joker- wrote:

Hi~ m4m

Easy

• 
  distance snap issues(?) they are fine, just different ds for 1/1 and 2/1 in some spots, doesnt affect readability

1. 00:09:637 - i suggest to beat on this sound since strong drum sound and your pattern is beat those sound(00:02:780 (3) - and 00:05:065 (3) - 00:07:351 (3) - ...)
   can you try to use this rhythm pattern below? really need some circles/less density here, the part is already very dense

Normal

1. cool

Advanced

1. 01:13:208 (3,4) - if you are following vocals, i suggest to use 1/1 slider on here(01:13:208 - ) cuz vocal is prolonged in my thought 1/2 slider might work, but too dense there for this diff I think

Hard

1. 00:00:637 (2,1) - can you increase distance on here like insane diff? i think more better to emphasize the sound to use distance I can't really fine a way to make it work well and look nice and current is alright too.

Insane

1. 00:22:494 (6) - i suggest to use circle + 1/1 reverse slider. from 00:22:780 - to 00:23:351 - is one word in Japanese and not connected from 00:22:494 - to 00:22:780 - it's not really going by words (which would hard cause I have no idea), I just think it fits well with the syllables/how vocals go there
2. 02:38:222 (4) - i feel better to move it inside 02:37:650 (2) - like 02:37:936 (3) - . I think the "moving" pattern works better, that suggestion looks weird to me and also too low spacing for intensity

Absense

1. 01:51:650 (6,8,9) - unstacked intentional?
2. 02:15:650 (1,7) - same as above enable stacking in editor and look again lol
3. 02:31:650 (1,3) - can you kinda improve the placement like this image? sure

im sorry for quantities and qualities about mod...
i feel nostalgic for symmetric placement on highest diff
Good Luck with you!

Mir wrote:

Hi Lasse.~

How the fuck am I supposed to mod this.

[ General]

1. Wave hitsounds with possible delay > 5ms:
   
   1. drum-hitfinish.wav
      
   2. drum-hitfinish2.wav
      
   pass. hitsounds are fine (seriously though, they just peak a bit later, no problem)

[]

[ Easy]

1. 00:36:208 (5) - Not supposed to be symmetrical? Looks a bit weird how it is considering the points are vaguely symmetrical but the shape isn't :thinking: http://i.imgur.com/BXoYdGn.png made it even less symmetrical
   
2. 01:14:034 (1) - Spinner starts a bit too suddenly imo and probably won't be enough time for a noob to register he has to spin. It's also really really short. Maybe a slider would work better here rather than a spinner. 00:37:494 (1) - Kinda same for this tbh, if you removed 00:37:351 (1) - it would probably be easier to register for a new player but after clicking that it changes to 133bpm here, so gap is way bigger than it looks
   
3. 02:01:936 (3) - This DS is kinda fucked. i've been using 1.2x for 1/1 gaps all the time for the 1x base parts, cause 1x looks bad and is harder to read imo

Yeah I'm not too good with lower diffs, but that's all I could find. Oh also about the break, maybe start mapping earlier so it fits with the rest of the difficulties cuz atm this diff is the only one that starts exactly when the vocals come in, but the rest of them start slightly before at 00:41:922 - instead of 00:46:494 - part is a pain rhyhthm wise (see intro) and also a good spot to give beginners some rest cause there is only a really short break later on

[ Normal]

1. 00:46:494 - Wouldn't you start mapping here? In the Easy you left more break (and while I get it's an easy yes) and starting before the vocals come in I feel kind of defeats the point of the break in the first place. might consider deleting this, but I think it's alright lol
   
2. 01:14:034 (1) - Spinner is also questionable regarding start time and duration if you ask me. same here
   
3. 01:38:621 (4) - Uwah. Blue tick start will screw some players up and I'm sure you expected this to be pointed out. But I think starting on the red tick for simplicity's sake will just work better because for one there's a snare there, and two it would remove the weird rhythm gap. I mean I get it's a slider but it's still kinda lol. It's not a major issue though at least I don't think so. What you could do instead is lower the DS so that it's closer (even AIMod complains about it) so players will click earlier anyways. closer will make it look like 1/2 and clicking too late is less problematic on sliders than early. only way to map to the song here. if it turns out to be a real issue i'd just delete it lol
   
4. 02:07:793 (3) - DS is a bit too high. (minor tho since visual spacing is fine) true, fixed
   
5. 02:38:507 (1) - It makes more sense at least to me to use reverses here since hitsound-wise you're going for all the snares (I think) so using reverses on areas like here you can get the snare while still holding for as long as you want the player to. It fits the intensity here better imo and you don't seem to be using slider bouncing or slider tick hitsounding so yeah. yea but that becomes so dense.. and there is a drawn out vocal so it works fine imo

Yeah the rest is fine, not much to say.

[ Advanced]

1. 00:27:351 (6) - Makes much more sense as two circles to me, since the vocals are very distinct. And you kinda did it here 00:31:922 (6,7,8). slider makes the guitar scratching thing stand out a bit and also makes the next click feel more emphasized 00:27:922 (7) - which makes sense here imo
   
2. 00:46:494 - Kinda same what I said about Normal but come to think of it it's probably the Easy where it's worth mentioning. Probably start mapping earlier in the Easy so the rest doesn't look so inconsistent.
   
3. 01:22:944 (4,5) - Hm, while it fits, it's never really used in a kiai setting so this tapping + acc strain seems to be kind of out of place in a calmer section. I'd use a 1/2 slider instead. it's 133 bpm though, the other parts are like this +dt lol
   
4. 01:49:936 (7) - Why not make this a 1/2 repeat and bring 01:50:507 (1) - closer. Seems a lot more fitting to the sound at least to me. snares on the white ticks but I made the shape for "wobbly" to fit the vocals better
   
5. 02:07:507 (4) - Pretty strong beat on a slider end. Minor, but you can try a reverse or ctrl+g the rhythm of 02:07:507 (4,5) - feels really unintuitive with the vocals. people won't expect sudden instrument emphasis so sliderend to map it is fine as other stuff all focuses vocals. it's not really a "strong beat" in context of the way the whole map is emphasizing things
   
6. 02:20:936 (3) - Too far away from previous object DS-wise. // 02:23:222 (3) - fixed second as it got a bit fucked by stacking others are fine cause map uses 0.9x for 1/2 and 1x for 1/1 in this part. also fixed like 3 more spots where the ds concept was inconsistent in kiais

Nothing else for this either. ;-;

[ Hard]

1. 00:27:065 (1,2,3,4) - I'm pretty sure the phrase here is similar enough to 00:22:494 (3) - that you can use another multi-reverse. In fact the one where you do use a multi-reverse sounds stronger to me so maybe make it clickable and make this one 00:27:065 (1,2,3,4) - a multi-reverse? Either way only using it once seems out of place imo. I think that one is cute enough to stay lol. also changing the other thing would make 00:27:494 - etc. too undermapped
   
2. 01:37:267 (3) - Might work as a triple instead seeing as the snare lands on the white. curren is easier though and also makes sense with 01:35:688 (3) - and piano emphasis on blue
   
3. 02:33:222 (3,4) - Flow is kind of questionable imo, seeing as how the entirety of the diff so far has used comfortable flow out of hook sliders. Maybe flip this slider around? http://i.imgur.com/DEUf7Cs.png never really liked this, changed in a different way to make it way nicer

[ Insane]

1. 01:11:208 (1,2,3) - Maybe arrange these in a triangle pattern like 01:10:065 (1,2,3)? I feel like it fits a bit better than back and forths. I think it's pretty nice to play once you got it figured out and adds some more variety. 02:24:365 (1,2,3,1) - does the same
   
2. 02:09:507 (4,5,6) - Having wide angled flow that's harder to play here and 02:10:365 (2,3,4,5,6) - sharp back-and-forth flow here seems like it doesn't really mesh well considering they're both very similar sounds. Not sure exactly how to fix this though with the current patterning. Considering the next patterns you use wider angles so maybe change the back-and-forth one to be less sharp. makes sense, I just swapped 02:09:365 (3,4) -
   so the only wide angle is right at the start and starts from a sliderend, this also makes 02:13:793 (2,3,4,5,6,1,2,3,4,5,6) - a nice "progression" in pattern difficulty
   
3. 02:22:079 (1,2,3,1) - Way more intense than 02:23:222 (1,2,3,1) - but the intensity is quite similar imo. Maybe nerf the former. 02:22:222 (2) - has cymbal

Fuck I hope I can find shit in the top diff.

[ Extra]

1. 01:10:065 (1,2,3) - Only case of back and forth flow in the kiai for the same sounds, seems a bit inconsistent to me, maybe make it a triangle instead? I just don't think that matters much as it still fits and adds some more variety in movement, just like the wide angles and chorus 2 picks it up again at 02:23:222 (1,2,3) -
   
2. 02:09:222 (2,3,4,5,6) - Super wide angle but this is the only case it's used for the same sounsd. Also seems inconsistent, I would suggest making flow sharper considering the latter patterns are all sharper flow. spacing is low and consistent and it seems totally fine to me, also it's not like the map doesn't use other wide angles or even lines lol
   
3. 02:12:650 (3,4,5) - MIGHT be misread as 1/2 considering the DS difference is quite minor. Space the 5 out a bit more? how is it minor it's twice the spacing (both use 1.4x on their respective snaps) and the whole part is distance snapped

Damn it Lasse.

Set is fucking clean, I love the song too. Good luck!

Testo wrote:

Hi, from queue
My map: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/589990
[Absence]

1. 01:45:650 (9,10,2) - why you don't stack it like here? 00:27:351 (7,8) -
2. 01:57:650 (2,3,5) - ^ enable stacking they are fine already

[Insane]

1. 01:20:914 (3,4) - maybe do it like this http://i.imgur.com/q1gYa3b.png inconsistent with other overlaps
2. 02:42:222 (2,3) 00:52:637 (2,1) - - not perfect fixed

[Hard]

1. 00:09:637 (4) - overlap a little bit more
2. maybe http://i.imgur.com/fGcpl3g.png will be better
3. 01:45:650 (5,1) - overlap a little bit more no reason to for change either of these
4. 02:08:079 (1,1) - not perfect yes

easy normal and adv is perfect for me, good map gl<3

- Yoshimaro - wrote:

hi im modder c:

Easy

1. 00:36:208 (5) - You can better align the slider to land on the beat 00:36:494 - (this is pretty nazi but you've made it clear with its design that the flow is affected by the vocals, so it should at least be timed right). Nice slider btw =v=bdid something like that
   
2. 00:54:494 (3) - I really liked the theme of the slider you had 00:36:208 (5) - , maybe consider adding flow flourishes like that on all similar sliders that follow the 1/1 vocals? prefer to keep them mainly for more oustanding beats tbh
3. 01:28:132 (2) - Imo it would play nicer if you removed 01:29:260 (3) - and made 01:28:132 (2) - a 2 1/2 slider just like 01:26:553 (1,1,2) - . Also, the guitar riff is important but I don't think its important enough to change the structure of the 2 1/2 rhythm that you have with the other sliders i just linked. Maybe it would feel more natural to make 01:32:418 - a circle as well if you wanted to keep 01:29:260 - as a circle? guitar emphasis is more important imo, gaps are still all 1/1 so it's easy too
4. 01:37:606 (4) - I understand that the piano roll starts here but man it feels so unnatural that you switch from the guitar and downbeats (1/1) to end on a blue tick of all things in an easy diff LOL. Not to mention, the rest of the section tunes the player's ears into the guitar and drums, starting all the way back here 01:20:237 - ... so just out of no where switching which element you mapped to feels so weird... please change this lol please... i don't think it's a problem for playability due to how sliders works, might consider this though...
5. 02:03:936 - Feels more natural to play with this beat filled 02:04:222 (1,2) - are too outstanding, clicking right before takes away too much from that imo
6. In general I feel like the rhythms from 01:59:650 - to 02:12:793 - are a bit unnatural, idk what else to say LOL it just felt like I was following your rhythm and not the musics rhythm even though the notes start and end on the important musical elements... idk I remapped this part like 3 times before submission and everything else didn't seem nice so lol

Normal

1. 01:34:448 (3,4) - 52% of the way through the map and you just now introduce a 1/2 rhythm element... not a good idea for new players in terms of playability / readability and very very not good for the difficulty in terms of introducing new rhythms and elements into the spread as a whole. If you wanted to use this rhythm type in the difficulty, introducing it sooner would've been a much better idea. Not to mention, introducing it here, in the middle of the map of all places, has literally 0 impact on the following half of the map because you don't even use this rhythm type again for the rest of the difficulty. There are plenty of places to use this rhythm type both before and after half way through the map. but this part is 133bpm and not 210
2. 01:38:621 (4) - It wasn't that much of an issue in the easy difficulty, but it's a serious playability issue in the normal difficulty because you're actually giving it a clickable functionality. On top of the argument I made for the easy difficulty (inconsistently mapped with what you have been mapping since 01:20:237 - and that it's out of sync with what the player is listening to at that point), now there is also the fact that you've not introduced a 3/4 rhythm type anywhere in the map OR spread (nor do you use it again for the rest of the difficulty). pretty much the only reasonable rhythm here, it's also no the lowest difficulty and the part is much slower than most of the map
3. Aside from those 2 points, I like the difficulty. The easiest option in all honesty would be to just remap 01:34:448 (3,4,1,2,3,4) - tbh

Just these 2 difficulties, really quick though I want to explain why mapping to the piano in the these 2 difficulties (if your argument is that you're mapping to the piano) is not a very good idea. In the entire section from 01:20:237 - to 01:38:959 - , the piano is introduced 01:32:869 - here, but the piano notes are still being played on the same times as guitar notes. Because of this, your rhythm choices also still technically follow the guitar. It's because of this that it is ambiguous up until the point of 01:38:621 - (the first point and only point where the guitar and piano do not land on the same note) whether you're mapping to guitar, or piano. Thus, the safest option in terms of playability, is to keep consistent with what was previously established - mapping to the guitar, since not only does it land on 1/1, but it's also much more intuitive and does not require the player to have to account for 1/4 less time in between objects halfway through the map.

Anyway nice set c: