Thanks! , update.
xxdeathx wrote:
Track 10^ There're follow "Whistle"
- 10:30:496 (1,2) - not perfectly lined up ◄ Fixed
- 10:40:663 (5,1) - improve blanket ◄ Fixed
- 10:49:663 - put something on this tick
- 10:54:996 ^
- 11:00:329 ^ white ticks are part of the main beat so you don't want to ignore it
- 11:01:663 - 11:02:996 - 11:04:329 - 11:05:663 ^
Its same as
I think if I add some beat it could confused[/color]
Thanksalot , Don't forgot to PM me when you want to use my ticket.xxdeathx wrote:
hi, m4m from your queue
Test play (didn't need no-fail but almost died at the streams a few times):
It looks like you have a lot of experience in mapping because this beatmap played very well! It's better than most BATs' maps (no offense, BAT's, this one was just great) <<< ThankYou! but I'm still worry, about my outdated mapping style compare to the present beatmap.
I guess I'll do part B: Tracks 6-10
Track 6Track 7
- 05:30:185 (2) - since you were just mapping vocals on 1/8 and 1/4 ticks on 05:27:601 (2,3) you should stay consistent and do the same here. shorten slider to 05:30:601 < use 1/8 instead of 1/4 fix more that this point whole this section is better at match vocal completely.
- 05:37:351 - 05:38:018 - 05:38:351 - 05:38:684 - put circles here, i can hear stuff on these ticks. also triples are much better than double circles.
< the volume of your suggest place is too quite and I think it's don't match when listen compare to 2 circles- 05:40:101 put circle here < same as above
- 05:40:684 ^ significant beat here although you might want to make the whole thing into a stream < I think follow the loop sampler is better
- 05:48:018 - strong drum here and 05:48:684 , don't ignore it < for this section I've intention to ignore the 1 beat loops here until the next vocal section start and I'll put note on that 1/1 loop.
- 05:50:684 - 05:51:351^
- 05:53:351 - 05:54:017 ^
- 05:54:684 ^
- 05:56:017 ^
- 05:57:351 ^ also undermapped
- 06:02:684 ^ < follow the 16 beats loop here is more good.
- 06:11:685 (1,3) - the slider ends are very strong so i wouldn't use repeating sliders because i'd rather have a new keypress on them. also stay consistent with four 1/2 sliders like the other parts 06:14:351 (1,2,3,4) < four sliders I 've use alot already so try slider + 2 circles 2x
- 06:23:685 (1,2) - blanket?
All doneTrack 8
- 06:32:023 (2,5) - blanket
- 06:44:928 (1,2,3) - i'd blanket these
< Done
- 07:57:499 (3,5) - flip them horizontally separately for better flow < Swap instead of flip
- 08:22:499 - 08:22:999 don't ignore these beats < it weird if you listen at 25 percent playback it should add but I listen at 75 percent playback and i think it's shouldn't there. there 're at least 2 sound loop here and i think focus both at same time is not good sorry.
- 08:28:332 - 08:28:499 ^[/color]
- 08:36:832 (6) - move northeast a bit for better flow with previous object < It should be good now.
- 08:39:499 (4,1) - blanket better < Done
- 08:48:916 (8) - curve slider less so it looks more similar to previous sliders
Track 9 and 10 is not my part.
Good luck!
ขอบคุณฮะCelsiusLK wrote:
ดาวเหลือ เลยมายิง
Thanks ( NO comment = Fix )Hinsvar wrote:
Yo; modding here!
*Bolded = Unrankable or very, very strongly suggested; red = Highly suggested or questionable (still weaker than the bolded ones); black = Minor suggestions/rants; blue = Notes/advices to avoid/fix repeated problems. Also note that hitsound suggestions on a diff may apply on similar parts of the song and the other diffs of the mapset.
>General
- Why are there two .osb files in the folder?
>MarathonWell that's it.
- 00:02:685 - 00:05:185 - Why not add whistles here too? It feels awkward to hear whistles late into the song. Might as well add some here.
I prefer to use the whiistle when new sampler start at 00:05:352- 00:34:102 - Why not add a note here so you can make a stream at 00:34:019 - 00:34:352? The instrument also sounds pretty strong here, and it feels weird to leave that unmapped. < there are also here 00:34:935 and alot instead of stream all sometimes It's better to undermap for this kind of songs
- 00:43:519 (3,4,5,1) - Don't you think these notes are too close to each other? I personally would make them have a bigger distance/spacing from each other. < It's just first track in the map yeah I need players too warmup
- 01:12:518 (2) - Make this curved like 01:12:184 (1)? You know, something like this? It'll make a better flow.
- 01:26:851 (1) - Move to (204,32) for a better transition to 01:27:184 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13)? < Bend the tail of slider
- 01:38:851 (1,2,3,4) - Try this? Plays better, IMO.
- 02:18:183 (5) - Why don't you make it more curved like 02:17:350 (1,4) for shape consistency?
- 02:17:350 (1,4) - Make them curved the same so they'll look neater?
- 02:34:683 (1,4) - ^
---------------- PAN- 03:01:183 - Try begin the 1/4 stream from here if possible, since the music sounds pretty loud already starting from this point?
- 03:49:266 - Add a circle since the instrument is pretty noticeable here?
----------------- 04:03:686 (1,2,3) - Why are they spaced the same visually while the rhythm suggests otherwise? Make the spacing at (1,2) smaller than (2,3) so this will be readable?
- 04:26:519 (1,2,3) - Don't you think these notes are too close to each other?
- 04:29:686 (1,2,1,2) - Any reason why the spacing looks random?
- 04:40:852 (5,1) - Why don't you make the spacing larger to emphasize the instrument at 04:41:019?
- 04:56:686 (5,2) - (5)'s tail overlaps (2)'s tail partially... Is this okay? I feel that this makes them look weird.
- 04:59:686 (1) - Rotate ~25 degrees anti-clockwise and move to (372,204) for a better flow from 04:59:519 (7)?
- 05:02:352 (1) - Move one grid down so it'll be in line with 05:02:519 (2,3,4)? Looks neater, you know.
- 05:11:019 (1) - I don't think this NC is needed... Why are you using this? < just 4 beats NC
- 05:13:686 (1) - ^ (Applies to similar cases.) < it's too long for 16 -17 notes and i think it's help bad stream player to gain life also.
---------------------- I'll continue Later ------------------------- 05:37:185 (1,2) - Move to (484,112) so the flow to 05:37:518 (3) will be nicer and thus this part will be more comfortable to play?
- 06:27:185 (4) - Make this curved? Similar to 01:12:518 (2), btw.
- 07:28:999 (1) - Make it curved like this so this part will be, again, more comfortable to play? Adjust 07:29:333 (2,3) too if you did this. < current is good for me no need to do more
- 08:08:499 (3,4) - Don't you think it'll flow better and be more fun if you swapped (3) and (4)'s place in the timeline?
- 08:25:499 (3) - Move to (304,308)? 08:24:999 (1,2,3) will look symmetrical, and thus neater this way.
---- mercury- 09:43:666 (2) - NC to indicate that this is the beginning of a new stanza?
---------- 7Ka- 10:20:163 (2,3,4) - Why you don't just make the spacing consistent? That way, this part would be better to play.
- 10:49:996 (5,6,7,8,1) - I believe this stream can be made tidier. Right now, it looks a bit too wavy.
------------- 11:19:997 (3) - Rotate 15 degrees anti-clockwise for a better flow?
- 12:03:164 (4,5) - Same as 10:20:163 (2,3,4).
---------- 7Ka2- 12:43:080 (3) - Consider using the same curving as 12:42:664 (2) for a nicer flow.
-------------- 13:33:337 -
(best timestamp ever hail our beloved goddesses)Add a note? I feel that it's very awkward to leave this empty and players might hit 13:33:421 (3) earlier because of this emptiness. < After 6 Player test play this No one hit it early and this rhythm is easy catch- 14:30:504 (2) - Make it look like this for a smoother play?
- 15:13:004 (1) - Move to (204,80) so the stream here will be curved better?
- 16:43:838 (1) - Make this curved similarly to 16:43:505 (6)?
Good luck on the way
thanks for modding :3Hinsvar wrote:
Yo; modding here!
>MarathonWell that's it.
- 03:01:183 - Try begin the 1/4 stream from here if possible, since the music sounds pretty loud already starting from this point? it more comfortable to play if I keep placing four set of double to make the rhythm same as the previous one.
- 03:49:266 - Add a circle since the instrument is pretty noticeable here? it's weird imo to play 5 streams before the long one
Good luck on the way
Fix all!Hinsvar wrote:
---------- 7Ka
- 10:20:163 (2,3,4) - Why you don't just make the spacing consistent? That way, this part would be better to play.
- 10:49:996 (5,6,7,8,1) - I believe this stream can be made tidier. Right now, it looks a bit too wavy.
---------- 7Ka2- 12:43:080 (3) - Consider using the same curving as 12:42:664 (2) for a nicer flow.
Thanks :3handsome wrote:
[TRACK 12]
12:35:997 (2) - show more of the circle, then it is a more obvious 1/4, like a 12:44:997 (1,2) - Fix
12:37:497 - why dont map this sound (and subsequent parts) What are you meaning? It really have hs
mostly fix on blanket and few space error thankshandsome wrote:
m4m~
change combocolours
also, if you need better SB resources i can help, but i won't do SB[TRACK 11]
11:19:997 (3,4) - blanket better
11:21:664 (4) - this pattern not good for repeat
11:26:831 (3,4,5) - 11:31:581 (6) - spacing like the rest
11:38:082 (4,1) - spacing isslightly off from the rest of the stream
11:42:498 - add circle, make it a double
11:45:831 (6) - ctrl+g
11:59:664 (1,2,3,4) - ctrl+g each one individually
12:03:497 (5) - weird spacing going on here
12:08:830 (8,9,1) - ^
12:11:664 (1,2) - can be blanketed better
12:18:664 (2,3) - use same slider, then ctrl+h and rotate
[TRACK 12]
12:35:997 (2) - show more of the circle, then it is a more obvious 1/4, like a 12:44:997 (1,2) -
12:37:497 - why dont map this sound (and subsequent parts)
[TRACK 13]
13:34:337 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - the pattern don't fit
14:02:337 (1,2) - untidy imo, make like 14:08:171 (2) - look better
14:19:671 (1) - too near
14:38:087 (6,7,1) - copy paste, now is not parallel, same for others like it
14:57:837 - missing important beat here
15:08:504 - ^
[TRACK 14]
15:53:005 (1,2,3) - blanket better
15:53:839 (4) - ^
16:37:005 (1) - ctrl+g or smth, spacing too small
16:37:672 (2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - use 1/4 slider better
16:43:005 (3,4,5,6) - 3-4 should be big jump, then 5 and 6 closer
16:59:672 (1) - rotate anticlockwise slightly