1. Ayyri's Muzukashii (2.88 stars, 421 notes)
2. Futsuu (2.57 stars, 294 notes)
3. Kantan (2 stars, 159 notes)
4. Oni (4.04 stars, 558 notes)

Arrival wrote:

Hello Hi

[Kantan]

OD 4 / HP 6 or 7 OD 3.5 / HP 7

00:30:469 (48) - Even if you want to vary a bit, I don't think putting a k here fits well. Maybe k d k instead of k k d That's what I have...?

01:11:041 - Slider here Done

01:33:612 (47) - If you put a note here, then do it for the similar rhythmical parts after, like here 01:35:898 - etc Done

[Futsuu]

OD 4.5 / HP 6 OD 4 / HP 6

I overall suggest you to avoid using too many 1/2, it makes the map really hard for a futsuu with this BPM. The futsuu has 150 more notes than the kantan ! Map it more like a 105 BPM song for this difficulty. I'd suggest you only keeping those like this one 00:21:898 (48,49,50) - or this one 00:26:469 (66,67,68) - Fixed but SR went up...?

01:11:041 (214) - Slider here Done

01:29:898 (75,76,77,78,79) - Way too hard for a Futsuu. In the Kantan the hardest pattern is a k k d 1/1, and now we have k d k d d 1/2. The gap is way too big. Refer to my first point. Fixed

[Muzukashii] This is more for Ayyri to look at, not myself.

00:19:612 - Consider deleting this. Sounds better with the music, is better to play too. (Do the same for the others if you apply)

00:37:326 - Same here.

00:39:041 (128,129,130,131,132,133) - This doesn't fit at all, put k k d k d d ???

00:48:184 (171,172,173,174,175,176,177,178) - If you don't apply my first suggestion, at least remove a note in this pattern, this is high bpm and hard to play for a muzu.

[Oni]

00:55:041 - This is the calmest part of the song, there shouldn't be so many notes... Agree/Disagree, although this is the calmest part of the song there's a noticeable instrument that's introduced at this time. I think the way I mapped it highlights that instrument enough as to not be overmapped... I'll make it a little less dense, however, the 1/4 will probably stay.

01:11:041 - Make this like this : For consistency, this kind of stream will throw players off because the majority of this difficulty is just triplets, so I feel that putting a stream here will just throw players off and just cause unnecessary misses when playing, especially for elementary Oni players.

01:17:184 (32,33) - Make this a ddk and remove 01:17:469 (34) - ? (Same for the other patterns after if you do this) Maybe, I'll think on this one.

Nothing else really botherd me. Good luck !

poots_mcgoots wrote:

Kantan:

00:55:041 – This is a lot of dk repetition, in my opinion. Maybe make it dkdkkkkk, or dkdkdkkk? Something of the sorts. I'd agree with you if this was any harder of a difficulty, but repetition in a Kantan is fairly appropriate. It helps the new player get used to that specific pattern.
01:31:041 (41,42,43) – I think KKK sounds better. The last note is higher than the rest. Changed to d k K.
Good difficulty

Futsuu:

I don’t see any problems here

Sweet.

Ayyri’s Muzukashii:

01:31:612 – Here I think you’re following the melody in the background? Or at least at 01:36:184 -? I think it would be better if you strictly followed the loud drum sounds. Not only are the drums more prominent, but you just came out of kiai following the melody, so it would be a nice break.

I don't take care of the Muzukashii, that's all in Ayyri's control.

Sorry for such a short mod, and sorry for keepin' you waiting! Ha, I experienced no waiting, thank you for the hastiness on this mod.

Stefan wrote:

[Kantan]
00:18:469 (21,22,23) - I am honestly not the biggest fan of this pattern. Instead, move (22) to 00:19:041 - .
00:23:041 (31,32,33) - ^
00:20:755 (26,27,28,29,30) - I don't believe the pattern above will work to 100%, try this: https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/rssxdNrN
00:25:326 (36,37,38,39,40) - ^
00:27:612 - 00:33:898 - You sneaky little guy, I actually tried to suggest this for the part before but I saw you exactly used these pattern here. They're cool btw.
00:34:469 (56) - remove one repeat to have a little more room between. between 00:36:184 - and 00:36:755 - there is nothing to "hit".
00:56:184 - 01:03:612 - remove all Don notes with exception of 00:59:612 (105) - rather have the stronger beat than the weaker in this calm part. 00:59:612 (105) - makes the transistion of 00:59:041 - and 01:00:184 - better, that's why you should keep it.
01:11:326 (130,131,132) - remove (130,132) and add a Finisher on (131): Despite of the 1/4 sound, I think less is more here. The Finisher adds a stronger impact.
01:31:326 (42) - It's weird you use d k K here, I'd rather go with d d K since both notes before K sounds very similar.
01:40:755 - 01:49:898 - Similar to 00:56:184 - 01:03:612 - I'd use less notes and remove some dons, however it won't be so much compared to the previous part.
01:40:755 - 01:43:041 - that is pretty nice and can be looped several times: https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/u1sDi4lu
01:49:041 - 01:49:898 - ...except of this part: https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/S2nbqBXB This adds a very nice ending imo.

[Futsuu]
00:18:755 (36,37) - I mean (37) is obviously stronger than (36). Why would you use k in this case?
00:23:326 (52) - ^
00:36:755 (90) - I don't believe the finisher is essential here, due the BPM and pattern I wouldn't use it.
00:39:041 (98,99,100,101,102) - I think the emphasis can be improved here: https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/2tVANKII kdd works better than dkk, it's different from the sound at 00:36:755 (90,91,92) - but still similar. and k d works after then.
00:49:612 (133,134) - They should be switched for sure. Else it makes no sense you mapped 00:48:755 (131,132) - as k d for example.
01:02:184 (170,172) - Switch them too, d d k x k d k sounds okay and is more consistent with the rest of this part.
01:13:326 - 01:40:755 - Hum... what happened here? The last time I've checked the difficulty by request it had some breaks and wasn't so dense.
You could delete for example 01:14:469 (6) - and switch 01:14:755 (7,8) - afterwards, to skip the logic that 01:14:184 (5) - follows the hard beat. And after the kiai, try something like that: https://derpovic.s-ul.eu/jn2Zl0Eo

[Muzukashii]
00:01:326 (4,9,14,19) - This is purely my own preference, feel free to ignore it: I don't find them really good sound-wise.. Oni also do have them but it'd make a little change at all. I'd remove them here but like said, that's how I feel.
01:32:898 (377,378) - It feels random that you first mapped the hard beat with k and then change to the "calm" background sound. 01:33:326 (380,381) - works this way, although I'd also switch them personally.
01:37:184 (403,404) - ^
01:33:898 (386,387,388,389,390,391,392) - I find kdkd kdk is better than kdk dkdk, it's sound-wise more logical.
Ari will check this within time.

[Oni]
00:12:469 (34,35,36,37,38) - Something bothers me a lot here. Removing (36) would make the part less spamy but then again it actually fits because you map the 1/1 rhythm as something continious, then again deleting (35) is a bad decision because of the strong beat. feelings are really mixed for this one but I guess this is okay.
01:14:469 (11,12,13) - I'd remove (11) and make (13) as k; the sound on 01:14:326 (10) - makes it feel to have 01:14:469 - since it's somewhat a break of this, 01:14:612 (12,13) - should be consistent because they're following the same sound. I think the way it's mapped is quite alright, and has quite a bit of flow to it as well. This conecpt is demonstrated in the 2nd half of the kiai, so I think the 1st half is fine as is, at least concerning this suggestion.
01:19:041 (44,45,46) - similar case.
01:31:612 - 01:40:755 - while I find it good the density is way lower than the kiai, I find you could use one-two triplets where's appropriate. Not a criticism, more a neutral feedback.

• 00:20:469 (41) - delete
  00:22:755 (49) - ^
  00:25:041 (55) - ^
  00:25:612 (57) - k because is the same rhythm in 00:20:755 -
  00:26:612 (60,61) - ctrl g, same rhythm in 00:21:898 -
  00:27:326 (63) - delete
  00:29:612 (69) - ^
  00:31:184 (74,75) - ctrl g, same reason as above
  00:31:898 (77) - delete
  00:34:469 (89) - for me it's better to put a spinner instead a slider, and it's better
  if it ends in 00:36:184 -
  00:43:755 (115,116) - ctrl g
  00:44:184 (117,118) - ^
  00:48:326 (129,130) - ^
  01:21:898 (31) - k
  
  [Oni]
  
  • 00:34:469 (1) - Spinner should be end here 00:36:184 -
    00:55:184 (85,86) - maybe change to d?
    00:57:469 (103,104,105) - kdd sounds better
    00:57:898 (107,108,109) - ^
    00:59:826 (122,123) - ctrl g
    01:00:469 (128) - d
    01:00:898 (130,131,132) - ddk
    01:01:612 (137) - d
    01:11:041 - to 01:12:041 - try this if you don't like it, you can only change these two 01:11:612 (196,197) - to k and it sounds good too, also i think you should add d here 01:11:969 - and here 01:12:112 - because there's a sound here
    
    That's all, hope my mod was useful
    good luck

Q____X wrote:

Hi ʕ/ ·ᴥ·ʔ/ M4M from PM

[Futsuu]

• 00:20:469 (41) - delete
  00:22:755 (49) - ^
  00:25:041 (55) - ^
  00:25:612 (57) - k because is the same rhythm in 00:20:755 -
  00:26:612 (60,61) - ctrl g, same rhythm in 00:21:898 -
  00:27:326 (63) - delete
  00:29:612 (69) - ^
  00:31:184 (74,75) - ctrl g, same reason as above
  00:31:898 (77) - delete
  00:34:469 (89) - for me it's better to put a spinner instead a slider, and it's better Maybe so, but new players can hit whatever they want here instead of having to do a specific rhythm to clear a spinner. I think the slider would just be little easier for them.
  if it ends in 00:36:184 -
  00:43:755 (115,116) - ctrl g
  00:44:184 (117,118) - ^
  00:48:326 (129,130) - ^
  01:21:898 (31) - k
  
  [Oni]
  
  • 00:34:469 (1) - Spinner should be end here 00:36:184 -
    00:55:184 (85,86) - maybe change to d?
    00:57:469 (103,104,105) - kdd sounds better
    00:57:898 (107,108,109) - ^
    00:59:826 (122,123) - ctrl g
    01:00:469 (128) - d
    01:00:898 (130,131,132) - ddk
    01:01:612 (137) - d
    01:11:041 - to 01:12:041 - try this if you don't like it, you can only change these two 01:11:612 (196,197) - to k and it sounds good too, also i think you should add d here 01:11:969 - and here 01:12:112 - because there's a sound here I liked kdddk instead of kkddk personally.
    
    That's all, hope my mod was useful It was indeed, thank you very much!
    good luck

IControl wrote:

Hi

Oni


00:55:041 (84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92) - for this stection I think it would be better if you mapped to the keyboard like you did in the last section for better flow

So I suggest
00:55:255 (86) - remove

00:55:684 (89) - move to here 00:55:541 - change to d

00:56:398 (94) - remove

00:56:826 (97) - move to here 00:56:672 -

00:56:755 (97) - change to d

change the other parts in this section to something similar to this type of pattern if you agree
01:04:184 - for the build part try this

01:04:184 - D d k d d d k dkD... repeat This is a good suggestion, but I think the way I did the build-up is pretty good as is.

01:09:326 (176) - you could remove these K finishers. I don't think they fit the build part very well This is a good point, if someone else brings this up I'll change it, because I've had my doubts about the kat finishers before but they don't sound wrong :Thinking:

01:11:041 (188,189,190,191,192,193,194,195,196,197,198,199) - change all to d or k? much easier to read and sounds nicer imo

01:11:969 - add d here?


01:15:184 (16) - This could be removed to match your other parts in the kai time

01:19:755 (49) - remove ^

01:20:184 (50) - change to k to be consistent with this part 01:17:898 (34) -

01:18:041 (35,36,37) - change to kkd^

01:21:898 (64,65) - clt g

01:24:184 (81) - change to k ^ to be consistent with other sections

01:24:898 (84,85,86) - I like kkd better here flows well with other parts

01:26:326 - add d ^

01:26:469 (97) - change to k ^

01:26:612 - add d ^

01:26:755 (99) - change to K ^

01:27:255 (102) - remove ^ I wasn't a fan of how this sounded.

01:28:398 - add k ^

01:31:612 - Also I think the last section could be improved imo if you just flowed the drums because they sound much stronger


For example:

01:32:326 (4,5) - clt g
01:32:469 (5) - K
It should be similar to kai time with out the triples


Good Luck Also consider an inner oni? This map could be fun for experienced players

Weber wrote:

its ya boi

Kantan

00:29:898 - I think dkk or even kdk might be a better alternative for variation here, something about kkd just rubs me the wrong way with the music
00:37:326 - Change to k
00:39:898 - This note should probably be at 00:39:612 - instead.
00:44:469 - ^
00:46:469 - ^
00:48:755 - ^
00:49:898 - ^ I left this one as is, it sounds a little better to me.
00:53:326 - ^
01:13:326 - I think that there are a lot of very noticable drum beats that you are missing in this kiai time, try this change in rhythm to fix it (repeated throughout the kiai, pay no attention to which notes are k or d) https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/7075022 I also left the kiai as is, for now at least.

Futsuu

00:03:612 - Not really any sound here in the music to justify this note Changed this in my own way.
00:08:184 - ^ ^
00:13:041 - Try adding some variation to this section by making this note (k)
00:17:612 - ^
00:19:612 - Move this note to here: 00:19:469 -
00:24:184 - ^
00:28:755 - ^
00:33:326 - ^
00:54:469 - Make this d Pitch starts increasing here, so I'd rather keep it as kat.
00:55:041 - Make this K, makes a better contrast in the music with these two changes
01:11:612 - Change to k

Ayyri's Muzukashii

00:55:041 - Change to K

I suk at onis LUL

Good luck! Thanks for the mod! Any points not noted on were accepted.

Raphalge wrote:

Aiight so this is going to be mostly subjective since I don't know much about the ranking criteria, and also because this song has a lot of interpretative sounds.

[Oni]
General: map felt fairly repetitive, so a lot of the points will be mostly for variation purposes.

00:10:184 (26,27,28,29) - invert pattern, sounds just as good I think There are drum hits on the dons and claps on the kats as is.
00:12:469 (34,35,36,37,38) - split this up into a double and a quad, a quint felt quite unnatural when I was trying it I'll think about this one, it's an interesting suggestion.
00:17:041 (51,52,53,54,55) - same with this one ^
00:23:184 (82) - change to k?
00:26:755 (101) - change to d if you accept the other one
00:56:612 (95,96,97) - change to dkd so it looks good alongside 00:58:898 (111,112,113) -
01:00:326 (122) - a k here plays better I think
01:01:184 (127,128,129) - another dkd here
01:01:469 (130) - another k
01:26:755 (95) - big k maybe? The sounds are still falling in pitch so, a big don sounds better here.

cool song and cool map Thank you for the mod!

JarHed wrote:

Im here for your Mod

KANTAN:

-Nothing to change here seems very well mapped to me

FUTSUU:

00:41:469 (103,104) - Change (103) to a KAT and (104) to a DON
Reason: To match what you did at 00:36:755 (86,87,88) - Since it is the same sounds in both sections. Agree.

00:39:041 (94,95) - Change (94) to a DON and (95) to a KAT
Reason: To match the same pattern you used at 00:43:612 (110,111,112) - That pattern is better for the sounds heard. Agree.

00:50:469 (132) - Change to a DON
Reason: Matches 00:45:898 (117,118,119) - Same sounds No need to change the note pattern. Agree.

01:19:898 (24) - Change to a DON
Reason: Sounds a lot better (personal opinion) also matches the previous sounds before. It was already a don.

01:49:326 (125,126) - Change (125) to a DON and Change (126) KAT
Reason: I think it sounds better (Personal opinion) Disagree, I think the way it's mapped is fine as is.

ONI:

<This difficulty is really fun to play only a few things i saw>

01:48:755 (29) - Change to a KAT and Change 01:49:041 (30) - to a DON and change
01:49:612 (32) - to a KAT
Reason: This pattern seems to sound better to me (personal opinion)
VERY NICE ONI DIFFICULTY
No changes made to Oni.
GOOD LUCK WITH RANKING

1. 01:12:184 (1) - Should be substituted by notes somehow, as Muzukashii has notes in here. Otherwise spread becomes contradictory.
2. 01:31:612 (1,2) - You should definitely swap these two, the kat-don here kinda contradicts the instruments being played as the second beat on every bar is usually a snare-ish instrument that would be definitely better represented as a kat. If you do this you'd also keep the structure consistent.
3. 01:33:612 (11) - I don't think beats like this on every measure are deserving of a finisher, they are not notably louder than the rest.
4. 01:40:469 (44) - Is this a don on purpose? If so, I'd recommend swapping this with 01:40:755 (1) - because 44 represents the same sound as 01:33:612 (11) - (aka every 4th beat of each bar)

1. 00:36:755 - 00:55:041 - This part is too close in terms of density with Oni, so either increase density in Oni or decrease it here.
2. 01:49:898 (443) - Despite being the last note it is not so emphasized anyway, so I'd say remove the finisher

1. 01:12:184 (199) - The slider should rather be at 01:11:041 - 01:12:041 - since the real DRUMROLL is there
2. The rhythm used on kiai and 00:36:755 - is sorta eeeeeeeeeh... despite wanting to accomodate to the Futsuu's snapping "rules". I would recommend to adjust into a more 3/2 oriented rhythm even if it increases SR, as the current rhythm right now just feels off. All you have to do is taking the two last notes of each bar and move them 1/2 to the left, like this:
   to
   This way you still have that precious 5/2 break which is pretty good for a Futsuu in a consistent way. If done, repeat the process in the kiai.

1. 01:12:184 (124) - Same as Futsuu
2. Similarly as Futsuu, I think following the 1/1 structure is not so good and that you could go with the 3/2 rhythm, moving 2nd and 3rd notes 1/2 tick to the right, and deleting the note that represents the downbeat of the following bar. Repeating this process once every 2 bars.
   
   A rhythm like this: (cursor at 01:15:041 - )