-Bakari- wrote:

Hi!

te amo! o3o





hahah xD

[General]

1. Don't know, maybe you can add band members in tags? Just to give them some respect.(and I want to know name of this guy inside box above) I don't find this really necesary, there is a lot of bands in this game without any member in tags. btw the singer name is Asier Cazalis

[Insane]

1. x0.95 Slider velocity multipler? Are you sure? It feels kinda pointless to me The Velocity in the song increase really slowly since the first part till 00:18:236. Maybe I had to increase the SV a bit more, but this way work properly in my opinion. I think that you should notice that listening the music several time as I did with that.
2. 00:06:317 (1,2) - x2.0 jumps for start part is too much! This part is so calm and players won't expect anything hard here! Emm.. agree with you, just kept the 1,6x jump between (3,1). Fixed the others.
3. 00:33:706 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - I'm not sure about flow here. It's a bit weird, imo. I'd suggest you to place 00:34:658 (5,6) - just like 00:33:706 (1,2) - to follow rhythm/vocals closer. And then move 00:35:134 (7) - to keep jumpy pattern consistent.uh.. what you will get Fixed almost with your idea.
4. 00:46:082 (4,5) - I'd stack (5) with 00:46:796 (1) - to keep patterns consistent. It'll also give you better flow because stack (4,5) is too unexpected after jumps. I don't agree here, the map has varieties in antijump, manual stacks and simple stacks. After to a jumpy pattern, I think that feels better if you move the mouse at least a bit instead of leaving on a place.
5. 00:58:458 (5) - I feel like you'e missed a new combo here. It'll fit with music and your combo-pattern. Done
6. 01:50:846 (5,6) - same as 00:46:082 (4,5) - I'd stack (6) with 00:46:796 (1) - to keep patterns consistent. It'll also give you better flow because stack (4,5) is too unexpected after jumps. Same response.
7. 03:00:128 - in other diffs, spinner starts here. So, I'd put here circle for some-kind-of-consistency. No, in the others diff. the Spinner follows the 'long' Instrumental section.. I don't have any rhythm to be followed in there.
8. 03:01:794 (7) - too suddenly, imo. I'd recommend you to start spinner here! Oke.

[Hard]

2. x0.95 Slider velocity multipler? Are you sure? It feels kinda pointless to me
3. 00:29:192 - 00:30:145 - i'd place here circles to keep rhythm consistent. a specially 00:30:145 - feels too empty I just wanted to follow the Vocal in those places. I find it good, since it is one of the lowest part of the song.
4. 02:19:892 (6) - Maybe it's just me, bt I feel like triplet here will fit MUCH better. For consistency and for rhythm. Just try >3</ THen this 02:34:642 (5) - slider will be the only 1/4 slider. And it'll make patterns more readable!
5. 02:50:370 (6) - same as above. use triplet instead? [url=this way]http://puu.sh/1R2Ba[/url] I don't agree with these cases, the effect that I provided with the previous objects call me to add a Slider, to vary the gameplay.
6. 02:59:652 (3) - same as above. I have nothing to say about this diff. Really well-mapped. But, agree with this one.

[Normal]

• 
  x0.95 Slider velocity multipler? Are you sure? It feels kinda pointless to me

1. OD here feels a bit too hard for this diff. Try OD -1 to make it more balanced.
2. 00:20:856 (4) - to follow music closer, and to make rhythm consistent and enjoyable use 1/1 slider here instead! (remove reverse, and end it at 00:21:332 - ) Totally Agree with you. Fixed.
3. 02:07:034 (4) - and some other parts like 01:57:277 (1,3) - 01:37:269 (2,4) - and so on.. - beat that supposed to be clicked later, is too close! It's easier for players to click it earlier. This kind of flow is just confusing! Fixed some of them
   
   

[Easy]

1. SV changes here? I wouldn't recommend you to use any velocity changes here! They're totally confusing! If you want to point out slower music - use easier rhythm. faster music - harder rhythm. But there's no need to use velocity changes! It's easiest diff! C'mon man, there are minor SV changes that are not really predictable at the hour to play the map.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I love that map! really love! Awesome music and that creepy guy awesome map. But I really can't understand what's the point of using x0.95 slider velocity? ;_; It ruins all the fun from playing [Easy] and [Normal] diffs, imo :< I hope I could fix your doubt, if you listen the music, the music velocity increase slowly, so I can't use high SV changes. Btw, these Slow SV changes, allows me to use them in Easy and Normal diffs too.

Song is awesome, and harder diffs are almost perfect, too. /me favorites

DaxMasterix wrote:

Hello~ Mod from my Emporium :33
I don't like the spanish songs.
Note: Modeare en Español porque me sale más fácil. LEL

Easy:

1. 00:49:176 (2,3) - Este espacio esta.. raro.. comparado con el anterior de (1) a (2).. Moviendo (2) 1 Grid a la Izquierda se veria mejor imo.. (Grid lvl: 4)
2. 00:53:460 (2) - Eyup.. Este slider no esta.. com decirlo.. ''Perfectamente Simetriado'' (? xDD Bueno ya sabes.. Vale con copiar el Slider de 00:08:224 (3) , Pegarlo, y moverlo.. Si no.. puedes mover el mismo Slider. digo.. Moviendo el 2do SliderPoint a x:256|y:178 (Grid lvl: OFF) y el Último SliderPoint a x:200|y:155 (Grid lvl: OFF) :33
3. 01:55:371 (4) - Este tampoco se ve Perfectamene Alineado por decir algo.. Pero con el mirror se ve bien so.. No dire nada mas que eso lol xDDD .w.
4. 02:42:040 (3) - :I You know... Bueno.. Puedes simplemente mover el Slider a x:311|y:145 (Grid lvl: OFF).. Se consigue Activando el DistanceSnap y Desactivando el GridSnap o3o Todo hecho en Easy

Normal:

1. OD-1 (? Arreglado en el mod de bakari.
2. No Suggestions = 1 Star.

Hard:

1. 00:20:856 (4) - Y si haces este Slider como Así :33 Oke
2. 01:15:118 (4) - Triplet here plss-... Se vería mejor que un Slider. o3o
3. 02:19:892 (6) - Stacked Triplet here (? Me quedo con los Sliders como dije en el mod de bakari, por la jugabilidad que le da.
4. 02:50:370 (6) - En este Espacio si se veria mejor un Triplet Peeero Tendria que ser el mismo triplet anterior invertido (Ctrl+H & Ctrl+J) Para verse algo Así
5. 02:59:652 (3) - Triplet (? ;w; Me quedo con los Sliders, sorry.

Insane:

1. 01:15:118 (6,7,1) - Este triplet se vería mejor en x:408|y:56 (Grid lvl: 4) Totalmente cierto, fluye mucho mejor. Hecho.
2. 01:52:275 (2,3) - Yo creo que esto Se veria mejor Asi.. Etto.. Sera dificil explicarlo... Asi que Clickea Ctrl+G, Ve el grafico de Arriba y lo entenderas.. Asi es.. Mejor que comienze el Slider con repeat y luego en Circle alone :33 Cierto xD. Fixed.

OKAY- Creo que eso es todo.. Muy buen map.. Te deseo la mejor de las suertes y me parece raro que no tengas ningun taiko xDDD... Como sea.. Mucha suerte en el rank! Se que lo rankearas muy pronto ^^)/
PD: El cantante tiene cara de Psicopata Pervertido. HAHA, es cierto!

popner wrote:

Hi ~ Mod as requested.

Just suggestions:

[General]

Unsnaps:
Easy:
02:18:225 (2) - Unsnapped slider (end).
Normal:
00:31:574 (1) - Unsnapped circle.
02:18:225 (1) - Unsnapped slider (end).
Hard:
00:31:336 (5) - Unsnapped slider (end).
02:19:892 (6) - Unsnapped slider (end).

These slider end unsnaps are cause by sliders which overrides a red line(timing points). They can be fixed only by changing codes in .ose file.
I will tell you how to fix the first slider (Easy; 02:18:225 (2)) and you will know the solution.
Now open .osu file and find the slider code (02:18:225 = 2*60,000 + 18,225 = 138,225)

76,256,138225,2,0,P|140:352|184:208|256:376|256:376|328:208|372:352|440:256,1,480,4|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

that 480 means your slider's lasting time is 480*4 = 1920 (real time is 2:20:130 - 2:18:225 = 1905)
Now the slider ends at 2:20:130 but it should ends at 2:20:124, the difference is 6ms. 6/4 = 1.5, so you should change 480 to 479:

76,256,138225,2,0,P|140:352|184:208|256:376|256:376|328:208|372:352|440:256,1,479,4|4,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

[Easy]
00:16:329 (3,1) - maybe you can stack the two notes? It seems that timing changes and the slider velocity is different. so the distance is different too. Hmm.. nah.. the spacing is coherent as it is.
00:16:805 (4) - try to curve it to make a better blanket? I see similar slider here: 00:46:796 (1). This blanket is better IMO. I think that the blanket is good enough, more curved won't provide the same effect that I wanted.
02:49:656 (2) - change the direction of this repeat slider? Current one is not good enough both in flow and shape(repeat point is too close to next slider). Ohh.. Totally agree. Your way flows much better.Example:

SPOILER

Pretty nice diff and I have no more comment here.

[Normal]
00:17:282 (4) - same suggestion as Insane. The issue seems distinct here because a volume change from 30 to 50 usually apply for a very sharp change in music. I find the volume properly with the music increase, I prefer to don't change that.
00:52:508 (1,2) - nazi - the end of the two sliders are not stack properly. Since auto stack does not affect slider end, I think this is better to be fixed: just disable grid snap and then move the last node of the slider up a little. It is properly stacked at the gameplay.
01:40:127 (1,2) - same as above. ^
01:54:419 (2,3,4) - 01:58:706 (2,3) - you use different rhythm in this two parts. I must say that both rhythm are acceptable and good, but you'd better only use one of them in a Kiai, cuz the rhythm change is unexpected for the same music. Hmm.. this is preety readable, the music is not acting at the same way in these places. Btw, at the beginning I used the 'Hardest' pattern so the other 1/1 is really simple to be followed in my opinion.
02:55:368 (3,6) - consider make these notes symmetric? I think the note arrangement can be more meaningful. Like: Ok.

SPOILER

02:57:748 (7) - if you apply the change above, move this note to (24,292) to fix the spacing. ^

[Hard]
00:09:654 (5) - you can try to ctrl+g to this slider. It will flows better. No, no, not really. My way flow much better than yours, if you see the end of (3) and the note (4) it produce a better 'mouse movement' to the place where I have the start of (5), to the other place this flow awkwardly.
00:38:942 (4,1) - the two slider should be in same combo IMO. From pattern, they are symmetric sliders; and from the rhythm, vocal ends at 00:38:704 and restarts at 00:39:894, so the NC on 00:39:418 (1) does not make much sense. There are two alternative solutions: One is to move the NC to 00:38:942 (4), so the combo length is balanced because the NC is closer to big white tick. The other is to move the NC to 00:39:894 (2), so the 1/2 notes(00:39:894 (2,3,4,5)), which follows a new vocal, are in one combo. My own preference is the latter. Fixed with your preference
00:43:226 (1) - not recommend to use tick clap here as well as the long slider. As you know, one of the main purpose of hitsounds is to provide a response to player. So when player hit and hear a hitsound, he/she knows whether he/she has hit it correctly or accurately. Player always expect a hitsound on note or slider head/end, so the tick clap is unexpected during game-playing. If you are forced to add tick clap to keep consistency of hitsounds, there must be some problem in pattern and rhythm you used. My suggestion is simple: just change the 1/1 slider to a 1/2 slider with a note, like this: This Slider is following the Vocal especially, but I have to follow my hitsounding at the same time, I don't feel anything wrong with that and it is really easy to be followed properly.

SPOILER

01:15:118 (4) - a minor issue: the curved kick slider looks not so good, IMO a straight one will be better. I prefer the curved because gives a little blanketing.
01:48:702 (5,6,7,1) - try to arrange them in a line? Oke.

SPOILER

02:03:232 (2) - same as 00:43:226 (1). I know you want to follow the vocal here, but if you can take care of drums at the same time, things will be much better. No, I prefer to follow the vocal. If you see the whole of the map I follow the vocal especially.. but my hitsounding must be consistent.

[Insane]
00:02:979 (1) - 00:10:369 (9) - for this part I suggest you to add silent slider body hitsound (by using custom set) since this part have only soft guitar solo, and the sliderbody sounds weird now. Nah.. the sliderbody sounds properly in my opinion,
00:18:236 (1) - the volume increases here, but IMO it should be increased at 00:17:044 (2) (where the vocal starts) to make a fade in effect, you can add green line like this: Same as Normal.

SPOILER

00:21:808 (3,4) - if you ctrl+g to this two notes they will flows better IMO: Okey.

SPOILER

^ A wiggling movement right?
00:22:999 (2,3) - the shape of this two sliders is not good enough since the blanket is not perfect. You can move and rotate it a little to make a better shape: Done.

SPOILER

00:24:190 (4) - the slider is symmetric from 00:23:714 (3), so if you change (3), do same thing to (4).
00:34:182 (3,4) - why not use stacks like 00:33:706 (1,2) and 00:34:658 (5,6)? If you do so, they will become a group of stacks and jumps, but now I think it does not make much sense. Alternatively, change these two into a slider is also a good choice (if you want something different here). My intention was other, but fixed in this way anyways.
00:36:562 (4,5,1,2) - I think you can put them symmetrically like this: I want to break my symetries patterns and you want more symetry. With my previous Style I probably used your suggestion but now I found my way fluent and correct without the necesary to use symetry.

SPOILER

00:39:180 (1,2,3,4) - you use similar pattern at 00:31:802 (2,3,4,5), maybe you can come up with something new? There are only 8 seconds between the two patterns. Hmm.. But what is the problem? produce the effect that I wanted in this case following the Instrumental and at the previous case following the Vocal.
00:41:084 (1,2,3,4) - make a square here? It doesn't flow that good. I'll keep my pattern.

SPOILER

00:52:508 (1,2) - try to give more spacing between the two sliders to make a cleaner pattern, they looks not so good now: Done.

SPOILER

00:56:554 (1,2,3) - I think you want to use a consecutive changing angle for these sliders. You can just rotate 00:57:030 (2) anti clockwise a little. Like this: Ok.

SPOILER

01:03:694 (4,5,1) - change the direction of the triple will gives a better flow IMO Totally disagree with you, it is easier to move the tablet pencil/mouse with my form. I'll not change that with your pattern at least

SPOILER

01:26:550 (1,3) - same as 00:52:508 (1,2) Alright then.
01:40:127 (1) - the vocal changes at 01:40:365, but you use jump at 01:40:127. So if this jump is between 01:40:127 (1) and 01:40:365 (2), the flow will be better. Okey.
02:17:749 (3) - for the same reason as 00:52:508 (1,2), move 02:17:749 (3) left a little. I find that fine.
02:23:932 (1,2,3) - the spacing between them is not consistent, try to disable grid snap and fix it. Fixed
02:44:658 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - the spacing here seems random.. can you let them be more regular? For example: Random? I don't think so, the spacing increase properly since (3).

SPOILER

Such a long mod orz

GL~

MoodyRPG wrote:

Aqui en el sur se esta sufriendo mucho de calor, ahora no es tanto la verdad y ojala que se mantenga asi

General

1. Nada que señalar

Easy

• - 01:30:600 (3) - Yo aqui pondria un new combo porque sigue tu patron a y tambien remuevelo de aca 01:32:505 Oke.
  - 02:05:368 (4) - Como me gusta mucho la simetria, porque no haces este slider como lo hicistes aca en 02:03:470 Noo.. por favor, de a poco estoy sacando la simetria de mi mapeo, asi que no quiero agregar eso ahi. Con la que tengo es suficiente.
  - 02:04:899 (3) - Aqui sonaria bien un finish que por un whistle De acuerdo.

Normal

• - 00:47:748 (3) - Straight? La verdad no luce bien un slider que este al centro y este curveado Me quedo con el curvo.
  - 01:26:789 (4) - Un new combo aqui por el cambio de vocal Ok
  - 02:47:276 (1) - Straight de nuevo? Me quedo con el curvo

Hard

• - 01:14:642 (2,3,4) - Sugiero hacer un patron mas "llamativo" por asi decirlo, intenta algo asi No entiendo porque a la gente le gusta lo stright. Buee.. de todas maneras me gusta mas como fluye mi patron
  - 01:37:984 (4) - Este slider es inconsistente con los anteriores sliders, deberias hacerlo igual para que haga una estructura Es igual que el resto pero con Ctrl+J.. prefiero dejarlo asi

Insane

• - 01:15:356 (1) - Si vas a poner un new combo sugiero que tambien lo pongas en el (6) porque ahora mismo el new combo no se alcanza a notar y si lo pones en el (6), tendria mas sentido Fijate que sigo los downbeats en general, y el 2.0x jump empezo mucho antes, creo que no tendria mucho sentido poner uno en (6).

Buena suerte

BounceBabe wrote:

Hi from the Queue!

General

The blue combo colour is not readable enough with the BG, make it brighter or use another colour! Ok, I made it brighter

Easy

00:24:428 (1) - NC should be at 00:25:858 (3) - not here 00:24:428 Ok
00:27:763 (1) - Remove NC should be here 00:29:669 (3) - then remove NC again on 00:31:564 (1) - Done
01:13:452 (1) - Nc really needed? This long slider need a NC I guess, because it is covering a big part of the song
01:28:694 (1) - Remove NC Ok
02:58:224 (1) - NC really needed? Yes, why not. Remark the Vocal change

Normal

01:42:033 (3) - This is a huge spacing mistake and shouldnt be in this diff. The pattern is consistant and then suddenly there is this antijump which is unexpected. Move this further away to match the spacing that was not intentional.. Nice catch :3. Fixed.
02:27:502 (1) - Remove NC and add hre 02:28:692 (3) - Alright.

Hard

00:25:619 (5) - NC added
00:29:192 - Add a circle for better flow I don't agree.. I decided to follow just the Vocal here.


Insane

00:22:047 (4) - Onthe following jumps you did there is the last jump with normal spacing except from here, change this and move the next slider closer to (4) to match up to the others (00:29:669 (3,4) - )
02:58:224 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,1,2,3,4,5,6) - This whole pattern confused me totally when playing and i couldnt manage to get this done without breaking my combo. In some places there is a too close spacing and makes it hard to play these. Also i would delete this circle 02:59:176 (7) - and this one 02:59:771 (9) - this would play much better. 03:00:128 - Add a circle here then to make a better transisiton and flow, and then move this pattern 03:00:366 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - closer[/color]
Something like this would be nice: I used Normal spacing in the whole of the pattern, it is not hard to be followed.. I could do it easiley and I'm not a good standard player. It is fine in my personal point of view, so I'll not change anything.


Everything else is fine! Good luck

Wolf wrote:

Hi ♪ Ai se eu te pego
From my Modding Queue.
Been busy with some stuffs, sorry to keep you waiting. Sorry for my late response :/

General
Seems alright.

Easy
00:21:094 (4,5) - Would be nice if between them was a full blanket. Something like this. I prefer my way, I find it more fluent.
01:38:222 (4) - In my opinion, the whistle on the reverse arrow should be moved to the slider's end, you can clearly hear how on that specific part is a drum beat, therefore, whistle here sounds bad. And don't forget to let 01:39:651 (5) - without hitsound if considered suggestion. Follow my hitsounding properly in this section, I match the drums with the Normal Hitsound + Soft whistle, it sounds better to me. I'll keep it as it is for now.
02:21:552 (2) - Could've been made a blanket with 02:20:600 (1) -
02:22:980 (4) - Same here, would be nice a blanket with 02:23:932 (1) - I'm not searching any good blanket in there :/
02:30:596 - Why no object here, just like you did with 02:28:692 (1,2) - ? Hmm.. Okei.
02:42:992 (4) - Could be moved to x:176 y:28 to be symmetric with 02:41:564 (2) - I was searching that xD. Fixed.

Normal
I couldn't find anything here, pretty clear to me.

Hard
00:32:754 (3,4,1,2) - Hmm, (3,1) and (4,2) could've been made aligned with each other, something like this. Fixed a bit.
00:43:940 (2) - Can you manual move this slider until it matches with 00:41:798 (2) - fading spot? I dunno, it would be better imo. Nah.. it is ok as it is.
01:15:118 (4) - Would be nice if this was moved to the grid's vertical line: http://puu.sh/1TAZ9 I want a blanket with (3) here.

Insane
00:04:171 (6) - That slider up there doesn't look nice, specially considering the fact that is the beginning of the song. I don't found anything wrong with that.
01:55:133 (1,2) - Could've been made a blanket. The flow is much more important than a blanket I guess..
Won't add much stuff here either, it's pretty solid to me.

Good luck in there!

Pokie wrote:

Request from Forum PM

Feel free to ignore everything since they're 100% suggestions

　Easy

01:38:222 (4,5,1,2,3,4) - uhh.. I can't find out any changes from music. Is it intentional to place whistles with claps here? I'd say suspecting these are misplaced at the moment. xD
01:45:844 (3,4,1,2) - ^, These too. I can listen a particular sound that fits properly a Whistle and at the same time I have to follow the 2-4 consistent clap pattern, for this reason I'll keep that as it is.

• - Actually you can ignore ^these^ two lines, just saying I'd like placing hitsounds with a consistence way. xD

02:30:596 (4,5) - How about a blanket for these notes? I prefer to keep the symetry here.

SPOILER

02:49:656 (2) - (slider's reverse) I'd say Normal-hitnormal fits better than drum-clap here xD I don't agree with that, sorry.
[/list]

　Normal

• 00:14:898 (1,2,3,4) - hmmm...These whistles are on 1,3 beats. I don't know if you feel like to keep consistency with 00:10:608 (1,2,3,4) - If yes, put them to 2,4 beats properly? But this is not the way, actually it doesn't sound properly and the sound in the music is not the same.
  01:38:698 - Well again clap+whistles orz... Same response as before.
  02:15:606 (4) - (slider's head) hmm, imo this whistle should be placed on 02:14:415 (3) - 's slider's tail instead. Especially when you're using whistles on only 1,3 beats constantly. Sorry, but I prefer my hitsounding here.

　Hard

1. Drum hitsounds are placed randomly on my sight orz...That makes me feel sad. I can listen the drums over the red ticks, It was all checked before to add the hitsounding

　Insane

1. For those stacks you've did them manually: Keep them in same spacing which auto-stack did?
   00:33:706 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - 00:55:126 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - Just saying, there are plenty choices of pattern instead of placing these stacks in a random place >_<!! I have to repeat that, IT IS NOT RANDOM!! In addition, a lot of people loves this kind of patterns, so this is part of personal opinions, just that.

For Insane: Personally thought that it's lack of consistency of patterns and jumps, plus those manual stacks are quite confusing when they have a similar spacing with 1/4 streams orz... In general, I didn't use a lot of jumps, the jumps placed in general are following the combo changes and drum sounds, so I think that I can't be inconsistent if I do that :/

Overall: Hitsoundings may need some improvement.


That's all I can do atm >_< Good luck mancuso!

Chewin wrote:

General

1. Honestly I would change the actual BG because the singers' heads are cut by osu! resolution and it looks bad in my opinion: http://puu.sh/23Xtc o.o As I said before, it is okey in my way :/.
2. (In all your diff) I would set the last spinner's end on 03:01:794 , it looks more logical imo (don't forget to snap the kiai time end here as well, if you agree) I don't agree with that, I want to finish the map in the last little sound, so I'll keep it as it is.

Easy

1. 00:13:945 (5) - I don't like drum addition on this circle. This element is still going on the previous combo: 00:10:608 (1,2,3,4) - and so I would keep hitsound consistency using soft default whistle on it. I suggest you it also because it sounds bad together with drum addition you set on 00:14:422 (1) - to be honest. Then it would be better to set and start the drum hitsound from 00:14:422 (1) - where you have used that new combo, it sounds much better and it also looks more logical. I like how it sounds, it follow properly the sound in the music imo.

Normal

1. 00:38:228 (6) - I like this slider lol lol. Thanks xD

Hard

1. 02:21:552 (4) - This slider would flow better if you decided to CTRL + G it. Nah.. Actually flows better imo.

Insane

1. HP -1? Ugh. I think that the HP is coherent in this diff.
   This diff can still be improved. I don't like those random jumps and spacings, to be honest.. Well, I fix your mod and did some other changes by myself. I think that it is much better now (anyways I didn't touch the diff that much

That's it, good luck with this mapset, mancuso. :3