1. Another (3.88 stars, 142 notes)
2. Fuhai (1.21 stars, 5 notes)
3. Repentance (Old) (8.68 stars, 1813 notes)
4. Repentance (8.68 stars, 1794 notes)

Shishou wrote:

hi from mod req

00:02:686 (1,4) - stack or blanket Fixed.
00:04:061 (3) - just copy+paste this slider 00:03:811 (2) - to make it more cleanOkay.
00:06:936 (3,2) - stack To what?
00:17:186 (4,5,6) - distance here suddenly decrease. increase more spacing The next couple notes have larger spacing since it is the beginning of the next measure, which has a larger impact.
00:23:186 (1,2,3) - same here ^ Fixed.
00:24:936 (1,1) - remove nc Fixed.
00:29:686 (7) - try avoiding using multiple reverse slider Tend to disagree here... The vocals kinda just stay on one word, which is why I did this.
00:29:686 (7,9) - stack
00:43:186 (4) - put this between here 00:42:936 (3) - and here 00:43:311 (5) - Yea, that was causing a flow disruption.
00:56:686 (1,2) - unstack it. It doesn't match the song or the rhythm you make Fixed.
00:57:686 (6) - nc Fixed.
00:58:936 (2,1) - stack Nah... it's fine.
01:00:936 (2,1) - stack Same...
01:09:061 (2,3) - distance this two The spacing in this entire section was weird now that you point it out. I changed things a lot.
01:49:186 (4) - distance this to here 01:49:311 (5) - Fixed.
01:56:686 (1,2) - unstack I think this is okay.
01:58:686 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - you change your rhyhtm here try matching the rhythm you make here 01:54:686 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - Sorry, but I'm gonna have to disagree here. The rhythm that I follwed here was of the vocals. If you listen to the "screaming", this is the rhythm thatis being followed.
02:10:811 you missed a note herePurposefully.
03:10:061 (3,4) - fix blanket Fixed.
03:17:186 (4,5) - stack or fix overlap Definitely.
03:48:061 (3) - ctrl + g? Meh.
03:58:436 (4) - distance this Okay.
04:06:686 to 04:18:561 unnecessary break. map this part Yea... i got u
04:23:936 (5,6,7) - make this part a stream? Made kick sliders instead.
04:42:936 (2,3) - fix blanket What's wrong with this?Fixed.
04:42:936 (2,4) - ^ ?
04:46:686 to 04:48:561 - map this part Done.
04:50:686 to 05:06:686 (1) - same ^ Done.

good luck ! Thanks!!!

yShadowXOP_ wrote:

M4M

00:19:686 (5) - NC
00:27:686 (7) - ^
00:31:186 (1) - Remove NC
00:34:686 (1) - This break time does not make sense here
00:58:936 (2) - Remove this big slider
01:00:936 (2) - ^
01:05:748 (2) - The circle does not have sound
01:06:248 (2) - ^
01:23:061 (1) - Remove NC
01:29:686 (1,2) - what? take out the reverse and place normal sliders or circles
01:37:686 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16) - no sound for streams here
01:57:686 (6) - NC
02:10:748 - circles pls
02:12:748 - ^
02:22:686 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - try to arrange this
02:25:748 (2) - The circle does not have sound
03:53:686 (1,2) - circle or slider
04:10:498 (6,7,8) - no sound
04:17:748 (2) - ^
04:44:686 (9) - NC
05:00:623 (12) - No sound
05:02:623 (12) - ^
05:04:623 (12) - ^


Good map man

1. all of these are general issues. you can find examples of all of them through the entire map.
2. as a general point, it helps to make objects look like theyre equidistant from each other to make the map neat - you don't follow this in some places like 00:04:936 (3,4,1,2,3) - (note how 1 is closer to the red 3 than the red 4) which makes your map look a bit messy imo. equidistance is a great way to make your map look much neater.
3. on the topic of messiness, your map contains plenty of unjustified overlaps (ie those not part of a pattern) like 00:18:561 (6,2) - , 00:21:436 (4,3) - , and 00:20:436 (6,2) - . try avoiding overlaps when possible by stacking when possible unless the overlaps are justified by being part of a pattern, as overlapping without a pattern behind it looks ugly to most players. 00:50:686 (1,2,3,4) - is an example of a justified overlap - you can clearly recognize that the objects repeat themselves consistently through this overlapping pattern.
4. 00:03:561 (1,3) - imo it would be better to keep this parallel for reasons described below
5. 00:04:311 (4,5,6,1,2) - i don't really see any recognizable pattern to this, other than that the flow is circular. i strongly suggest that you consider arranging your patterns in easily recognizable shapes. such as regular polygons, symmetrical patterns (such as 00:27:686 (1,2,3,4) - ), and parallel lines (a thing you can do for 00:54:686 (1,2,3,4) - instead of what you have now).
6. 00:06:311 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - over here, you're switching from sharp flow (4,5,6) to wide flow (6, 1, 2, 3) even when thwe song is (imo) not doing anything out of the ordinary - stick to one kind of flow when the song isnt changing. (once again at 00:10:311 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - and 00:12:311 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - the correct way to handle this would be something like 00:14:311 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - where the flow remains sharp throughout)
7. 00:06:936 (3,4,1,2,3) - also, spacing inconsistencies - even though these represent more or less the same sound, (4,1) is spaced much less than the others, implying that it's a much weaker sound when it actually isnt.
8. 00:20:936 (2,3) - blanket fixes etc. don't underestimate blankets - they are key to making your map look much much neater.
9. 00:25:686 (1,2,3) - this is nice usage of consistent slidershapes - however this could be improved, as it lacks visual appeal. arrange this in a triangle perhaps?
10. 00:29:686 (7) - the reverses on this slider make it stand out too much from the other parts of the map here, giving it more emphasis than it needs.
11. 00:31:186 - starting here, you up the intensity of the jumps by a large factor even though the song is still doing more or less the same thing. if anything, the jumps should get larger at 00:31:186 - since that's where the growl in the vocals gets noticably deeper.
12. 01:06:686 - spacing varies variably in this section (for example compare 01:06:686 (1,2,3) - with 01:07:686 (1,2,3) - - the spacing between them is different even if they represent the same sounds.)