Pokie wrote:

才看見你這個未rank就先1X個favourtie了! 太兇殘啦抖抖抖 >_<

xcherry wrote:

wow, I never expected you to take every single mod I had suggested, I'm both appalled and flattered. I do understand it's your first, I just want your first taiko rank to go off with a big bang instead of potentially risking humiliation by the community D: that being said, you didn't have to take absolutely every suggestion if you didn't like them, as long as they were helpful, then I'm glad to be obliged. just remember I'm not trying to impede on your style, just building on it. once again, you're very welcome :3

I just want to let you know that if you want the rest of the mod, you'll have to wait until friday night because I'm loaded with assignments until then @_____________@

spboxer3 wrote:

嘛~ queue被搶到Taiko slot 沒辦法 所以我來mod了...

Taiko

• 
  
  mapping
  (These are about your pattern.Mostly for the suggest, Just some unrankable issue I will use red color to highlight it.)
  

1. 00:18:411 (38,39,40,41,42) - ddkkd?
2. 00:22:928 (82,83,84,85,86) - dkkdd?
3. 00:33:089 (159) - 這個為什麼用D? 感覺並不適合 因為這地方不是重音 本身也很安靜
4. 00:34:057 (165,166,167) - kkd?
5. 00:36:799 (187) - k?
6. 00:39:380 (207,208,209,210,211,212,213) - dkddk k d?
7. 00:40:670 (216,217,218) - ddk?
8. 01:14:702 (466,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475,476) - 對我來說這是overmap了 本來背景上面並沒有鼓點的地方也被你map上去了
9. 01:16:154 (482,483,484,485) - d d k k?
10. 01:17:444 (493) - 這種放大圓的方式感覺起來是在放osu.. 真的打起來會感覺很獵奇
11. 01:31:154 (570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589) - 這串. 背景音樂很安靜 但是你用了很多大圓 變的很吵 感覺不是適合大圓擺放的片段
12. 01:37:928 (596,597,598,599,600) - k d d k d
13. 01:42:605 (628,629,630,631) - k ddk?
14. 01:43:251 (633,634,635,636,637) - ddkkd?
15. 01:52:605 (691,692,693,694,695) - 同樣finish擺這麼多幹麻lol
16. 02:03:089 (777,778,779,780,781,782,783) - kkkkddk?
17. 02:04:379 (789) - k?
18. 02:05:992 (802,803,804,805,806,807) - ddk kkd?
19. 02:09:702 (828,829,830,831,832,833,834,835) - 不適合的梗 2 6連並不適合這邊使用. 要就把02:09:782 (829) - move到02:09:863 - 吧
20. 02:13:573 (860,861,862,863,864) - dkddk?
21. 02:15:669 (879,880,881,882,883,884,885,886,887,888,889,890) - kdk dkd kdk dkd ?
22. 02:20:670 (29) - 在串中1/4大圓目前還是unrankable的
23. 02:28:412 (102,103,104,105) - finish在Taiko並不是只是音效阿 感覺你都把finish來當做音效來用... 這個你看 k K D k 打起來就很奇怪本來應該是兩個2連的後端襬大圓的 這樣才有關聯性 可是你卻直接擺在2,4上 讓我感覺起來就是把finish當作音效用 而沒有想到他是大顆的 玩起來的感覺沒有顧到
24. 02:41:960 (7) - 用d就好了 不用用到D 因為(7)和(8)有重音區別 所以把(8)放重音就夠了
25. 02:44:863 (x) - 加個d?
26. 02:46:799 (4,5,6) - d d k?
27. 02:53:412 (63,64,65,66,67,68,69) - overmap的感覺
28. 03:00:025 (114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121) - 不適合的梗 2 6連並不適合這邊使用 同上面的

下次做Taiko給我把NC放好= = 這樣多難mod阿

1. Why SV1.5? The purpose is unknown for me.
2. 00:22:927 (82,83,84,85,86) - I think kkdkk sounds much better here.
3. 00:23:895 (92) - k here?
4. 00:30:509 (140,141,142) - It didn't fit the music and i couldn't get your intention for the triplet.I highly suggest changing it to simple 1/2 or another pattern.
5. 00:33:089 (159) - Remove the big note here because it didn't fit with music.Big note should only be used when it appears a accent point or fit the music.
6. 00:44:702 (251) - A kat is much better than don here imo.
7. 00:47:121 - What's the purpose for the green line?It seems a bit unnecessary in Taiko diff.
8. 01:10:025 (425,426) - Remove the big notes here because there are no drum to support the notes.
9. 01:14:702 (466,467,468,469,470,471,472,473,474,475,476) - What did this stream going for?It didn't fit the music.
10. 01:17:928 (496,497,498,499,500,501,502) - A weird rhythm here.This kind of rhythm is rarely seen in Taiko diff.
11. 01:23:492 (543,544,545,546,547,548,549,550,551,552) - A fake pattern in the diff lol Seems the diff haven't attain to that level.
12. 01:25:831 (567) - I would remove the slider here or remove this note :01:25:750 (566) - for better gameplay.
13. 01:26:476 - Remove the x0.75 here it looks weird.
14. 01:28:896 (568,569,570,571,572,573,574,575,576,577,578,579,580,581,582,583,584,585,586,587,588,589) - I'm utterly disagree with the usage of big notes here.Please recheck them and ensure the you really want to use that but this is up to you.
15. 01:48:734 (665,666,667,668,669,670,671,672,673) - So fake. lol
16. 01:52:605 (691,692,693,694,695) - Again the usage of finish.
17. 02:04:540 (790,791) - It didn't fit the music :/
18. 02:09:379 (x0 - I think a note here would be nice.
19. 02:25:509 (66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102) - I highly recommend removing the finish note at the end of the stream because of long stream and tricky pattern.
20. 02:54:863 (76,77) - Rhythm problem here again.

1. 00:15:105 (12) - sorry about fixing this, but make this a o for better playing and sound.
2. 00:16:396 (23) - ^
3. 00:15:993 (18,19,20,21,22,23,24) - this should be ooooooo (noting that all patterns, like I had fixed above, should be like this for consistency).
4. 00:18:653 (42) - o
5. 00:19:541 (51,52) - you should try:
   1. o o
   2. ooo
   3. ooo
6. 00:20:267 (58) - o
7. 00:20:509 (60,61,62,63) - oooo
8. 00:21:153 (64,65,66,67,68,69,70) - the consistent pattern here: ooooooo
   00:22:202 (76) - o
9. 00:22:928 (83,84,85,86,87) - ooooo
10. 00:23:412 (88,89,90,91,92) - reverse: ooooo
11. 00:25:750 (106) - I think you get this by now: o xD
12. 00:31:879 (x) - o, sounds better, sorry for not noticing before.
13. 00:32:040 (155) - remove.
14. 00:32:524 (158) - o is nice here.
15. 00:33:089 (160) - just normal o
16. 00:42:605 (234,235,236,237,238,239) - I'll suggest something else: ooo o o
17. 00:43:251 (239,240,241,242,243,244,245) - ooooooo
18. 00:51:234 (285) - if you want: o
19. 00:56:798 (318,319,320,321,322) - try ooooo
20. 00:59:783 (344) - delete?
21. 01:01:153 (356,357,358,359,360) - should try ooo o
22. 01:02:363 (x) - add a o here.
23. 01:02:444 (367,368) - what about o O?
24. 01:03:251 (371) - O instead.
25. 01:05:993 (392,393) - oo
26. 01:05:831 (390,391,392,393,394,395) - okay different approach since the finish doesn't fit: ooo O o
27. 01:06:476 (395,396,397,398,399) - ooooo
28. 01:07:927 (407,408,409,410,411,412,413) - ooo o o
29. 01:10:670 (427,428,429,430,431) - ooo o
30. 01:12:363 (442) - remove.
    01:12:444 (442,443,444) - ooo
31. 01:13:089 (449) - o
32. 01:14:702 (462,463,464,465,466,467,468,469,470,471,472) - try:
    1. o ooo o o o
    2. o ooo O O O
    3. o O O O O O
33. 01:15:669 (469) - remove.

1. 01:16:315 (473,474) - switch to o o
2. 01:16:153 - 01:25:831 - you should most likely copy/paste this section from the beginning since it's the same, it'll keep a very nice consistency instead of going through this and thoroughly refining it until it is quite similar. Give it a try, just so you know, it is perfectly okay to copy/paste in taiko... in fact, it's not even frowned upon.
3. 01:26:476 - 01:31:153 - lets fill this in properly. Do you need help? I'd rather help you irc so we can delve into your understanding a bit more... I mean, I just want to help you out >A<
4. 01:31:154 (566) - o
5. 01:31:153 (566,567,568,569) - o__o o
   01:31:799 (569) - remove.
6. 01:32:122 (570,571,572) - o
7. 01:32:444 (572) - remove.
8. 01:32:767 (571,572) - no finishes, just o o
9. 01:33:573 (574) - o
10. 01:33:734 (575,576,577,578) - o o o o
11. 01:34:863 (580) - o instead.
12. 01:35:186 (581,582) - either or here:
    1. o o
    2. reverse: o o
13. 01:36:960 (x) - o
    01:37:122 (586) - o
14. 01:37:363 (x) - o
15. 01:37:758 (x) - o
16. 01:38:008 (x) - o
17. 01:38:089 (594,595,596,597) - lets try something else: oo o o o
18. 01:39:621 (x) - a o here, perhaps?
    01:38:734 (599,600) - reverse the two so it's oo
19. 01:39:863 (x) - o
20. 01:40:269 (x) - ^
21. 01:41:315 (619,620,621) - how about ooo?
22. 01:41:638 (622) - o
23. 01:42:282 (627) - ^
24. 01:42:928 (632) - ^
25. 01:43:251 (634,635,636,637,638) - why not ooooo?
26. 01:44:218 (641) - regular o
27. 01:44:541 (642,643,644,645) - try either:
    1. o ooo o
    2. o o o o
28. 01:45:347 (646) - o
29. 01:45:521 (x) - o sounds better when it's put here.
30. 01:45:670 (648) - o
31. 01:46:154 (651,652,653,654,655,656,657,658,659,660) - lets try: ooo ooooooo
32. 01:49:057 (671) - o
33. 01:49:218 (673) - o
34. 01:49:299 (674,675) - switch so it's oo, so the pattern here should be: ooooooooo
35. 01:49:540 (xx) - please add a o, you can hear the sound in the background.
36. 01:49:702 (678) - remove finish so it's o
37. 01:50:024 (679) - add finish so it's O
38. 01:50:508 (681) - ^
39. 01:51:154 (682,683,684,685,686,687,688,689,690,691,692,693) - flip it so the two in the beginning are oo and the rest are o's, sort of like how you had it in the beginning.
40. 01:52:605 (694) - o, the finish doesn't fit and it is in tune with the previous bridge.
41. 01:52:766 (695) - remove.
42. 01:52:766 (x) - just copy the section for this part at 00:50:670 (281) to keep consistent throughout the map.
43. 01:54:057 - 01:56:153 - I suggest you just copy the section from 00:52:121 - 00:54:218.
44. 01:56:798 - 01:57:444 - lets try a pattern to fit the stream, either:
    1. ooooo___O (this is consistent with the beginning but it's totally up to you)
    2. ooooooooo
45. 01:57:605 - 02:17:444 - I also suggest you copy the first chorus, from 00:55:669 - 01:15:508
46. 02:17:686 (x) - o
47. 02:18:412 (893) - o
48. 02:19:057 (898) - ^
49. 02:19:621 (x) - to keep flow, try o here.
50. 02:20:025 (905,906,907,908,909,910,911,912,913) - how about... ooooooooo
51. 02:20:831 (x) - lets fill this in: o o o
52. 02:21:315 (917) - no finish, just o
53. 02:21:482 (xx) - lets put in:
    1. oo
    2. oo
54. 02:24:299 (945) - remove.
55. 02:24:380 (945,946) - switch so it's oo
56. 02:24:863 (949,950,951,952) - a better suited pattern here would be: ooooo
57. 02:25:427 (x) - works well here.
58. 02:25:508 (955) - maybe a o would sound better here.
59. 02:25:589 (957) - remove.
60. 02:25:751 (958) - ^
61. 02:25:750 (x) - add a o here so that the next pattern will be consistent.
    02:25:831 (958,959,960,961,962,963,964,965,966,967,968,969,970,971,972,973,974,975,976,977,978,979,980,981,982,983,984,985,986,987,988,989,990) - not consistent enough with the music. lets try something new: ooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
62. 02:29:218 (994) - O to be consistent, if you'd like.
63. 02:30:751 (1000) - o works better here D:
64. 02:30:912 (1002) - ^
65. 02:37:767 (1044) - o
66. 02:38:089 (1045) - O instead.
67. 02:38:573 (1049) - o
68. 02:39:702 (1057) - ^
69. 02:40:025 (1059) - o
70. 02:40:347 (1061) - o
71. 02:41:960 (7) - no finish, just o
72. 02:42:282 (x) - o
73. 02:42:605 - 02:45:024 - fill this in , following the vocals if you've been following that closely or the guitar.
74. 02:45:025 (1) - o
75. 02:45:186 (2) - get rid of the slider and map it. I tried this and it sounds fine but try yourself first before looking at this: o ooo ooo ooo
76. 02:46:315 (x) - a o to lead into the next sound.
77. 02:46:476 (13) - try O to accentuate the sound here.
78. 02:46:799 (14) - o
79. 02:46:960 (15) - o
80. 02:47:444 (18,19,20,21,22) - a better pattern to follow the sounds: ooooo
81. 02:47:927 - 02:52:282 - as I had said before, copy the other chorus. so delete everything between those times (and the notes already on it) and copy/paste 01:11:153 - 01:15:508.
82. 02:52:363 (60) - remove.
83. 02:52:686 (63) - o
84. 02:52:928 (66) - o
85. 02:53:411 - 03:02:605 (143) - copy from 00:55:992 - 01:05:186
86. 03:02:767 (1) - o
87. 03:02:928 (2) - o
88. 03:03:009 (3) - o
89. 03:03:412 (7) - o
90. 03:03:492 (8) - o only if you want.
91. 03:03:734 (10) - o to accentuate this part here.
92. 03:03:896 (11) - o
93. 03:03:976 (12) - o
94. 03:04:218 (15) - o
95. 03:04:380 (16) - ^
96. 03:04:764 (2) - ^
97. 03:05:194 (4) - ^
98. 03:07:414 - 03:10:639 - you might want to just copy/paste 01:13:250 - 01:16:154. Once done, you'll need to move everything but 03:07:414 (9) over to the next white tick, 03:07:736. then move everything again but 03:07:414 (9,10) to the next white tick, 03:08:059.

spboxer3 wrote:

下次做Taiko給我把NC放好= = 這樣多難mod阿

haha5957 wrote:

Mod from the Challenging queue~

[General]

Nice map~

[Insane]
- Just like hard, could find almost nothing cuz of the map is ok as is already.


Long sliders like these 00:29:702 (1) - can be done better Imo

00:57:767 (3) - This better go downward at the start (like this : http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/330717) because small overlap on previous (5) makes me feel like the map is less in order
01:10:993 (7,1,2,3) - (pattern suggestion) http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/330719
02:50:347 (1,2,3,4) - (order suggestion) http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/330720 , because I think this plays better, and currently, current (1) is in at path of 02:49:380 (3,4) and I don't think it's a good idea to pass there again when it's very short time between when


Plus I want to mention that my map for challenge changed, just saying in case if you would mod wrong map :3


nice map again, good luck~

haha5957 wrote:

[Normal (Banana)]
- Even this is 3 star difficulty, AR3 is bit too low for this high-tempo song. maybe AR 4 or 5 (4 might be ok)? 3->4
- Generally, Normal maps has flow on curser. Idk how to explain, but let's use image here :
Usually, Normal maps cursor movement follows preety smooth and soft, like this : http://puu.sh/y4DM
(Purple, Blue, Reds are just new combos, and arrows are how the map "flows" oh i guess i understand what you try to told me....anyway i won't do some change about it for it is a big work.. while i will try to take this into consideration in my following 3-star map
but this map feels little like this : http://puu.sh/y4G6 (lol, shit my drawing sucks) , pink points are repeats

for example, at 00:28:412 (3,1) - , if you do it like http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/330713 this way, (still the shape needs to much much preetier, just an example)
you see how cursor flows naturally from previous (2) to next (1)?

I hope this is understandable, I will give some examples about this on the further modding

You don't really need to follow it , but usually normal maps has soft flow and fine cursor movements.
since this is matter of style if you deny to do it then I will respect it, but imo this way is better ^o^//

- some sliders (especially those with 2 of more turning points and repeating sliders) can be shaped better I think. I'm not gonna point about those things, but I would suggest the mapper to redo some (just a little will make it much better) works to the sliders (you might just move 1 or 2 grids for each turning point, but it will make it look much better) emm.. sliders are nice to me though, maybe i need to pracctise more



00:29:702 (1,2) - this pattern doesn't look godo in my opinion (because about how 1 and 2 overlaps) i just like overlap that time.. and changed
00:55:831 (1) - shorten this to 00:56:153 fits better i think. many people pointed this and i won't change until i'm forced to .-.
00:58:089 (1) - this looks bit offscreen (although not completly) and should fix it i think didn't aware that this shuold be a problem.. changed this three
Plus, the Osu!Wiki saids especially in easier diffs, this isnt allowed o.o/ actually..not quiet know wiki before..
01:27:444 (2) - ^
01:57:767 (1) - same as 00:55:831. btw i think 02:00:670 (2) - is good, but 01:57:767 is not good
02:49:702 (5) - This almost became must for how it's offscreen. in testplay they are in screen, but as normal, this is not suggested (look on osu! wiki for this issue)

good luck~

DJPop wrote:

It isn't about play well, it's about how it fits the music (I mean 2 repeat sliders), but anyway :

~Banana's Normal~
- OD is too low, change to 3 fix~
~Kite's Hard~
00:52:767 (1) - start at 00:52:927 (to be similar to 01:54:863) and I don't see any reason not to fix this fix~

no kds

CDFA wrote:

Allright, bubble modding

Taiko:
03:00:345 (1) - Unsnapped! fix~
03:01:475 (11,12) - These two notes are on the same place! This is like, SUPER unrankable. fix~

Insane:
00:19:057 - add note here? X
00:19:218 - ^ X
00:19:379 - ^ X
00:34:702 - It doesn't look like this timing section does anything X
01:06:154 (2) - Use normal hitsounds for this finish? X
02:01:638 (7) - Not moe overlap ;~; X
02:04:863 (3) - Make this stack with the previous (5) fix~
03:01:637 (4) - Add clap on beginning of slider? fix~

Hard no change
Normal change something form Kurai :3

desunyan~

DJPop wrote:

Re-checked and re-bubbled.

NatsumeRin wrote:

T T