Dainesl wrote:

Taiko mod by your request.

General

Everything is OK here~

Muzukashii

00:45:792 (127) - maybe make this a kat, higher pitch of vocal here? - i prefer a simple pattern.
01:05:763 (191) - maybe make this a big kat for consistency with Oni? unless it's like this in all the other diffs, I haven't checked, really (applies to all kiai times, if not done for this, don't do for others) - no.
01:34:812 - How come kiai time doesn't end here? it ends here in all the other diffs. - it was my mistake.
01:48:429 (335,336,337,338) - maybe make these kats for simpler playability here? - ddddK is easier than kkkkK.
02:24:286 (451,452) - make 452 a kat, practically the same sound as 451 - not the same. slightly lower.
03:06:498 (596) - change to kat? you used ddk before, and it provides more flow imo - no.
03:31:008 - why no kiai time here? ;w; - you should listen to the song properly.
04:34:553 - maybe extend spinner to here? - nope.

Oni

00:55:550 (201) - maybe make this a kat for simpler playability? - i prefer dkd
01:34:926 - why put a inherited point here? remove it perhaps? - to avoid a sound volume change of suddenly.
01:38:216 (401) - make this kat to fit the higher vocal? - kept.
01:48:429 (438,439,440,441) - see suggestion for Muzukashii (but maybe you will deny it because kats have been used on previous notes) - why is here kat ;_; i want to follow the bassdrum
02:22:357 (582,583) - why use a doublet here? it would flow better as just one note imo - boring. i dont want to make a taiko diff with no personality.
02:38:130 (661,662,663,664) - kd dk pattern? I would put it as kkd k instead - kd dk is already fine for the vocal
03:35:547 (901,902) - make these kats for better flow with the vocal? - i want to use a simple pattern on this part. why doesnt everybody understand the my intent....lol
see spinner and Kiai Time suggestions on Muzukashii - i kept it.

really nice maps as always, not much to mod here ;w; good luck!　

• 
  None!

1. 02:54:243 - k 追加? // ほかの場所と比べて明らかにスッカスカですしなによりKantanの同じところにはNoteが置いてあります。 02:53:789 - から1/2でd k kでもいいとおもいます。お好みで!

1. 00:22:189 (54) - finisher追加...?
2. 00:30:132 - k追加? // 空けてあるのはわざと?この辺のほかのところはだいたいボーカルに沿う感じで1/2 notesが置いてあるのにこの空白はちょっと気になります!

• 
  
  初見Result

  連打練習しなきゃ ;w;
  

1. 00:20:033 - d追加? // 手前の00:19:466 (59,60,61) - が今までの00:08:119 (8,9,10,11) - みたいなパターンと違い白線から始まってるのでなんでかなーと思ってよく聴いてみたらドラムに合わせてあるんですね、その区切りといいますか違いをきれいに見せるためにも、ついでに(弱いですが)ドラムの音に合わせるためにもここにdonがほしいかなと思いました。
2. 00:21:849 - d追加...?
3. 01:18:699 (305,306,307,308,309,310) - <3 ゅ

Naryuga wrote:

ゅ from PM request

[Kantan]

• 
  None!

[Futsuu]

1. 02:54:243 - k 追加? // ほかの場所と比べて明らかにスッカスカですしなによりKantanの同じところにはNoteが置いてあります。 02:53:789 - から1/2でd k kでもいいとおもいます。お好みで! - なんでなかったんだ(;_;)/~~ placed dkk.

[Muzukashii]

1. 00:22:189 (54) - finisher追加...? - fixed.
2. 00:30:132 - k追加? // 空けてあるのはわざと?この辺のほかのところはだいたいボーカルに沿う感じで1/2 notesが置いてあるのにこの空白はちょっと気になります! - 単発からの～っていう配置を作ってたんですが確かにチョット変な感じだったので周辺を置き直しました。

[Oni]

• 
  
  初見Result

  連打練習しなきゃ ;w;
  
  - プレイありがとうございます！連打もそうだけどこの曲めっちゃ精度取れない！なんなんだ(怒)

1. 00:20:033 - d追加? // 手前の00:19:466 (59,60,61) - が今までの00:08:119 (8,9,10,11) - みたいなパターンと違い白線から始まってるのでなんでかなーと思ってよく聴いてみたらドラムに合わせてあるんですね、その区切りといいますか違いをきれいに見せるためにも、ついでに(弱いですが)ドラムの音に合わせるためにもここにdonがほしいかなと思いました。 - 試してみます！後半にも併せて追加。
2. 00:21:849 - d追加...? - バスドラムのダブルキックが00:22:076 (70,71) - にあるので、出来ればそっちの方にノーツを偏らせたいです！
3. 01:18:699 (305,306,307,308,309,310) - <3 ゅ - ヽ(*･ω･)ﾉ

割とマジで書くことなくてEdit辞めるべきか悩みました！ goodluck

MidSoul wrote:

Hi~ mod from PM req><)
1diffでいいとのことでしたが気付いたら全部観てました

Kantan
01:53:876 (111) - d?
・このあたり少し変化がなさすぎる気がしたのでボーカル寄りでもdにかえて不自然さが出ないかな?と思うこの位置を提案します。 - 確かに単調ですが、ノーツが少ないKantanでは避けられない事な気もしますし、d を入れるとどうしても浮いてしまうため様子見します。

03:51:887 (62) - k
・各サビでこの位置にあたる部分が全部kだったためになります。また、ddの配置換えは多いですがkkの配置換えは(連打等のために)少し少ないみたいなので、ボーカル合わせはそのままでも少し変化付けの役割としてもどうでしょうか！ - sounds good.

Futsuu
great~;;

Muzukashi
01:34:812 - SV90%
・自分の考えではむずかしい以下では極力SV変化を使わないというのがあるので敏感なだけかもしれないのですが、この箇所の減速はかなり難易度が高いような気がしました。私が不慣れだったときもそうだったのですが加減速でかなり混乱するので減速率を落としてあげてもいいかもしれないです。 - 0.9でも試してみたのですが、元のBPMが遅いせいでそもそも意味が無いような感じがしました。ただ、01:48:429 (336,337,338,339,340) - の部分はどうしても維持したいので、他の人に怒られたら検討してみます。


Oni
01:26:869 (352,353) - dd >> k_ or d_
・テストプレイ時に感覚で思ったところなのですが、この353は繋げない方がいいかなと思いました。mod時に長期的に見直してみてこのサビ内でパターンが変わっている面白いところだとは思うのですが、このままでは少し違和感を感じたので。 - 直前にあるdkdkdに合わせてここに5pletの音が欲しいな～って感じがなんとなくしたのでこのままにします！

02:09:535 (525,526) - k d
・他に特にとるべき音がないのでボーカルの高低に合わせて k d とした方がいいかな？と思います！ - ボーカルの音もギターの音もその方が正しいとは思うのですが、パターン的には k で終えて d で一度落としてまた k で入る形が好きなのでこのままにします。プレイする上でも自分はこの方が好きです。

03:05:817 (780,781,782) - kdk
・782をkのような音取りはたくさん出ているので、ここはギターの高低に合わせる配置のなので音もそれ寄りの方がいいかなと思いました。 - ギターの音としては中途半端な音ではあるんですが、03:03:548 (767,768,769) - の音よりは、03:02:186 (759,760,761) - の音に近い感じがしたのでそちらに合わせてます。

03:40:994 (923) - k
・ボーカル取りです。わかりやすく上がってますし、変化をつけるのにいいかと思います。 - 03:43:037 - からの展開のためにもこのパートはゴリ押ししてでも単純なパターンにしたいです！

マッピングで尊敬してる人の譜面見るとなると何言ったらいいかわからないところがあります。。
でも正直何考えてるのかわからない人の譜面見るよりかなりやりがいがあります。
modreqありがとうございました！

Go Rank! Get Rank!(ψ*･ω･)ψ

mingmichael wrote:

m4m with tkgays @w@/


Red ~> unrakable issue, must be changed
Blue ~> highly suggested, consider to use it
Black ~> suggestion, just free to choose it


====================


[ Kantan]

General

☞ delete some useless inheriting points. for the examples on 01:47:975 - ; 01:48:202 - ; 01:48:656 - ; 01:49:110 - ; because there aren't any notes which come on that inheriting points, so it could be said that they aren't usefull - deleted some sections.

Notes Structure

☞ okay~

Notes

• change this note on 01:00:316 - to be kat, because of the vocal sound which is higher than two notes before - got it. also 02:12:939 (130) - and 03:25:562 (30) -

• change 02:35:634 - to be don, since the vocal has dropped here and it becomes lower than 02:35:180 - - nope. i like this as a pattern.

• add finisher on 04:03:689 - because of the cymbal which comes out here. i saw for whole of this kantan that you used finishers to follow the cymbal sounds. so why don't you use it too on 04:03:689 - ? - because i want to emphasize 04:05:504 (78,79) -

====================


[ Futsuu]

General

☞ okay here~

Notes Structure

☞ no problem too here~

Notes

• start from 00:13:565 - until 00:14:473 - , why don't you use oo oo. with this pattern, the consistency for the kats will be much better because the kat should be appear on the white strikes or on the 2nd or 4th beats from 00:07:665 - until 00:18:558 - . and also with those notes, they will follow the instrument sounds much better too~ - why dont i used that?lol ok, fixed.

• you can move 01:06:898 - to 01:06:444 - . i moved this because this note can follow the vocals much better than you put it on 01:06:898 - , and it doesn't follow any particular sounds btw. it's just an additional note on 01:06:898 - - relatively, im focused on pattern than sound. current pattern has integrity of overall.

• change 01:08:032 - to be kat, so it'll be o o o. it will follow the dropping pitch sounds for vocals much better too than monotonous notes which are o o o - same reason as above. i dont want to lose a contrast with kkk 01:11:664 (141,142,143) -

• how about don on 01:19:380 - ? because the vocal has been low on 01:19:380 - than the previous notes. the highest one is on 01:18:245 - and it becomes lower lower and becomes the lowest on 01:19:380 - - i know. but just simply, i like this patten :3c

• kat too on 01:22:557 - ? to follow the dropping pitch sounds for vocals - same reason as 01:08:032

• same on 02:20:655 - , how about o o o, same like the first kiai part that i modded before - sure.

• don too on 02:32:002 - - nope. same reason as 01:19:380

• same too on 02:35:180 - , o o o - fixed.

====================


[ Muzukashii]

General

☞ okay~

Notes Structure

☞ nice muzu here nothing issue that found here

Notes

• none

====================


[ Oni]

General

☞ HP is 7? how about to change it to be 6?

Notes Structure

☞ nice patterns for Oni~

Notes

• delete a note on 01:23:124 - because there's not any particular reasons to use a 5-plets there, and change 01:23:238 - to be kat, to follow the similar pattern like 01:08:713 - ; 01:08:940 - . it will be more interesting too because it sounds like we follow the "clap" sounds there even there's not any clap sounds come there ww - sure.

• same on 01:26:869 - , kat here. ooooo-plets is more interesting too there because of the different plets - fixed.

• change 02:35:634 - to be don, delete 02:35:747 - , and change 02:35:861 - to be kat. the reason is same like the first mod on this diff - hmm. but i want to keep the 5-plet. instead, changed pattern to dkddk.

• kat too on 03:48:483 - - changed to kkddk. also 03:51:661 (983,984,985,986,987,988,989) - changed to dkddkdk

====================


that's all from me >w<
it needs more star D: ~★

goodluck tks :3/

1. Delete the unused inherit sections on the Futsuu and Kantan.

1. 03:08:654 - Remove this? This will go with the guitar a bit more since the other d is more noticeable.

1. 01:48:202 - Delete this inherit.

Love wrote:

[General]

1. Delete the unused inherit sections on the Futsuu and Kantan.
   - deleted.
   on the Futsuu, 01:34:699 - this is necessary section for reliably changing volume. but i had set wrong volume on 01:34:812 - . fixed it.

[Oni]

1. 03:08:654 - Remove this? This will go with the guitar a bit more since the other d is more noticeable. - kdkdk sounds better to me!

[Muzukashii]

1. 01:48:202 - Delete this inherit. - deleted.

Tasha wrote:

[Kantan]

Whoa, its been a while since I've seen a real low end kantan. Actually surprised me a bit. Really good too!

[Futsuu]

No issues here

[Muzukashii]

No issues here

[Oni]

Aaaaah! As a general note for this song the kick drum not being mapped on the 1/1 ticks drives me nuts, but I know you didn't map to them because of your mapping style used for this map. ;~;

04:03:575 (1036,1037) - Should maybe delete 1036 to make 1037 a finisher to match the drums here. - ignored this cymbal on purpose for emphasize them. 04:05:504 (1044,1045) -

04:10:724 - Suggest adding a note here due to the drums being a constant stream until 04:10:951. This way you still keep the finisher hits and you fill this section up with a bit more notes to more closely match the drums. - agreed that. i added a don there.

keeeeeeko wrote:

おめでとうございます！