Can't agree for now :CReikosaka wrote:
Okay i think this is ready for rank
[General]
Also please answer to all mods in detail. Else people don't know what you think about their suggestions. It's important to give feedback to the feedback!
[Easy]
In general, its well designed. Just some suggestions to improve the playability and readability.
00:23:538 (23538|6) - move to 7? (^)
01:02:729 (62729|1) - 1? (no need to "jack" on the easy, also easier to play)
01:04:116 (64116|5) - 7? (^)
01:04:810 (64810|0,64810|6,65157|3,65503|5,65503|1) - try this: http://puu.sh/4Ys28/6da99d04af.jpg
01:14:868 (74868|2) - 2?
01:29:434 (89434|5) - 6?
01:46:775 (106775|5,106775|6,107815|4) - try this: http://puu.sh/4Ys5W/4fdb6ba7b8.jpg
01:48:162 (108162|1,108162|0,109203|2) - try this: http://puu.sh/4Ys7g/7186868708.jpg
01:50:937 (110937|0,110937|1,111977|2) - try this: http://puu.sh/4Ys9s/8331583689.jpg
01:52:324 (112324|2) - if you applied the last ones, put this on line 4
01:53:365 (113365|1) - 3?
01:55:446 (115446|0,115446|2) - move 1 left? (1,3)
01:56:833 (116833|3,116833|5) - move 1 right? (5,7)
[Normal]
I see no reason to change the SV at all. Please remove all SV changes, since they are quite confusing and offthrowing. SV changes do not work like that (they might do in Taiko).
00:12:093 (12093|2,12093|5) - put these on 4 and 6, else it plays a bit awkward for beginners
00:12:440 (12440|2,12440|1,12787|3) - if you fixed the one above, you can move this stuff one left: http://puu.sh/4YsmP/5af0c5dee6.jpg
00:40:792 (40792|2) - uuuh, what is that? Snap this on white tick ahead. I know where you are coming from, but snapping it here to the bluetick feels bad, since you are snapping it to the introduction and not to the emphazied drumbeat. And without the surrounding notes, it doesn't work.
00:42:266 (42266|4) - ^
01:19:723 (79723|5) - put on 6? don't put stuff so close to holds D:
01:21:110 (81110|1) - 2? they shouldnt be so close to the hold, since it makes you break easily
01:22:498 (82498|0) - 1?
01:23:885 (83885|6) - 7?
01:58:480 (118480|1) - same as in 00:40:792 (40792|2)
01:59:868 (119868|5) - ^
02:20:070 (140070|3) - end on downbeat? ( 02:21:457 )
02:21:457 (141457|0) - ^ ( 02:22:844 )
02:21:457 (141457|0) - ^ ( 02:24:232 )
02:33:162 (153162|5) - same as in 00:40:792 (40792|2)
02:34:550 (154550|1) - ^
02:46:428 (166428|1) - put on 4 please D:
[Hard]
Same goes here for all SV changes. I see no point in adding them at all. They don't serve any purpose. The song feels "less dense" enough when the note density decreases. No need to slow down the scrolling speed.
00:15:214 (15214|4,15214|1,15388|3,15561|2,15735|3,15908|4,16081|3,16255|5) - Basically, switching from one hold side to another while playing stairs is really bothersome and really unneeded here. It makes you jump more than you actually should. You should circumvent this awkward behavior. try this: http://puu.sh/4YsSL/f70c5eebbc.jpg
00:16:602 (16602|2,16602|5,16775|3,16948|2,17122|4,17295|3) - try this: http://puu.sh/4YsTN/43ea8172b4.jpg
00:38:278 (38278|3,38451|5,38451|4,38625|3,38798|2) - I would prefer this: http://puu.sh/4YsYY/9b217afc4a.png
00:42:613 (42613|1) - 2?
01:21:804 (81804|4,81804|6,81977|3,82151|2,82324|3,82498|4) - try this: http://puu.sh/4Yt5s/743f76776e.jpg
01:24:578 (84578|5) - 6?
01:24:752 (84752|4) - 5?
01:24:925 (84925|3) - 4?
01:25:099 (85099|2) - 5?
01:25:966 (85966|6) - 7?
01:26:313 (86313|2) - 6?
01:27:526 (87526|3) - 4?
01:29:954 (89954|5,90041|4,90128|3) - 6,5,4 please D:
01:39:145 (99145|5,99145|3,99318|5,99318|3,99492|3,99492|1,99665|1,99665|3) - try this: http://puu.sh/4YteU/4dea55ce44.jpg
01:39:839 (99839|3) - remove? I don't know what this one is supposed to follow, tbh.
01:43:654 (103654|3,103654|4) - 4,5 please.
01:43:827 (103827|0) - 3?
01:45:561 (105561|0,105561|1) - 1,2
01:45:908 (105908|5,105908|4) - 5,6
01:46:081 (106081|4) - remove, trust me. It plays quite better without that one.
02:17:122 (137122|6) - 3?
[Maximum]
Same here with the SV changes...
01:17:122 (77122|4,77122|0) - 1,5?
01:17:295 (77295|1) - 2?
01:40:489 (100489|3) - this is totally unneccessary imo. Remove that one.
01:40:879 - you could add some 1/4 alternate pattern or stair here instead.
Have a star for now. I highly recommend you to get some more advanced opinions on the Maximum and Hard. From what I see in the thread, many mods weren't really indepth and just minor suggestions. You should poke PROGUY again for a mod on Maximum, I'd like to see his opinions on that.
I'll consider rechecking it, if you give me detailed feedback of what you fixed and what you did not fix and if you bring some other profenient modders to take a look on the higher diffs (Hard, Maximum). Please provide valid reasons when denying something.
Yet it's a well designed mapset with some flaws that I want to see sorted out first.