just what kind of "community" is this? don't you mean circlejerk?UnderminE wrote:
Power makes you do stupid things anywaysilmarilen wrote:
you would break apart our small community here just over something this stupid?
The fact that this sentiment exists among the people that are supposed to survey this subforum frightens me. That's not stupid, but it's still pretty stupid.dkun wrote:
removing off-topic altogether is also a viable solution, don't you think?
please don't get me wrong when I say this, Wojjan. I have loved off-topic, which is why I requested to be on board with you a little back when. but the direction this forum has been heading is south, wouldn't you agree?Wojjan wrote:
The fact that this sentiment exists among the people that are supposed to survey this subforum frightens me. That's not stupid, but it's still pretty stupid.dkun wrote:
removing off-topic altogether is also a viable solution, don't you think?
dkun wrote:
please don't get me wrong when I say this, Wojjan. I have loved off-topic, which is why I requested to be on board with you a little back when. but the direction this forum has been heading is south, wouldn't you agree?Wojjan wrote:
The fact that this sentiment exists among the people that are supposed to survey this subforum frightens me. That's not stupid, but it's still pretty stupid.
maybe we should get those rules out and about.
If you have a message that addresses one person in particular, do not use a thread for that. I think that's stupid, wouldn't you agree?
Today I found out that the beginning of My Immortal reminds me of Les Mis.silmarilen wrote:
this new cover by lindsey stirling
[VIDEO]
eargasm
violin sounds really nice *drools *eargasm toosilmarilen wrote:
this new cover by lindsey stirling
eargasm
So in other words chit-chat is the only thing this place can offer?UnderminE wrote:
and Mara, I think silm's point is that if you don't let people have chit-chat like that, there won't be any activity in OT anymore in the end.
As you can see, it is because there is no active users. Remember how inactive the game you brought was? We were just playing it as 3 people or so. I guess I will have to copy the PM I sent to Wojjan:Mara wrote:
So in other words chit-chat is the only thing this place can offer?UnderminE wrote:
and Mara, I think silm's point is that if you don't let people have chit-chat like that, there won't be any activity in OT anymore in the end.
well I wanted to write a pm to wojjan aswell, but I don't think i could say it any better.UnderminE wrote:
As you can see, it is because there is no active users. Remember how inactive the game you brought was? We were just playing it as 3 people or so. I guess I will have to copy the PM I sent to Wojjan:Mara wrote:
So in other words chit-chat is the only thing this place can offer?
"Why do we need a solution? People in OT "as a community" are/were happy with the current situation. We don't even have "that" active users who visit forums these days anyway, people quit osu! or whatever. And why are we trying to bring back the old OT? Yes, it was good it was fun because it had more people. Not because of the quality of posts, it had too much active users back in those days, that's why even the shitposting was fun. Now just because threads are going around with only 4-5 people, everyone starts bitching about how bad OT is and suggesting people to use PMs. Let's just use PMs and noone visits OT anymore, let's just remove it then. Only solution is activity, not just saying "hey I love OT" and not visiting OT for 2-3 days. Even old users are doing this, anyways. "
And how do you think we are going to get people in OT? Shitty threads really don't attract people. They actually scare people away.UnderminE wrote:
"Why do we need a solution? People in OT "as a community" are/were happy with the current situation. We don't even have "that" active users who visit forums these days anyway, people quit osu! or whatever. And why are we trying to bring back the old OT? Yes, it was good it was fun because it had more people. Not because of the quality of posts, it had too much active users back in those days, that's why even the shitposting was fun. Now just because threads are going around with only 4-5 people, everyone starts bitching about how bad OT is and suggesting people to use PMs. Let's just use PMs and noone visits OT anymore, let's just remove it then. Only solution is activity, not just saying "hey I love OT" and not visiting OT for 2-3 days. Even old users are doing this, anyways. "
Do we have to? If someone really wants to be a part of OT, it is easy you know.Mara wrote:
And how do you think we are going to get people in OT? Shitty threads really don't attract people. They actually scare people away.
I'd never post that anywayCDFA wrote:
Is your inability to now post "hi cdfa" really such a big deal that it requires large drawn out paragraphs exemplifying how anybody with any sort of power has grown deep into corruption?
People that belong in OT will naturally flock to it, assuming they have the time and leisure to do that. It's how I ended up here, and I don't plan to go anywhere else anytime soon unless peppy decides to overhaul the website (which was why I left my previous board in the first place).Mara wrote:
And how do you think we are going to get people in OT? Shitty threads really don't attract people. They actually scare people away.
I actually only made that pretty write-up so you'd have something cool to read, the drama in there doesn't reflect the level of drama the mods feel! Gomen ne~Brian OA wrote:
But honestly, we can turn this around. Is posting "morning kyonko" and "morning slimfast" once every 24 hours such a big deal that it requires large, drawn-out narratives of dkun masterfully utilizing a glaive to exemplify how "bad" OT has become? No.