1. Cup (1,34 stars, 133 notes)
2. Escape (4,01 stars, 457 notes)
3. Platter (2,88 stars, 315 notes)
4. Salad (1,99 stars, 231 notes)

Cup : By Myle
Salad : By Myle
Platter : By Myle
Escape : By Myle

Beatmap Banner : By Luisina
Background : By azomo

@Ascendance: Thank you so much for your help at the beginning of creating this mapset. Also, make sure to play his Platter!
@Mage: LMAO. Thank you for 10 15 <3

Check out JBHyperion's set here!

Thank you everyone who supported me through this hard way of ranking this. I appreciate everyone's help a lot <3

RoseusJaeger wrote:

Secret Santa <3

General

Might as well uncheck “widescreen support” on Cup, Salad and Platter because no storyboard.

Cup

00:02:802 (1) - Why not shorten this slider and try to match the sound like at 00:14:802 (1) ? Playing the slider very long there is a bit awkward. Make the rhythm like this instead: meh, sound weird to me ;~;

00:06:102 (2,3,1) – This directional change is a bit awkward for a new player. I'd move 00:07:302 (3,1) to X=500 then move 00:08:802 (2) to X=156. Oki

Salad

00:09:402 (1) – Remove NC here since it's not needed. im dumb
00:43:602 (1,2,3,4,5,6) – Questionable length in combo since RC says combos should be limited to 10 fruits and this has 11. You might wanna simplify the pattern to lower your combo length by removing 00:44:052 (2) and 00:44:652 (4) . Right! But removed just 00:44:052 (2) since I still hear pretty loud 1/4 sound in 00:44:652 (3)
00:50:652 (7,1) – I'm not sure if this anti-flow is rankable since this is a borderline dash and dashes into anitflow arent allowed in Salads. I think that's fiiine
00:51:702 (2,3) - Since Salads are introductory to dashing, its not rankable to use dashes into anti-flow until you get to Platters. Use a C-curve or vertical slider instead. I think it's fine, but oh well, reduced the distance
00:55:302 (4,1) - ^ Same issue, antiflow not allowed. Oki
01:45:402 (4,1) – I'm pretty sure this counts as a dash into anti-flow because of the stream.

Platter

I'm just gonna get the hypers into antiflow pointed out because those are unrankable.
00:01:152 (2,3) – This anti-flow is weird, especially since you don't repeat it here at 00:06:252 (3) . Ctrl+H on (3) and put back on X=376.
00:16:452 (4,5) – This could be argued to be anti-flow and anti-flow hypers aren't allowed in Platters. Welp, I like this movement and I don't feel like it's awkward for playing at all
00:22:302 (2,3) – Anti-flow from hyper, rotate (3) to the left to fix.
00:24:402 (1,2) – Anti-flow from the hyper, rotate (2) to the right to get rid of this problem.
00:29:002 (4,1) – Anti-flow again, make this a C-curve slider instead curving to the left.
00:31:002 (7,1,2,3,4) – That stream is anti-flow, flip it so it's not. Ctrl+H the stream and put it back on X=424
00:49:452 (4,5) – Make (5) and C-curve so it's not anti-flow.
00:53:652 (4,5) - ^Do the same with (5).
01:25:402 (6,1,2) – Move (2) to X=508 because otherwise this counts as antiflow. Removed this HD at all
01:34:402 (3,4) – I'm not sure how you can rearrange this pattern, so it's best to just reduce this to a dash here so you can keep the pattern and still be rankable. Still managed to change for keeping HD :p
01:41:652 (4,5) – Antiflow again. Made the slider more vertical
01:42:852 (4,5) - ^ Again. ^

Escape

Seems fine to me.

Good luck.

-Nya- wrote:

Heya~ NM from my queue. Just saying this is my first mod for CtB >.< Don't bite me.

Escape:

1. 00:03:402 (2,3,4) –In this section I would rather stay consistent with 00:01:002 (2) – since the rhythm is still the same and it would be nice for consistency. Also leaving a gap here: 00:03:702 – would be nice to emphasize 00:03:852 (5) – and also since there isn’t really an audible beat here: 00:03:702 – I guess keeping the two hitcircles are fine, but rather remove 00:03:552 (4) – Yeah, changed this
2. 00:03:852 (5,6) –A hyperdash here is too much imo. The song still has a level of calmness and doesn’t really support a hyperdash. A normal dash will be better fitting. Perhaps move it to something around X:160 Agree, so chaned this pattern
3. 00:07:602 (1,2) –Why did you snap these two to 1/6 but these two: 00:08:802 (3,4) – are snapped to 1/8? Because I am dumb.
4. 00:07:602 (1,2,3,4) –If you want to gradually raise the distance between these sliders, I suggest increasing the distance of 00:08:202 (2) – a bit more If I'd do that, the jump between 00:08:202 (2,3) - would be pretty harsh for this section, so I gonna keep it how it is for now
5. 00:07:602 (1,2,3,4) –I suggest following a kind of pattern here with the sliders with the repeat of the sliders. (the middle fruit). The first slider’s middle fruit is at the left, then the second slider’s middle fruit is at the right, the next one is at the left and then the last one should be at the right to complete the pattern. Yours is currently at the left, so perhaps position the slider so the slider’s repeat is pointing to the right instead. Nice catch, also I think the last slider plays a lot easier than others in this patterns, so sure thing changed
   
   Picture

   
6. 00:10:902 (6,1) –No need for hyperdash here. The vocal on (1) is not that strong so it doesn’t really support it. Normal dash would be better. This hyperdash for example: 00:11:652 (4,1) – is cool since the beat on (1) is strong and distinctive so it benefits nicely from a hyperdash. Yup
7. 00:13:452 (6) –Quite a strong vocal. Consider placing a dash here to emphasize it. This vocal’s stronger than 00:13:602 (1) – imo so a dash on (6) rather than (1) makes more sense imo. Nah, the emphasize is good here imo, just made in the dash into 1/1 note for better playing
8. 00:14:802 –Not a good idea to have this important tick/vocal as a slider’s end imo since it would be nice to emphasize it more by placing a hyperdash there like here: 00:10:002 (1) – So rather change 00:14:202 (3) – into a ½ slider and place a circle here: 00:14:652 - and here 00:14:802 – (hyperdash this one) Try to stay consistent. Changed in another way
9. 00:14:952 (1,2,3) –Why didn’t you space consistently here like you did here: 00:15:852 (1,2,3,4,5) – It would just look better austhetically. I hope I got what you mean, changed xd
10. 00:19:002 (1) –Would be a good idea to increase the spacing here a bit since the beat is so strong and it would be nice to emphasize it a bit more. It's quite hard to understand which distance do I need to increase when you just said to increase it by mentioning 1 note lol. So, I changed 00:17:202 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this pattern for increasing a distance between 00:18:802 (6,1)
11. 00:19:602 –Again, rather not make this important beat be a slider’s end. It should be emphasized. So end 00:19:152 (2) – here: 00:19:452 – and add a circle here: 00:19:602 – (Adding a hyperdash here as well should be fine) Nice suggestion as well cx
12. 00:19:677 (1) –Listen to this at 25%. I can’t hear a beat here in the background, so rather remove this circle. You are tottaly right there's no beat, but I did place that note for aesthetics. try to removing this and look how awful it looks and plays without it. It doesn't affect the gameplay at all, so I'll keep this. Also that's located in the kiai section, so it's fine to overmap 1 note for aesthetics and gameplay purposes.
13. 00:22:077 (2) -^ ^
14. 00:23:202 (1) –The beat here is stronger than on 00:23:052 (2) – so I think it’s more important to emphasize (1) by adding a dash or something here. Adding nothing is a bit weird since this circle needs emphasis. Nerf the dash here: 00:23:052 (2) – a bit and add a dash on (1) Suure
15. 00:24:477 (2) –Same as 00:19:677 (1) – Etc. Explained why I think it's ok
16. 00:26:202 –Would be nice if this tick was a single fruit and not a slider’s tail since it’s an important beat. Changed
17. 00:27:802 (6,1) –Why is the distance between these two objects so small? The beat on (1) is still strong so a bit of a dash would be nice. Right!
18. 00:29:202 –Same as 00:19:602 – ~
19. 00:29:277 (1) – Same as 00:19:677 (1) – I’m not gonna point out all of them so I’m stopping here but there’s probably more similar places like this. ~
20. 00:35:802 (5) –This is so inconsistent with other similar patterns. Like 00:21:402 (7) – Hyperdash would fit here. Yup
21. 00:35:202 (1) –Remove NC here since it’s inconsistent with 00:20:802 (3) – Ok
22. 00:37:002 (2) –It would make more sense if the spacing here was bigger than here: 00:38:202 (4) – since the beat on (2) is much stronger. I think it's fine how it is now. Yes, the beat is strong, but the fact what here 00:38:202 (4) - ends all loud music is stronger
23. 00:38:202 (4,1) –Rather not add a hyperdash here. The beat on 00:38:802 (1) – isn’t strong enough to support it imo. A normal dash would do. The same reason like above, but now I put here a HD for emphasizing the end of the whole section, not just loud music, so yeah, keeping that
24. 00:43:002 (1,2) –Why add a hyperdash here? The beat on (2) is so soft so a hyperdash doesn’t fit imo. Not even a dash tbh. I would just use consistent spacing here: 00:43:002 (1,2,3) – xD It was, so yeah, let's bring it back how it was ;~;
25. 00:44:202 (5,6) –The beat on (5) sounds stronger than on (6) tbh, so a hyperdash on (5) would be better and a normal dash would fit better for (6). Changed
26. 00:45:402 (5) –Bigger spacing here, a bigger dash would be nice to emphasize that strong beat on the head of the slider. Changed by previous suggestion
27. 00:53:202 (8) –Add NC here and remove NC here: 00:53:352 (1) – for consistency with 00:50:802 (1) – Oki
28. 00:53:802 (1) –Remove NC here for consistency with 00:52:002 (3) – A E S T H E T I C S oh well I just think 11 fruits are quite high
29. 00:53:202 (8,1) –The hyperdash here doesn’t really make sense to me since the beat on 00:53:352 (1) – isn’t that strong at all. Rather decrease the spacing. Sure
30. 00:55:602 (9) –Why not add a dash here as well? It has the same beat as 00:54:402 (1,5) – so stay consistent. Also, add NC here and remove it here: 00:55:752 (1) – since the important beat is on the white tick. I won't place a HD this time, but implented a NC suggestion
31. 00:57:252 –Consider adding a note here. It feels a bit empty without one. If I'd add a note here, then I need to make one 00:56:952 here as well, which doesn't fit here at all imo
32. 01:10:902 (2) –Move this slider a few ticks backward so it starts here: 01:10:902 – Follows the rhythm better imo. Not for be :c
33. 01:11:952 (4) -^ ^
34. 01:18:402 (3) –Make this dash a bit bigger. The beat on this circle is strong. Yupie
35. 01:20:202 (1,2) –The beat on (2) isn’t strong enough for a hyperdash here. I highly discourage a hyperdash here. Tried to emphasize vocals here... but let's see how it goes for others, if someone will mention this once again - I'll remove it xd
36. 01:44:602 (1) –Why is there a NC here? Probably a mistake so rather remove it. x3

Platter:

1. 00:04:602 –Consider placing a single fruit here to catch that strong vocal. It’ll also support 00:04:902 (4) – so then you have two consecutive fruits to emphasize the vocal. So you can end 00:03:852 (3) – here: 00:04:302 – and add a circle here: 00:04:602 – I don't see any problems with how it is not
2. 00:10:602 (5,5) –Shouldn’t the spacings here rather be consistent since they have the same beats. Right now the distance of 00:13:002 (5) – is much larger than the distance of 00:10:602 (5) – and it looks inconsistent. Same here: 00:15:402 (3) – etc. So consider adding a hyperdash here: 00:10:452 (4,5) – to be consistent with the rest. You are talking about the distance of the objects just by mentioning 1 slider xD. Welp, I tried to understand what you mean, so put a HD here 00:10:452 (4,5) -
3. 00:10:602 (5) –There has to be a finish on the head of this slider and not a clap to be consistent with the hitsounding of: 00:13:002 (5) – Doublecheck this in your other diffs as well. whoops
4. 00:16:002 (1) –To be consistent with the previous combo’ing pattern, shouldn’t you remove the NC here? You won’t cross the 12 object limit so it’s fine. Yup
5. 00:22:902 –It would be better to map this out imo. Feels weird if you don’t. I suggest extending this slider: 00:22:602 (3) – to this tick: 00:22:902 – I did nice emphasize of the vocal in here in my opinion '~'
6. 00:23:802 –Same suggestion as 00:04:602 – etc. Not gonna point them all out Emphasizing dude :c
7. 00:23:202 (2) –Perhaps increase the distance here a bit for a dash. The beat on the head of the slider is strong.
8. 00:27:402 (2) -^
9. 00:28:602 (2) -^ Implemented everything, I think, sice you're still telling me to increase the distance between one object xc
10. 00:31:002 (7) –When you compare this dash with the rest of the similar beat: 00:21:402 (6) - 00:26:202 (4) - it looks out of place. Consider decreasing that dash. Okii
11. 00:38:202 (2) –The beat/vocal here isn’t that strong so the dash can be decreased a bit. Emphasized the end of loud music
12. 01:08:202 (3) –This slider is weird.. Is this allowed? Yeah, it is allowed xD
13. 01:11:202 (1) –You can increase the dash/spacing here a bit. How am I supposed to understand what do you mean to increase again :cc. Increased 01:11:202 (1,2) - between them, dunno if you mentioned them or not, but I think that's the only place here I can increase the distance
14. 01:26:202 (4) –Why not add a dash here as well to be consistent with 01:25:002 (4,1) – Won't be rankable due anti flow HD
15. 01:26:802 (1) –A hyperdash can be added here for this strong beat. ^, but increased the distance just a little bit
16. 01:27:402 (5) –I feel the spacing here can be increased a bit, just to emphasize that strong beat more. Here you increased the distance by a lot: 01:29:802 (3) – so try to be consistent. Just like above~
17. 01:32:352 (2,3,4) –This is not consistent with the other similar patterns and it seems a bit out of place. It's nice imo
18. 01:34:002 (1) –Increase the distance of this note a bit. I caaan't increase the distance of one note xDDD But still got what you mean and changed
19. 01:51:702 (6) –This hyperdash seems weird since there’s no strong beat on: 01:51:702 (6) – and it’s also not fitting for a platter diff imo. Decrease the spacing here. A dash can be added here: 01:52:002 (1) – instead. Revamped the whole section

Salad:

1. 00:33:702 –Add a fruit/note here. This is an important vocal so map it out. Okii
2. 00:31:002 (7) – Again, is this allowed, lol >.< Why xd
3. 01:25:602 (3,4) –It looks a bit weird that the distance here is smaller than here: 01:24:402 (1,2) – since the rhythm remains the same. Consider making the distances similar. Nice pattern in my opinion, so just increase the distance a little bit
4. 01:21:402 (2,7,7) –You can change these sliders into two fruits/circles to catch those two vocals and you’ll also use a bit more of a variety of pattens in the kiai and not just mostly ½ sliders. Same applies for the first kiai. Don't see any problems with it. Also, variety is a really subjective in such a song xd
5. There are also places where you didn’t add notes/circles where I think you should since there are vocals. Examples are: 00:21:702 - There is also inconsistency here since you added a circle here: 00:26:502 (8) – but not here: 00:21:702 - Further examples are: 00:33:702 – Also inconsistency here since you added a circle here: 00:24:102 (7) – but not here: 00:33:702 – Just recheck those patterns please and make sure they are consistent. Check the second kiai as well, there are places where circles can be added: 01:19:302 - 01:48:102 – I hope I've made something with that ;-;

Cup:

1. Uncheck widescreen support.
2. 00:02:802 (1) –The repeat of this slider is not landing on any beat in particular. The actual beat that you want to catch is: 00:03:852 – Perhaps try something like this: Made something different
   
   Picture

   
3. 00:06:102 (2) –Shouldn’t this slider start on this tick: 00:06:252 - ? It also feels a bit weird while playing so I highly suggest you don’t place a slider off-beat. Yeah
4. 00:13:302 (2) -^ I am retarted
5. 00:17:202 (1) –There is not adequate time between the start and the end of the spinner. It has to be a ½ beat since the song has a BPM of 100 Sooo? I used 1/2 beat k
   
   RC

   
   I suggest remove 00:16:902 (3) – and end the spinner here: 00:19:002 –
6. 00:47:802 (1) –Unnecessary NC imo. Nooo, really loud sound so I decided to place a NC here
7. 01:19:302 –You can add a circle here. There’s a strong vocal.
8. 01:24:102 - ^
9. 01:28:902 - ^, etc. Will refrain from this on Cup diff though

Good Luck~ Hopefully this helped a bit. This helped a lot, nice first o!c mod <3