Dashyy- wrote:

dis map is fun so i'm gonna mod this for free!@!!!!

g:

might wanna cut the mp3 if ur not gonna use all of it. you have like 40 extra seconds at the end which is not rlly needed and i need that precious extra mb may map end

nm:

00:28:206 (3,4) - why did u skip the whole 1/2 thing like u did here 00:24:995 (2,3,4) - [/color]
00:48:544 (3) - u better blanket this or i'm gonna have to call the police i try
00:54:252 (3) - oh wow you actually blanketed something i'm really proud that you are growing as a mapper !!!
00:58:891 (2,3) - skipped the 1/2 thing again smh
01:18:158 (1) - can u fix this overlap it's bad fixed!
01:21:726 (1,2) - This just ruined the whole mapset for me. No, not just the map, my perception of you. I would have never expected my mapping idol to mess up THIS badly. I thought you were the best mapper ever, and you just had to go and mess up this almost perfect mapset up and make this a shitmap. You are nothing but a shitmapper now, the speck of dust that no one in the mapping commuinity or the playerbase will ever like. Face it, you're maps are terrible now. You don't deserve to be part of the BAT, you don't deserve to be a BN. Shit, you don't deserve the right to even UPLOAD A MAP. You are a fucking disgrace, pishifat. You may be able to fix this blanket, but you will NEVER fix the respect everyone had for you. i t r y
01:54:909 (1) - don't u think this 1/2 repeat is a bit too zoom for the easiest diff i had them at the beginning so hoping not too zoom zoom

hd:
01:18:158 (1) - is this out of the play area or is it just my lowered resoulution out of the grid yea, but not the playfield
01:34:214 (6) - might be touching the hp bar a little bit lowered

best diff:
hoyl where is the flow

00:44:262 (1) - if ur gonna keep with the whole uncomfortable flow thing u could prob ctrl+g this sdfafs i got smooth flow on all these in the intro
01:18:158 (1,2) - insert break??????????????? the slow line across screen so much cooler than a breakt bh
02:24:167 (1) - THIS FLOWS WELL CHANGE IT is doing stuff like 01:23:867 (5,1) - 01:29:576 (6,1) - z

askl;fjdsklfjakl;fjklafjkl;ajfkl;ajfskl;afjkajfkl;skajf;kafkkfjklsafjkasfsd gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg[ d/quote]

Rizen wrote:

in addition to yurica suggested by frontier, perhaps you could add the translation of the song title too? which apparently is somehow did

Normal

1. 01:07:811 (3) - perhaps replace this with two circles instead on each slider end? to allow the piano sound at 01:08:168 - to be clickable
2. 03:35:527 - soft finish on slider head? because of cymbals in music and also because you did for counterpart in other kiai 01:38:496 - . applies to other diffs too did all these

Hard

1. 00:46:403 (1) - excessive NC? wanting this offpitch piano thing to stand out more than others
2. 03:25:448 (5) - just a little concerned with the readability of this circle since it's basically hidden behind 03:25:180 (4) - ? same at 03:40:433 (8) - manually stacked

Insane

1. 02:44:148 (1) - perhaps give more spacing because of finish? could also be because of consistency with 01:09:773 (6,1) -
2. if not, 02:43:434 (1,2,3,4,1) - maybe you can apply the same "larger to smaller spacings" idea here? somethin like this
3. 02:35:584 (1,2,3,4) - I see you are increasing the spacings with these sliders but imo it doesn't really fit for the 4th slider. The first three sliders 02:35:584 (1,2,3) - fit due to the note scale climb but the 4th doesn't as the note scale goes lower at this point. perhaps you could instead increase spacing for 02:36:298 (3) - but decrease for 02:36:655 (4) - ? (or ctrl+g 02:36:298 (3) - would have the same effect but not sure if you like how it flows) did all these too

mostly just suggestions. don't kd if not helpful ;c

ranksoonpls hopefully!!

Winfall wrote:

[Insane]
02:06:327 (1,2) - I think would be better as a slider but I dont know. i mean, both work, i just find holding through the sounds to be less cool than clicking
02:08:289 (6) - Wouldn't this be better with a little more spacing emphasis since its on a louder sound? would make the following note seem less important without the contrast
02:46:289 (4) - There's a distance gap here because of the stronger sound but not here 02:47:716 (3) - for all the consecutive 1/1 stuff i stack tho g

[Hard & Easy]
My brain is about as good as a rotten potato with modding these, sorry. G

xChorse wrote:

Hello, NM from my queue.

Normal

Are those inherited points at the start necessary? I think you can remove them if you don't plan on mapping the start in this diff. i guess ya. when they dont do anything its not a big dela tho lol

00:25:530 (3) - I'm a bit confused on the consistency of this pattern, 00:28:384 - is the same drum sound but doesn't have a hitcircle mapped to it. there's like 3 of them per 4 measures and i skipped the second one each time in this section. would have to use constant 1/1 sliders to do otherwise and thats even lamer:(

03:40:522 (6) - could be a 1/2 slider to follow the vocals a bit more continuous 1/1 gaps wouldnt amek last note stand out as much

Hard

00:05:906 - not sure if these inherited points do anything either just like in normal diff a

00:45:332 (4,1) - fix stack

01:59:012 (2) - could probably move this to 01:59:191 - and add a hitcircle on 01:59:012 - or do the same as you did at 02:04:186 (1,2,3) - aaaa

02:16:049 - ^ did em

02:32:373 - I feel like this stands out more so it could be mapped as a hitcircle 5 is supposed to stand out tho

03:23:931 (4,5,1) - uh this looks a bit weird, idk if it's intentional since 03:23:931 (4,5,1) - was standard idk how that happened lol

Insane

01:06:740 (5) - all other stacks like this were on vocals so I'm not sure if this one is intentional slidered

I like the really interesting emphasis on cursor movement.

Hope this helps even if it's short, good luck!