1. Labradorite (5.7 stars, 1461 notes)

lol

1. 00:06:721 (3) - this slidertick hitsound is not fit here imo (04:50:859 (6) - 04:53:618 (6) - …… too)
   
2. 00:25:514 - this sound is important, why you ignore it? at least use a slider instead 00:25:342 (4) -
   
3. 01:04:997 (1) - I find no reason to use 3/4 here, both vocal and piano is at 01:05:169 -
   better to use same rhythm between 01:04:652 (1,1,1) - and 03:43:273 (1,1,1) -
   
4. 01:21:549 (2) - jump is not good imo, it's red-line-sound and the drum is at 01:21:376 (1) - . Using ds as same as 01:24:135 (1,2) - is better
   
5. 02:55:169 (3) - nc?
   
6. 03:56:204 (3) - nc for vocal? same as 04:07:238 (1) -
   
7. 04:21:204 (1,3) - swap nc
   
8. i check nc from the beginning again and find many unconsistent issue: 01:39:480 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,1) - 01:50:169 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2) - 02:31:721 (4,5,1,2) - …… maybe you need to check by yourself again

Pata-Mon wrote:

1. 00:06:721 (3) - this slidertick hitsound is not fit here imo (04:50:859 (6) - 04:53:618 (6) - …… too) about this.. i will find something to fit in , currently thinking of which hitsound would do great here

nice map take my star

StarrStyx wrote:

shen mapo rumia /w\ big lao starrstyx /w\
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6543331

[Starlight]
how about custom diffname? ww sure w
01:45:600 - feels quite empty lol, how about this http://starrstyx.s-ul.eu/1BxRCe4X (replacing 01:45:342 (1) - )
did some changes on the beat for this part

other points are fixed

not really much to nitpick about tbh, really nice and fun map :v thanks ><
take the star and gl
btw can i have the 320kbps mp3? owosure

Kami-senpai wrote:

M4M from your queueueueue :3

Extra

So close to that 5 minute drain... ;-; it is! its just the last spinner didnt count as actual drain
Also, some super cryptic/edgy name for the sole difficulty would be sick xD thinking of a name ;w;

00:19:307 (1,2,3) - Maybe make equidistant? the visual distance looks a bit messy ;;
00:30:859 (4) - According to the music, the sound at the sliderend here is emphasized, so it would make sense to make it clickable. My suggestion is make the slider end here a slider and the repeating slider after just a single 1/2 slider: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6576713 for me it ruins the instrument focus , thanks for suggesting
00:51:376 (3) - Maybe make this some sort of stream or stream alternative to map to the piano? keeping the intensity for smooth transition
00:57:583 (3,1) - You probably overlapped on purpose, but I think a blanket would look better i see no problem with either of it! wanted to keep this sorry!!
01:11:204 (6,7,8) - Equidistance? no , i was arranging this wrong , fixed in other way
01:33:790 (1) - You made the similar sounds 1/8 repeating sliders but a long slider here? the idea if making the 1/8s is to stop your cursor from moving , as for this slider i wanted to do a movement instead of stopping your cursor
For the dnb parts, maybe replace the hitnormal hitsound so its like a hi hat sound and use more kicks
02:47:756 (7) - Maybe increase SV here? It seems like it would be fitting since it's such a sudden change in the music feel bad..
03:36:549 (1,2) - Maybe blanket?
03:58:962 (5,3) - Stack properly those dont affect gameplay!
04:19:997 (2) - Would look better if you ctrl+h and placed it in same position no for me
04:42:066 (5) - Start sliders here and make downbeat of next measure clickable? i think its fine

Thankee and good luck

Left wrote:

M4M

Nice Map

-00:10:169 (2) - I think sound in 2's head is relatively obvious enough to be clickable. I think ???? yea but the transition will be a little uncomfortable , was avoiding that
-00:19:307 (1,2,3) - just using the rhythm you used before is better i think. trying to make it less repititive!
-00:25:514 (5) - use more distance or make DS same pls, I can see intention but it's quite ambiguous in look now... re arranged this section , yea i was out of idea
-00:47:583 - idk why you missed this beat..I think you have some intentions but i felt empty here. i want to do a close up to the previous part , while the next section starts with different things , this is for smooth transition
-01:21:549 (2) - i want to know the intention of this two white tick slider, not one white tick. I felt a bit uncomfortable here. i was just following the instrument.. im not sure how to deal with this part tbh TT
-03:12:411 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - can i know reason why you lowered DS here? because its entering the fading part , this lowered ds act as the transition so it doesnt suddenly stop moving your cursor , instead it slowers your cursor movement and raise it back later
-04:19:135 (7,8,1) - make smoother curve line?
?

rip mostly just suggestions cuz it's nice map
Good Luck!

haha woah man wrote:

m4m from queue

SPOILER

00:03:273 (2,3) - maybe increase spacing just so it doesnt read like 1/2
01:04:652 (1,1,1) - i think following vocals here would be better since the piano is pretty quiet and you follow the vocals in the last few measures. keep
01:07:928 (1,1,1) - i think flipping this vertically would make it flow better, both from 01:07:411 (3,1) and 01:08:618 (1,1) keep
01:27:928 (1,1,1) - it is quite hard to read this rhythm. its hard to see a way to fix though. maybe separate 01:27:583 (1) into two sliders so that you tap each 1/2? that way the next rhythm is a natural progression. keep
01:57:066 (7,1,2) - this rhythm doesnt play that well imo. i think a rhythm like this plays better and follows the melody nicer. keep as for now
02:20:342 (1,2) - this rhythm doesnt really seem to follow anything to me. i think circle, 1/2 slider, circle would play better yea this part act as a filler , just want to make it easier a little
02:42:583 (7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - i just wanna say i really like the flow here thanks!
02:34:307 (7,1) - this doesnt emphasize the vocals well, imo. because im not emphasizing vocal
03:01:376 (1,2,3) - maybe not necessary but althought 1.75x is more consistent here, it might be too dramatic, since there is a danger of reading these sliders like 1/2 sliders. 1.5x would work better i think. just fine for me
03:01:893 (4,5) - why not 0.2x like these 03:02:756 (2,3,4,5) ? entirely different instrument
03:14:135 (5) - ending the stream like this is really anticlimactic, especially with how emphasized the melody is right there not really , giving emphasition on the next cymbal isnt that bad!
03:41:376 (1,2,1) - this looks a little weird to me. maybe just add a slight curve or subtle red tick to the final slider so the angles dont clash keep
03:43:273 (1,1,1) - same as before. this one is better though, the spacing emphasizes it nicely. keep
03:53:100 (1,2,3) - i think following the whispered vocals is better here, since they are so emphasized dont think so...
03:56:031 (1,2,1) - i think stacking these would display the rhythm better did close up a little spacing, didnt stack
04:08:445 (2,3) - 04:11:204 (4,5) - i really dislike these stacks, especially with parts like 04:11:807 (7,1) existing. it is very confusing. i would use the small spacing you used in the intro (00:21:031 (2,3) - 00:23:790 (2,3) - etc) to make this read better. if you do this, i would stack 04:19:911 (1,2) to continue these trends. from my perspective of playing this does not really confuse anything , as a player you should actually aware of how a 1/4 and 1/2 approachrate is coming , and most of my 1/4 stacks are usually before a slider and a lot of testplays have been asked in range of 10k>100 ranks and no one seem to be confused to this kind of pattern
04:31:549 (4) - making this 1/2 instead of 04:31:721 (1) - would emphasize the rhythm that the kicksliders follow better, imo. (and then a circle on the red tick) highlighting the trumpet
04:37:239 (1,2,3,4) - this small spacing is quite odd, its not used for this part of the song anywhere else, i think a bigger spacing would end this section more nicely its for the build up , this is pure drum and the space one have the bubbly electronic sounds
04:39:135 (4,1) - stacking these on 1 would follow the piano better i think stick it to my current pattern it group out the instrument better
04:50:859 (6) - you could find something cooler / nicer than this i think. no idea how to make a cool sliders B(

fun map good luck!

Lami wrote:

pop GD quiz

00:19:307 (1,2,3) - since you already followed to vocal(clickable) on this section, (00:13:100 - ~ 00:24:824 - )
i feel a bit weird rhythm choice, as you didn't make clickable at 00:19:824 - (vocal). i think its ok!
00:52:066 (1) - ctrl+G? because 00:52:066 (1,2) - they have pretty different vocal. yeah but the tone doesnt really change so different direction feels weird to me!
i think it's better when they have different ways, as different vocal.
03:11:721 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - if more follow music,
i think 03:11:721 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 's DS ≤ 03:12:411 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 's DS i already replied in Left's mod but now that people pointing out it twice , i tried some other way
03:14:393 - consider to fill up this sound if you concerned similar sound at 03:13:790 (1,2,3,4,5) - would be too hard i think..the current one is fine! to give better emphasis to the crash
03:24:480 (2,3,4,5) - can you consistent shape no o
03:55:945 - i think this stream 03:56:031 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - started from 03:55:945 - the blue tick sound is too dim..and it plays awkward
04:25:859 (1) - consider to make two circle according to music. i think no

[C u r i] wrote:

[general]


[Extra]
00:46:549 (2) - how about change to two 1/4 sliders? i want to keep it calm here
00:46:893 - how about map this part? idk why you empty this part as explained in Left's mod reply.
01:36:031 (2) - how about nc here and 01:36:204 (1) - delete nc this for catch piano sound? focusing on the dnb as for this part
02:01:204 (2) - nc? want to keep consistent as 1 2 1 2 nc

omg soooo nice map xd take my starrr

Hanazawa Kana wrote:

rumiao shenmapo! kanashen!!!

water mod come

[Labradorite]

00:19:824 - i think maybe you can make it clickable since you followed voice this part and just ignored that one - - feels a little weird want to give emphasis to next slider

00:28:962 (1,2,3,4) - that maybe hard to play in that part nono not hard at all

00:57:583 (3,1) - that overlap...QAQ maybe do some blanket looks better i intentionally overlap this , dont want to change , blanket doesnt make it better

01:04:652 (1,1,1) - a bit weird when you almost follow voice in that part and suddenly follow pianos with that 3 sliders its a transition that i like between the vocal , it gives various feel of playing instead of just vocal

01:55:687 (1) - you can have a try of that shape.maybe better the flow between 1 and 2 https://puu.sh/sRd8P.png adjusted the current slider curver a little on my own record

01:58:790 (2,3) - have a try of that? https://puu.sh/sRdf2.png did something similar

that's all from me
really shen map!
good luck~~

1. 01:26:204 (3,4) - fix blanket a bit
2. 01:59:997 (1) - maybe move to 450 237 for better appearance with previous slider
3. 03:27:756 (3,2) - leave untouched looks bit neater
4. 03:55:945 - sounds that the stream should start here?
5. 04:23:962 (4) - why not just use two 1/4 sliders, feels more natural while playing
   
   Hitsounding:
6. 00:35:859 - to 00:45:342 - and 00:48:273 - to 00:54:480 - forgot to add hitsounds or its intentional?
7. 00:57:928 - finish?
8. 01:42:238 - 01:44:997 - 01:45:687 - 01:57:928 - 02:03:618 - 02:12:583 - 02:13:273 - 02:18:790 - 02:19:307 - 02:20:687 - 02:22:928 - 02:23:618 - 02:26:376 - 02:34:652 - 02:37:411 - 02:44:997 - 04:29:135 - 04:31:893 - not quite sure about all but some of them seem to miss whistle?
9. consider 01:58:618 (1) - clap, 01:58:962 (3) - finish
10. 01:59:652 - can somewhat use a cooler clap sound
11. 01:07:928 - 01:08:273 - 01:08:618 - maybe add whistle for those vocals
12. 03:46:549 - 03:46:893 - 03:47:238 - ^
13. 03:54:307 (5,6,7) - whistle on all or on 7 for the piano?
14. should clap 04:29:997 - instead of 04:30:169 - i guess
15. 04:40:687 (3) - 04:46:204 - clap?
16. 04:44:135 - 04:45:169 - finish?
17. consider adding some whistles to the last part?