1. Fingerdash - 4Key (5.25 stars, 3570 notes)

Hydria wrote:

hands aren't in the best condition for this but lets go
1/2/3/4

NSFW Activities

I'd be careful on doing stuff like 00:21:092 (21092|1,21181|1) - during your streams since this is 336bpm streams, also there's a lot of notes in the middle and not so many on the outside (15 vs 10) so you might wanna move some notes out to the sides, same with 00:29:083 -
00:32:297 (32297|2,32431|2,32699|2,32833|2,33235|2,33369|2) - lot of column 3 usage moved 00:33:235 (33235|2) - to column 4

If I move notes out to the sides, those 336bpm streams should be broken (or I can't use tripple patterns like 00:20:556 (20556|3,20601|2,20646|1,21226|3,21271|2,21315|1) - ) and it would be much harder to read. So I just avoided 00:21:092 (21092|1,21181|1) this pattern and rearranged it.
00:20:512 - changed patterns. (14/11)
00:29:083 - changed patterns. (13/12)


-- PR MOD OVER THE RELAXING SECTION --
00:35:244 (35244|3) - move to 1
00:36:047 (36047|1) - move to 4
00:36:315 (36315|0) - 3
00:36:449 (36449|1) - 2
00:37:387 (37387|1) - 1
Some fixed
-- PR MOD OVER --

00:42:208 (42208|1,42342|1,42476|1,42610|1,42744|1,43146|1,43280|1,43413|1) - err what is this, move 00:42:610 (42610|1) - to 1
00:42:208 (42208|2,42208|0,42275|1,42275|3,42342|2,42409|3,42409|1,42476|0,42476|2,42610|1,42610|0) - rearranged patterns

just as a warning 01:10:869 (70869|1,70869|2,70869|3,70869|0,71003|1,71003|3,71137|3,71137|1,71271|0,71271|1,71271|3,71271|2,71405|0,71405|2,71538|0,71538|2,71672|0,71672|2,71672|3,71672|1,71806|3,71806|1,71940|3,71940|1,72074|0,72074|1,72074|2,72074|3,72208|2,72208|0,72342|2,72342|0,72476|3,72476|1,72476|2,72476|0) - is a lot harder to hit than the previous pattern and most people won't be expecting it, i'd suggest a [14][23] here instead of [24][13] but that's up to you I just wanted to give some difference between 02:28:012 - this part

01:20:110 (80110|3,80244|3,80378|3,80512|3) - this might end up putting more strain on people's hands than they're expecting
that definitely becomes a problem here: 01:28:280 (88280|3,88413|3,88547|3,88681|3,88815|3,88949|3,89083|3) -
01:20:244 (80244|3) - moved to 3
changed patterns like 01:28:681 (88681|3,88681|0,88681|1,88815|1,88815|2,88949|3,88949|0,89083|1,89083|0) -

02:02:431 (122431|0,122565|0,122699|0,122967|0,123101|0) - had a bit of trouble hitting this a couple of times
Wanted to give same strain in both hands ( 01:53:860 (113860|3,113994|3,114128|3,114396|3,114530|3) - )
I think this trouble of hitting is caused by 02:03:235 (123235|1) - this note sine one more jack is given to left hand so moved it to 4

02:37:119 (157119|3,157253|3,157387|3,157521|3) - watch out for this definitely right after that stream
02:37:387 (157387|3) - moved this to 1

02:42:108 (162108|1,162208|1,162309|1,162409|1) - feels a bit jammed here
ctrl+Hed 02:42:409 (162409|0,162442|1) - these two notes.

02:45:690 (165690|3,165824|3,165958|3,166092|3) - same problem as before
02:45:824 (165824|3,165824|1,165958|0,165958|2) - fixed like this

02:50:690 (170690|1,170780|1,170869|1,170958|1) - questionable
02:50:690 (170690|1) - moved this one to column 1

03:24:864 (204864|3,204864|2) - sound doesn't exist
Aaah thanks for finding it. idk why I put those notes there.
Erased notes and fixed SVs.

03:55:333 (235333|3,235467|3,235601|3,235735|3,235869|3,236003|3,236137|3,236271|3) - >_>
Oops......
01:13:012 - to 01:15:155 - and 02:30:155 - to 02:32:297 - tone down the SVs here, it's really hard to see what the next note is on my speed (28)
Changed SVs (2.4x 0.3x 0.3x -> 2.0x 0.5x 0.5x)

final words:
yknow, in the editor this map looks frankly horrible and a lot of questionable design choices have been made which would have made this mod 4x longer than it actually was agree... this was the biggest reason why I hesitated to get a mod for this.
but, whilst playing it, those problems just went away, and things that even I would question myself doing you've made work so well, and I don't know anyone else who could pull off 450bpm streams to work as well as you have for a diff that's this low in star rating
do I think this is rankable? not under current ranking criteria standards sadly (some of the bursts are only mapped to one sound which they don't like)
do I like the chart? yes. Yay!!
good work here, well done.