forum

Rule: Every slider must have a clear and visible path to...

posted
Total Posts
51
show more
mm201
They can quickly turn into:


It isn't fair to expect players to read crescents/gradients to figure out what a slider does.
ouranhshc
sooo even if i can tell which way the slider goes on BD's example , its a bad slider because the borders touch?
mm201
If it's very clear and obvious what it does, and difficult to change, then it should be allowed to pass.
That slider breaks the rule, but it can probably be allowed anyway.
Sakura
And the solution appears!
SPOILER
Top Slider:


Bottom Slider:
HakuNoKaemi got it completely wrong.
Luna got it half-right (basically mixed them up)
mm201
That example doesn't actually matter since there's only one tick located somewhere in the middle. If you play it like a linear slider, you'll pass.
ouranhshc

mm201 wrote:

If it's very clear and obvious what it does, and difficult to change, then it should be allowed to pass.
That slider breaks the rule, but it can probably be allowed anyway.
soo if a slider has a very clear path from start to end, does it really matter if the borders impact
mm201
The same is true for any rule. Border impact is a good judge of readability in most cases.
ouranhshc

mm201 wrote:

The same is true for any rule. Border impact is a good judge of readability in most cases.
wouldn't there have to be some serious impact for that to be an issue
mm201
In my previous example, they only impacted by a small amount.
Think of it this way: It's impossible to make an unreadable slider if the borders never touch. If they do touch, it needs to be taken on a per-case basis.
ouranhshc

mm201 wrote:

In my previous example, they only impacted by a small amount.
Think of it this way: It's impossible to make an unreadable slider if the borders never touch. If they do touch, it needs to be taken on a per-case basis.
guideline it then?
D33d
I feel like I should point out that anything in a map to which the mapper would say, "This might be confusing," or for which one has to go through a hefty process of justification, there is a fucking problem. Think about the amount of time that a player would have in order to read a slider. They don't have the time to analyse and scrutinise a slider before the thing goes back on itself twenty times, only for the player to lose their place and wish cancer upon the mapper.

It's common sense, and if the slider isn't readable at a glance, then it should be changed.
Ekaru

ouranhshc wrote:

guideline it then?
Remember, this has been a rule for years. It'll be enforced through the same mean as it always has; very lenient BATs.

The only difference is that it has finally been written down. *gasp* Seriously, dude, there's no reason to guideline something that has been a rule for, again, years with no real issues.
NatsumeRin

ouranhshc wrote:

mm201 wrote:

In my previous example, they only impacted by a small amount.
Think of it this way: It's impossible to make an unreadable slider if the borders never touch. If they do touch, it needs to be taken on a per-case basis.
guideline it then?
This. also add more:

A "hard-to-read" slider could be done with 2 reasons:
1. Mapper want that slider to be very difficult, very hard to read/predict.
2. Mapper have a musical sense to do a strange slider there.

For the first reason, obviously it should be banned, (hope we could already agree on this).
For the second one, it could come to a case-to-case thing, if none of the other people could share his feeling, he may be wrong. but use a rule for it is too much.
HakuNoKaemi

Sakura Hana wrote:

And the solution appears!
SPOILER
Top Slider:


Bottom Slider:
HakuNoKaemi got it completely wrong.
Luna got it half-right (basically mixed them up)
Hey, i did got them right as I said "zizaging with the red points" and it those wo case it zigzag vertically and horizontally.

Slider posted by mm have the gradients plus the ticks helping reading them, so they are judged "good"

i do think to divide it in:
a rule that disallow slider that pass on themself in a non-readable manner
a guideline that discourgare difficulty readable sliders
Topic Starter
pieguyn

NatsumeRin wrote:

ouranhshc wrote:

guideline it then?
This. also add more:

A "hard-to-read" slider could be done with 2 reasons:
1. Mapper want that slider to be very difficult, very hard to read/predict.
2. Mapper have a musical sense to do a strange slider there.

For the first reason, obviously it should be banned, (hope we could already agree on this).
For the second one, it could come to a case-to-case thing, if none of the other people could share his feeling, he may be wrong. but use a rule for it is too much.
I completely agree with this...
mm201
I don't follow how the music could imply, "here, there belongs a confusing, unreadable slider." Odd slider shapes in general, yes, but there are many ways to make readable but odd sliders.
Slider arts can usually be made readable, but should be considered for exemption if they honestly can't. A slider expert should always be consulted before resorting to this.
NatsumeRin
http://osu.ppy.sh/s/9868

old example.


Such sliders works as a flower, no one will get break on it (because just hold and don't move is enough), it's well-formed than any other slider types imo (and 100% sure not only me)


In this slider, it's not set there to be hard. the first character "hi" is a long voice stay there, and the next "so" is where the slider really begins, (and "ya" at the slider's end)

For such cases, can you think of a better way to replace? If not:

mm201 wrote:

but should be considered for exemption if they honestly can't.
If exemption is there, it shouldn't be made a rule, right? Let's say, make "don't use slidertrick (such as burai sliders) to make your map harder" a rule, and "try avoid use such sliders" as a guideline.
Soaprman
^ Can't believe I never thought to cite this map. Every weird slider in that map works. Seconding that entire post.
ouranhshc
@NatsumeRin
The Second Example
You would have to know the song in order to know that


@Ekaru
this is public discussion of the rules

@General

I think that this shouldn't be a rule because it would be broken in most cases than not, and this is also would be case-by-case. The slider would have to have an extreme overlap in order to be unrankable which is usually fixed through the modding, and if the mapper doesn't want to change it, the map just doesn't get ranked
Mismagius

ouranhshc wrote:

be unrankable which is usually fixed through the modding, and if the mapper doesn't want to change it, the map just doesn't get ranked
That happens with pretty much every other rule, so mentioning this here isn't really useful.

However this is so subjective that it shouldn't even be a rule and be something more like "Please make sliders that don't make the player go lolwtf"
NatsumeRin

ouranhshc wrote:

@NatsumeRin
The Second Example
You would have to know the song in order to know that.
You don't need to know the song to play it (the shape already implies something), and after you know the song it plays better than any other types.

Edit:

Blue Dragon wrote:

However this is so subjective that it shouldn't even be a rule and be something more like "Please make sliders that don't make the player go lolwtf"
This is enough imo.
ouranhshc

Blue Dragon wrote:

ouranhshc wrote:

be unrankable which is usually fixed through the modding, and if the mapper doesn't want to change it, the map just doesn't get ranked
That happens with pretty much every other rule, so mentioning this here isn't really useful.
true.

I wonder if anyone has thought about putting actual pictures of overlaps that should be avoided in the explanation.
eldnl

NatsumeRin wrote:

burai sliders
What is that? really, I don't know.
ouranhshc

eldnl wrote:

NatsumeRin wrote:

burai sliders
What is that? really, I don't know.
viewtopic.php?f=56&t=27721
EvianBubble
Since we're asking questions here, what are mm sliders? o_O I saw them mentioned on the first page and ... yea, what are they? D:
D33d
Transparent sliders.
Raging Bull
The ones BD linked are mmsliders I think.

Blue Dragon wrote:


Sakura
Well seems like no more input was given here so we've reached a decission, and this one isn't changing, sorry
Please sign in to reply.

New reply