1. use 1262ms as offset
2. change lead in time to 2500 (1500 for normal) oh you calculated the exact lead-in time for normal to fit the other diffs

1. 00:46:802 (3) - tricky delay for easiest diff, starting this 1/2 earlier would be better
2. 01:01:802 (5) - 1/2 earlier start here as well
3. 01:04:240 (1) - this is hidden under the previous objects too much
4. 01:06:865 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is too streamy (yes, 1/2 stream), you could replace it with a return slider
5. 01:42:115 (5) - I would just remove the break after this
6. 02:02:740 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - another stream you might want to replace with a slider

1. OD++?
2. 01:49:052 (1) - remove the new combo here
3. 02:07:240 (1) - move the whole pattern a bit to the left

Dangaard wrote:

general

1. use 1262ms as offset Fine.
2. change lead in time to 2500 (1500 for normal) oh you calculated the exact lead-in time for normal to fit the other diffs Yes. I did, lol.

[Normal]
In general this diff is a tiny bit too hard on some parts for being the easiest diff of the set. I recommend to either add an easy diff, or fix some harder parts in this diff: Then I pick the 'fixing stuff'

1. 00:46:802 (3) - tricky delay for easiest diff, starting this 1/2 earlier would be better Fine.
2. 01:01:802 (5) - 1/2 earlier start here as well That would be pretty offbeat and confusing and fits in no way. Sorry
3. 01:04:240 (1) - this is hidden under the previous objects too much Fine. Replaced objects.
4. 01:06:865 (1,2,3,4,5) - this is too streamy (yes, 1/2 stream), you could replace it with a return slider Fine.
5. 01:42:115 (5) - I would just remove the break after this Okay.
6. 02:02:740 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - another stream you might want to replace with a slider I might.

[Hard Collab]

1. OD++? Uh, okay.
2. 01:49:052 (1) - remove the new combo here Okay.
3. 02:07:240 (1) - move the whole pattern a bit to the left Okay.