1. 00:19:907 (5,1) - I can accept some of these random spacing changes which are fun to play but this spacing is misleading and even if it's playable it shouldn't be used. Reduce the spacing to the previous 1/4 spacing you've been using until now
2. 00:38:761 (2,3,4) - Same here ^
3. 01:10:115 (1,2,3) - ^
4. 01:13:449 (1,2,3,4) - Same here, I don't understand why did you increase the spacing between these objects, it seems unnecessary and misleading as I said before. You need to try and be more consistent with jumps and spacing variations.
5. I find spacing "acceleration" (referring to "increasing spacing for some parts in the map") fun to play and a nice mapping technique when it's properly used, while going through this diff I've noticed that there are some unjustified spacing changes, I'm not talking about jumps, I'm talking about how 1/2 or 1/4 varies from pattern to pattern. You need to spend a little more time designing patterns so these changes can be consistent and fit the music, try to place your jumps or slow-downs on specific places where there's a vocal or rhythmical variation, like this pattern 01:25:116 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - this one is perfectly constructed and the spacing changes make sense, try to do more of "these". Otherwise, sure, it's "fun" and "challenging" to play but not a good mapping practice, in my opinion. Overall the diff looks okay except for some misleading spacing.

Gonzvlo wrote:

|Insane|

1. 00:09:074 (3,4) - The first time I played this pattern, I could see that there's just a little time to notice that (4) is not a circle but a slider due to the previous objects covering it. If it's possible, try to re-arrange this pattern so (4)'s slider-body is a little more visible. This was why I moved (4) slightly. Now I think it's readable enough; Also actually I don't want to change it to something else cause I can't think of new pattern which plays better than the current. So if possible I want to keep it as it is.
2. 00:26:782 (1) - New Combo is missing here, post-spinner bug. Sure, fixed.
3. 00:41:782 (1,2,3,4,5) - Whoops, this pattern. The switch from 1/4 to 1/1 with the stack it's quite misleading, I strongly suggest to unstack the stream All 1/4s are unstacked so I assumed it's not confusing.. but apparenlty you think otherwise. I don't know if it's actually confusing but I asked some players to test this difficulty and no one had trouble reading it. So I think it's readable enough for Insane-players.
4. 00:41:782 (1) - I'm not completely sure about this slider... I believe you could try something different to what you used on [Hard], something that would follow the music in a more accurately way. It was originally different and following the bass-drum. But after several testplays I found it a bit weird and didn't sound great either. So I made it like now and it gives me a perfect feeling now.
5. Pretty good, I enjoyed this diff :3 Good to hear that. Thanks :3

|Hard|

1. 01:25:741 (1,2) - Just a minor observation, this Blue combo blends with the previous spinner, try a colourhax in order to fix this, just to be sure. Fixed.

It seems like Pokie mentioned something about the source and once again, I can't understand, damn you Pokie :c
As I said before, overall, pretty good!

1. The source should be "To Aru Kagaku no Railgun S"

1. 00:41:782 (3) - Wrong hitsounding here. You should add the custom slider tick on the first tick removing the clap from this slider's reverse arrow
2. 01:25:949 (1) - I can hear a sound on the 01:26:261 tick. What about to reduce this slider till there adding a repeat that makes the slider end on the current red tick? http://puu.sh/2GJAw.jpg (I noticed later that you applied this on the normal diff xD I don't see a problem to set it here as well since this is a slider and repeating slider on 1/4 tick doesn't hurt so much)

1. 01:06:782 (1) - I don't think this new combo is really needed, especially because you didn't use it on 01:20:116 (5) that has the same vocal rhythm. You should remove it to keep consistency with this next part then ;3
2. 01:13:240 (3,4) - (nazi) move these two circles to stack the (4) with 01:11:782 (1)'s head? Actually it looks ugly IMO

1. I would decrease OD by 1 tick (maybe HP as well)
2. 00:27:199 (1,3) - You forgot to add claps on these two sliders' heads, I guess ;3 You should add them to fill those sounds in the music :3
3. 00:54:074 (2) - What about make a triple here? I feel this rhythm fits better here because it would fill all the vocal sounds in the music: http://puu.sh/2GJNk.jpg or maybe: http://puu.sh/2GJOm.jpg I think both fit better than the actual long slider

1. 00:14:699 (3) - This is just a small suggestion. In my opinion this slider would flow muuuch better if you decided to make it less curved. Something like: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/721204
2. 00:19:699 (6) - I would place this slider closer to the previous one, maybe at x:208 y:132
3. 00:28:449 (1,5,9) - What about to add some finishes on those two circles and on (9)'s slider head? They sound pretty nice in my opinion, also to distinguish them from the other streaming circles
4. 00:41:782 (1,2) - Actually I felt this pattern very awkward to play when I tested it, really. What about to use this pattern filling each sound in the music with adding those elements? This is muuch better, believe me:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   44,268,41782,6,0,P|112:284|174:270,1,135
   236,136,42407,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   160,72,42616,2,0,P|140:116|144:160,1,90

5. 00:58:032 (7) - Clap

1. 00:33:241 (7,1) - You are using jumps on the whole map why don't you use it here as well? This part (also because of that new combo) would be much better to play if you decided to make the spacing larger
2. 00:44:699 (5) - Move this slider (or the whole pattern) some grid down because actually it touches hp bar and it's ugly
3. 00:51:782 (6) - New combo?
4. 01:01:574 (5) - Same of the first point, move it some grid down
5. 01:10:115 (1,2,3,4) - I don't get this part, I don't get the reason you used this rhythm with all those sliders that start on the blue tick with no sounds in the music. The rhythm should be easier, like: http://puu.sh/2GK7U.jpg

1. 00:04:282 (6,7,8,9,10) - This plays quite good actually, but I really don't like the jumps you have done there, considering that the progression starts at 00:04:699 - , and that this pattern doesen't really follow it. I would recommend instead another option, using a square pattern, plus a triangular pattern as a jump to go with 00:05:116 (1,2,3,4,5) - . It is really fun to play as it follows the oval flow there quite good, and it follows how the synth's progressing there! Here's what I have done, see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   268,188,3657,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   268,188,3761,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   144,148,3970,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   144,148,4074,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   104,268,4282,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   104,268,4386,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   228,296,4595,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   228,296,4699,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   236,84,4907,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   36,160,5116,5,2,0:0:0:0:
   20,284,5324,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   20,284,5428,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   112,368,5636,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   112,368,5741,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   236,376,5949,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   236,376,6053,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   336,300,6261,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   336,300,6366,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   312,176,6574,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   312,176,6782,6,0,P|268:156|212:148,1,105,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:25:116 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Huh... Why are you using these doublets in the red ticks instead of using the downbeats? It doesen't really go well with the music, on the countrary it sounds quite strange and it kinda breaks your rhythmical pattern here... If you want to use some doublets, then use them at 00:25:949 - and at 00:26:261 - : it will go a whole lot better, other than fitting pretty good in the song! Here's a pattern I have done following this suggestion, see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   196,88,25116,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,25324,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,25428,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,25532,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   316,88,25741,1,4,0:0:0:0:
   284,268,25949,6,0,L|277:215,1,52.5,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,26261,2,0,L|153:236,1,52.5,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   208,320,26574,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   252,144,26782,5,4,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:32:407 (4) - Well, even if this slider DOES follow the vocal held there, the instrumental transition with this slider seemed kinda off to me, I expected instead some notes being played there, as they could go on really nicely, considering that you could rearrange the whole pattern as well to make it flow really smoothly! Here, I have rearranged the pattern using a triangular jump: see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   324,132,32407,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   440,84,32616,5,2,0:0:0:0:
   440,84,32720,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   252,40,32928,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   252,40,33032,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   304,228,33241,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   172,264,33449,6,0,P|98:230|56:167,1,157.5,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   43,118,33866,1,10,0:0:0:0:

4. 00:37:824 (4) - Not a really big deal here, though I would really modify this by tweaking it a bit, changing its rotation and putting it at x:276 y:44 : it's a really little thing, but anyways it smooths out the oval flow you have there, started from 00:37:199 (2) - ! Here's what I have done once again, see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   372,220,37199,2,0,P|428:228|472:204,1,105,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   392,96,37616,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   276,44,37824,2,0,P|223:54|188:92,2,105,0|10|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   392,96,38449,5,4,0:0:0:0:

5. 00:41:782 (1) - Actually, the whistle you have currently put on 00:42:199 (2) - should be used at the end of this slider, instead... I can clearly hear that the kicks are 3/4 here, so following them by using a 1/1 whistle pattern doesen't really make sense, imho... I would rather remove the whistle from 00:42:199 (2) - and add it at the end of this slider.
6. 00:48:865 (7,8) - Well, I really didn't like how the oval flow started there continued with 00:49:282 (8) - ... It seems quite forced and it doesn't really go that smooth there, considering the way you have structured the whole pattern. What about instead tweaking the pattern so that 00:49:282 (8) - goes on a circular track continuing perfectly 00:48:865 (7) - 's oval flow, maybe by making 00:50:116 (1) - go upwards as well? Here's what I have done, see if you like it!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   412,72,48032,2,0,P|464:60|512:80,1,105,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   344,256,48449,2,0,P|272:224|188:232,1,157.5,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   148,260,48865,2,0,P|96:272|48:252,1,105,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   48,76,49282,2,0,P|104:112|96:204,1,157.5,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   40,152,49699,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   188,68,49907,2,0,L|184:24,3,26.25
   200,104,50116,6,0,P|263:123|328:58,1,157.5
   332,16,50532,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   440,116,50740,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   492,196,50949,2,0,P|512:268|484:352,1,157.5,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

7. 00:59:907 (7) - I could understand the reasoning behind putting this circle in the current position, but as now it feels really uncomfortable to play imho, and I think you should definitely "stabilize" your jump by simply putting this circle at x:172 y:268. If you still want to keep the spacing increasing there, then you could use this pattern instead:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   8,236,59490,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   144,112,59699,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   256,332,59907,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   248,204,60115,6,0,B|320:196|320:196|356:248|424:232,1,188.999994232178,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

8. 01:03:449 (3) - While I could understand your point on using a New Combo at 01:03:032 (1) - to warn about the big jump used there, what about putting a new combo as well here, as there is a new vocal phrase and as it totally follws your New Combo pattern? It would fit pretty good actually... Remember that the same applies for 01:16:782 (3) - !
9. 01:22:616 (5,6) - One last thing, though I am being really nitpicky here: what about reversing 01:23:032 (6) - , using CTRL+G? I really like how the opposed sliders work there, considering 01:23:032 (6) - 's angle it would continue 01:22:616 (5) - 's oval flow in a really nice way, as you have done in other patterns as well! Here, if you want to fix I have reorganized the next patterns as well:
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   360,228,83032,2,0,P|296:228|240:252,1,125.999996154785,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   324,344,83449,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   360,228,83657,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   360,228,83761,2,0,L|356:140,1,62.9999980773926,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   192,304,84074,1,4,0:0:0:0:
   92,228,84282,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   96,200,84386,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   100,172,84491,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   208,108,84699,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   276,280,84907,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   436,184,85116,5,4,0:0:0:0:

-kevincela- wrote:

Hey! Chewin linked me a few days ago this map, saying that kusano's diff might need some work before ranking. I got quite curious, so now I am modding it to say what I didn't really like in your diff. Feel free not to give the kudosu, as I'm just modding this diff!

[kusano's Railgun]

1. 00:04:282 (6,7,8,9,10) - This plays quite good actually, but I really don't like the jumps you have done there, considering that the progression starts at 00:04:699 - , and that this pattern doesen't really follow it. I would recommend instead another option, using a square pattern, plus a triangular pattern as a jump to go with 00:05:116 (1,2,3,4,5) - . It is really fun to play as it follows the oval flow there quite good, and it follows how the synth's progressing there! Here's what I have done, see if you like it!fixed.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   268,188,3657,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   268,188,3761,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   144,148,3970,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   144,148,4074,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   104,268,4282,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   104,268,4386,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   228,296,4595,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   228,296,4699,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   236,84,4907,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   36,160,5116,5,2,0:0:0:0:
   20,284,5324,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   20,284,5428,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   112,368,5636,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   112,368,5741,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   236,376,5949,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   236,376,6053,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   336,300,6261,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   336,300,6366,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   312,176,6574,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   312,176,6782,6,0,P|268:156|212:148,1,105,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

2. 00:25:116 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Huh... Why are you using these doublets in the red ticks instead of using the downbeats? It doesen't really go well with the music, on the countrary it sounds quite strange and it kinda breaks your rhythmical pattern here... If you want to use some doublets, then use them at 00:25:949 - and at 00:26:261 - : it will go a whole lot better, other than fitting pretty good in the song! Here's a pattern I have done following this suggestion, see if you like it!fixed.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   196,88,25116,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,25324,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,25428,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,25532,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   316,88,25741,1,4,0:0:0:0:
   284,268,25949,6,0,L|277:215,1,52.5,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   160,184,26261,2,0,L|153:236,1,52.5,0|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   208,320,26574,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   252,144,26782,5,4,0:0:0:0:

3. 00:32:407 (4) - Well, even if this slider DOES follow the vocal held there, the instrumental transition with this slider seemed kinda off to me, I expected instead some notes being played there, as they could go on really nicely, considering that you could rearrange the whole pattern as well to make it flow really smoothly! Here, I have rearranged the pattern using a triangular jump: see if you like it!no change. I feel like current pattern are good enough.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   324,132,32407,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   440,84,32616,5,2,0:0:0:0:
   440,84,32720,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   252,40,32928,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   252,40,33032,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   304,228,33241,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   172,264,33449,6,0,P|98:230|56:167,1,157.5,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   43,118,33866,1,10,0:0:0:0:

4. 00:37:824 (4) - Not a really big deal here, though I would really modify this by tweaking it a bit, changing its rotation and putting it at x:276 y:44 : it's a really little thing, but anyways it smooths out the oval flow you have there, started from 00:37:199 (2) - ! Here's what I have done once again, see if you like it!fixed.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   372,220,37199,2,0,P|428:228|472:204,1,105,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   392,96,37616,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   276,44,37824,2,0,P|223:54|188:92,2,105,0|10|0,0:0|0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   392,96,38449,5,4,0:0:0:0:

5. 00:41:782 (1) - Actually, the whistle you have currently put on 00:42:199 (2) - should be used at the end of this slider, instead... I can clearly hear that the kicks are 3/4 here, so following them by using a 1/1 whistle pattern doesen't really make sense, imho... I would rather remove the whistle from 00:42:199 (2) - and add it at the end of this slider.ok.
6. 00:48:865 (7,8) - Well, I really didn't like how the oval flow started there continued with 00:49:282 (8) - ... It seems quite forced and it doesn't really go that smooth there, considering the way you have structured the whole pattern. What about instead tweaking the pattern so that 00:49:282 (8) - goes on a circular track continuing perfectly 00:48:865 (7) - 's oval flow, maybe by making 00:50:116 (1) - go upwards as well? Here's what I have done, see if you like it! no change. I like current pattern than yours.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   412,72,48032,2,0,P|464:60|512:80,1,105,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   344,256,48449,2,0,P|272:224|188:232,1,157.5,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   148,260,48865,2,0,P|96:272|48:252,1,105,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   48,76,49282,2,0,P|104:112|96:204,1,157.5,2|2,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   40,152,49699,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   188,68,49907,2,0,L|184:24,3,26.25
   200,104,50116,6,0,P|263:123|328:58,1,157.5
   332,16,50532,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   440,116,50740,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   492,196,50949,2,0,P|512:268|484:352,1,157.5,2|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

7. 00:59:907 (7) - I could understand the reasoning behind putting this circle in the current position, but as now it feels really uncomfortable to play imho, and I think you should definitely "stabilize" your jump by simply putting this circle at x:172 y:268. If you still want to keep the spacing increasing there, then you could use this pattern instead: no change. I like current pattern than yours.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   8,236,59490,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   144,112,59699,1,10,0:0:0:0:
   256,332,59907,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   248,204,60115,6,0,B|320:196|320:196|356:248|424:232,1,188.999994232178,6|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:

8. 01:03:449 (3) - While I could understand your point on using a New Combo at 01:03:032 (1) - to warn about the big jump used there, what about putting a new combo as well here, as there is a new vocal phrase and as it totally follws your New Combo pattern? It would fit pretty good actually... Remember that the same applies for 01:16:782 (3) - ! fixed.
9. 01:22:616 (5,6) - One last thing, though I am being really nitpicky here: what about reversing 01:23:032 (6) - , using CTRL+G? I really like how the opposed sliders work there, considering 01:23:032 (6) - 's angle it would continue 01:22:616 (5) - 's oval flow in a really nice way, as you have done in other patterns as well! Here, if you want to fix I have reorganized the next patterns as well: no change. I like current pattern than yours.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   360,228,83032,2,0,P|296:228|240:252,1,125.999996154785,10|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   324,344,83449,5,4,0:0:0:0:
   360,228,83657,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   360,228,83761,2,0,L|356:140,1,62.9999980773926,0|8,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   192,304,84074,1,4,0:0:0:0:
   92,228,84282,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   96,200,84386,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   100,172,84491,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   208,108,84699,1,2,0:0:0:0:
   276,280,84907,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   436,184,85116,5,4,0:0:0:0:

And that's all from me! Good luck with your map, I hope I have helped you for now

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:

Gravephobia >:

cRyo[iceeicee] wrote:

Gravephobia >:

1. I guess the source being "Toaru" and not "To Aru" would mean that all of the ranked maps are wrong. Hmmm.

1. 00:13:032 (7,8,9) - I'd like it if you could match the 00:12:199 (3,4) jump with a little more spacing to the stream here. It feels like the stream is too close.
   
   Example

   
2. 00:13:449 (1,2) - I can't really hear what this rhythm is following, it's confusing in play. I'd prefer that you use the same rhythm as 00:16:782 (1,2,3,4) to follow vocals. Try to extend the 1 and have a circle at 00:13:866.
   
   Image

   
3. 00:18:032 (6,7,1) - A bit strange the flow into the 1. Try placing the 6 around (336,16) instead. It provides a more comfortable flow imo.
   
   Example

   
4. 00:24:491 (4,5,1,2,3,4,5,1,2,3,1) - I'd really like to see more spacing here as the music gets more intense. I don't think using Kevin's code was such a good idea because this section feels out of place in the map IMO. The rhythm is good, but you need more spacing between the 00:25:949 (1,2,3,1) especially. Try to rework this a bit.
   
   Example

   Just an example here. You could move the 2 more upwards and the 3 more downwards and to the left.
   
5. 00:35:116 (1) - Remove finish from the head, it is not supported by a finish in the music and is breaking your pattern here it seems.
   
6. 01:03:449 (1,2) - I want less spacing to the double. The reach feels a bit too far. Less of a jump feels more fitting with vocals imo and more consistent with 01:16:365 (1,2,1,2). Try around (435,364).
   
   Example

   

1. 00:38:449 (1,2) - It's difficult to understand the switch to 1/4 on the 2, players will want to hit the 2 as if it were at 00:39:074. Try to make a little more spacing between the 1 and 2, it will be easier to read, like the 00:34:595 (4,5).
   
2. 00:41:782 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - This is really difficult to understand. The 1 having an extra repeat makes it end on the blue tick 00:42:720 which isn't hitting with anything in the song because the bass transition switches to 1/2 at that point. I highly suggest remove a repeat from the 1 and add a circle 00:42:616 and 00:42:824 to follow the music.
   
   Example

   
3. 00:57:407 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - It would be much nicer i we didn't start streaming until 00:57:616 where the bass stream starts in the music. I think you could have a 1/4 slider at 00:57:407 to follow the pattern from 00:56:782 (1,2,3,4) and use it to kick off the stream:
   
   Example

   

1. 00:41:782 (1) - Same as Insane, the extra repeat doesn't make any sense because the bass begins to hit in 1/2 there. Please remove the repeat and add some circles.

1. 00:56:782 (1) - How about deleting this and placing a spinner from here until 00:58:032? I think it might fill this awkward (imo) from 00:57:407 to the downbeat when the music is so intense. This portion is even mapped in the easy diff.
   
   Example

   
   Or you could try extending the 1 like in the easy:
   
   I feel either would be much better.

UnitedWeSin wrote:

I always knew I'd be the one to bubble this map, somehow.

Mostly just suggestions~

[General]

1. I guess the source being "Toaru" and not "To Aru" would mean that all of the ranked maps are wrong. Hmmm. i'm sure the current one is correct considering its meaning. Pokie and MiLu are comfirming and wikipedia says it is "Toaru" too.

[Insane]

1. 00:38:449 (1,2) - It's difficult to understand the switch to 1/4 on the 2, players will want to hit the 2 as if it were at 00:39:074. Try to make a little more spacing between the 1 and 2, it will be easier to read, like the 00:34:595 (4,5). Good point. :3
   
2. 00:41:782 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - This is really difficult to understand. The 1 having an extra repeat makes it end on the blue tick 00:42:720 which isn't hitting with anything in the song because the bass transition switches to 1/2 at that point. I highly suggest remove a repeat from the 1 and add a circle 00:42:616 and 00:42:824 to follow the music. Actually it was originally like that, but i changed it because it felt awkward to me. the current one somewhat sounds better to me.
   
   Example

   
3. 00:57:407 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) - It would be much nicer i we didn't start streaming until 00:57:616 where the bass stream starts in the music. I think you could have a 1/4 slider at 00:57:407 to follow the pattern from 00:56:782 (1,2,3,4) and use it to kick off the stream: Cool. Fixed but i rearranged the pattern a bit.
   
   Example

   

[Hard]

1. 00:41:782 (1) - Same as Insane, the extra repeat doesn't make any sense because the bass begins to hit in 1/2 there. Please remove the repeat and add some circles. Same as Insane.

[Normal]

1. 00:56:782 (1) - How about deleting this and placing a spinner from here until 00:58:032? I think it might fill this awkward (imo) from 00:57:407 to the downbeat when the music is so intense. This portion is even mapped in the easy diff. Sure.
   
   Example

   
   Or you could try extending the 1 like in the easy:
   
   I feel either would be much better.

Cool, check these and let me know. :3

1. 00:41:782 (1) - I'm sorry I really can't agree with that slider having the extra repeat. I think it's a really unintuitive pattern, especially because you are stacking the stream on the end of the slider.
   
   The extra repeat is really unexpected, especially if you know the song, and it ending on the blue tick is hitting along with nothing in the music. I talked with a few other people and they agreed that the pattern is confusing when it doesn't need to be.
   
   I'll try again with some different options here:
   
   You could have a 1/2 slider at 00:41:782 to reflect the 00:41:365 (6) and then use a rhythm like so:
   
   
   Or you could try a triplet after the 2 instead:
   
   
   
   More Bland Options

   Single circles with jumps might be nice:
   
   
   The classic:
   
   
   Please consider changing in the Hard diff also.
   
2. 00:57:407 (5) - Finish on head?

UnitedWeSin wrote:

[Insane]

1. 00:41:782 (1) - I'm sorry I really can't agree with that slider having the extra repeat. I think it's a really unintuitive pattern, especially because you are stacking the stream on the end of the slider.
   
   The extra repeat is really unexpected, especially if you know the song, and it ending on the blue tick is hitting along with nothing in the music. I talked with a few other people and they agreed that the pattern is confusing when it doesn't need to be. By nothing in the music you mean there's no sound at 00:42:720 - ? I think otherwise.. there's actually a sound which is more noticeable than the bass-drum. That's why that slider originally had an extra repeat. But yeah, I can tell why you think it's confusing thus I replaced it with 2 sliders according to kajiyatta's suggestion so it is now less confusing imo (hopefully). i'm not sure if you're fine with it so i'd like to get your opinion on it. (at least i really love the current one.)
   
   I'll try again with some different options here:
   
   You could have a 1/2 slider at 00:41:782 to reflect the 00:41:365 (6) and then use a rhythm like so:
   
   
   Or you could try a triplet after the 2 instead:
   
   
   
   More Bland Options

   Single circles with jumps might be nice:
   
   
   The classic:
   
   
   Please consider changing in the Hard diff also.
   
2. 00:57:407 (5) - Finish on head?

I have nothing else to say. Please consider changing that pattern and let me know.

kajiyatta wrote:

As requested.
[General]
add silenced soft-sliderslide? I-it's not like I forgot to add it or anything...
[Easy]
Rhythm
01:25:949(1) it would be a bit difficult for newbie because of after a spinner. so try to put more simply like this? A slider is even easier than a circle to hit imo~

SPOILER

Hit Sonud
00:36:782(1) add finish at head Fixed.
[Normal]
Placement
01:08:032(6,1) just suggestion, it would be good flow for me. The flow between (5) and (6) will be even worse imo.

SPOILER

Rhythm
00:54:907 add a note? it is effective for the next slider. Good point.
[Hard]
Placement
00:57:616(4) add NC same as Insane? Fixed.
01:23:449(9)^ No.
Rhythm
00:08:241 not sure, but add a note better. it would follow the drum sound and look effective. Cool.
01:02:407(2,3) current looks fine, but to follow the vocal, it would be more fine. Ingoring many vocals in this difficulty in order to reduce its difficulty.

SPOILER

01:15:741(2,3)^ ^
[Insane]
Placement
00:23:866(3) super nazi, x should be 344. Ok.
01:16:574(5) to make a nice flow, move up better. The current one flows better to me. (Or I just like the way it flows..)
01:23:449(9) add NC for pattern. I know it's inconsistent with 00:23:449 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5) - but the pattern is differently configured and a newcombo there would make the pattern look worse.

SPOILER

Rhythm
00:17:407(2,3,4) current looks fine, but slider should start at 00:17:511 to follow the vocal I suppose. e.g) Fixed.

SPOILER

00:22:616(3) I know you followed the drum sound at 00:22:928, but it sounds weak than vocal at 00:22:824, so to put simply better. Keeping this for the sake of consistency.

SPOILER

00:41:782(1) it is allowed for normally Insane. but to be honestly, I suppose you can make it more consistent.
As UWS said, I don't follow this point the stream begins on the end of slider with double kicks. Thus, blank from 00:42:720 to 00:43:032 looks not good, and may cause confused.
To keep consistence, pick a drum sound at 00:42:824 better, here is example. if you do it, you can stack stream on the last note, it will look fine.
But, I suppose it looks fine in the Hard diff since it should be simple Rhythm. Fixed the rhythm accordingly, but I rearranged the placement in my own way.

SPOILER

00:45:324 add a note to follow the instrumental. for me, this blank looks a bit weird. Fixed.
Hit Sonud
00:57:616(1~8) How about add decrescendo? it seems to really great effect before kiai-time. I don't think it sounds that great.
overall fine I suppose. good luck~

1. 00:32:407 (1) - How about moving this NC to 00:31:782 (6)? Seems to follow vocals nicer here imo. I think the jump down to the 00:32:407 (1) is still perfectly intuitive without the NC there.
   
2. 00:42:407 (2,3) - Feel free to ignore, but I'll complain a little more about this. I guess by having the 2 end at 00:42:720 on the blue tick you're following that guitar sound. I think that's alright and all, but I think it would be much better to include the bass hit at 00:42:616 in the mix. Can you try shortening the 2 by 1/4 and adding another circle to make a triplet? Here's what I did:
   
   Example

   

1. What do you think about reducing AR by 1 tick? I think it's a bit too fast in this spread.

UnitedWeSin wrote:

Just a few more things, feel free to deny.~

[Insane]

1. 00:32:407 (1) - How about moving this NC to 00:31:782 (6)? Seems to follow vocals nicer here imo. I think the jump down to the 00:32:407 (1) is still perfectly intuitive without the NC there. That was actually my mistake, fixed accordingly.
   
2. 00:42:407 (2,3) - Feel free to ignore, but I'll complain a little more about this. I guess by having the 2 end at 00:42:720 on the blue tick you're following that guitar sound. I think that's alright and all, but I think it would be much better to include the bass hit at 00:42:616 in the mix. Can you try shortening the 2 by 1/4 and adding another circle to make a triplet? Here's what I did: Hmm, I prefer to keep it as it is since i think the bass-drum isn't really noticeable compared to 00:42:720 - and the current one plays better to me - i tried the triplet but it didn't play good to me since the pattern was too streamy.
   
   Example

   

[Easy]

1. What do you think about reducing AR by 1 tick? I think it's a bit too fast in this spread. Alright.

So nazi orz