forum
What personality type are you?
posted
Total Posts
501
This isn't even funny anymore, there's gotta be an extrovert somewhere...
Reading about ENTP... i also can relate to that, more than to INTJ. Only thing not fitting is the extraverted part. To be more specific, i have no idea why this type is associated with extraverted, i certainly love arguing and am blunt as does the not neccesarily liked part. I have a tendency to be unpopular but its not like i mind that, in fact i prefer that because most people leave me alone except a few i can argue with. Wheres the extraverted part here? Just because the arguing thing?Aurani wrote:
Well yesterday I went out and actually took the same test and got examined by a proper psychologist and even if we rule out that I got the same answer on every test online - it still can't rule out the fact that I got the same thing irl too. There's apparently not a single mistake in that site's test - at least as far as it goes for me... even if it surprised me in an unpleasant way (at first I didn't like my type at all).Granger wrote:
Oh wow, how different we are.
The test gave me INTP but the description for INTJ also fits...
We also don't seem to be compatible at all~ *high five*
I also redid the same test, the result didnt change much... Little less prospecting and a bit more thinking. But i havent seen a psychologist (should go to one sometime annyways, to deal with various problems with my mind you know about). Doesnt surprise me that it surprised you unpleasantly, in my oponion you dont seem like INFJ, at least from what i know about you, which is arguably not that much considering i know you since barely 2 months only.
From this test it seems like we're not compatible, esp with the tactics. If we'd life together i can imagine a lot of stress there, with me being so relaxed about work while you're pretty serious there.
But does that matter so much? I mean, we dont life together (and likely wont ever do), i like you so we cant be as incompatible as this test says, can we?
The thing is, there's only one person who has ever learned enough about me to be able to tell if my personality matches it or not - and that person came to the same conclusion I did. EVERYTHING in INFJ matches me except for the part about me not liking to argue (I actually love arguing quite a lot). Everything else matches perfectly - be it to my liking or not. I'd quite want to hear your opinion on my personality, now that you mentioned I'm "different" in your eyes.Granger wrote:
I also redid the same test, the result didnt change much... Little less prospecting and a bit more thinking. But i havent seen a psychologist (should go to one sometime annyways, to deal with various problems with my mind you know about). Doesnt surprise me that it surprised you unpleasantly, in my oponion you dont seem like INFJ, at least from what i know about you, which is arguably not that much considering i know you since barely 2 months only.
From this test it seems like we're not compatible, esp with the tactics. If we'd life together i can imagine a lot of stress there, with me being so relaxed about work while you're pretty serious there.
But does that matter so much? I mean, we dont life together (and likely wont ever do), i like you so we cant be as incompatible as this test says, can we?
It would also be rather hard living with another introvert, especially INTP, as I'm quite emotional and seek other emotionally expressive people who can offer and show unconditional love - something mostly types like ENTP can provide. I shouldn't be stereotyping like that, but that's how it mostly goes anyways...
NaCl+kirukashi wrote:
This isn't even funny anymore, there's gotta be an extrovert somewhere...
ISTJ, sounds good i guess idk.
8) autism god blessLewder wrote:
IxTJ is another way of saying autist B)
Well, the stongest traits of you i know are how you love to argue and how much you value intelligence which isnt etactly a INFJ trait, but more of ENTP and INTP, so naturally i see you differently than the INFJ suggests.Aurani wrote:
The thing is, there's only one person who has ever learned enough about me to be able to tell if my personality matches it or not - and that person came to the same conclusion I did. EVERYTHING in INFJ matches me except for the part about me not liking to argue (I actually love arguing quite a lot). Everything else matches perfectly - be it to my liking or not. I'd quite want to hear your opinion on my personality, now that you mentioned I'm "different" in your eyes.Granger wrote:
I also redid the same test, the result didnt change much... Little less prospecting and a bit more thinking. But i havent seen a psychologist (should go to one sometime annyways, to deal with various problems with my mind you know about). Doesnt surprise me that it surprised you unpleasantly, in my oponion you dont seem like INFJ, at least from what i know about you, which is arguably not that much considering i know you since barely 2 months only.
From this test it seems like we're not compatible, esp with the tactics. If we'd life together i can imagine a lot of stress there, with me being so relaxed about work while you're pretty serious there.
But does that matter so much? I mean, we dont life together (and likely wont ever do), i like you so we cant be as incompatible as this test says, can we?
It would also be rather hard living with another introvert, especially INTP, as I'm quite emotional and seek other emotionally expressive people who can offer and show unconditional love - something mostly types like ENTP can provide. I shouldn't be stereotyping like that, but that's how it mostly goes anyways...
I personally see living with another introvert not as hard, quite contrary, i see that as highly desired since both could satisfy their little social need and be alone for a while again easily without much stress.
I might not be emotionally expressive but i certainly can offer unconditional love. Not so sure about showing it though.
That's the thing... you basically picked up the only trait that ISN'T a part of an INFJ that I showed. You'd have to spend a massive amount of time to actually get to know me more than what you just do now - and sadly we haven't talked all that much either.Granger wrote:
Well, the stongest traits of you i know are how you love to argue and how much you value intelligence which isnt etactly a INFJ trait, but more of ENTP and INTP, so naturally i see you differently than the INFJ suggests.
I personally see living with another introvert not as hard, quite contrary, i see that as highly desired since both could satisfy their little social need and be alone for a while again easily without much stress.
I might not be emotionally expressive but i certainly can offer unconditional love. Not so sure about showing it though.
I'd actually love it more to have an ENTP or ENFP, as I appreciate long relationships with intense dedication and understanding of one another. Sadly, you just pointed out what the problem is with more introverted types "I might not be emotionally expressive...." "Not sure about showing it" - that's the most important part of it all.
Topic Starter
Damn, I didn't know Arnold Schwarzenegger was autisticLewder wrote:
IxTJ is another way of saying autist B)
you're heavily implying that these aren't bullshit to begin withJordan wrote:
Damn, I didn't know Arnold Schwarzenegger was autisticLewder wrote:
IxTJ is another way of saying autist B)
I consider myself extroverted. And there were plenty of us on the first pagekirukashi wrote:
Wow judging from everyone's posts am I seriously the only one here that's extraverted?
Extroverts of page one:kirukashi wrote:
Wow judging from everyone's posts am I seriously the only one here that's extraverted?
BRBP
-LeeP-
Zakkyliar
Kayne West seems to be more inbetween, judging from this:
ENTP, ENTJ are extroverted personalities while INTP and INTJ are introverted.Kanye West wrote:
Got ENTP, usually get INTP, ENTJ or INTJ
Good to know I'm not alone here
Most of you seem pretty extroverted to me when posting on the forum lol.
Most of you seem pretty extroverted to me when posting on the forum lol.
That's just how most people behave over internet, regardless of personality. That's why judging someone over internet is like trying to poke a cat's anus through a rice sack... good luck hitting it spot on.
This is one of the most bizarre analogies I've ever seen in my life.Aurani wrote:
That's just how most people behave over internet, regardless of personality. That's why judging someone over internet is like trying to poke a cat's anus through a rice sack... good luck hitting it spot on.
took it twice to make sure
i was an ISTP like last year from that topic i made, tho it also resulted me to being an INTP after retaking after some months later but after retaking it again, it resulted me to being an ISTP again lol
i guess im kinda both types lol
considering i'm on the same boat but with slightly different fluctuation in outcome i retook the test and this time i noticed a few discrepancies in the questions in relation to another myers-briggs type personality test I took on another website, can't remember what website it was but someone linked a screenshot from it somewhere in this thread-Seren- wrote:
took it twice to make sure
i was an ISTP like last year from that topic i made, tho it also resulted me to being an INTP after retaking after some months later but after retaking it again, it resulted me to being an ISTP again lol
i guess im kinda both types lol
this test seems to have slightly modernised ways of presenting the questions (however that is not to say i wasn't fucking stumped on a few of them, too ambiguous and neutral), so in one sense this one might be slightly more accurate than the one i took earlier, not sure where you took your previous test however
That's what I was aiming for, lol. It wasn't actually surprising to see him on the list, since I immediately recognised him at the end of the test - when I read the description. Inspiring speeches? Analyzing people? Creative and with a vivid imagination? Rings a bell, definitely.
i took my test from here: http://similarminds.com/jung_word_pair.htmlLewder wrote:
considering i'm on the same boat but with slightly different fluctuation in outcome i retook the test and this time i noticed a few discrepancies in the questions in relation to another myers-briggs type personality test I took on another website, can't remember what website it was but someone linked a screenshot from it somewhere in this thread
this test seems to have slightly modernised ways of presenting the questions (however that is not to say i wasn't fucking stumped on a few of them, too ambiguous and neutral), so in one sense this one might be slightly more accurate than the one i took earlier, not sure where you took your previous test however
i remember after retaking that test some months ago, it resulted me of having a 50/50 between sensing and intuitive tho it resulted me to being an INTP and after some consecutive retakes, it showed the intuitive one is more dominant
and oh,i also remember taking this kind of test some years ago and that one resulted me to being an ISTP
but well, i think can consider myself as being both since i somehow have a good sense of intuition and sensing, and sometimes i can find myself connecting these 2 capabilities either way
Took like two tests and I got ESTJ, so I could go either way based off of my previous post here.
however 2 > 1 so god bless.
however 2 > 1 so god bless.
I'm fairly certain similarminds is where I took the test some years ago too, actually.-Seren- wrote:
i took my test from here: http://similarminds.com/jung_word_pair.htmlLewder wrote:
considering i'm on the same boat but with slightly different fluctuation in outcome i retook the test and this time i noticed a few discrepancies in the questions in relation to another myers-briggs type personality test I took on another website, can't remember what website it was but someone linked a screenshot from it somewhere in this thread
this test seems to have slightly modernised ways of presenting the questions (however that is not to say i wasn't fucking stumped on a few of them, too ambiguous and neutral), so in one sense this one might be slightly more accurate than the one i took earlier, not sure where you took your previous test however
i remember after retaking that test some months ago, it resulted me of having a 50/50 between sensing and intuitive tho it resulted me to being an INTP and after some consecutive retakes, it showed the intuitive one is more dominant
and oh,i also remember taking this kind of test some years ago and that one resulted me to being an ISTP
but well, i think can consider myself as being both since i somehow have a good sense of intuition and sensing, and sometimes i can find myself connecting these 2 capabilities either way
ENFP
They're kind of right ;_;
They're kind of right ;_;
sure that test isnt specific and only concise as it's only making you choose from which of those adjectives describe you the most but it has a good insight neverthelessLewder wrote:
I'm fairly certain similarminds is where I took the test some years ago too, actually.-Seren- wrote:
i took my test from here: http://similarminds.com/jung_word_pair.html
i remember after retaking that test some months ago, it resulted me of having a 50/50 between sensing and intuitive tho it resulted me to being an INTP and after some consecutive retakes, it showed the intuitive one is more dominant
and oh,i also remember taking this kind of test some years ago and that one resulted me to being an ISTP
but well, i think can consider myself as being both since i somehow have a good sense of intuition and sensing, and sometimes i can find myself connecting these 2 capabilities either way
anyway, kinda agree that this one seems more accurate than that one; but oh well, as long as your corresponding type is accurate, that's all that matters
Actually, the one I took is this one: http://www.humanmetrics.com/cgi-win/JTypes2.asp
I knew it wasn't that specific test on similarminds, I thought it was another one hosted on their website, my bad.
I knew it wasn't that specific test on similarminds, I thought it was another one hosted on their website, my bad.
Nooph wrote:
i'm not an introvert. we should start a club.
Extroverts 4 lifeCritical Dude wrote:
ENFP
They're kind of right ;_;
Don't forget that while introverted, my type is actually quite fond of company and appreciates a good conversation.
So are you ambiverted?Aurani wrote:
Don't forget that while introverted, my type is actually quite fond of company and appreciates a good conversation.
I'm still an introvert, as my energy drains when I'm around people - but unlike other types, I can hold out a veeeeeeeery long time until I have to retreat and "recharge". I've read a similar description on one of the sites too, and was rather shocked to have it confirmed, but I don't remember where I saw it.... I guess I'll have to dig it up tonight.
introversion isn't as black and white as you think, aurani, and you're describing it in a way that every introvert is like an autist that gets annoyed as soon as people try to talk to them
Being an introvert means that your internal energy is the strongest when reflecting and is the weakest when interacting - nothing else. If anything, I'm one of the people who actually knows what it means to be either I or E, unlike most others who generalize and immediately come to retarded conclusions such as "OH being an introvert means that you're automatically a shut-in!".Lewder wrote:
introversion isn't as black and white as you think, aurani, and you're describing it in a way that every introvert is like an autist that gets annoyed as soon as people try to talk to them
Also Kiru, here's what I found so far - "While they are introverted, they sometimes seem extroverted at times due to their strong interest in people and society."
Not the one I read a day or two ago, but close enough.
I seem to always get INFP (though the last test said I was INFP and/or INFJ).
So TL;DR, introverts aren't just very good at socializing?Aurani wrote:
Also Kiru, here's what I found so far - "While they are introverted, they sometimes seem extroverted at times due to their strong interest in people and society."
Not the one I read a day or two ago, but close enough.