forum

capsule - Hello

posted
Total Posts
43
Topic Starter
Kurai
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on mercredi 25 avril 2018 at 18:49:06

Artist: capsule
Title: Hello
Tags: PLAYER 中田 ヤスタカ Nakata Yasutaka こしじま としこ Koshijima Toshiko
BPM: 132
Filesize: 2609kb
Play Time: 01:40
Difficulties Available:
  1. Hard (3,1 stars, 199 notes)
  2. Normal (1,87 stars, 156 notes)
Download: capsule - Hello
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
hello
[Nemesis]
Hello M4M

Normal

00:00:534 (2,3) - forging them into a straight line like so would improve the visuals and the "rectangularness" of the map
00:06:898 (4,1,2) - these spacings are identical, yet 00:07:352 (1,2) - is a 2/1 snap and nothing really emphasizes that. I feel like these two sections should feel differently since they're snapped differently also
00:30:989 (1,2) - maybe reposition (2) so that it lines up with (1) a little bit?
00:39:398 (4) - this slider looks kinda ugly, maybe recenter the white anchor?
01:11:898 (2,3) - I think this spacing is a little too high for a normal, I'm no expert but I believe stacking (3) on (2) is gonna feel a bit better
01:18:261 (1,2,3,4) - (1) seems to be standing out a little too much, how about using the same angle you used for (2,3,4)?
01:26:443 (2,2) - stack these up for aesthetics

Hard

00:02:352 (2,4) - if you ctrl+g them you might end up with a more consistent flow (reposition the circles afterwards though)
00:18:261 (1,2,1) - same spacing issue I mentioned in Normal
00:32:807 (1,2,3) - spacings between these are kinda contradictory, (3) is snapped closer to (2) than (2) to (1), yet it's spaced higher for some reason. Why did you go for that inconsistency?
00:37:352 (4) - soften the curve there, I believe it's gonna line up with 00:36:443 (1) - a bit better
00:46:443 (1,2,3) - I believe this sound isn't as strong for a jump like this
00:47:352 (1,1) - not a fan of these slider shape varieties
01:03:489 (5) - move the white anchor exactly one pixel up, it's gonna look much better than you think, trust me
01:34:170 - since it's a hard I'm pretty sure you can add a circle there, it's a pretty strong sound after all.

aight all from me, best of luck :3
Topic Starter
Kurai

[Nemesis] wrote:

Hello M4M

Normal

00:00:534 (2,3) - forging them into a straight line like so would improve the visuals and the "rectangularness" of the map sure, that was a mistake from my side
00:06:898 (4,1,2) - these spacings are identical, yet 00:07:352 (1,2) - is a 2/1 snap and nothing really emphasizes that. I feel like these two sections should feel differently since they're snapped differently also I believe the underwhelming presence of beats at this moment justifies using a lower spacing. Moreover, the player has 1 second to realise the spacing changed.
00:30:989 (1,2) - maybe reposition (2) so that it lines up with (1) a little bit? yess
00:39:398 (4) - this slider looks kinda ugly, maybe recenter the white anchor? sure
01:11:898 (2,3) - I think this spacing is a little too high for a normal, I'm no expert but I believe stacking (3) on (2) is gonna feel a bit better I believe this is okay. Stacking it would make it harder to play actually since the pattern is stuck at the top of the screen, using a slightly higher spacing (which is somewhat justified by the pronounced beat the slider is snapped on) makes it actually more readable in my opinion.
01:18:261 (1,2,3,4) - (1) seems to be standing out a little too much, how about using the same angle you used for (2,3,4)? sure
01:26:443 (2,2) - stack these up for aesthetics it would break the spacing unfortunately. Anyway there is a couple of seconds between those objects, so no problem

Hard

00:02:352 (2,4) - if you ctrl+g them you might end up with a more consistent flow (reposition the circles afterwards though) I do not like this ;w;
00:18:261 (1,2,1) - same spacing issue I mentioned in Normal same thing then xp
00:32:807 (1,2,3) - spacings between these are kinda contradictory, (3) is snapped closer to (2) than (2) to (1), yet it's spaced higher for some reason. Why did you go for that inconsistency? to mark the slowdown in the song
00:37:352 (4) - soften the curve there, I believe it's gonna line up with 00:36:443 (1) - a bit better did it a bit
00:46:443 (1,2,3) - I believe this sound isn't as strong for a jump like this I actually like it, if someone else complain, I guess I will rearrange it
00:47:352 (1,1) - not a fan of these slider shape varieties why tho
01:03:489 (5) - move the white anchor exactly one pixel up, it's gonna look much better than you think, trust me True!
01:34:170 - since it's a hard I'm pretty sure you can add a circle there, it's a pretty strong sound after all. mmhhhh, not sure, I'll think about it

aight all from me, best of luck :3
Thanks a bunch for the mod! Highly appreciated
Aurele
alo l'espace

General
  1. Utilise un background JPG au lieu de PNG
Ovoui's Easy
  1. 00:32:807 (1,2) - Je remarque que tu utilises des whistles pour ces deux cercles, par contre, si on regarde un peu plus tôt à 00:21:898 (1) - , le combo complet contient le même son que les deux cercles, mais ils n'ont pas de whistles. Ce que je peux te suggérer, c'est de supprimer les whistles des deux cercles afin que ça soit pareil avec le combo avant.
  2. 00:36:443 (1) - Puisque c'est le début de la section du kiai, tu pourrais ajouter un finish sur le début de ce slider afin de représenter le début de la nouvelle section. Ça permet aussi de distinguer le changement de mesure.
  3. 01:30:989 (1,2) - Avec tes hitsounds, tu ne joues pas de la bonne façon avec les instruments. Je te suggère de supprimer le whistle sur le début du slider (2) et d'ajouter des whistles sur la fin des deux sliders. De cette façon, ça te permet de mettre l'accent sur le piano.
  4. 01:34:170 (1) - C'est la seule diff qui a un cercle à ce moment avant le spinner. Je te suggère de le supprimer, ça serait plus facile pour les beginners et ça serait plus constant avec les deux autres difficultés.
  5. Je n'ai rien d'autre à ajouter par rapport à la map en général. C'est une difficulté très simple avec des patterns constants. La seule chose, par contre, tu devrais regarder tes timings points, parce qu'il y en a qui ne sont pas utile.
    Dans la box ci-dessous, je t'ai highlight ceux qui tu devrais supprimer.
Normal
  1. 00:06:898 (4) - Si tu veux jouer un peu avec le contraste du mouvement, je te suggère de stack ce cercle avec le cercle (2). Puisque le flow va naturellement vers le haut, tu peux le break en le plaçant vers le bas au lieu.
  2. 00:07:352 (1) - à partir de cet objet jusqu'à 00:33:716 (2) - tu as placé les objets d'une façon où que tu dois faire un rectangle continue vers le haut dans le sens contraire de l'aiguille. Tu pourrais facilement arrêter ça en plaçant 00:13:489 (2,3) - vers le bas et recontinuer de la droite vers la gauche. (Si tu ne comprend pas, tu me le dira)
  3. 00:29:170 (1,2) - Les cercles ne sont pas alignées!1!!11!
  4. 00:38:943 (2) - J'ai de la difficulté à voir pourquoi ce cercle il est placé ici. Je te suggère fortement de le déplacer à 00:38:716 - au lieu. Ça serait plus évident vu le rythme des derniers objets. (aka 00:36:443 (1,2) - )
  5. 00:43:034 (4) - Vu les vocals et les instruments, je ne comprend pas pourquoi tu as décidé de mettre un deuxième reverse arrow. Pourtant, 00:43:716 - cet endroit est 'worth' pour être cliquable surtout que c'est de début d'une nouvelle mesure :( (Ce n'est pas comme 00:57:125 (3) - qui est approprié puisque le moment le plus important est le prochain cercle)
  6. 01:12:807 (4) - New combo?
Hard
  1. 00:04:625 (3,4) - Pas parfaitement alignés
  2. 00:14:170 (4,1) - Pas parfaitement alignés
  3. 00:18:034 (4) - Penserais-tu que ça serait trop edgy si tu déplaçais le cercle un peu vers la droite pour créer le même effet que 00:15:307 (3,4) - ? xd - Ça pourrait bien faire puisque la chanson a un bruit un peu plus fort au moment du cercle (4).
  4. 01:03:261 (4) - Je vois bien un petit jump à cet endroit.
    Clickie
    c'est presque une blague mon affaire
by la terre
Topic Starter
Kurai

Gabe wrote:

alo l'espace

General
  1. Utilise un background JPG au lieu de PNG ah ui faudra qu'j'le fasse uwu
Normal
  1. 00:07:352 (1) - à partir de cet objet jusqu'à 00:33:716 (2) - tu as placé les objets d'une façon où que tu dois faire un rectangle continue vers le haut dans le sens contraire de l'aiguille. Tu pourrais facilement arrêter ça en plaçant 00:13:489 (2,3) - vers le bas et recontinuer de la droite vers la gauche. (Si tu ne comprend pas, tu me le dira) J'ai tout réarrangé autrement
  2. 00:43:034 (4) - Vu les vocals et les instruments, je ne comprend pas pourquoi tu as décidé de mettre un deuxième reverse arrow. Pourtant, 00:43:716 - cet endroit est 'worth' pour être cliquable surtout que c'est de début d'une nouvelle mesure :( (Ce n'est pas comme 00:57:125 (3) - qui est approprié puisque le moment le plus important est le prochain cercle) je trouve que ça fait mieux pour suivre les 1/4 dans la musique
Hard
  1. 01:03:261 (4) - Je vois bien un petit jump à cet endroit. Je préfère pô, je trouve que justement avoir un spacing régulier c'est plus approprié pour le slowdown de la musique
    Clickie
    c'est presque une blague mon affaire
by la terre
Merci petit astronaute ^^
YuzukiEba
Bonsoir

GENERAL

Rajoute plus de tags owo

NORMAL

00:35:989 - petit son inaperçue
00:44:170 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Les hitsounds sont trop bas
01:12:580 - 01:18:261 (1) - Kiai ?
01:17:807 (4,5,1) - Bizarre le pattern

En tous ça fait plaisir de voir une beatmap AVEC DU RYTHME ^^ ( c dur en std )
Topic Starter
Kurai

YuzukiEba wrote:

Bonsoir

GENERAL

Rajoute plus de tags owo oki

NORMAL

00:35:989 - petit son inaperçue
00:44:170 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - Les hitsounds sont trop bas
01:12:580 - 01:18:261 (1) - Kiai ?
01:17:807 (4,5,1) - Bizarre le pattern

En tous ça fait plaisir de voir une beatmap AVEC DU RYTHME ^^ ( c dur en std )
tt fix merci bb ^^
Topic Starter
Kurai
METADATA INFORMATION


- The artist name "capsule" is not capitalised because the album "PLAYER" was released in 2010. The artist name started being capitalised to "CAPSULE" when the album "STEREO WORXXX" was released in Fall 2013 as the band decided to transfer to the record label "unBORDE" (Warner Music Japan).
→ Read this for more information: http://www.capsule-official.com/news_detail/8 (use google translation if you don't understand Japanese).

- Before signing with unBORDE/Warner Music Japan, CAPSULE was with the record label "YAMAHA MUSIC COMMUNICATIONS" and the artist name was not capitalised ("capsule").
→ Here is the album's page on YAMAHA MUSIC's website: http://www.yamahamusic.co.jp/artist/det ... tist_id=73 ("Hello" is the 9th song).

- Tags:
  1. "PLAYER" → Album name (http://www.yamahamusic.co.jp/artist/det ... tist_id=73)
  2. 中田 ヤスタカ (Nakata Yasutaka) → composer and record producer
  3. こしじま としこ (Koshijima Toshiko) → vocalist
  4. → information taken from there: http://www.yamahamusic.co.jp/artist/ind ... tist_id=73
Arrival
Ovoui

00:10:534 (3) - Decale ce slider un peu a droite

00:34:398 (3) - Ctrl+g pour une plus grosse emphase

00:43:261 (4,1,2) - DELete pour emphase spectaculaire

Normal

00:02:352 (2) - Clap pour la repetition instrumentale

01:20:080 (1,2,3) - Ctrl+g pour la sensation flow spaciale (alo l'espace)

Hard

00:04:625 (3,4,5) - augmente le spacing pour que le centre du slider

00:40:761 (2,3,4) - Meme chose que sur la easy

01:10:080 (2,1) - DOuble clap pour des sensations de jeu incroyables
Topic Starter
Kurai
Euh ouais ok, on va dire que j'ai fix certains trucs ^___^"
Ovoui
j'ai tout fix aussi !
PoNo
Easy

00:06:443 (2) - pas besoin de nc ça

00:34:398 (1) - nc ça

01:03:489 (1) - beaucoup trop rapide pour une easy

normal

00:06:443 (3) - T'aurais pu faire un slider 1/2 ici Imo pour plus emphasise le changement dans le song

https://imgur-archive.ppy.sh/GSc5iS0.png 00:30:989 (1) - thinking face utilise CTRL Shift S pour faire ce genre de chose :D

01:03:489 (1) - c'est également un peu fast je trouve

01:06:443 (2) - pareil que pour 30sec, copy past le slider c'est tellement plus propre


un peu la flemme de mod le reste, back in 2k8 mapset xD
Pachiru
jpe gd?
Topic Starter
Kurai

Ponoyoshi wrote:

Easy

00:06:443 (2) - pas besoin de nc ça

00:34:398 (1) - nc ça

01:03:489 (1) - beaucoup trop rapide pour une easy

normal

00:06:443 (3) - T'aurais pu faire un slider 1/2 ici Imo pour plus emphasise le changement dans le song

https://imgur-archive.ppy.sh/GSc5iS0.png 00:30:989 (1) - thinking face utilise CTRL Shift S pour faire ce genre de chose :D

01:03:489 (1) - c'est également un peu fast je trouve

01:06:443 (2) - pareil que pour 30sec, copy past le slider c'est tellement plus propre


un peu la flemme de mod le reste, back in 2k8 mapset xD
Tout fix voilà merciiii

Pachiru wrote:

jpe gd?
Ya plus vraiment grand chose à GD :/
Shmiklak
[General]
  1. Some minor issues:
    - no combo colours
    - widescreen while there's no sb
    - countdown is enabled, though you can use it if you really want
  2. modding assistant tells there are some unsnapped green lines on ez and nm
[Hard]
  1. I think AR8 is kinda high for 132 bpm song hard diff because even my Insane on 124 bpm has AR8. What about AR7?
  2. 00:34:398 (3) - needs NC because you placed them every new tact and this slider crosses the tact's start.
  3. 00:44:625 (1) - 00:46:443 (1) - 00:48:261 (1) - is it really required to place NCs there? They break the system of placing NCs every tact.
    NC issues also go to the end part
  4. 00:53:261 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - these sounds aren't worth being circles with such space. This rythm would fit better https://puu.sh/wWaa0/a66386aa37.jpg also you used it at the same sounds here 00:54:625 (1,2,3,4,5) -
  5. 00:59:170 (3,4) - try to avoid this overlap, it looks ugly. same goes for 01:00:989 (3,4) -
[Normal]
  1. AR6 is too high for normal especially on such BPM. Yes, RC allows you to use AR6 but we usually use high AR on high BPM songs so you know what I mean
  2. what about using 1.2 ds on 1/2 beats so we can avoid such ugly overlaps?
  3. 00:07:352 (1) - is there any reason why this is spaced so far from the previous object?
  4. 01:12:125 (3) - inconsistent spacing
  5. 01:30:989 (3) - missed NC
[Easy]
  1. DS 1.3 would work better
  2. I cannot catch your NCing, you always use different system of NC placing. In the beginning you used it every tact, a bit later every two, later just no ncs then two random ncs etc. Please make it more logical.
I guess this is an oldschool map. Not what I like but I think some people might love it. Best of luck~ ♥
Topic Starter
Kurai

M a r v o l l o wrote:

[General]
  1. Some minor issues:
    - no combo colours
    - widescreen while there's no sb
    - countdown is enabled, though you can use it if you really want
  2. modding assistant tells there are some unsnapped green lines on ez and nm
alright
[Hard]
  1. I think AR8 is kinda high for 132 bpm song hard diff because even my Insane on 124 bpm has AR8. What about AR7? changed
  2. 00:34:398 (3) - needs NC because you placed them every new tact and this slider crosses the tact's start. kk
  3. 00:44:625 (1) - 00:46:443 (1) - 00:48:261 (1) - is it really required to place NCs there? They break the system of placing NCs every tact.
    NC issues also go to the end part yes because the song changes rhythms as well
  4. 00:53:261 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - these sounds aren't worth being circles with such space. This rythm would fit better https://puu.sh/wWaa0/a66386aa37.jpg also you used it at the same sounds here 00:54:625 (1,2,3,4,5) - kk
  5. 00:59:170 (3,4) - try to avoid this overlap, it looks ugly. same goes for 01:00:989 (3,4) - I like it :'(
[Normal]
  1. AR6 is too high for normal especially on such BPM. Yes, RC allows you to use AR6 but we usually use high AR on high BPM songs so you know what I mean sure
  2. what about using 1.2 ds on 1/2 beats so we can avoid such ugly overlaps? but they're not ugly uwu
  3. 00:07:352 (1) - is there any reason why this is spaced so far from the previous object? mistake from my side lmao, fixed
  4. 01:12:125 (3) - inconsistent spacing done on purpose
  5. 01:30:989 (3) - missed NC boop
[Easy]
  1. DS 1.3 would work better Ovoui told me he doesn't want to fix that
  2. I cannot catch your NCing, you always use different system of NC placing. In the beginning you used it every tact, a bit later every two, later just no ncs then two random ncs etc. Please make it more logical. Made it better
I guess this is an oldschool map. Not what I like but I think some people might love it. Best of luck~ ♥
Thanks for the mod!
Mir
hi

[Ovoui's Easy]
SV is really low and that causes 1/1 overlaps which isn't advised according to the RC guidelines.
You also have a spinner that violates several guidelines regarding recovery time and spinning time at 01:03:489 (1) - would recommend removing it and replacing it with a circle on 01:03:489 -

- 00:29:170 (1,2,3,4) - Don't really get why you decided to vary the slider shapes so much despite no change in the music really.

Otherwise it's just overall issues.

[Normal]
Kinda same about DS but you already said you didn't wanna change it :?
MA is telling me lots of unsnapped greenlines.
SPOILER
01:05:530
01:11:894
01:34:166
01:34:621
01:35:076
01:35:530
01:35:985
01:36:439
01:36:894
01:37:348
01:37:803
01:38:257
01:38:712
01:39:166
01:39:621
01:40:076

- 00:33:716 (2,3) - Maybe making these slightly closer would make the 1/2 more obvious?
- 00:43:034 (4) - eee 00:57:125 (3,3) - can't be trusted owo
- 01:15:307 (2) - Slider end sounds like it should have a slider instead like this instead?

[Hard]
- 00:44:625 (1,1,1) - I don't think this is ever used again and that's kinda sad cuz I like this idea :( (also kinda looks random)
- 00:47:352 (1,1) - No same shape?
- 00:49:625 (3,4,5) - 4 has more emphasis than 5 but 5 is stronger no?

Otherwise fine I think.

Good luck!!
Topic Starter
Kurai

Mir wrote:

hi hi

[Normal]
Kinda same about DS but you already said you didn't wanna change it :? overlaps make it easier to read
MA is telling me lots of unsnapped greenlines. fixed
SPOILER
01:05:530
01:11:894
01:34:166
01:34:621
01:35:076
01:35:530
01:35:985
01:36:439
01:36:894
01:37:348
01:37:803
01:38:257
01:38:712
01:39:166
01:39:621
01:40:076

- 00:33:716 (2,3) - Maybe making these slightly closer would make the 1/2 more obvious? changed
- 00:43:034 (4) - eee 00:57:125 (3,3) - can't be trusted owo why tho
- 01:15:307 (2) - Slider end sounds like it should have a slider instead like this instead? but, that would ignore the main instrument :'( I purposedly ignored this beat to leave a small 1/1 break

[Hard]
- 00:44:625 (1,1,1) - I don't think this is ever used again and that's kinda sad cuz I like this idea :( (also kinda looks random) I didn't want to abuse it
- 00:47:352 (1,1) - No same shape? changed
- 00:49:625 (3,4,5) - 4 has more emphasis than 5 but 5 is stronger no? but it's a star

Otherwise fine I think.

Good luck!!
thanks!!
Ovoui

Mir wrote:

hi Hey o/

[Ovoui's Easy]
SV is really low and that causes 1/1 overlaps which isn't advised according to the RC guidelines. It's not recomanded by the RC but i don't the see probem in this map. Moreover overlaping make the map easier to read because when the player will focus on a circle he will see instantly the next object thanks to the overlap.
You also have a spinner that violates several guidelines regarding recovery time and spinning time at 01:03:489 (1) - would recommend removing it and replacing it with a circle on 01:03:489 - The guidlne isn't clear enough, 4 beats is too vague and depends of the bpm of the music, so the guideline is not general enough and shouldn't be applied imo. I don't want put any 1/2 gap between two hitobject, it'd feel weird it'd be the only in the difficulty.

- 00:29:170 (1,2,3,4) - Don't really get why you decided to vary the slider shapes so much despite no change in the music really. To make the pattern less boring.

Otherwise it's just overall issues.



Good luck!! Thanks for the mod !
lazygirl
Hello :3

[Ovoui's Easy]

  1. 01:27:352 (1,2) - maybe you can do 1/2 sliders here, like you did earlier (although you only used repeats) but this should fit since it's not gonna be followed by more hits with low rhythmic spacing.
Otherwise map could use some visual cleaning up but not much :P

[Normal]

  1. 01:02:807 (2,1) - Probably not recommended to have that big of a gap to the centre on a normal when a spinner comes
  2. 01:05:080 - might wanna add a note here? maybe not since the spinner is still close but eh
  3. 01:15:307 (2,3) - why does the pattern change here?
I find it weird that you start with full square gimmick and just randomly abandon it

[Hard]

  1. 00:43:488 (7) - there's barely any sound here
  2. 01:03:489 (5) - could use some beautification
Again weird how you abandon the 90° gimmick.

That's all for me, gl!
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply