*ahem*Natteke wrote:
What's this thread about?
F is for friends who do stuff together,
U is for you and me,
N is for anywhere and anytime at all
down here in the deep blue sea!
*ahem*Natteke wrote:
What's this thread about?
You're going to meet a terrible fate, aren't you?datslok wrote:
Let the fun start!!
* le me watching paint dry O_O
NO.datslok wrote:
Let the fun start!!
* le me watching paint dry O_O
^Natteke wrote:
What's this thread about?
my fate, that I laid out for myself, determines my destiny :3ragelewa wrote:
You're going to meet a terrible fate, aren't you?datslok wrote:
Let the fun start!!
* le me watching paint dry O_O
pretty much explains teenagers nowadays.mathexpert9981 wrote:
Flirtatious Underage Narcissists ?
I'm sorry... "Underage teenagers"? o-opacmanmania wrote:
pretty much explains underage teenagers nowadays.mathexpert9981 wrote:
Flirtatious Underage Narcissists ?
go away, you're no fun.CNM501 wrote:
I'm sorry... "Underage teenagers"? o-o
Yes.Mashley wrote:
Is it still cool to post threads for sexual gratification?
iMercurial wrote:
Deal With it.
Yes, but have you not ruled out the possibility that we are not having fun as we post? Although as humans having fun may be an "absolutely primary category of life", it doesn't necessarily state that one must engage in the enjoyment of pleasure at all times. If, for example, a loved one passes away in an accident, would you say that receiving the news that the aforementioned loved one has died would be a "fun" experience? If not, does that not mean, by your logic, that during the time of receiving the news one has collapsed into a state of "non-living"? I do not think so. Furthermore, the fundamental guideline of this establishment states that '"fun" is now summarily expelled and hereby banned from acquiring presence within this forum'. It does not state that "fun" is not allowed outside the off-topic forum, therefore making it completely possible to be a living human while not engaging in "fun" specifically when inside this forum, but potentially experiencing pleasure from other aspects of daily life.Oreiora wrote:
By method of induction, it is therefore inferred that all living species both organic or non-inorganic having exposed their presence within the boundaries of anything pertaining to the forum present on this site, has ceased to exist in a state of 'living' for the following reason(s). Fun, as stated by Johan Huizinga, a Dutch historian and one of the founders of modern cultural history, is 'an absolutely primary category of life, familiar to everybody at a glance right down to the animal level.' As this forum denies access to anything vaguely reminiscent of 'fun', it can hence be stated that all beings present here lacks a 'primary category of life' as so stated above. Additionally, as of now, a method for the reanimation of a corpse to a living state has not been established in reality, as a result, the above thesis can be further simplified into a statement which suggests that any residents obeying the rules of this forum are in a permanent state of 'non-living'
iMercurial wrote:
tl;dr
Eh, that wasn't meant to be taken seriously, but upon reading what you just wrote, I'm really impressed by that rebuttal. You basically pinpointed it with your second point, likewise, another example can be that all living species must reproduce or have the potential to do so from birth, correct? That does not mean that they have to constantly reproduce to be considered 'living'. As for having fun while we post, I'm not too sure about that, since posting something that is not fun is incongruous with having fun in the process of doing so. But the perception of fun is subjective so I'm not sure. Maybe you meant it being that you have fun typing letters which otherwise conveys something 'not-fun'. But you're right, I was basically nit-picking at the small stuff. Although something to note is that enjoyment is different from fun although they are not mutually exclusive.mathexpert9981 wrote:
Yes, but have you not ruled out the possibility that we are not having fun as we post? Although as humans having fun may be an "absolutely primary category of life", it doesn't necessarily state that one must engage in the enjoyment of pleasure at all times. If, for example, a loved one passes away in an accident, would you say that receiving the news that the aforementioned loved one has died would be a "fun" experience? If not, does that not mean, by your logic, that during the time of receiving the news one has collapsed into a state of "non-living"? I do not think so. Furthermore, the fundamental guideline of this establishment states that '"fun" is now summarily expelled and hereby banned from acquiring presence within this forum'. It does not state that "fun" is not allowed outside the off-topic forum, therefore making it completely possible to be a living human while not engaging in "fun" specifically when inside this forum, but potentially experiencing pleasure from other aspects of daily life.Oreiora wrote:
By method of induction, it is therefore inferred that all living species both organic or non-inorganic having exposed their presence within the boundaries of anything pertaining to the forum present on this site, has ceased to exist in a state of 'living' for the following reason(s). Fun, as stated by Johan Huizinga, a Dutch historian and one of the founders of modern cultural history, is 'an absolutely primary category of life, familiar to everybody at a glance right down to the animal level.' As this forum denies access to anything vaguely reminiscent of 'fun', it can hence be stated that all beings present here lacks a 'primary category of life' as so stated above. Additionally, as of now, a method for the reanimation of a corpse to a living state has not been established in reality, as a result, the above thesis can be further simplified into a statement which suggests that any residents obeying the rules of this forum are in a permanent state of 'non-living'
we? what's all this we stuff?Shellghost wrote:
I think if we remove a bit of the first page, the 2nd and 3rd pages entirely as well as some of the last page and lock it, then this would be a good thread.
I'm doin' all the hard work!laport wrote:
we? what's all this we stuff?Shellghost wrote:
I think if we remove a bit of the first page, the 2nd and 3rd pages entirely as well as some of the last page and lock it, then this would be a good thread.
tl;driMercurial wrote:
iMercurial wrote:
tl;dr
that was beautifulkanye west wrote:
I'm doin' all the hard work!
Breaktime's over, here we go!
Metapod, Marowak, Kakuna, Clefairy
Dodrio, Seadra, Vileplume, Krabby
Lickitung, Tauros, Weedle, Nidoran♀
Machop, Shellder, Porygon, Hitmonchan
Gotta catch 'em all, gotta catch 'em all, yeah!
Gotta catch 'em all, gotta catch 'em all, yeah!
Articuno, Jynx, Nidorina, Beedrill
Haunter, Squirtle, Chansey (Pokémon!)
Parasect, Exeggcute, Muk, Dewgong
Pidgeotto, Lapras, Vulpix, Rhydon
At least 150 or more to see.
To be a Pokémon Master is my destiny.
Charizard, Machamp, Pinsir, Koffing
Dugtrio, Golbat, Staryu, Magikarp
Ninetales, Ekans, Omastar
Scyther, Tentacool, Dragonair, Magmar
Whoa, catch your breath man. Shake out those lips.
It's downhill from here, just 24 more to go.
Now it gets tricky so listen real good!
Sandslash, Hitmonlee, Psyduck, Arcanine
Eevee, Exeggutor, Kabutops, Zapdos
Dratini, Growlithe, Mr. Mime, Cubone
Graveler, Voltorb, Gloom - We're almost home!
Gotta catch 'em all, gotta catch 'em all, yeow!
Gotta catch 'em all, gotta catch 'em all, huhh!
Gotta catch 'em all, Pokémon! (yeeaahh!!)
Charmeleon, Wartortle
Mewtwo, Tentacruel, Aerodactyl
Omanyte, Slowpoke
Pidgeot, Arbok - That's all, folks!
I thought it was funny.Wojjan wrote:
Kazuo shows a perfect demonstration of a not-funny post.
i know how to count till redShiirn wrote:
its a bummer kazuo secretly hates himself for needing to put up emotional barriers around himself, never being able to trust anyone because nobody trusts him.
(also, you didn't feel an economic downturn because brazil has no exports or imports and just in general has no economy anyway)
Shellghost wrote:
Fun is used as a last resort to justify something when you can't think of any actual reasons as to why you do/play/spend time on it over something else.
>not the 6th biggest economy in the worldShiirn wrote:
(also, you didn't feel an economic downturn because brazil has no exports or imports and just in general has no economy anyway)
Brazilian economy runs on Mordekaiser.Blue Dragon wrote:
>not the 6th biggest economy in the worldShiirn wrote:
(also, you didn't feel an economic downturn because brazil has no exports or imports and just in general has no economy anyway)
ok?
even though i agree brazilian people are retarded so it doesn't matter much
we es #1Kazuo wrote:
we es brasillian
You can't use double negatives in English, silly.iMercurial wrote:
justin-chan wrote:
I don't know how to NOT have fun
Fixed for you.
Interesting...Valentiino wrote:
While it may appear to be redundant, teenagers can still be legal for sex and alcohol.CNM501 wrote:
I'm sorry... "Underage teenagers"? o-opacmanmania wrote:
pretty much explains underage teenagers nowadays.
I don't even want Faust's name on this personKai Faust wrote:
Nono. If you don't want to have fun, just never watch anime ever again.
Who's Faust? O.oWojjan wrote:
I don't even want Faust's name on this personKai Faust wrote:
Nono. If you don't want to have fun, just never watch anime ever again.
fapfapfapfapiMercurial wrote:
Think on something disgusting. Think on something disgusting