1. 00:26:037 (4) - Though this goes very well with the music, it's not always readable, especially since the slider tick is hiddden under (3) so the player cannot use that to judge when (5) should be played. I suggest this:
   

1. 01:18:401 (3) - Kickback once, otherwise there's a stalling, hanging feeling. Also, the snare is on every 1/1 so there should be an object on every 1/2.

1. 00:06:219 (1) - From here to 00:16:765 (2) - it just feels like you're going in a huge circle. One big reason is because everything is concave towards the centre. While this is not unrankable, it proves to be a boring play, but I'm sure you can find some variation in this by flipping and rotating some of the sliders. Rhythm pattern is fine. Take this time to better regulate your spacing as well.
2. 00:26:946 (1) - From here to 00:41:492 (3) - you have an excessive use of 2/1 sliders. You should try to make more use of the 1/2 rhythms. For example, 00:38:583 (1,2) is perfect to break this rhythm with two 3/2 kickback sliders.
3. 00:54:583 (3) - The music suggests that this shouldn't be a rotation of 00:53:128 (1) - . You should use a different slider shape.
4. 01:21:310 (1) - Perhaps end this spinner at 01:23:492 - to match the glissando. This would also give 5/2 for the Easy player to prepare for the 3/2 slider. In addition, remove the new combo on this spinner since it appears to be a part of "toki".

1. 01:18:401 (3) - It would be awesome if you added a repeat to this slider in order to keep the flow going strong.

Sprite,Background,Centre,"SB\sky.png",100,320
_S,0,57492,67674,2,1.6
_R,0,57492,69128,-0.4,0
_M,0,67674,68219,100,320,320,240
_S,0,67674,68219,1.6,1.1
_S,0,68219,69128,1.1,1.06

Sprite,Foreground,BottomCentre,"SB\twgok.png",320,0
_M,0,6219,6583,320,0,320,440
_F,0,6583,8401,1,0
_S,0,6583,8401,1,2.2

Kawayi Rika wrote:

Andrea ♥ の 紋

1. I'd put +250 ms to the audio lead-in.
2. Why are you using SV 1.60 , That doesn't really fit the song, actually it really looks like playing a normal taiko difficulty with Hard Rock. That's not realloy appropriate. Consider reducing it to 1.40 as taiko guidelines suggest.
3. Increase the hitsound volume to 100% (except for the last one), because they aren't enough audible (especially during the kiai part where the music is louder), and I find that kinda uncomfortable when notes aren't totally hearable when I play taiko.
4. 00:10:401 (2,1,1,2,1,1,2,1) - d kkd d d k k
5. 00:12:674 (3,1,2,1,2,1) - I don't really see why you are using doubles here, that doesn't really fit the music.
6. 00:28:037 (3,4,1) - kkd maybe ? Sounds better to me.
7. 00:30:128 (2,3) - kd ?
8. 00:47:583 (2,1,1,1,2,1) - Same as before.

1. 00:56:401 (1) - This spinner is too short. This kind of ninja spinner are playable, but only if you know the map and that there is this kind of spinner. Otherwise it's too surprising to be played correctly without confusing the player. :/

Kurai wrote:

o/

[Taiko Oni]

1. I'd put +250 ms to the audio lead-in. k
2. Why are you using SV 1.60 , That doesn't really fit the song, actually it really looks like playing a normal taiko difficulty with Hard Rock. That's not realloy appropriate. Consider reducing it to 1.40 as taiko guidelines suggest. Umm... well SV 1.4 is too slow for me. and use HR is too fast and too high OD for me. so I don't want to change my SV :<
   
   form Taiko Rules and Guidelines Discussion Thread 1.0.3 Ver.

   
3. Increase the hitsound volume to 100% (except for the last one), because they aren't enough audible (especially during the kiai part where the music is louder), and I find that kinda uncomfortable when notes aren't totally hearable when I play taiko. yep~ fixed
4. 00:10:401 (2,1,1,2,1,1,2,1) - d kkd d d k k k
5. 00:12:674 (3,1,2,1,2,1) - I don't really see why you are using doubles here, that doesn't really fit the music. Uh. It's an assist note. I don't want to change :< maybe you can see NatsumeRin and wmfchris 's mod post~they are pro Taiko player/modder but they didn't point this problem. I think it feasible pattern.
6. 00:28:037 (3,4,1) - kkd maybe ? Sounds better to me. k
7. 00:30:128 (2,3) - kd ? k
8. 00:47:583 (2,1,1,1,2,1) - Same as before. same as 00:12:674 (3,1,2,1,2,1) -

ykcarrot wrote:

Yeah