1. The Malicious Goddess of Fate and the Blooming White Lily (5.1 stars, 1141 notes)

Time Capsule wrote:

will wrok the hs on Saturday mate

Shiratoi wrote:

Time Capsule wrote:

will wrok the hs on Saturday mate

ty so much mate!

Time Capsule wrote:

not finished, just a beta ver (only hs) https://puu.sh/uDL8V/d43830a79e.rar
green light or red one?

greeeeeeeeen

CraEZy wrote:

https://osu.ppy.sh/forum/t/568249

asdf

quick mod, since its a good map

1. 00:52:166 (1) - could blanket 00:51:468 (2) - better
2. 00:56:352 (1) - this slider is kinda ugly compared to the others.
3. 00:59:143 (1,2) - I dont think the 1/4 jump reflects the song that well, this happens a lot more times in the song its fine imo since its repeated a lot throughout the map
4. 01:00:364 (7) - the vocal on this sound is above the rest, you should emphasize it more. example: https://imgur-archive.ppy.sh/MAWBjTa.jpg?1 i dont want the downbeat to become unclickable + the new rhythm will cause inconsistencies
5. 01:12:399 (3) - this sound is loud, you should emphasize it more with larger spacing from 01:12:224 (2) - i dont think its too loud >< maybe the hs are making it louder than you think aha
6. 01:57:748 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - i dont really like how you kept this part basically stationary just my personal aesthetics
7. 05:34:375 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - cacner and doesnt support the song i like it ._.

otherwise i cant find anything really jarringly wrong with this map. I would change a few aesthetics here and there, like keeping the same curve on curved sliders, like 04:59:143 (1) - is way more curved than the other oens.

also at the end kiai, you keep a constant counter-clockwise motion.

this is super fun to play, cant wait for this to be ranked

Time Capsule wrote:

Apply this one first before start take mod mate
still not totally complete, ill finished it tomorrow (volume and polish)
https://puu.sh/uFsRU/dc01688593.rar

Time Capsule wrote:

well, prolly final form (since i dont any praticullar reason to spam volume change)
if theres any stuff I miss feel free to poke
https://puu.sh/uGFZm/6c34aaa84a.rar

Asaiga wrote:

Hi, mod

[Cursed]
Need someone better to recheck timing! It's around 100ms early (source: me)
Due to the fact that timing is off and I didn't notice it earlier so some rhythm mod can be wrong
sorry, false alarm. my bad! I just checked the other well timed map and spotted something weird. I went into setting and saw my Universe Offset -300 and I was speechless, I will remod at a later time if you want xD omg rip

Dunno why universe offset went low ; w;. Some lines here are likely false so you can just leave those out

00:06:419 (4) - This slider can be moved a bit to the right so 00:05:879 (3) - slider end can be in the middle, aesthetics. Also it will flow a tad nicer
00:08:041 (3) - This slider has the only shape that none other in this section looks a like and it doesn't support any unique sound, maybe some simple like a curve slider? It can ruin your aesthetic purpose a bit here but for consistency nah theres a little curve sound xd
00:16:690 (3,4) - These sliders' arrows don't land on anything, do they?

00:25:655 (1,2) - This can be a slider because the red tick is too faint to be clickable and I think it leads into the vocal better
00:30:887 (4) - This slider is questionable, not only the slider head doesn't have any sound to click on, the slider tail has a sound which goes against the purpose of using slider. I think it's better to just extend this slider 00:30:364 (3) - and a triple leads to another section, hooray rhythm

00:33:852 (4,5) - I don't think triple works here since you have been following the vocal and it's still strong enough.
00:32:457 (1) - Also the vocal is more stressed than the previous part 00:28:968 (2,3,1,2) - so I think this slider is pretty undermapped, and it leads to the existance of this lonely note 00:33:329 (2) - that supports nothing. You can just map 1/2 sliders here instead of one repeated 3/2 imo. Infact, you can reverse your rhythm so the previous part can get the 3/2 slider but let's not do that.

00:36:468 (4,5) - same thing mentioned
00:39:608 (1,2,3,1) - I think you switched back to vocal here, I wouldn't mention it but the rhythm conflicts with this part 00:36:817 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - which I think you were trying to follow the instrument. The power of vocal in this part should be equally the same so you can just map instrument here 00:39:608 (1,2,3,1) - till the next section
00:41:352 (2,3,4) - rhythm is also wrong here

00:45:364 (2,3) - I think spacing is too big and unreasonable compares to the next objects not really, in fact, the next slider has larger spacing
00:46:846 (3) - I think this note can be deleted. 1/2 jump section here is fine enough. You can build spacing up to 5 then spacing reduces again to match the music

01:00:800 - You skipped out this beat and followed drums, I think you can do the same for these 00:59:405 (2,6) - . Especially something like this doesn't support any beat in the song 01:01:498 (4) -
And if you followed instrument should this 01:00:015 (5,6,7) - better be ctrl+g? I don't know what are you trying to follow anymore @-@

01:03:852 (5) - Wrong emphasis here
I believe you are trying to follow instrument in this section and not vocal so wrong emphasis here too 00:59:666 (4) -
01:11:701 (1,2,3) - Wrong spacing emphasis, 2 to 3 should have bigger spacing because of more stressed drum
01:13:620 (2,3) - This is definitely wrongly emphasized in both vocal + instrument term
01:14:841 (3,4,5,6) - This bothers me because vocal starts later and the instrument is not strong enough to stand out, and vocal should be more noticable by changing the spacing. 01:14:841 (3,4) - should be different compares to 01:14:491 (1,2) - (i'm not sure either, maybe it's fine)

*just noticed the timing is strange so I stop with rhythm mod* smh

02:06:120 - Jump section can be more variant my personal aesthetic
02:25:655 (1) - Can this be more smooth? :d
03:43:794 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - This part sounds like the spacing can be more even -> more pp i think its fine >_<
03:57:748 (1) - This can just be a normal curved slider lolol yea but i wanted some sort of emphasis on the last beat here so i tried
04:20:073 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - Spacing too big for music

good luck :d

[-Crissaegrim-] wrote:

Hey o/ from m4m

Cursed

00:05:879 (3,1) - maybe stack them better

00:10:203 (3,4) - i think you could nc on 3 because of new sound

00:12:365 (3,1) - stack

00:45:364 (2,3) - i don't think 3 should have that distance, you have nothing to emphasize there nah its fine imo. the flow is nice so it wouldnt really ruin playability

00:45:538 (3,4,5,6) - same here with distance, they are all the same intensity ^

00:46:585 (1) - prob a 1/4 slider could fit better, the sound continues strong from 1 to 2 no sound there :<

00:46:556 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - offset here is different? try with 1/12 light purple line, you could fix that

00:50:684 (4) - there's no sound here, probably you used to emphasize next sound but idk, maybe a little jump could fit better i hear a sound

00:53:474 (4) - same here, their sound is so low too, maybe up it a bit so the feedback is stronger ^

01:20:422 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - maybe you could increase their distance gradually, song isn't the same intensity through this section nope its already hard enough as it is

01:21:468 (1,2,3,4) - offset is different too, next 4 are still a BIT out

01:36:817 (1,2,3,4) - it would be nice if their SV variation were a bit higher i dont want to SV to be the same as the kiai

01:53:038 (4) - distance from 3 should be that high? for the stack aesthetic with 01:52:166 (1,4) -

02:22:806 (1) - you should move it to the previous tick, sound starts there and make it repeat

02:33:155 - map this vocal maybe? instruments
02:33:852 - ^ i want to begin it on the stronger beat

02:44:143 (3,4,5,6,7,8) - timing here is different too, bpm should be higher its fine ?_?

02:45:015 (8,1) - distance should be higher, 1 sound is really big nope the anti flow already emphasizes it + i dont want to be inconsistent with the spacings here 01:21:294 (7,1) - and other places

02:55:480 (3,4) - isn't ctrl+g better here? i follow vocals for this section. the "nai" part

03:06:032 - you could map this sound would break the consistency with 01:18:678 -

03:10:306 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3) - timing
i think you know about the timing issues so i'll not point anymore

03:17:631 (3,4,5) - a bit of SV emphasis could be nice nah its fine, still the same section of the song

03:48:678 (1,1) - distance is too big imo since the song is repeating id like to show it with the mapping + there's NC to help players read it

04:02:631 (3,4) - too low distance here i think sound isnt too big here imo

05:01:410 (3) - hmm a slower SV could fit really well here imo i dont want to make it harder to read than it is ;w;

06:02:677 (1) - 362677 offset seems to be better for me its okay for me?

06:03:647 (1) - this isn't totally symmetric, you could try to change it

06:08:546 (1) - 368546 same as above zz
06:14:732 (1) - 374732 ^ ^
i think you're mapping vocals on this last section but if it's the other sound you could re check them too

Pretty nice map^^
Good Luck!

Time Capsule wrote:

my turn

MAP
00:15:608 (1,2) - considering (3,4) movement is r-clockwise i get choked with sudden transtition here sometimes. simply make them to r-clockwise imo i think its fine + it adds more emphasis to the downbeat
01:00:277 (6,7) - the angle is sharper than 00:59:405 (2,3) - which i found a bit awkward and then the jump to (1). try to considering ctrl+g it, if the distance to close just move it a bit further
01:55:829 (4) - reccomend to move it to x208 y264 which not only make it pretier to look it also make 01:55:306 (2,3,4,5) - jump easier to catch (ignore the overlap with 01:56:701 (2) - .-.) changed a little
02:00:364 (6) - move it to x208 y264 idk why the overlap with slider bother me //runs also changed a little~
02:42:399 (1,2) - ctrl one per one. the reason is you will make actually more movement there especially at 02:42:748 (2,3,4,5) - instead of moving your pointer from (4,1,2) but the transition from 02:42:050 (4,1) - will be a bit angley + hopefully its not too noticeable in game
02:44:317 (4) - ctrl+g for this one, i think its not really neccesary give jump suddenly atp i want to keep the back and forth jump with these things :c
02:50:684 (8) - well, make it simmilar like 02:47:980 (1,2) - maybe? but on slider head of course gotta keep the consistency with the doubles + get the nice piano sound
03:06:468 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - i really feel this pattern could be improve more bbut not sure how its generally the same as the first one just rotated a bit xd
03:39:608 (1,3) - a bit off at slider end (3)
03:56:352 (1,2) - not the right time for change flow direction (clockwise to r-clockwise). ctrl+g them
04:01:061 (4) - how to trap approved lol nah i was playing it and it played fine to me :^(
04:45:713 (2,3) - i feel that supposed to be simmilar like 04:47:108 (2,3) - or just me idk variety xD
05:58:445 (3,4,5,6,1) - not a fans of it //slapped was actually one of my favorite patterns //slapped

HS
I think that how you spam cymbal at last kiai a bit off from what it should emphasis. not all, but i reccomend to listen the beat more carefully and hope you could figure out what i mean i think its nice :^)

thats it
(at least i try)
good luck

Neoskylove wrote:

Q

[aasfd]
00:31:061 - should be clickable nah i want to emphasize the piano note here
00:31:236 (1,2) - weird flow? i think its fine + it looks nice ;w;
00:45:887 (4,5) - I suggest you ctrl G for make similar moving with 00:45:189 (1,2,3) -
01:20:422 (2,3,4,5,6,7) - overmapping? no? i think its fine since it hits every beat
02:31:236 (1) - ctrl j for flow
02:58:794 (6,1) - try to avoid overlap personal aesthetic
03:03:329 (1,3) - stack
03:28:620 - add a beat here? vocal emphasis
03:48:678 (1) - 03:49:027 (1) - NC is not necessary imo. since its kind of hard to read, i want to have an NC here to indicate a new pattern
04:03:329 (1,3) - make similar slider? i like it D:
04:38:387 (2) - how about ctrl G? you tried it in 04:36:817 (1,2,3,1) - i dont want to break the flow with the next slider
GL