This is a BSS beatmap submission. Click here to view full beatmap information.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
2,285 posts
Offline
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on Saturday, March 18, 2017 at 12:36:28 PM

Artist: kamome sano
Title: starlights feat. TEA
Tags: Goodbye , Friend Rumia- 昨日までのキミを忘れたいから dnb dubstep pop
BPM: 174
Filesize: 11806kb
Play Time: 05:02
Difficulties Available:

Download: kamome sano - starlights feat. TEA
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Image

my heart shivers
Keysound by GOD thzz
first dnb map
歌詞
少し急いでる一人じゃない足音
本当だったら帰ろうとしてた時間

曇り空で隠れてる星粒
弾む声の君を追いかけていく
聞こえてきた好きなあの曲
重い扉の向こうで

弾けて、いま光った 瞬きもできない色
言葉にできないから少し苦しくて
溢れた心全部
一瞬のスローモーション
「まだ消えないで」
君の隣で

知ってる音楽 知らなかった気持ち
同じ景色の中で

壊れてしまいそうな 息継ぎもできない音
君を揺らすビートがすべて眩しくて
忘れないくらい刺さった
痛いくらいのエモーションは花火のようで
立ち止まってる

初めていま気付いた 君の腕の体温
言葉にできないまま いまも苦しくて
さよなら これで最後
魔法がほどけてく
「あと少しだけ!」

弾けて、いま光った 瞬きもできない色
言葉にできないから少し苦しくて
溢れた心全部
一瞬のスローモーション
「まだ消えないで」
君の隣で


lol
Image
Last edited by Rumia- on , edited 57 times in total.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,254 posts
Offline
Earned 2 kudosu.

nice map take my star
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
2,285 posts
Offline
Pata-Mon wrote:

nice map take my star

other fixed!
will see through my Ncs again since some part i messed up ;;
thx for star and mod!!
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,254 posts
Offline
No kudosu yet.
default softslidertick is not bad imo
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,210 posts
Offline
No kudosu yet.
take my kds

dont rape me
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
967 posts
Offline
Earned 2 kudosu.
shen mapo rumia /w\
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6543331


Starlight
how about custom diffname? ww
00:06:721 (3) - just pointing out anyway, saw that pata mon said something about it already lol
ctrl g on 00:34:480 (1) - and 00:34:824 (2) - ? just a suggestion
00:54:307 (1,2,3) - the 3 is rather unreadable... just look like another note than a sliderend tbh
01:01:893 (3) - nc?
01:45:600 - feels quite empty lol, how about this http://starrstyx.s-ul.eu/1BxRCe4X (replacing 01:45:342 (1) - )
02:28:100 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - feel like the hitsounds on this stream is rather lacking lol, a bit silent imo
02:54:997 (2) - ctrl g?
03:38:445 (1,2,3) - just a bit tilted when this is not a straight line :/ its fine tho, just my own thought

not really much to nitpick about tbh, really nice and fun map :v
take the star and gl :D
btw can i have the 320kbps mp3? owo
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
2,285 posts
Offline
StarrStyx wrote:
shen mapo rumia /w\ big lao starrstyx /w\
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6543331


Starlight
how about custom diffname? ww sure w
01:45:600 - feels quite empty lol, how about this http://starrstyx.s-ul.eu/1BxRCe4X (replacing 01:45:342 (1) - )
did some changes on the beat for this part

other points are fixed

not really much to nitpick about tbh, really nice and fun map :v thanks ><
take the star and gl :D
btw can i have the 320kbps mp3? owosure

thanks for mod!!
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
525 posts
Offline
Earned 1 kudosu.
M4M from your queueueueue :3

Extra
So close to that 5 minute drain... ;-;
Also, some super cryptic/edgy name for the sole difficulty would be sick xD

00:19:307 (1,2,3) - Maybe make equidistant?
00:30:859 (4) - According to the music, the sound at the sliderend here is emphasized, so it would make sense to make it clickable. My suggestion is make the slider end here a slider and the repeating slider after just a single 1/2 slider: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6576713
00:36:549 (3,4,5,6) - Equidistant? Or it would be cool if you made them all increasing distance spacing, so like https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6576726. Small change, but I think it would be nice
00:44:652 (2) - The sound suggests that the slider end should be clickable
00:51:376 (3) - Maybe make this some sort of stream or stream alternative to map to the piano?
00:57:583 (3,1) - You probably overlapped on purpose, but I think a blanket would look better
01:11:204 (6,7,8) - Equidistance?
01:15:514 (6,7,8,9) - I would increase the spacing in between these because 7 8 9 are emphasized with the piano trill
01:16:893 - Start spinner here?
01:33:790 (1) - You made the similar sounds 1/8 repeating sliders but a long slider here?
For the dnb parts, maybe replace the hitnormal hitsound so its like a hi hat sound and use more kicks
02:47:756 (7) - Maybe increase SV here? It seems like it would be fitting since it's such a sudden change in the music
03:36:549 (1,2) - Maybe blanket?
03:58:962 (5,3) - Stack properly
04:11:204 (4,5) - Putting this next to 04:11:807 (7,1) - this makes the latter seem a bit unpredictable
04:19:997 (2) - Would look better if you ctrl+h and placed it in same position
04:35:169 (1,2) - I feel like the distance between these two should be bigger than the distance between 04:34:480 (1,2) -
04:42:066 (5) - Start sliders here and make downbeat of next measure clickable?


My mappu: https://osu.ppy.sh/s/533587

Thankee and good luck :D
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,653 posts
Offline
Earned 1 kudosu.
M4M

Nice Map


-00:10:169 (2) - I think sound in 2's head is relatively obvious enough to be clickable. I think ????
-00:19:307 (1,2,3) - just using the rhythm you used before is better i think.
-00:25:514 (5) - use more distance or make DS same pls, I can see intention but it's quite ambiguous in look now...
-00:47:583 - idk why you missed this beat..I think you have some intentions but i felt empty here.
-00:51:376 (3) - tail silent?
-00:54:652 (4) - i think this note deserves more emphasis. how about using more distance?
-01:03:962 (2) - tail wierd HS
-01:21:549 (2) - i want to know the intention of this two white tick slider, not one white tick. I felt a bit uncomfortable here.
-01:28:790 (3,1) - I think these are one set of pattern, how about NC 01:28:790 (3) - , not 01:28:962 (1) - ?
-02:49:652 (4) - actually sound changes here, but you don't have anything to show it. 02:49:652 (4) - NC here and 02:49:480 (2,3,4) - DS lower?
http://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6581548 this kind? is yeah just my taste
-03:12:411 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - can i know reason why you lowered DS here?
-04:19:135 (7,8,1) - make smoother curve line?
-04:59:135 (6) - tail soft sampleset?
-05:01:204 (1) - tail volume?


rip mostly just suggestions cuz it's nice map
Good Luck!
User avatar
Star Shooter
182 posts
Offline
Earned 1 kudosu.
m4m from queue

collapsed text
00:03:273 (2,3) - maybe increase spacing just so it doesnt read like 1/2
00:06:721 (3) - if this is supposed to blanket its quite off. if not its fine :D
00:13:790 (1) - angle directly towards 00:14:307 (2) - so that its a perfect back and forth
00:25:342 (4,5) - this spacing is weird, because its almost 1.0x but just slightly more. i think either using 1.0x again or using something bigger like 1.5x to separate it more would look nicer
01:04:652 (1,1,1) - i think following vocals here would be better since the piano is pretty quiet and you follow the vocals in the last few measures.
01:07:928 (1,1,1) - i think flipping this vertically would make it flow better, both from 01:07:411 (3,1) and 01:08:618 (1,1)
01:11:549 (8,1) - bigger spacing? the vocal on 1 is pretty emphasized
01:22:583 (3) - ending this on blue tick is confusing since you don't do it beforehand. the synths on 01:19:824 (2) and 01:23:273 (4) end the same way, but the slider ends on 1/2 those times. or maybe just decrease the spacing to make it more clear.
01:27:928 (1,1,1) - it is quite hard to read this rhythm. its hard to see a way to fix though. maybe separate 01:27:583 (1) into two sliders so that you tap each 1/2? that way the next rhythm is a natural progression.
01:29:307 (2,3) - put 3 under 2? it would read better and create more emphasis on this rhythm: 01:29:652 (3,1) which you use a few more times.
01:38:273 (1,2,3,1) - this jump flows really awkwardly, if 01:38:618 (1,2,3) was moved more to the left it would read / play better.
01:45:169 (3,4,1) - this is quite an unnatural movement because of how high 4,1 is
01:57:066 (7,1,2) - this rhythm doesnt play that well imo. i think a rhythm like this plays better and follows the melody nicer.
01:59:135 (4,5,6) - moving 5 to the left side of 4 and 6 would make this pattern flow better imo.
02:06:721 (2,3) - a 1/2 slider on 2 follows the music better i think
02:20:342 (1,2) - this rhythm doesnt really seem to follow anything to me. i think circle, 1/2 slider, circle would play better
02:31:549 (2,3) - i think you accidentally messed up the spacing here. otherwise, it doesnt make sense for this to not have the same spacing as the rest of the stream (or the triple, since 3,4 is 0.78x and 2,3 is 0.58x)
02:31:721 (4) - NC to match the streams in the next kiai?
02:42:583 (7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - i just wanna say i really like the flow here :D
02:34:307 (7,1) - this doesnt emphasize the vocals well, imo.
02:56:893 (3,4,1) - space this more? it would emphasize it better like here 02:56:204 (1,2,1)
02:58:445 (3,4,5) - why not use 0.6x like 02:57:066 (4,1,2) ? i think consistent spacing is important to clarify the rhythms more intensely.
03:01:376 (1,2,3) - maybe not necessary but althought 1.75x is more consistent here, it might be too dramatic, since there is a danger of reading these sliders like 1/2 sliders. 1.5x would work better i think.
03:01:893 (4,5) - why not 0.2x like these 03:02:756 (2,3,4,5) ?
03:01:980 (5,6) - why not 0.6x like 03:03:531 (1,2) ? both of these (^) would make this section look nicer imo
03:07:152 (4,1) - maybe increase this spacing like you did here: 02:56:118 (4,1) ? it would be cool to use again :D
03:14:135 (5) - ending the stream like this is really anticlimactic, especially with how emphasized the melody is right there
03:18:962 (1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - imo these are way too spaced for how calm this section is, they are almost as big as the jumps in the kiais.
03:21:204 (5,6,7,1) - ^
03:25:514 (1,2,3,4) - why not make this a perfect parallelogram? http://imgur.com/a/zfa6F looks nicer (top is my suggestion, bottom is map)
03:41:376 (1,2,1) - this looks a little weird to me. maybe just add a slight curve or subtle red tick to the final slider so the angles dont clash
03:43:273 (1,1,1) - same as before. this one is better though, the spacing emphasizes it nicely.
03:51:721 (1,2,1,2,1,2,3,4) - maybe just a little too big
03:53:100 (1,2,3) - i think following the whispered vocals is better here, since they are so emphasized
03:56:031 (1,2,1) - i think stacking these would display the rhythm better
03:58:618 (3,4,5) - i dont like the circle being under the last slider tail, but this is probably ok. just seems unnecessary.
04:03:962 (1,2,3,1) - ^. this one is worse imo, since 04:03:962 (1,2) is grouped more because of the rhythm. putting the final circle under 2 plays and looks much better i think
04:08:445 (2,3) - 04:11:204 (4,5) - i really dislike these stacks, especially with parts like 04:11:807 (7,1) existing. it is very confusing. i would use the small spacing you used in the intro (00:21:031 (2,3) - 00:23:790 (2,3) - etc) to make this read better. if you do this, i would stack 04:19:911 (1,2) to continue these trends.
04:31:549 (4) - making this 1/2 instead of 04:31:721 (1) - would emphasize the rhythm that the kicksliders follow better, imo. (and then a circle on the red tick)
04:35:859 (1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - i think these could be spaced more, they are much more emphasized than the jumps before. its a little anticlimactic.
04:37:239 (1,2,3,4) - this small spacing is quite odd, its not used for this part of the song anywhere else, i think a bigger spacing would end this section more nicely
04:39:135 (4,1) - stacking these on 1 would follow the piano better i think
04:50:859 (6) - you could find something cooler / nicer than this i think.


fun map :D good luck!
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
1,401 posts
Offline
Earned 1 kudosu.
pop GD quiz

00:19:307 (1,2,3) - since you already followed to vocal(clickable) on this section, (00:13:100 - ~ 00:24:824 - )
i feel a bit weird rhythm choice, as you didn't make clickable at 00:19:824 - (vocal).
00:52:066 (1) - ctrl+G? because 00:52:066 (1,2) - they have pretty different vocal.
i think it's better when they have different ways, as different vocal.
00:54:480 (3,4) - wanna more DS as strong beat.
00:56:893 (1,2,3) - can you plz straight placement
01:38:273 (1,2,3) - nazi kinda inconsistent DS
01:39:480 (3) - 1/4 slider?
03:11:721 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - if more follow music,
i think 03:11:721 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 's DS ≤ 03:12:411 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 's DS
03:12:411 - this section is bigger than 03:11:721 - imo
03:14:393 - consider to fill up this sound if you concerned similar sound at 03:13:790 (1,2,3,4,5) -
03:24:480 (2,3,4,5) - can you consistent shape
03:55:945 - i think this stream 03:56:031 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - started from 03:55:945 -
04:07:928 (5) - NC as 01:51:376 (1) -
04:25:859 (1) - consider to make two circle according to music.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
978 posts
Offline
Earned 1 kudosu.

general
plz delete .osb file and starlight bg.png


Extra
00:02:756 - equalize red and green volume level.
00:19:652 (3,1) - avoid overlap plz
00:46:549 (2) - how about change to two 1/4 sliders?
00:46:893 - how about map this part? idk why you empty this part
00:50:687 (1,2) - this rhythm should be like this. cuz 00:51:031 - here is not exist anything sound but 00:50:859 - here is exist vocal sound.
asd
Image

01:17:238 (1) - how about this spinner start at 01:16:893 - here? cuz vocal is start at here.
01:36:031 (2) - how about nc here and 01:36:204 (1) - delete nc this for catch piano sound?
01:35:859 (1,2) - avoid overlap plz
02:01:204 (2) - nc?
03:52:756 (1) - ^
04:50:859 (1) - ^
04:53:618 (6) - ^
04:56:376 (6) - ^

omg soooo nice map xd take my starrr
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
2,285 posts
Offline
Kami-senpai wrote:
M4M from your queueueueue :3

Extra
So close to that 5 minute drain... ;-; it is! its just the last spinner didnt count as actual drain
Also, some super cryptic/edgy name for the sole difficulty would be sick xD thinking of a name ;w;

00:19:307 (1,2,3) - Maybe make equidistant? the visual distance looks a bit messy ;;
00:30:859 (4) - According to the music, the sound at the sliderend here is emphasized, so it would make sense to make it clickable. My suggestion is make the slider end here a slider and the repeating slider after just a single 1/2 slider: https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/6576713 for me it ruins the instrument focus , thanks for suggesting
00:51:376 (3) - Maybe make this some sort of stream or stream alternative to map to the piano? keeping the intensity for smooth transition
00:57:583 (3,1) - You probably overlapped on purpose, but I think a blanket would look better i see no problem with either of it! wanted to keep this sorry!!
01:11:204 (6,7,8) - Equidistance? no , i was arranging this wrong , fixed in other way
01:33:790 (1) - You made the similar sounds 1/8 repeating sliders but a long slider here? the idea if making the 1/8s is to stop your cursor from moving , as for this slider i wanted to do a movement instead of stopping your cursor
For the dnb parts, maybe replace the hitnormal hitsound so its like a hi hat sound and use more kicks
02:47:756 (7) - Maybe increase SV here? It seems like it would be fitting since it's such a sudden change in the music feel bad..
03:36:549 (1,2) - Maybe blanket?
03:58:962 (5,3) - Stack properly those dont affect gameplay!
04:19:997 (2) - Would look better if you ctrl+h and placed it in same position no for me
04:42:066 (5) - Start sliders here and make downbeat of next measure clickable? i think its fine

Thankee and good luck :D


Left wrote:
M4M

Nice Map


-00:10:169 (2) - I think sound in 2's head is relatively obvious enough to be clickable. I think ???? yea but the transition will be a little uncomfortable , was avoiding that
-00:19:307 (1,2,3) - just using the rhythm you used before is better i think. trying to make it less repititive!
-00:25:514 (5) - use more distance or make DS same pls, I can see intention but it's quite ambiguous in look now... re arranged this section , yea i was out of idea
-00:47:583 - idk why you missed this beat..I think you have some intentions but i felt empty here. i want to do a close up to the previous part , while the next section starts with different things , this is for smooth transition
-01:21:549 (2) - i want to know the intention of this two white tick slider, not one white tick. I felt a bit uncomfortable here. i was just following the instrument.. im not sure how to deal with this part tbh TT
-03:12:411 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - can i know reason why you lowered DS here? because its entering the fading part , this lowered ds act as the transition so it doesnt suddenly stop moving your cursor , instead it slowers your cursor movement and raise it back later
-04:19:135 (7,8,1) - make smoother curve line?
?


rip mostly just suggestions cuz it's nice map
Good Luck!


haha woah man wrote:
m4m from queue

collapsed text
00:03:273 (2,3) - maybe increase spacing just so it doesnt read like 1/2
01:04:652 (1,1,1) - i think following vocals here would be better since the piano is pretty quiet and you follow the vocals in the last few measures. keep
01:07:928 (1,1,1) - i think flipping this vertically would make it flow better, both from 01:07:411 (3,1) and 01:08:618 (1,1) keep
01:27:928 (1,1,1) - it is quite hard to read this rhythm. its hard to see a way to fix though. maybe separate 01:27:583 (1) into two sliders so that you tap each 1/2? that way the next rhythm is a natural progression. keep
01:57:066 (7,1,2) - this rhythm doesnt play that well imo. i think a rhythm like this plays better and follows the melody nicer. keep as for now
02:20:342 (1,2) - this rhythm doesnt really seem to follow anything to me. i think circle, 1/2 slider, circle would play better yea this part act as a filler , just want to make it easier a little
02:42:583 (7,8,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1) - i just wanna say i really like the flow here :D thanks!
02:34:307 (7,1) - this doesnt emphasize the vocals well, imo. because im not emphasizing vocal
03:01:376 (1,2,3) - maybe not necessary but althought 1.75x is more consistent here, it might be too dramatic, since there is a danger of reading these sliders like 1/2 sliders. 1.5x would work better i think. just fine for me
03:01:893 (4,5) - why not 0.2x like these 03:02:756 (2,3,4,5) ? entirely different instrument
03:14:135 (5) - ending the stream like this is really anticlimactic, especially with how emphasized the melody is right there not really , giving emphasition on the next cymbal isnt that bad!
03:41:376 (1,2,1) - this looks a little weird to me. maybe just add a slight curve or subtle red tick to the final slider so the angles dont clash keep
03:43:273 (1,1,1) - same as before. this one is better though, the spacing emphasizes it nicely. keep
03:53:100 (1,2,3) - i think following the whispered vocals is better here, since they are so emphasized dont think so...
03:56:031 (1,2,1) - i think stacking these would display the rhythm better did close up a little spacing, didnt stack
04:08:445 (2,3) - 04:11:204 (4,5) - i really dislike these stacks, especially with parts like 04:11:807 (7,1) existing. it is very confusing. i would use the small spacing you used in the intro (00:21:031 (2,3) - 00:23:790 (2,3) - etc) to make this read better. if you do this, i would stack 04:19:911 (1,2) to continue these trends. from my perspective of playing this does not really confuse anything , as a player you should actually aware of how a 1/4 and 1/2 approachrate is coming , and most of my 1/4 stacks are usually before a slider and a lot of testplays have been asked in range of 10k>100 ranks and no one seem to be confused to this kind of pattern
04:31:549 (4) - making this 1/2 instead of 04:31:721 (1) - would emphasize the rhythm that the kicksliders follow better, imo. (and then a circle on the red tick) highlighting the trumpet
04:37:239 (1,2,3,4) - this small spacing is quite odd, its not used for this part of the song anywhere else, i think a bigger spacing would end this section more nicely its for the build up , this is pure drum and the space one have the bubbly electronic sounds
04:39:135 (4,1) - stacking these on 1 would follow the piano better i think stick it to my current pattern it group out the instrument better
04:50:859 (6) - you could find something cooler / nicer than this i think. no idea how to make a cool sliders B(


fun map :D good luck!



Lami wrote:
pop GD quiz

00:19:307 (1,2,3) - since you already followed to vocal(clickable) on this section, (00:13:100 - ~ 00:24:824 - )
i feel a bit weird rhythm choice, as you didn't make clickable at 00:19:824 - (vocal). i think its ok!
00:52:066 (1) - ctrl+G? because 00:52:066 (1,2) - they have pretty different vocal. yeah but the tone doesnt really change so different direction feels weird to me!
i think it's better when they have different ways, as different vocal.
03:11:721 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - if more follow music,
i think 03:11:721 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 's DS ≤ 03:12:411 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8) - 's DS i already replied in Left's mod but now that people pointing out it twice , i tried some other way
03:14:393 - consider to fill up this sound if you concerned similar sound at 03:13:790 (1,2,3,4,5) - would be too hard i think..the current one is fine! to give better emphasis to the crash
03:24:480 (2,3,4,5) - can you consistent shape no o
03:55:945 - i think this stream 03:56:031 (1,2,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4,1,2,3,4) - started from 03:55:945 - the blue tick sound is too dim..and it plays awkward
04:25:859 (1) - consider to make two circle according to music. i think no


[C u r i] wrote:

general



Extra
00:46:549 (2) - how about change to two 1/4 sliders? i want to keep it calm here
00:46:893 - how about map this part? idk why you empty this part as explained in Left's mod reply.
01:36:031 (2) - how about nc here and 01:36:204 (1) - delete nc this for catch piano sound? focusing on the dnb as for this part
02:01:204 (2) - nc? want to keep consistent as 1 2 1 2 nc

omg soooo nice map xd take my starrr



deleted points are fixed!!
thanks for modding and stars!!
Last edited by Rumia- on , edited 3 times in total.
User avatar
Rhythm Incarnate
2,285 posts
Offline
double post by accident
User avatar
Spinner Sage
155 posts
Offline
Earned 1 kudosu.
mod kuih :v


nice map

02:05:428 (2,3) - kinda curious to know if theres any reason that u stack it manually
03:19:307 (1,2,3) - 1-2 and 2-3 not same spacing?
03:22:238 (1,2,3) - ^ unless it's intentional
nvm it's same if i use grid snap lol
03:24:480 (2,3) - could be lined up better imo
03:24:997 (4,5) - ^
04:08:445 (2,3) - i cant read well tbh, (would prefer to unstack and move 2 somewhere left) but for an antijump is okay i guess..
04:56:031 (5,1) - slider could be shaped better to blanket the note

I don't have any more suggestions (⌣_⌣”)

hope it's ranked !
This is a BSS beatmap submission. Click here to view full beatmap information.
Reply 85 posts jump | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  next

Users browsing this forum: None


Jump to: