1. Candy (3.22 stars, 539 notes)
2. Easy (1.34 stars, 138 notes)
3. Normal (2.07 stars, 258 notes)

TheVileOne wrote:

Sweetie

4.00 star rating as your easiest difficulty. Are you sure? I guess it's simple except for a few parts. It could pass but really I don't know if they will even allow it on principle. What Easy player is going to want to download it when they see the easiest difficulty is 4 stars? Is Normal diff and really the star rating matter? if you played the diff not is hard.

I feel the combos shouldn't go up to 8. Consider cutting most of your combos in half to lower the combo lengths. This will give extra drain time for the Easy players, it will be more consistent with Easy difficulties in general. It's okay, furthermore the HP not too high.

00:25:667 (7,8,1) - A softer curve would be better here. All the transitions you had until here have been subtle curves. This is a much more acute change and it doesn't look as nice. Okay
00:26:821 (2,3,4,5) - I see the shape you were going for, but when I play this the first thing I notice is how different 00:26:821 (2,3,4) - is from 00:27:513 (3,4,5) -. You should use a softer design by smoothing out the curve.
01:12:513 (4) - Awful lot of repeats for something in your easiest difficulty. splitting it into two repeat sliders might be better. it's okay~
01:16:898 (5,1) - Would prefer this not be 1.25 too nazi ><
01:21:052 (6,1) - ^ Also that pattern is very close to the life bar. ._. Does it have to be so close? for me not is a problem
01:43:667 (1,2,3) - Exactly 1.2 lol okay
01:47:360 (1,2,3) - ^
02:10:436 (3,4,5) - Something about this doesn't play right. I don't know why though. Hmm...Since I can't find a fault, it's fine.
02:26:360 (4) - Too many repeats IMO.
02:56:590 (6) - Too many repeats for easiest difficulty, especially after a large stack. A stack that should probably move to here. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/404818 because it doesn't look good stuffed in the corner. Repeating isn't fun in a corner either. Changed
03:15:052 (5) - Slider looks out of place to me. I'm sure there's a better way to map 03:14:129 (3,4,5) -
03:17:821 (3,4,5) - ^
03:21:513 (3,4) - Looks a bit weird to me. I guess it's fine, but that blanket. Same for the other parts like this.
03:25:206 (3) - Okay this note along going into a half transition. It's finally bothered me enough to mention it. The beat that starts the repeater is not strong. So transferring is a bit weird. the repeater should start on the white tick IMO. And it stil has too many repeats. Fixed

Candy

03:21:513 (3,4) - spacing? is intentional
00:18:513 (1,2,3) - ^ same
00:20:359 (1,2,3) - doesn't look exactly straight and why does the spacing differ by 0.07? A lot of transitions are like this.
00:32:013 (2) - Note has no purpose. You should delete.
00:43:436 (3,4) - Why is this 1.0 snap?
00:44:590 (1) - Straight isn't the best here, but it doesn't go well with the next pattern if you change. :/
01:09:052 (3) - Clap doesn't sound good here. Might just be me. The clap follow the pattern without clap sounds empty
01:13:667 (6) - Clap doesn't sound good here. fits with the track~
01:19:667 (1,2,3,4,1,2) - Really nice symmetry. lol
01:46:436 (5,6,7) - Curve looks off to me.
01:58:667 (2,3,4) - I feel there shouldn't be a triple so soon after the one here 01:57:744 (4,5,6) - . It just seems like there's too much clicking to fit the song. You should remove the center note or turn into a repeat slider.
02:01:898 (5,1) - You should find a way to bring the snap down to 1.5.
02:12:513 - why does Vicho's name appear here? because began his part?
02:29:360 (4) - Maybe 1 unit to the right?
02:29:821 (1) - Perhaps give more of a curve like this. http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/404851 nop
02:33:052 (4,1) - ^^^
02:38:590 (4) - There's not something else you can do with this. It's a curved slider coming off a pointed one in a strange spot :/
02:42:513 (5,6) - Add whistles?
02:49:667 - Really sounds like a slider here. AlsoI really don't recommend you have a note hidden under 02:48:975 (5) - . It's harder to read and not nice to look at.
03:39:975 (1,2,3) - I like 1.2 snap better. But that's just me.

256,216,72283,1,4
304,276,72513,2,0,B|316:308|349:320,2,65
256,216,73206,1,0
208,276,73436,2,0,B|196:308|163:320,2,65

Chewin wrote:

Hi kenezz, mod requested via game ;3

[General]
Remove letterbox during breaks, the video already has got it :3
You are using the "Collab SB" in the Sweetie diff too.. Remove SB from this diff and just use it on the collab one
Is this mapset for approval? If not you should map an easier diff with 3 stars or less.
OMG THERE IS A DIFF NAMED "CHEWING"1!11! *jumps everywhere*

[Sweetie]
00:52:667 - Don't you think that this rhythm is becoming monotonous? What about to add a circle here?
Something like this (to keep consistency) is awesome: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/406290 You hace the reason, changed!
00:53:821 (4) - You should CTRL + R this slider, it flows really much better because in this way every slider's head is close to each other.
I mean that every slider's start is blanketted with the next slider's curve: Fixed!

00:58:436 (6) - Overlap with 00:56:590 (3)? Done!
01:01:667 (4) - CTRL + R is better imho Okay
01:12:513 (4) - I don't like this slider, why so much repeats? ._. I highlu suggest you to follow this rhythm instead, It's much better in my opinion:

You could move the elements in this way, always to keep a symmetry: http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/406298 Fixed

256,216,72283,1,4
304,276,72513,2,0,B|316:308|349:320,2,65
256,216,73206,1,0
208,276,73436,2,0,B|196:308|163:320,2,65

02:01:206 (5,6) - Make them symmetric with 02:00:283 (3,4) using the same x/y? Is already symmetric o3o
02:10:898 (4) - Overlap with 02:09:975 (2) instead, It would flow much better Okay
02:11:360 (5) - New combo Hmm no
02:26:360 (4) - Same of 01:12:513 (4). Use this rhythm instead:

02:55:898 (3) - New combo
Awesome! Moe song >w<

[Candy]
03:25:206 (1) - Remove new combo and use it on 03:25:436 (2) hmm no
Just this, awesome map *-* thanks u3u

Really nice collab >w< I liked it a lot.
That's all kenezz, I hope it's useful for you, good luck with rank >w<
Oh yes, star ;3

spboxer3 wrote:

※ Notice

red is unrankable issue.
blue is recommended to fix.
Black is just suggestion.

general

• 
  Settings
  (For the setting/general issue.)
  [list:9f34c]In pending? It's must have 1 diff under 3.24 stars if this for "Ranked"

Sweetie

• 
  Settings
  (For the setting. like Song Setup/timing or break time~)
  

1. 01:41:821 - break end at here?
2. 03:10:436 - ^

Hitsound
(For my listened. Just some suggest for the hitsound.)

1. 00:28:898 - 00:29:129 - 00:29:360 - add clap?
2. 00:57:513 (5) - finish? to emphasize the empty part(00:57:513 - to 00:58:436 - )
3. 02:25:206 (3) - change clap to reverse and add finish at slider tail.
4. 02:43:436 - 02:44:360 - 02:47:129 - 02:48:052 - 02:50:821 - etc. add whistle?

mapping
(These are about your patterns.Mostly for the suggest, Just some unrankable issue I will use red color to highlight it.)

1. 02:49:436 (4,1) - [suggestion] let 02:50:360 (1) - move to x424,y216 ((make those to the same straight.
2. 03:34:898 (2) - move to x440,y356? ((make the curve
3. 03:35:822 (4) - looks you used copy from 03:34:436 (1,2) - if you changed 03:34:898 (2) - you must change this too.

Candy

• 
  Settings
  (For the setting. like Song Setup/timing or break time~)
  

1. 01:41:821 - break end at here?
2. 03:10:436 - ^

mapping
(These are about your patterns.Mostly for the suggest, Just some unrankable issue I will use red color to highlight it.)

1. [keenezz's part]
   
   1. 00:28:667 (4) - It's 1/6 rhythm
   2. 01:28:898 (7) - NC ((it's a start for the paragraph. so it should used NC imo
2. [vicho's part]
   
   1. 02:17:821 (3,1) - [super nazi] It's should be stack
   2. 02:50:590 (4) - [curve] rotate -20∘ to make 02:50:129 (3,4) - at the straight and 02:50:590 (4,5) - have a good curve~
   3. 03:41:821 (4) - NC? same reason as 01:28:898 (7) -

yay~
good luck~[/b]

Kurisuchianu wrote:

:3

[Sweetie]
02:49:436 (4) - me confunde, reducelo plox

[Taikow]
Disable the custom hitsounds

Y lo demas no encontre nada malo