Shiirn, you're doin' it right.
00:41:276 (2) - 1SP = x:348|y:230 / 2SP = x:354|y:170 / 3SP = x:316|y:100 (Grid Snap OFF)
*After of make the Slider put a copy-paste and Ctrl+h obviously..
Merci beaucoup! I'm sure Shiirn hasn't added that tags yet until this is 100% rankable.Serval wrote:
CTB Mod: Requested here
[Deif's CTB]:
Mostly suggestions ~
00:17:082 (12,13,1) - - I don't really like this pattern. It's not really pleasant to play imo. I think something like that (Timeline position: 00:17:082 (12,13,1,2,3,4) - ) would be more pleasant to play. It's only a suggestion you can place triplets where you want but the high spaced note at the end doesn't fit well imo. (Agreed)
01:14:566 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3) - I think this pattern is a bit crazy. I had a some trouble to FC it due to 01:15:437 (4,5,6) - Maybe you should make look a bit smoother, like stacking 01:15:631 (6) - with 01:15:534 (5) - . It'll make it more intuitive for the hyperdash in 01:15:728 (1) - (I knew ppl will complain cos of that pattern, inverted (1,2,3) to avoid that ~5x distance)
01:19:986 (4,5,6) - Not really an issue, but I think a slider return would be more pleasant to play here. Maybe with a x1.25 to add some dynamic to the slider? Just a suggestion ! (I've already used 3 different BPMs: 0,5 0,75 and 1x. If I introduce another one, it'll probably become unrankable)
01:31:211 (8,9,10,11,1) - Well... Like I said for the triplet earlier, I don't really like it. You can either increase or decrease the spacing but like this it's a bit frustrating to play. You don't have to move a lot (you don't even need dash) to get it, but still, you have to move. Increase it if you think there must be a real movement here, or reduce it a bit so it can be catched with the edge of the plate, without moving. It's more a suggestion for this one, cause it fits better compared to triplet @ 00:17:082 (12,13,1) - (Nah, I wanted to make an S-shaped pattern there, to change a bit the style)
01:41:663 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1) - Some people are going to hate you for that, when it'll be ranked . I don't really have issues with it, though I think it's worth mentionning it. (Unless someone really hates it, or it's unrankable, I won't change it :3)
Drafura wrote:
[Deif's CTB]
00:09:534 (1) - For me this is ugly, try to make it a bit more beautifull ? And please don't use 10% vol. Remember HS is also the indicator if you miss. (Raised the volume a bit, but I'll keep the design)
00:11:663 (1) - 2 grid 2 right ? (Done)
00:35:276 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - Can you try to make it less visually broken ? i found it a bit hard to read (I hope it looks better now)
00:36:825 (7,8,9,10,11,12) - ^ (^)
00:40:502 (1) - Not rankable, non sense with the music please use sliders or map the rythmic. (Remapped this part)
00:42:050 (1) - ^
00:44:179 (1) - ^
00:45:147 (1) - ^
00:46:695 (1) - ^
00:46:695 (1) - ^
00:47:470 (6) - ^
01:09:147 (6) - I'll ctrl-R it. I found it ugly like this. (Intentional, I was just following the music, not looking for a nice aesthetic)
01:12:244 (7) - These one are ok. not muted like this they fit with the song.
01:12:631 (8) - ^
01:13:792 (7) - ^
01:26:953 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - Here i'll add the missing note and make the pattern like that :
And modifiying HS to : (1) clap (2) whis (3) none (4) whis (5) clap (6) whis (7) none (8) only finish (1 next combo) clap (I think it's better not to add the note 01:28:115 (7), as I want to emphasize the actual 01:28:308 (7). Anyway, applied that HS)
01:31:211 (8,9,10,11,1) - AAAAAH, ok ok it's hard but fun and sexy. If some modders don't like it modify it. But for me this is ok for ranking
01:37:211 (7,8,9,10,11) - the visual is really wierd (Okay)
You know I hate streams on CtB but let's be objective, the map is good but I think looking the shape of your streams should be a good idea to make your map perfect.
starr'd, I really want to recheck this map after your mod apply (can't test play the jumps now :s but I believe they were ok when i played it last day. So it's not a matter if it's ranked/bubbled before my recheck.
\:D/Spectator wrote:
Yay second CTB diff ranked \:D/
70 MB at 1024x768 vs 40 MB at some tiny resolution that's square and would require cropping.Fallingfall wrote:
Wow...
I love this song!
Then, follow the link to suggest HQ(High Quality)bga What do you think?
BOF2011_NO.118 - Laplace
HQ BGA link
Please consider it.
Indeed.litchmore wrote:
Oh my god ctb is rankable now?!
Odaril wrote:
CtB diffs are now rankable~