1. Urakaze (6,58 stars, 2039 notes)

VINXIS wrote:

CXu wrote:

thx

LordGeek101 wrote:

I can't find much wrong with this map, but I'm inexperienced so only obvious issues stand out to me.

OD 9.5 seems very high for a map of this bpm and length. I'd drop it to OD 9. - The map is technical enough that I think having a focus on accuracy isn't bad.

00:13:768 (1,2,1,2) - These sliders break the consistency of each slider pair having the same shape - You're... right, but I never intended them to have the same shape, it just kinda happened
00:40:767 (1) - This corner in the stream has no emphasis in the music (that I can hear) - It doesn't That was just because I was at the end of the playfield LOL. I don't think it's that weird to play, and the other times I make a straight line stream it's to keep some consistency.
01:19:768 (1) - Slider is very close to being off-screen - As long as it isn't, it's fine.
01:45:768 (1) - I'd move this circle down a bit to fit with the increasing distance between the sliders in the stream - Hmm, I think it fits where it is as it's at the end of where you would move your cursor if you follow the sliders down the mdidle.
02:28:101 (1) - This corner in the stream has no emphasis in the music (that I can hear)
02:59:601 (1) - This slider breaks flow - I understand what you mean, but just for future reference, it's often a good idea to explain why you think something breaks flow, and not just saying it does. Anyhow, ctrl+j'd the whole thing, should be better now.
03:29:435 (2) - Slider is very close to being off-screen - As long as it isn't, it's okay
03:57:101 (4,5,6) - (5) is closer to (6) than the end of (4) - How do people even notice a 0.01x difference. I fixed it.
04:13:601 (1) - I don't think that increasing the spacing in this stream so much is warranted by the music. - Not sure if you copied the correct timestamp there, but the stream uses the same spacing as previous streams at the same place. If you mean the one at 04:15:101 (1) - , that's because of the different drum sound.

In other streams with corners, I think they're fine because the streams there are more spaced and in more energetic sections of the song.

Overall, it's a very fun map to play.

-Fluffy wrote:

TATOE!, - T A T O E

From my modding queue.
Insert self advertisement here: p/5928394/

00:40:767 (1,2,3,4) - This random straight part triggers my OCD. - As explained above, the first one is because of playfield space The rest are to keep some consistency. I don't think they overall make much of a difference in playability, and provide some variance in aesthetics.
00:42:768 (1) - The kiai part after this has a bit too many hitsounds. 00:59:101 (1) - and you stopped it after here. ohkay. Scratch that, it sounds nice after listening through a couple times. - Yeah, the whistles can be a bit too busy for some I think, but I don't really have any other fitting hitsounds for those parts, and it's important that they're there to add proper emphasis on the actual clicked beats.
02:27:851 (2,3,4) - Random straight part in stream triggering OCD again D:
03:59:768 (1,2) - change these to 1/4 jumps like you did for everything else. You never used these again so doesn't make much sense. - Not sure what you mean here by 1/4 jumps like everything else The reason they're 1/4 sliders and not a stream is because of the vocals still being sung, similar to 04:10:434 -
04:15:101 (1,2,3,4) - aaa, OCD
05:15:101 (1) - Change volume to 60 or maybe 70. I understand the build-up to the next kiai,but it sounds too loud and it ends up standing out more than the chorus. - I use 80 for every buildup in the map though, so I think it's fine for now, unless you think that for every build up. Also I think the kiai parts stand out enough with the use of hitsounds and the mapping anyhow.

Sorry can't offer much. Still new to modding.
<3

Mitkoff wrote:

Hello - Hi
from my q.
sry for terrible English

[Urakaze]
^ is it her name, right? just interesting - Yes, the name of best waifu.

00:16:434 (1,2,3,4) - i might be wrong but it's not square 4 a bit off 90 degrees - I think that's just from the angling. You can try moving 2 of the notes on top of the other two and see that they fit, or check the distance snap for all of them to be equal.

01:03:934 (2) - kind a strange move to slower movement. As follow your stream i expected really big jump and after slow down slider (as it is). Actually i think for this palce really good fits 2 kicksliders. You'll still get decreases an intense as it's less clicable objects, catch weak but noticable blue ticks and follow strong lingering sounds on 01:03:768 - and 01:03:934 - - I think the two strong sounds there should be emphasized much more, which is why I use two notes rather than kicksliders. Since the stream 01:03:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) clearly follow the same sound as 01:03:767 (1,2) - , usng kicksliders add two sliderends on parts where that sound isn't present.

01:05:768 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - Can You palce it more structurized? If to be honest i didn't get patterns following... Yeah it's strong-weak doubles but why 01:06:768 - two beat here don't stacked and NCed as new part? Follow vocals? Imo it's wierd when You swap to vocals right after kicks follow pattern. - I use doubles like that when I don't follow vocal, and go to the background beat (like at 01:19:101 (1,2,3,4) - and 03:27:101 (1,2,3,4) - ) The pattern is a zig-zag of doubles with increased spacing, and the nc and the 2 notes not being stacked is because the vocals start up again, yea. I don't think it's too confusing like that.

01:05:768 (1,2,3,4) - Also I want to note that there is a good instrumental part, which is quite noticeable, and you can base pattern on it. By using [url] https://puu.sh/vdzqB.jpg [/ url] rhythm and jumping 1,2,3,4 or ... string hmmm. There can be many things: lol :, based on instruments - Yeah I know, I decided to map the vocals instead since they're more focused in this part than the background instruments

01:13:768 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - i've got your polarity based NC, but i think 1-2's patterns is more intuitivity variatoin for this part. I'll try to explain... 01:14:268 (3,1) - This 2 beats have pretty similar sound structure with a bit different with other pars (01:13:768 (1,2) - 01:14:684 (2,3) - ) wich make feeling like 01:14:268 (3) - sound goes over to 01:14:434 (1) - mainly because of accompanying noise after beats. And others (01:13:768 (1,2) - 01:14:684 (2,3) - ) feels like independent ones. So this parts more intuvity readable as 1-2 jumps imo. i'm not fan of 1-2 pattern but ... yea https://puu.sh/vdB09.jpg Maybe if You applied this, make sance to restructure pattern a bit as well... - I think that's gonna be way more confusing, since it'll make people expect all 3 to be using the same rhythm. If you look at other miiro maps, you'll notice that unless they spam NC's, they usually divide them into 3 notes each for this part.

01:32:101 (4,1) - fix blanket xD - lul.

01:35:351 (2,3) - make sense to unstack it. Cause it'll be more similar visually with 01:35:768 (5,6,7) - wich sounds equal - Sure, fixed.

01:39:434 (2,3,4,5) - ^ same idea , make sense to do equal visual spacing here - Not sure what you mean here, but (4) has an emphasis on the vocal going higher in pitch so the spacing is slightly higher.

01:41:768 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - It's kind a wierd suggestion but.. Can You make patterns wich makes 2 lines (or mabe 2 double lines) instead of https://puu.sh/vdBGe.jpg like https://puu.sh/vdBNU.jpg for visual equivalent ship's position-attack in kancolle game https://puu.sh/vdC6J.jpg i did't play but saw it somewhere - I don't think anyone would ever catch that, and i like showing the slight change in the vocals with the different spacing

02:07:768 (1,2,3,1) - Fix 1,2,3 blanket arond 1. Each circle have different visual spacing. - Should be better

02:26:268 (4,1) - it's unrankable overlap, nearly unreadable - These are really common though, and not unreadable since everyone I asked to try it hit it xd

02:28:101 (1,2,3,4) - i guess if You change flow in stream, it (changes) should be starts from NC like https://puu.sh/vdE40.jpg - It changes, but it's still a part of the same stream, so connecting them on the downbeat makes more sense to me imo.
05:18:434 (1) - ^

02:45:768 (1,2,3,1,4,5) - Can You make these overlaps have equal spacing to be more neat? - Done.

02:48:850 (6,4) - stack? - Wouldn't really be possible with the way the curve curves and the spacing.

04:16:434 (2) - any sense for NC here You already base on patterns here so remove it 04:15:851 (1,2,1,2) - - Because it changes into the other NC pattern,
that's why it has a NC again

[]

Thats all.
Hope You find smthing helpfull.
Goodluck!

Gokateigo wrote:

Hi Shoe Guy o/

Mod (nice bg btw)

1. 00:04:934 (3,1) - 2x ds between these two sliders, it's too high
2. 01:14:268 (3,1) - remove nc and remap these triangles, the spacing is too confusing
3. 01:42:434 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - nerf
4. 01:55:101 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - make this easier, it's a calm part, remove the stream and add a repeat slider
5. 02:27:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - why this stream isn't curved everywhere, there is a line in the middle, it looks bad
6. 03:51:101 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2) - nerf
7. 03:54:101 (1,2,3,4) - nerf (x15 ds wow)

gl

YokesPai wrote:

Modded this cuz I want cookie
Also I couldn't find a lot.

Mod

00:33:101 (3,4,1) - Could be better triangle - I guess.
00:32:434 (1,2,3,4) - Unconsistent spacing (if that's what you're going for here)
00:33:768 (1,2,3,4) - ^ (1 is 0.89x and the rest are 0.88x) - It's a result of rounding. This is negligible in-game anyway.
01:13:768 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - 3/4 rhythms haven't come up before this point so I'd suggest to make them sliders so it's easier to read/acc - The difficulty of the map (and the intended player audience anyway) probably won't have too much of a problem reading this, considering the high AR and difference in spacing between 01:13:601 (5,1,2) - being clear.
06:13:434 (1) - This blanket can get fixed - I kinda moved the endpoint around a bit, but tbf I think it looks close enough.
06:16:434 (1) - ^ - It's probably negligible really.
06:23:101 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 2, 4 and 6 could be a better triangle (move 6), and 1, the sliderend if 4 and 5 could be a better triangle as well (move 5) - Oh yeah I wanted to fix this thing the other day and forgot. Done.
06:34:101 (2,3,4) - Could be better triangle and 06:34:101 (2,3) - could be a better blanket - They're not really blankets of the sliderend and more blankets of the slider-body itself. Also it's not supposed to be a triangle.
06:35:768 (1,2) - These sliders are different from the other sliders (like 06:30:434 (1,2)) and I don't see or hear why - I don't know what you mean by different. If you mean the hitsounding, then the clap/drum thing stopped playing.
06:45:101 (3) - This blanket can get fixed - I guess.

There's a lot of blankets that can be done better, so here's some timestamps:
00:20:434 (1,2) -
00:22:101 (2) - Is this a blanket for 00:21:101 (3) or 00:22:434 (1,2)?
00:31:101 (1,2) -
00:33:101 (3,4) -
00:34:768 (4,1) -
I'd suggest looking through the map again and look for more - I'm not too interested in looking through to find a bunch of random blankets that are 1-2 pixels off, really.

Sorry for nitpicking a lot, but I couldn't find anything else
Looks like a great map!