1. Song Setup - Stack Leniency - I point this out according to a rule.
   Easy - do not have a stack about this. so It is not necessary to use 0.4
   Goddess - Why this diff only use the 0.5 ? I did not understand a reason about it If you use 0.5, I suggest that you change to 0.5 about other diff.
   
   Stack leniency Rule

   Stack leniency must not be set to a point where stacking no longer occurs. The option only exists for advanced patterns where a higher stacking leniency looks horrible or doesn't work.

1. 00:50:554 (2) - add finish to start of the slider. ( it have a bass as other )
2. 00:59:004 (3) - hmm... Sound does not remain almost here. so I do not put a note here in my case. if put it, the volume should lower it. ( about 40%? )
3. 01:12:526 green line - vol40⇒vol70%. I feel this big difference sound to be noisy. If you want to use the vol70%, 01:07:455 (1,2,3) - I recommend that you gradually increasing the volume from these. i mean 01:07:455 (1) - vol40%, 01:09:145 (2) - vol50%, 01:10:835 (3) - vol60%. i think the pattern will be suitable very much here.
4. 01:34:075 (x) - add note. 01:27:737~ i think too simple rhythm in kiaitime. I hope to be able to put a note here in my case.
5. 01:39:145 (x) - ^
6. 01:51:399 (1) - I feel that a sound is too loud. whistle sound in particular. This part does not have a loud sound that much. I recommend volume matching next note. ( about 40~50%) It is important that make volume in accord with music.
7. 01:53:934 (1) - add finish to end of the slider.
8. 02:12:526 (2) - Rhythm that is different from the other. i mean 02:09:990 (3) - 02:12:526 (2) - 02:16:328 (2) - These can use the similar rhythm.
   02:09:990 (3) - 02:16:328 (2) - If you fit into these, 02:12:526 (2) - slider end should be put to 02:13:371. or
   02:12:526 (2) - If you fit into this, 02:09:990 (3,2) - These should be placed in the red tick of the previous. ( 02:09:779. 02:16:540. ) I recommend former suggestion to have constant rhythm.
9. 02:36:821 green line - vol80%. I think that this is slightly big. That volume should be used in the kiai time. I recommended that you change the volume as part of previous. ( 01:07:455 ) for ex: 02:36:821 - vol60%. 02:47:173~ vol70%.
10. 03:04:497 (1) - When played with 4:3 it is slightly off-screen. You must adjust it. http://puu.sh/2VQMu.jpg
11. 03:12:103 (x) - same as 01:34:075 (x)
12. 03:31:962 (1) - remove finish to end of the slider. The sound of slider end is the remainder of the echo from 03:32:385. I felt that the consecutive finish sound did not match.

1. 00:59:004 (3) - same as Easy
2. 01:12:526 green line - ^
3. 01:19:709 (1,2,3,4,5) - These are the sounds which are connected. 01:19:920 (2,3) - I think that you should put it to 01:20:131 if put these. ( It is like 01:26:469 (1,2,3) - ) or http://puu.sh/2VTg1.jpg , http://puu.sh/2VTgK.jpg etc
4. 01:28:582 (2,1) - 01:30:272 (2,1) - appearance is 1/2 rhythm spacing, but actually it have 1/1 rhythm. If it is overlapped I do not recommend such a pattern... i feel narrow the appearance and it may deceive the spacing and rhythm a little. ( 02:42:948 (1,2) - If you have in the other a pattern like this, it would be very confused it )
5. 01:35:342 (2,3,4,1) - 01:37:033 (2,3,4,1) - 01:38:723 (2,3,4,1) - ^
6. 01:51:399 (1) - same as Easy
7. 01:54:779 (2) - add finish to start and end of the slider.
8. 02:05:765 (2) - remove clap to end of the slider. clap of the different pattern. I think that it does not match even if this is intentional. better to put a clap to repeat instead.
9. 02:12:526 (2) - same as Easy
10. 02:14:216 (1) - add whistle to start of the slider. to put for the beginning of vocal. It is like 02:10:835 (1) -
11. 02:17:596 (1) - ^
12. 02:36:821 green line - same as Easy
13. 02:57:737 (1,2,3,4,5) - same as 01:19:709 (1,2,3,4,5)
14. 03:05:765 (1) - Why do you put a finish only this diff? You should unify them in all difficulty. either is fine.
15. 03:06:610 (2,1) - 03:08:300 (2,1) - 03:13:371 (2,3,4,1) - 03:15:061 (2,3,4,1) - same as 01:28:582 (2,1)
16. 03:26:892 (1,1,2,1,2,3) - this combo color I think a little strange >.< 03:27:737 (1) - remove NC is better imo.

1. OD,HD +1 ( I think that it is too easy setting for hard. because BPM is not so fast & placement along the DS & If you're using CS3...etc )
2. 00:23:511 (2) - Why change the slider speed only this? I did not understand a reason. If you change the slider speed here, 00:24:357 (3,4) - I suggest these change the slider speed together. for ex: 00:23:511 (2) - 0.80x, 00:24:357 (3) - 1.00x, 00:25:202 (4) - 1.20x.
3. 00:36:188 (1) - add whistle to start of the slider. to put for the beginning of vocal. It is like 00:34:497 (1) -
4. 00:45:483~00:59:004 - Why do you put clap to 1 ? ( All of clap,finish,whistle is put there... ) In the case of this clap sound, I think that it is the sound that should be put to 2,4. actually 2,4 positions are quiet .
5. 00:51:821 (6) - Suggestion of the flow: http://puu.sh/2Witl.jpg change the direction. 00:51:399 (5,6,1) - create a different flow in these.
6. 00:56:469 (2,3,4,5) - Suggestion of the flow & design: http://puu.sh/2WiFm.jpg
   
   SPOILER

   304,200,56469,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   144,248,56892,1,0,0:0:0:0:
   16,144,57314,2,2,P|71:67|167:99,1,210,14|6,0:0|0:0,0:0:0:0:
   208,172,58159,1,4,0:0:0:0:

7. 01:12:526 green line - same as Easy
8. 01:51:399 (1) - ^
9. 01:53:934 (1,2) - I prefer using the circles here. (it is like 00:31:117 (1,2,3) - 02:22:666 (1,2,3) - ) for ex: http://puu.sh/2WiXI.jpg
10. 02:10:835 (1) - add whistle. to put for the beginning of vocal.
11. 02:14:216 (1) - ^
12. 02:36:821 green line - same as Easy
13. 02:59:638 (2,3) - hmm... I feel like you are breaking the rhythm of the song a little by these.. because do not have the sound that should emphasize in these. 02:59:850 sounds are outstanding most, but note is not put there.. >_< so I think you should make a rhythm like this at least: http://puu.sh/2WjvS.jpg
14. 03:01:328 (2,3) - ^
15. 03:08:722 (5) - add clap

1. 00:23:511 (2) - same as Hard
2. 00:26:892 (2) - ^
3. 00:45:483~00:59:004 - ^
4. 00:58:688 (4) - remove whistle to end of the slider. The sound of slider end is the remainder of the echo from 00:58:899. Sound does not remain almost there. so I suggest that you do not put it like hard.
5. 01:12:526 green line - same as Easy
6. 01:20:554 (5,6) - Ctrl+G Natural flow to next note more?
7. 01:34:920 (2,3,4) - Suggestion of the form design: http://puu.sh/2WlbK.jpg Form of various flows
8. 01:51:399 (1) - same as Easy
9. 02:10:835 (1) - add whistle. to put for the beginning of vocal.
10. 02:13:159 (7) - i prefer Ctrl+G flow. http://puu.sh/2WlkU.jpg ( it is like 02:09:145 (4,5) - different flow
11. 02:14:216 (1) - add whistle. to put for the beginning of vocal.
12. 02:16:540 (5) - add whistle. ( same as 02:09:779 (5) - 02:13:159 (7) -
13. 02:36:821 green line - same as Easy

1. very solid SB. but SB load over 5.00 at many places. I worry about only it. ( but I thought it to be all necessary when I looked. so I say nothing ) I hope that do not have any problem~

BounceBabe wrote:

To all of the people who complain about the circle size on Insane: No, i won't change it. It suits the spread AND the difficultie perfect and it plays better than with a lower circle size.

1. o3o all ok

1. 01:22:244 (2) - clap(+whistle) at slider start
2. 01:23:934 (4) - clap(+whistle) at slider start
3. 01:25:624 (6) - clap at slider start
4. 03:01:962 (4) - clap at slider start
5. 03:03:652 (6) - clap at slider start

1. 01:27:737 (1,2,3) - personally i don't like pattern like this i know that this is a easy diff but think about to add something in the empty places like : 01:29:004 - or 01:30:695 - ecc..
2. 01:57:314 (3,4) - what about to make the slider 01:57:314 (3) - in a other way so to make a blanket with the next slider? something like:
   
   SPOILER

   don't look at combo numbers :O
   

1. 00:03:230 (2,3) - i would suggest in pattern like this to place the whistle on the white tick (so the second slider start) and not at the end of the first slider
2. 02:14:216 (1) - whistle on slider body
3. 02:20:342 (1) - a finish with 30-35% of volume would be better here

1. 00:17:596 (2) - what about to make this slider like this: atm the actual flow is not so good
   
   SPOILER

   
2. 00:48:230 (5,6) - what about to make a slider of this 2 circles?
3. 00:55:624 (1,2) - make a better blanket here
4. 01:19:709 (1,2,3,4,5) - to not use many circles here what about to make 01:19:709 (1,2) - to a slider
5. 01:28:582 (2,1) - uhm this overlap is for first uglu and can be very confusional for many player try to improve it maybe like this:
   
   SPOILER

   
6. 01:30:272 (2,1) - same here^
7. 01:34:497 (1,2,3,4,1) - this pattern is a bit hard for a normal imo try to make more visble 01:35:765 (4) - maybe with something like this,this is just a suggestion how to fix it but the complicate pattern itself should be fixed like the next one : 01:36:188 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) -
   
   SPOILER

   
8. 01:53:934 (1,2) - make a better blanket here
9. 02:01:540 (1) - here the rhythm should be like: sounds a bit better
   
10. 02:03:230 (4,5) - improve this blanket
11. 02:08:300 (3,4) - this pattern is cute but i think if it were not stacked would be better
12. 02:26:680 (2,4) - improve the little overlap between this 2 sliders
13. 02:40:413 (3) - new combo here for read better this pattern
14. 02:57:737 (1,2) - replace this 2 circles with a slider
15. 03:06:610 (2,1) - like i said before this overlap is ugly and confusional
16. 03:08:300 (2,1) - same^
17. 03:12:526 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - same again about this patterns

1. HP and OD +1

1. 02:20:131 (1) - a finish with 30-35% of volume would be better here

1. 01:19:075 (4,5) - make a better blanket here
2. 01:35:976 - feels a bit empty here add a circle
3. 02:02:807 (4,1) - iprove this overlap
4. 03:00:061 (3) - new combo here for helping to read the rhythm

1. HP +1

1. 02:20:131 (1) - a finish with 30-35% of volume would be better here

1. 01:00:695 (7) - new combo here would be cute
2. 01:41:258 (7) - new combo here would be cute
3. 03:19:286 (6) - new combo here would be cute

General

• Besides the SB you said to me that you were already fixing, this looks fine.

Easy

1. 00:28:582 (3) - I might be seeing things, but I honestly think the middle of it is a bit higher than it should be. If you check 00:27:737 (2,3) - the blanket looks a bit odd in comparison to 00:26:892 (1,2) -. You should at least give it a try and move the middle node of 00:28:582 (3) - to x:336 y:232.
   
   Example

   

1. 00:33:652 (4,5,1) - Flow doesn't work nice here imo, would be a lot better if 00:34:920 (5,2) - was placed a bit higher to give a better variation when playing.

1. 00:57:314 (2) - There should a clap on the end of it, as you can still hear that specific "drums" that you've chosen to add claps for the pattern. I know there is sort of a "breakdown" there as well, but I think the emphasis should've been on the clap to keep the consistency.

1. 02:08:300 (2) - Shouldn't have a NC here? Looks pretty reasonable to me since it begins a new section of the song. Plus, it'd make consistency with only two combos, following the next objects: 02:10:835 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - .

Normal

1. 00:27:737 (2) - Ctrl+g here works better for the flow imo, it looks kinda harsh to me the way it is.
   
   Example

   

1. 01:20:131 - Hm, it feels pretty empty without anything here, I honestly think there must be something there to follow the emphasis on the song, based on what you've done with 01:20:342 (2,3,4) - . Maybe adding a circle or adding a reverse arrow to 01:19:709 (1) - should do the trick if you don't want something a bit hard for a normal.

1. 02:05:765 (2) - Consider removing the clap on the end of it, doesn't make any sense at all.

1. 02:42:948 (1) - This doesn't look good to me, it's a bit excessive two arrows on that slider (I broke my combo here when tesplaying aaaa), and I think it should've ended at 02:43:370 - to give more emphasis on the vocals. Though if you still want all those ticks mapped, consider making another pattern for it. I find the pattern below better though. Oh and the same applies for 02:46:328 (1) -, though there looks more reasonable since it doesn't follow the vocals, but you might want to change it as well for consistency (considering you've changed the patterns before).
   
   Example

   

Hard

1. 00:25:201 (4) - Hmm, better not start this slider with it being curved, looks somewhat weird in parallel with 00:24:357 (3) - . You might want to start is straight shape, then make it curved, it looks better for flow, considering it'd be a nice blanket.
   
   Example

   

1. 00:58:582 (6,7) - Pointing this one more the "personal" side. I feel uncomfortable with fast stacks, especially on a hard. Though it's not a serious thing, I'm still suggesting a pattern below so you can take a better look on what I'm talking about. This same thing applies also for 02:07:877 (4,5) -.
   
   Example

   
   

Goddess

1. 01:00:695 (7) - I really think this shouldn't be at the center, I wonder why you haven't finished the "circle" here, it'd look so nice. Note that you'll also have to move 01:00:483 (6) - to get a better place on the grid. This is also better for flow of course.
   
   Example

   

1. 02:41:892 (3) - Shouldn't this have a finish? Sounds quite reasonably since it matches with your other patterns like this, before and after.

1. 03:31:540 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Unfinished circle AAAA. Just kidding .

ztrot wrote:

looked over everything no complaints here~ enjoy your rank!

Gabe wrote:

BounceBabe is on a ranking streak :3

silmarilen wrote:

those single notes after the last spinner in goddess diff are mapped to nothing

Aleks719 wrote:

silmarilen wrote:

those single notes after the last spinner in goddess diff are mapped to nothing

+1

and 1st couple of doubles are hard to read. especially in stack. i'd prefer to see sliders, but too late.

Gratz anyway

BounceBabe wrote:

I'm not average like others and make every map 08/15. Some of you didn't mod it before, so don't mod it now.

Thank you for the congratulations.

silmarilen wrote:

i dont check unranked maps, i see the map is ranked, i play it and i notice something about it so i post it. if you dont like people saying stuff about your maps then dont map

rezoons wrote:

once you understand it

Natsu wrote:

agree also that CS is real annoying in harder diffs anyways congratz

Stefan wrote:

inb4 small CS sucks