I believe that love is not a question of gender or political correctness, or even age. Do you believe gay love is correct, should it be allowed? If so, what is your view if not your reasoning?
silmarilen wrote:
anybody who even thinks of gay people being "different" should get special treatment, they aren't any more different than you or me.
Hahah no!4c1dR4inb0w wrote:
I apologize if this is taboo on this site I was just wonder what some of my fellow osu!ers thought :/ I apologize if this is offensive.
+1silmarilen wrote:
anybody who even thinks of gay people being "different" should get special treatment, they arent any more different than you or me.
^silmarilen wrote:
anybody who even thinks of gay people being "different" should get special treatment, they arent any more different than you or me.
best post in this thread by farSotodashi wrote:
I'm Swedish.
</thread>boat wrote:
Majority of the users here aren't old enough to provide any sensible arguments regarding this topic. I suggest you go somewhere else.
; - )Seph wrote:
also most gay people are pretty much good looking than the normal ones so guys, think of it that they are trying to help you get a girl
This is another thing that bothers me.4c1dR4inb0w wrote:
I believe that love is not a question of gender or political correctness, or even age. Do you believe gay love is correct, should it be allowed? If so, what is your view if not your reasoning?
I think you're being rather anal if you'll excuse the pun. The fact is that most people in romantic relationships are also in sexual ones. People with affectional orientation and sexual orientation outside of the norm are persecuted minorities most anywhere and something like equal marriage rights supports them both in the long run. Seeing as how the words love and romance aren't exactly interchangeable and that the former can be a euphemism for sex in the first place, I don't see why it would bother you; gay primarily refers to homosexual and possibly homoromantic people, not just homoromantic.Brian OA wrote:
Homosexuality is strictly, well, sexual. Love doesn't fit in anywhere in the equation. For example, while there can be gay love in the sense that two men love each other and also want each other's bodies, they don't always go hand in hand. Two men can love each other and not feel any carnal desire and viceversa.
When people ask "what's wrong with two men loving each other?!" I cringe. People immediately jump to the conclusion that that means they're gay, because clearly two men caring for each other obviously means they want to be butt buds. Point is sexuality and love aren't mutually inclusive. Please don't use love so casually.
Looking back I regret writing that the way I did.Jarby wrote:
I think you're being rather anal if you'll excuse the pun. The fact is that most people in romantic relationships are also in sexual ones. People with affectional orientation and sexual orientation outside of the norm are persecuted minorities most anywhere and something like equal marriage rights supports them both in the long run. Seeing as how the words love and romance aren't exactly interchangeable and that the former can be a euphemism for sex in the first place, I don't see why it would bother you; gay primarily refers to homosexual and possibly homoromantic people, not just homoromantic.Brian OA wrote:
Homosexuality is strictly, well, sexual. Love doesn't fit in anywhere in the equation. For example, while there can be gay love in the sense that two men love each other and also want each other's bodies, they don't always go hand in hand. Two men can love each other and not feel any carnal desire and viceversa.
When people ask "what's wrong with two men loving each other?!" I cringe. People immediately jump to the conclusion that that means they're gay, because clearly two men caring for each other obviously means they want to be butt buds. Point is sexuality and love aren't mutually inclusive. Please don't use love so casually.
Best post in the thread.Jarby wrote:
I think you're being rather anal if you'll excuse the pun.
You sly fuckerJarby wrote:
I think you're being rather anal if you'll excuse the pun.