loud, you better check them out

1. 00:17:560 (2,3,4,5,6) - Not forming a good round curve. Streams are apparently placed too low
2. 00:39:082 (5,6) - Wrong, they should switch place and flow won't be broken
3. 00:51:908 (2,3,4,5) - Stacks are kinda nonsense, why? They didn't follow anything (not music, not the atmosphere, nothing)
4. 01:14:952 (1,2,3,4,5) - Sliderends are not stacked properly.
5. 01:27:126 (4) - Bad sliderwave. Whenever you want to create such sliderwave take this as an example http://puu.sh/8rYmD.jpg
6. 01:44:300 (1,2) - Not a proper place to put a sliderbow. Never make a sliderbow if the second slider is shorter than the first slider
7. 02:32:343 (5,6) - Not good. Maybe http://puu.sh/8rYuP.jpg (notice the way they are parallel enough; which looks nicer)?
8. 02:33:647 (5,6) - Stack breaks flow, so please unstack.
9. 02:37:560 - Eh... why empty? There's clearly music beats in the back so why not
10. 02:37:778 - ^
11. 02:56:691 (1,2,3,4) - Instead of continuing the previous pattern's movement straight, why don't you copy paste previous pattern (02:55:821 (1,2,3,4) - ) and flip it horizontally, now that looks nicer
12. 03:04:082 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I was expecting a symmetrical placement but eh
13. 03:09:734 (3,1,2) - Bad flow. Why don't you stack (1) with (3)'s end and move (2) and 03:10:604 (3) - away?
14. 03:13:213 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Somehow I don't like this. Why don't you use more symmetrical approach by copy pasting 03:13:213 (1,2,3,4) - , Ctrl+G the copy pasted pattern, and readjust next patterns into symmetrical positions?
15. 04:12:040 (1) - oh wow, big assymetric slider.
16. 05:24:376 (6) - Bad polarity; a note starts on a blue tick. In order to restore the polarity you should add a note at 05:24:263 -
17. 05:27:647 (3,4,5) - Stack here is better than these antijumps; as they're going to confuse with the next pattern
18. 05:36:442 (1,2,3,4) - Too far
19. 05:47:995 (1,2,3) - Spacing is pretty confusing. I hope you could fix these
20. 06:00:479 (5,1) - I'd rather stack these, you know.
21. 06:33:833 (5,2) - This is bad, why don't you stack them?
22. 07:31:038 - Feels empty, add a note?
23. 11:39:953 (1,2,3) - Weird to have a jump right after an antijump pattern
24. 12:03:203 (1) - Too far as the spinner just end shortly
25. 12:24:953 (3) - Bad way to make a slider tie. Trust me, you could put the sliderpoints symmetrically and still get a perfect slidertie
26. 15:08:759 (7) - Missed a kick sound at the start I guess
27. 15:31:347 (1) - That drumwhistle sound at the end is not really fitting imo

Lanturn wrote:

Shouldn't this be titled based on its Japanese name? Ueki no Housoku Compilation. Looking at the Anime and Manga, it seems to use its Japanese name over the English translation (although the logo for the Anime has "The Law of Ueki" on it). I haven't seen the show so I could be wrong, but I'd suggest using the Japanese name of the anime over the English translation.

The main reason why I'm bringing this up is mostly just because the Manga only has the Japanese name, and since it is the original.. yeah.

Title: うえきの法則 Compilation
Romanised Title: Ueki no Housoku Compilation

(Also because of this. Maybe change the source as well.)

ps. Don't bother KDing

Teru21 wrote:

fix some

setsu ;; this part 11:37:578 (6,7) - it sounds awkward, it suppose to be 1/6 ;; even if you don't want to use 1/6, 11:37:703 (7) - suppose to be at 11:37:828 - ;; I suggest you to get the second one ((7) moved)

https://www.dropbox.com/s/xw4nbgr44up3j ... hon%5D.osu

and I may re-do some parts I guess =w=)a;;

340,220,371845,2,0,P|256:172|172:220,1,200,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

464,216,836759,2,0,B|404:152|312:168|272:240|256:276|256:276|240:240|200:168|108:152|48:216,1,519.99997619629,2|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

PureCreamy wrote:

Hi! Here is my mods
00:21:691 add a note. So it will follow the music along with the vocal
00:22:126 ^
00:22:343 ^
00:22:560 ^
00:26:908 add a note
00:27:778 ^
00:28:647 ^
00:39:517 ^
00:39:734 add a note and clap there
00:40:821 add a note to follow the background music
00:46:365 ^
00:46:473 ^
00:46:582 ^
01:31:691 add a note so it will fit the music
01:31:908 ^
01:32:126 ^
01:35:169 ^
01:35:386 ^
01:35:604 ^
01:40:821 add a note so it will easier to follow the flow
04:40:053 ^

By the way, it's a great map! Good luck!

1. 05:22:233 ~ 05:36:106 - timing here feels really early to me, I was playing it and I suddenly hit 10ms late starting from here. I think it'd be good to get some ppl to check the timing on this.
2. no kiai? I think for a long map such as this, it'd be nice to have kiai so it's not a straight 15 minutes with the same setting.
3. 05:36:278 - imo the transition here was really abrupt. it's only a small pause in between songs and the change in BPM here was huge. I realize this would be a loooot of effort to fix, but I think it'd feel a lot better if you could make a larger distance in between the 2 songs; I think it'd also be more fun bc u ended this part of the map right where the chorus of the song is, and this way u could map it (since seems u didn't map the chorus before).
4. 14:37:688 - don't get why not 1.3x in chorus here, since u used it before. it'd be better to keep it consistent (regardless if u choose to use 1.0x or 1.3x here) imo.
5. how about silent soft-sliderside in the soft songs? imo it'd feel a lot more natural, songs 2 and 7 are quiet enough I can hear it and it feels out of place to me.
   

pieguy1372 wrote:

[Marathon]

1. 05:22:233 ~ 05:36:106 - timing here feels really early to me, I was playing it and I suddenly hit 10ms late starting from here. I think it'd be good to get some ppl to check the timing on this. I'll find someone to time this once again orz
2. no kiai? I think for a long map such as this, it'd be nice to have kiai so it's not a straight 15 minutes with the same setting. people are asking this like many times, lol - I didn't add kiai because there are some song that I took only bits of verse, and lots of refrain part, so there will be part that has lots of kiai... (well if this is a must, then I'll add kiai)
3. 05:36:278 - imo the transition here was really abrupt. it's only a small pause in between songs and the change in BPM here was huge. I realize this would be a loooot of effort to fix, but I think it'd feel a lot better if you could make a larger distance in between the 2 songs; I think it'd also be more fun bc u ended this part of the map right where the chorus of the song is, and this way u could map it (since seems u didn't map the chorus before).I can't make the gap longer, since this is medley. - a spinner here 05:34:865 - ~ 05:36:278 - is far worse imo, so I did a slider there
4. 14:37:688 - don't get why not 1.3x in chorus here, since u used it before. it'd be better to keep it consistent (regardless if u choose to use 1.0x or 1.3x here) imo. eh, I didn't use 1.3 as a standard here, 1.3x+ are jumps and not all of the jumps are consistent here
5. how about silent soft-sliderside in the soft songs? imo it'd feel a lot more natural, songs 2 and 7 are quiet enough I can hear it and it feels out of place to me. I've checked the soft part, they're using defaults, so should I move them to custom, and add the defaults?

Setsurei wrote:

1. eh, I didn't use 1.3 as a standard here, 1.3x+ are jumps and not all of the jumps are consistent here sry if I wasn't clear - this chorus 13:29:924 ~ 13:58:159 uses 1.3x SV but this chorus 14:35:571 ~ 14:57:453 - uses 1.0x SV. imo it'd be better to keep consistency between the 2.
   
2. I've checked the soft part, they're using defaults, so should I move them to custom, and add the defaults? it looks like u already have a silent soft-sliderslide in the folder. the 2nd song uses standard drum hitsounds, so C/P soft-sliderslide9 to drum-sliderslide9 and set the timing points at the 2nd song to use D:C9.
   
   imo silent sliderslide would fit the 7th song too, if you agree you'll have to basically make a new set of hitsounds that's the same as C1 except with silent sliderslide added, and set the 7th song's timing points which use C1 to that instead.
   
   again just a suggestion, I don't want to force it or anything. if anything isn't clear let me know

pieguy1372 wrote:

1. sry if I wasn't clear - this chorus 13:29:924 ~ 13:58:159 uses 1.3x SV but this chorus 14:35:571 ~ 14:57:453 - uses 1.0x SV. imo it'd be better to keep consistency between the 2. I'll preserve this 1.0x, because 1.3x gap is quite far
   
2. it looks like u already have a silent soft-sliderslide in the folder. the 2nd song uses standard drum hitsounds, so C/P soft-sliderslide9 to drum-sliderslide9 and set the timing points at the 2nd song to use D:C9. added
   
   imo silent sliderslide would fit the 7th song too, if you agree you'll have to basically make a new set of hitsounds that's the same as C1 except with silent sliderslide added, and set the 7th song's timing points which use C1 to that instead. added, and changed to C8
   
   again just a suggestion, I don't want to force it or anything. if anything isn't clear let me know

437,272,206631,2,0,B|360:228|396:152|396:152|444:136|476:68|448:16,1,300,0|2,1:3|0:0,0:0:0:0:

idea

372,192,554622,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,360,554808,1,0,0:0:0:0:
310,165,555181,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,360,555367,1,0,0:0:0:0:
241,160,555740,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,360,555926,1,0,0:0:0:0:
174,175,556298,5,14,1:2:0:0:
260,356,556484,1,0,0:0:0:0:
120,216,556857,5,14,1:2:0:0:
262,356,557043,1,0,0:0:0:0:
118,216,557416,2,0,P|184:7|376:115,1,500,6|2,1:2|0:0,0:0:0:0:

examination wrote:

As requested



you can ask someone else to check it www

pieguy1372 wrote:

i just think songs 3-6 all need about +10ms. i'll try to get some other ppl to check this (for reference, i do think 160.03 is correct here)
no kds (obv)