Pagliaccio wrote:

поставьпоставь
а вдруг там годнота
будем убеждать тебя запилить на ранк \:D/

crabovan wrote:

kosiga's Normal

こんにちわ。:3 :3

All what i can say:
00:51:157 (2) - not see the point in curve slider, because slider too short for this, remade to standard two-points flat slider.　　It is a little monotonous. so I changed it in kiai time.
00:51:157 (2,5,6) - ^^^
01:02:865 (3,4) - ^^^
01:28:291 - Change slider to spinner. I think that it is slightly sudden, and it is short in normal diff

Stefan wrote:

[Normal]
00:25:913 (5) - Finish sounds awful here, it let makes this part that loud. have to emphasize finishsound here
00:40:913 (5) - Maybe Finish at the Middle Point? do not have finishsound there. sorry, no change
00:48:230 - I think it's worth enough to add a Circle here. it's ok. added~

Black_Cherry_Ita wrote:

-Bakari- wrote:

[Easy]
00:04:328 (1) - прикрыт хитбрстом спиннера. что в самой-легкой-дифе не ок. ;_; не знаю как пофиксить ;w;

1. Мне кажется, оффсет чуть спешит Или мне кажется о\ Но лучше уточнить

1. 00:04:328 (1) - Заметила, что у тебя везде клапы стоят на даунбите и соответственно на каждом втором от него (3 по счету). Лучше их переставить на каждый второй (даже в песне так, послушай), ибо звучит лучше. А то как-то не на своем месте
2. 00:05:426 (2) - ^ ну и сюда клап
3. 00:13:840 (2) - попробуй такой ритм:
   
   SPOILER

   
4. 00:19:694 (1,2,3) - чуть-чуть неравный спейсинг, не очень красиво
5. 00:38:718 (1) - клап и финиш - неочень же! К тому же клап на даунбите. Убери его :< Вообще исправь все клапы (или я уже это говорила?)
6. 00:44:572 (1) - ох не нравится мне, как он играется.. Эти красные фоллоупоинты. Может так?
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:47:499 (3) - нью комбо, по логике

1. 00:18:230 (4) - finish on the beginning
2. 00:29:938 (6) - ^
3. 00:44:755 (1) - maybe remove this spinner and map this part? I think, spinner is not good here
4. 00:53:352 (1) - finish
5. 01:05:060 (1) - ^
6. 01:28:291 (1) - maybe nc? Will be epic!

1. Опять хс :<
2. 00:00:670 (1) - может убрать лучше клап и поставить финиш?
3. 00:01:035 (3) - а вот сюда клапик
4. 00:03:413 (1) - опять убери с начала
5. 00:03:962 (2) - поставь на начало клап (ну ты поняла, да? как в изе. Еще можешь глянуть в нормал, там правильно они расставлены)
6. 00:14:755 (8,1) - что-то тут не то.. Можно и так, конечно, но играться будет лучше как-нибудь так:
   
   SPOILER

   
7. 00:15:304 - не знаю, в этой части как-то хс звучат.. слишком громко что ли :С может громкость уменьшить?
8. 01:08:535 (2,3) - перемести (3) на 01:09:267 - , а на 01:09:084 - ноту
9. 01:11:462 (3,4) - ^ то же самое
10. 01:14:938 (6) - раздели на 1/2, а то не очень, когда красный тик пропущен тут
11. 01:16:401 (10) - опять же, перенеси на 01:16:584 - , а на 01:16:401 - ноту
12. 01:17:682 (3,4,5) - не нравится мне тут ритм... Сделай так:
    
    SPOILER

    

Reiji-RJ wrote:

Привет о/ \о

Easy

1. 00:04:328 (1) - Заметила, что у тебя везде клапы стоят на даунбите и соответственно на каждом втором от него (3 по счету). Лучше их переставить на каждый второй (даже в песне так, послушай), ибо звучит лучше. А то как-то не на своем месте да. только не на софт части :<
   
   Hard
   
   
   1. Опять хс :< ну я не про ;w;
   2. 01:11:462 (3,4) - ^ то же самое нет, потому что первое тут реально нормально звучит, а второе я просто не знаю куда пихать ноту, весь паттерн к чертям :<

Хорошая мапка :3
Удачи! спасибо с:

Reiji-RJ wrote:

kogisa's Normal

1. 00:18:230 (4) - finish on the beginning ok. fixed~
2. 00:29:938 (6) - ^ ^
3. 00:44:755 (1) - maybe remove this spinner and map this part? I think, spinner is not good here I will not change now. look at other mod
4. 00:53:352 (1) - finish no change
5. 01:05:060 (1) - ^ ^
6. 01:28:291 (1) - maybe nc? Will be epic! fixed~

-kevincela- wrote:

[kosiga's Normal]

1. 00:15:121 - As I said in the easy diff,you should change this as a soft hitsound inherited section (not custom!) to make the finish play much more better here. It does not match at other places when I use finish here. 00:18:230 (4) - 00:21:157 (3) - etc. so I think enough as now
2. 00:19:694 (1,2,3) - What about using a vocal based rhythm like this? This is pretty good and varies the rhythm a bit :3 It is fit to vocal. but I thought that it was the rhythm that it was hard to play a little. and use simplify this part here　
   
3. 00:32:865 (4) - Same as above ^
4. 01:19:877 - Add a note here? As i see,the phrase starts better here,and fits better within the instrumentals! sorry, vocal「月のように」 I do not put it to emphasize this.
   That's all. Talking about flow,this map is really solid and fells really good to play. Good job!

1. Huh...shouldn't the maximum res of the comboburst be 500x767? Well,the actual one is 499x768... It's just a pixel,but it's anyway suggested to resize it at 500x767.

1. 00:03:962 - Add a note here to start the phrase by following the drum here as you did on the following patterns? You could blanket it with 00:04:328 (1) - by adding it at x:272 y:192. Your choice,though
2. 00:12:743 (1,2) - Honestly,I think that the flow here could be continued in a better way. What about instead on modifying the pattern in this way? It flows actually way more natural than before,imho.
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   32,308,12743,6,0,B|64:356|124:368|184:340,1,160,0|0
   248,296,13840,2,0,B|298:272|358:284|390:332,2,160,8|8|4
   356,156,16035,5,8

   I modified 00:16:035 (1) - 's position to fix the spacing too,but if you want you can modify them in the way you want
   Also,as you can crearly hear a drum being played at 00:12:743 (1) - ,you should add a clap on both the top and the end of this slider to make it follow properly those drums.
3. 00:15:304 - Why are you using a normal finish here? A soft one (not custom!) fits much better within the part being quiet :<
4. 00:47:499 (3) - A new combo should be added here to follow the vocals properly
5. 00:54:084 (4) - What about moving it 1/1 before? As there is a drum being played there,it fits really good! (and you did the same on the other patterns,so ^^)
6. 01:10:913 (1) - You forgot to add a clap at the beginning of this slider (remove the clap on 01:11:645 (2) - if you do this!)

1. 00:15:121 - As I said in the easy diff,you should change this as a soft hitsound inherited section (not custom!) to make the finish play much more better here.
2. 00:19:694 (1,2,3) - What about using a vocal based rhythm like this? This is pretty good and varies the rhythm a bit :3
   
3. 00:32:865 (4) - Same as above
4. 01:19:877 - Add a note here? As i see,the phrase starts better here,and fits better within the instrumentals!
   That's all. Talking about flow,this map is really solid and fells really good to play. Good job!

1. 00:05:791 (8) - What about using claps on the end and the repeat of this slider,as kosiga did in his diff? They fit really well to start a new phrase here! :3
2. 00:08:718 (9) - CTRL+R here? That's a pretty much a subjective thing,and you might not agree with this,but as now imho this flows better by doing so,and the jump created with 00:09:267 (1) - fits quite well! Also,what about adding a clap here to make the sound consistent with 00:07:987 (7) - ?
3. 00:14:206 (6,7,8) - What about creating a triplet stacked under the slider? It follows pretty good the drums that are being played,and it isn't that difficult to play.
4. 00:31:401 (1) - That's a very little aestetical thing,but anyway you should make it just like 00:32:133 (3) - : it looks pretty good as it's linked with 00:32:133 (3) - and blankets 00:31:950 (2) - in a better way than the first wave-slider!
   
   SPOILER

   
   

   100,60,31401,6,0,B|122:75|150:71|150:71|188:38|231:46,1,140,8|2

5. 00:32:682 (4) - NC here to delimitate a new vocal phase?
6. 00:47:133 (8) - Please,consider shortening this 1/2 or deleting this and creating a new note at 00:47:316 - ,maybe with adding another note at 00:47:499 - . Why? Because that 1/1 slider,even id it follows the guitar well,does really fit strange again because of the vocals. I think that following both the parts would solve this problem.

jonathanlfj wrote:

[Normal]
00:09:084 (4,1) - overlap here looks better not stack here ==
00:36:157 (5,6,1) - that plays very confusing, try this good. ok~ change it

SPOILER

00:44:755 (1) - use a finish here? sorry, no finish
01:11:096 (1) - clap here not clap
01:13:840 (1) - add finish Since it is a quiet part, this is not placed deliberately　
01:25:182 (5,1) - overlap if you did it for 00:09:084 (4,1)

Lally wrote:

HI~ Req in game~
~because friendship is moe~ nya~

[Easy]
00:31:401 (1) - remove nc here
00:32:499 (2) - new combo here < ^ but why? D:

1. You need muzu...nah you know it.

1. 00:32:865 (1,2) - What's wrong on spacing D:?
2. 01:26:279 (2) - If you're making a blanket, I'll suggest you to put on x:244,y:108. That's more blanket I think. Don't forget to fix the spacing on the following objects if you except it (:
   Seems really awesome.

1. meh, fine.

1. 00:13:474 (4) - It would be great if you use 1/2 slider. I don't here any sound on the blue tick o3o
2. 01:13:109 (7,8,1) - Maybe use the same spacing? 1.0 > 1.0 > 0.6 is weird D;
3. 01:26:462 (3) - You can clap at the begin to instead clap on the third tick (there's nothing on the third tick D;)

Flask wrote:

Hi BCI :3 Mod Request via In-Game PM \o

[General]

1. You need muzu...nah you know it. Stefan is doing it atmi hope

[Easy]

1. 00:32:865 (1,2) - What's wrong on spacing D:? idk owo
2. 01:26:279 (2) - If you're making a blanket, I'll suggest you to put on x:244,y:108. That's more blanket I think. Don't forget to fix the spacing on the following objects if you except it (: not following these x/y but remade the slider
   Seems really awesome. wow thanks

[Hard]

1. 01:26:462 (3) - You can clap at the begin to instead clap on the third tick (there's nothing on the third tick D;) ..added at the end of 01:25:913 (2) - owo /misunderstood

[/list]

Awesome. Take my star!
Good luck BCI u3u! big-big thanks for mod and star ;;|

1. Why do you make you transparent sliderscorepoint?
   I think this is unnecessary. should remove it.
2. BG.jpg is 1.3MB. This is a large waste.
3. offset may be early. but can not suggest it. I am not good at checking about it....sorry

1. 00:11:645 (4,1) - not like this flow.
   
   
   I suggest this. this flow makes more natural flow.
2. 00:21:157 (3) - add NC
   Consistent with 00:16:767 (1) -
3. 00:28:474 (3) - ^

1. 00:06:340 - 音量がそれ以前のnoteと比較して小さく、私はそれに違和感を感じました
   70%のほうが曲にも音量変化的にも合います
2. 00:12:194 - ^
3. 00:14:480 - 緑線を00:14:663に移動
   00:14:572 - のヒットサウンドはnormalのほうが曲に合います
4. 00:35:060 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ダブルスタックを使用した配置は初心者を混乱させます
   この配置はDSに沿って置くだけでは(3,4)以降のタイミングが見切りにくく、初心者には大きな難易度を持ちます
   00:35:060 - 00:35:609 - にそれぞれ1/2スライダーを起き、その影響を無くす配置を私は提案します
5. 00:36:615 - 不必要な緑線
6. 00:51:157 (2) - この難易度はボーカルをフォローした音取りが多いです
   ですがこの箇所はボーカルを十分にフォローすることができていません
   私はこれを1/2前の00:50:974 - に置くほうがボーカルをフォローできると思いました
7. 00:52:255 (4) - ^
   1/2後の00:52:438 - への移動を提案
8. 01:03:962 (6) - ^
   1/2後の01:04:145 - への移動を提案
9. 01:16:035 (4) - このターン数の異なる短いスライダーが一貫性を持っておらず、プレイヤーを混乱させる可能性があるように思えました
   こだわりがないならば1/2スライダーを2つ使用した音取りの方が無難で良いと思います

1. AR+1
   I think AR7 is low. any note
2. 000:15:304 (1) - I felt strange rhythm of this note. Many of the rhythm of this difficulty has been covering the vocal, but this note does not follow vocal.
   I would suggest this slider move to 00:15:121.
3. 00:22:255 (1,2,3) - ^ suggesion of rhythem.
   
   00:22:255 - add circle
   00:22:438 - add 1/1 slider
   00:22:987 - ^
   00:23:535 - add circle
4. 00:34:328 (1) - same as 000:15:304 (1)
5. 00:39:267 (3,4,5,6,7) - I dont like this placement. felt coarse....
   00:39:633 (5,6,7) - move to x:412 y:220, and adjust 00:39:724 (6,7)
6. 00:57:743 (4) - same as 000:15:304 (1)
7. 01:06:523 (5) - ^

1. 01:29:389 - remove this green line. not hear hit sound the influence of this.

1. Need 1 more taiko diff but I'm sure others already mention it Good

1. 00:10:913 (3) - copy/paste from 2 and ctrl+h,j
2. 00:30:304 (4) - NC?
3. 00:43:840 (4) - clap
4. 00:47:499 (1) - hope you would make perfect slider for something like this
5. 01:01:401 (2) - why not just copy/paste from 1?
6. 01:25:365 (1) - 1 or 2grid up for better blanket

1. 00:35:060 (1,2,3,4) - combine as 1/2 sliders?
2. 01:19:328 (3,4) - ^

1. 00:01:035 (3,4) - ctrl+g

1. Offset +10 maybe? I am not quite sure, maybe ask someone else about the timing.
2. reversearrow.png is so inconspicuous, I missed the very first repeat because I didn't notice it. I am bit tired though, maybe that is the reason ^_^

1. 00:28:119 (3) - maybe use a different shape for this? Right know it is the same as 00:28:484 (1,2,3,4) although they shouldn't be similar (the music doesn't sound as if these parts should be connected).

1. 00:21:157 (3) - I suggest shortening it with ctrl+shift+s 0,80x. This way it would fit the music better. Because right now the repeat is mapped on nothing, it is just there and doesn't really fit. If you do this then you can add circles at 00:22:987 and 00:23:352 or something else, idk.
2. 00:32:865 (4) - ^
3. 00:40:913 (5) - ^ but with 0,667x. Again I cannot hear what the repeat is mapped to.
4. 00:50:974 - this beat is very strong imo, I feel something should be mapped here.
5. 01:16:035 (4) - I don't like double repeats, I think they are too surprising if they aren't used frequently.

1. 00:04:328 (2) - could be better:
   SPOILER

   

   192,128,4328,2,0,B|160:160|160:200|168:248|216:272,1,160,0|0,0:0|0:0,0:0:0

2. 00:44:572 (1) - I think ctrl+g would be better since 00:42:743 (3,4,5,1) will form a nice bow then. Right now it goes a bit against the flow. You will have to rearrange 00:46:035 (2,3,1) though.

Tshemmp wrote:

[General]

1. reversearrow.png is so inconspicuous, I missed the very first repeat because I didn't notice it. I am bit tired though, maybe that is the reason ^_^ specially found inconspicuous repeat, because i didn't like repeats at all lol

[Hard]

1. 00:28:119 (3) - maybe use a different shape for this? Right know it is the same as 00:28:484 (1,2,3,4) although they shouldn't be similar (the music doesn't sound as if these parts should be connected). urghm misunderstood. atleast ctrl+g this slider

SC-DrawerX3 wrote:

[Hard]

The Jumps are too big for the slider velo imo a bit of challenge, also i can pass the map and flow is saved. don't worry, go and play ranked version then.

[Easy]

Maybe add the clapsound as Tick so u don't have to break the claprythm all the time. there will be alot of timing sections ;; gonna change it if says another modder

Pagliaccio wrote:

Hope I help you, BCI-nyan~ of course~

1. Offset +12ms. 680ms seems too early.
2. Please add some words to taiko diff.
   

   AIBat v2.0 wrote:

   General and Metadata
   
   Inconsistency in Tags:
   - [Easy] : chiffon brownie defstar records opening op2 kosiga bci mintong89 stefan thenutritiousguy tng
   - [Hard] : chiffon brownie defstar records opening op2 kosiga bci mintong89 stefan thenutritiousguy tng
   - [kosiga's Normal] : chiffon brownie defstar records opening op2 kosiga bci mintong89 stefan thenutritiousguy tng
   - [mint's Taiko] : chiffon brownie defstar records opening op2 kosiga bci mintong89

• 00:51:533 (2) - Hmm...when this circle appears, it's covered with a hitburst of previous circle and it may cause to newbie players missing this note.
  Consider to move this circle to other place.
  00:51:899 (3) - Up side down? it flows well imo.
  01:28:301 (1) - Hm, I don't know it's rankable or not, but I want to say no to this. So suddenly slider reduce it's speed and it will cause mistake easily for newbie players. What do you feel if you were cut your combo at the last note? I recommend you to remove this 0.5x line.

• 00:26:289 - add note　繋ぎのノリが良い所なので、切られるとちょっと抜けた感じがしました。
  00:44:765 (1) - 1/2遅らせて00:44:948 (1)から始めたほうが拍としてもいいかなと思いますし、スライダーが終わってから回し始める感じがちゃんとするので落ち着いてスピナーに移れると思います。現状でも問題ありませんがスライダーが終わった直後から回せてしまうので、ちょっと急かされてる感じがします。
  01:05:984 (3) - このスライダーの音取りは十分理解できますが、前後に開いた空間が少し大きくリズムが不安定になる気がしました。01:05:801 にノートを追加するとかなり印象が変わると思うのですがどうでしょう。
  01:11:106 (1) - ここはスピナーをこのような形で置いてしまうより、他のノートで曲をfollowした方が合っている気がします。
  01:14:948 - 01:15:679 - 音が極端に少なく、寂しい感じがします。また、01:16:045 (4) に1/2で音が入っている為少し浮いてしまっている感じがするので、これらの部分に音を追加した方がいいと思います。

• 00:05:801 (8) - I prefer to do ctrl+G to this note. You see, when we hit 00:05:070 (6,7), the cursor will go upward. So it's natural for me to make a rainbow flow like this.
  SPOILER

  
  00:39:826 (7) - When I see this slider first time, I couldn't understand where this slider will start and go immediately. How about to use the same form of 00:41:106 (10)?
  01:16:960 (1,2,3) - How about to make a triangle with these notes more clearly?
  SPOILER