forum

Various Artists - singason

posted
Total Posts
41
Topic Starter
melon boy
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 16. maj 2017 at 22:42:18

Artist: Various Artists
Title: singason
Tags: rerulili Mes ayaponzu nayugorou ari eclair rishe kokoru sana wataame EVO+ hanichamu hotori れるりり あやぽんず なゆごろう あり リシェ ココル 鎖那 わたあめ はにちゃむ ほとり sing a song vocaloid hatsune miku megpoid gumi kagamine rin len ia kaai yuki nekomura iroha megurine luka lily yuzuki yukari 歌ってみた utattemita 歌い手 utaite 女の子12人 コラボ collaboration
BPM: 121
Filesize: 24498kb
Play Time: 05:45
Difficulties Available:
  1. Singing (4,54 stars, 978 notes)
Download: Various Artists - singason
Download: Various Artists - singason (no video)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------



Sing a Song




Nominated by Sonnyc and Kibbleru!
Natteke desu
same
Liiraye
mapping is a happy thing
Nokris
hi xd
00:22:881 (3,4) - really big jump without reason to do it, you have smaller jumps previosly in same moments. I think if you stack sliderstart with 00:24:369 (3) - it will be better
00:52:633 (4,1) - one slider sound a bit better. (with same length 00:53:129 (5) - )
02:26:683 (1,2) - wtf? xd i missed the first one when i played. i was suddenly
03:19:245 (4) - ctrl+g and replace 03:19:740 (1) - to x480 y96
04:09:327 (4) - maybe replace it a bit lower? flow will be a bit better imo
sorry, really little mod
no kds if i not helped you
(bg looks so spooky D:) :D
Topic Starter
melon boy

Reya wrote:

hi xd
00:22:881 (3,4) - really big jump without reason to do it, you have smaller jumps previosly in same moments. I think if you stack sliderstart with 00:24:369 (3) - it will be better I like the next slider moving into the body of (4) so I moved (3) a bit instead :>
00:52:633 (4,1) - one slider sound a bit better. (with same length 00:53:129 (5) - ) I think it's okay. If you hadn't realized, I'm focusing a lot on the vocals for this map
02:26:683 (1,2) - wtf? xd i missed the first one when i played. i was suddenly It's a nice pattern!
03:19:245 (4) - ctrl+g and replace 03:19:740 (1) - to x480 y96 ok!!
04:09:327 (4) - maybe replace it a bit lower? flow will be a bit better imo maybe... it kind of ruins my pattern
sorry, really little mod
no kds if i not helped you it's ok <3
(bg looks so spooky D:) :D SPOOKY?!
marcuddles
Amazing map! owo
Spaghetti
irc
2016-10-22 09:23 Spaghetti: o
2016-10-22 09:23 Spaghetti: hai
2016-10-22 09:23 Spaghetti: wanna do it now?
2016-10-22 12:51 Fuccho: bah
2016-10-22 12:52 Spaghetti: xd
2016-10-22 12:52 Fuccho: now?!
2016-10-22 12:52 Spaghetti: sure
2016-10-22 12:52 Fuccho: sweet
2016-10-22 12:53 Spaghetti: metadata source pls
2016-10-22 12:54 Fuccho: ah, yea that
2016-10-22 12:54 Fuccho: I have no idea what to call the artist
2016-10-22 12:54 Spaghetti: LOL
2016-10-22 12:54 Spaghetti: ask kwan
2016-10-22 12:54 Fuccho: ok
2016-10-22 12:55 Spaghetti: then call me xd
2016-10-22 12:56 Fuccho: eh?
2016-10-22 12:56 Fuccho: aren't you going to look at the map?
2016-10-22 12:56 Spaghetti: sure
2016-10-22 12:56 Spaghetti: ill look at it but wont post anything until theres a meta confirmation xd
2016-10-22 12:56 Fuccho: okok
2016-10-22 12:59 Spaghetti: 00:25:691 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - you should try to make this a perfect star
2016-10-22 13:00 Fuccho: ah, yea it does look a bit iffy
2016-10-22 13:00 Spaghetti: 00:27:344 (2,1) - more emphasis on this so it matches more with the spacing at 00:26:848 (1,2) - ?
2016-10-22 13:03 Spaghetti: 01:16:931 (5) - maybe ctrl g this and then bring 01:17:426 (6) - a bit higher?
2016-10-22 13:04 Spaghetti: would make sense cuz of the implied movement of 01:16:435 (3) -
2016-10-22 13:05 Fuccho: ooh, could definitely work
2016-10-22 13:06 Spaghetti: 02:18:253 (5,6) - this is the first time you do an overlap like this and it doesnt really fit with the visual concepts youve introduced already
2016-10-22 13:06 Spaghetti: id remove the overlap
2016-10-22 13:07 Spaghetti: 02:19:410 (3) - curve this a bit more so its like 02:19:740 (4) - ?
2016-10-22 13:07 Spaghetti: that or copypaste 02:19:740 (4) - xd
2016-10-22 13:07 Fuccho: ok~
2016-10-22 13:08 Spaghetti: 02:22:385 (2,3) - this spacing rlly opposes the one at 02:21:393 (1,2) - even though the music doesnt insensify and it kinda goes against what you did at 02:09:327 (1) - this section
2016-10-22 13:09 Spaghetti: 02:26:683 (1,2,3) - is this stack supposed to be like this? .-.
2016-10-22 13:09 Fuccho: heh
2016-10-22 13:09 Spaghetti: 02:28:666 (1,2,3) - i guess it is
2016-10-22 13:09 Spaghetti: it looks kinda ugly ingame with the autostack
2016-10-22 13:09 Spaghetti: http://puu.sh/rS0f1/8f073f6aba.jpg
2016-10-22 13:09 Spaghetti: especially on the second one
2016-10-22 13:09 Spaghetti: http://puu.sh/rS0fB/3b6ef53cc1.jpg
2016-10-22 13:10 Fuccho: I thought it looked nice because of the auto stack..
2016-10-22 13:10 Spaghetti: LOL
2016-10-22 13:10 Spaghetti: well if u like it then you can keep it :P
2016-10-22 13:13 Spaghetti: 03:52:137 (1,2) - if you changed the other overlaps id change these too
2016-10-22 13:14 Fuccho: yea, those are easy to change as well
2016-10-22 13:15 Spaghetti: 05:02:054 (2,1,2,1,2) - even out the spacing between these?
2016-10-22 13:15 Fuccho: sure
2016-10-22 13:16 Spaghetti: okii i think thats it placements wise
2016-10-22 13:16 Spaghetti: i love this song
2016-10-22 13:16 Fuccho: it's really sweet :>
2016-10-22 13:20 Spaghetti: ok i think its ready
2016-10-22 13:20 Spaghetti: get metadata check and ill bubble
ekafjr
Simple modding \ ( > w<)/

[General]
  1. Nice .
[Singing]
  1. 00:19:245 (4) - slightly regrettable clickable on white tick 1/2 at here its better 00:19:410 -
  2. 00:23:212 (4) - ^
  3. 00:28:666 (3) - ^
  4. 00:32:302 (3) - ugly ? blanket this its better
  5. 01:21:393 (1) - slightly not fit add clap on head for better sense
  6. 02:05:526 (1) - increase spacing ?
Hope this helped
please dont give me kds if my mod it suck XD
Good luck!
Topic Starter
melon boy

ekafjr wrote:

Simple modding \ ( > w<)/

[General]
  1. Nice .
[Singing]
  1. 00:19:245 (4) - slightly regrettable clickable on white tick 1/2 at here its better 00:19:410 - This is a theme through the entire song where I stick to mapping to the vocals. Changing it only here would be very weird xd
  2. 00:23:212 (4) - ^
  3. 00:28:666 (3) - ^
  4. 00:32:302 (3) - ugly ? blanket this its better I don't know what to tell you. I think it's fine it's just a different slider shape
  5. 01:21:393 (1) - slightly not fit add clap on head for better sense But there's no clap in the music xd
  6. 02:05:526 (1) - increase spacing ? Would ruin the pattern
Hope this helped
please dont give me kds if my mod it suck XD
Good luck!
Thanks and sorry xd
ProfessionalBox
irc
18:49 Fuccho: Is it still possible to get that mod? xd
18:49 Fuccho: it really doesn't have to be something special
18:50 ProfessionalBox: is it a single diff
18:50 Fuccho: a low star marathon
18:50 Fuccho: 5:30 drain~
18:50 ProfessionalBox: alright link
18:50 *Fuccho is listening to [https://osu.ppy.sh/b/1065635 Various Artists - singason]
18:53 ProfessionalBox: 00:48:666 (2) - The curve on this kills the symmetry imo
18:54 Fuccho: I think I like the movement though
18:55 ProfessionalBox: 02:02:550 (2,1) - Not a big fan of this spacing
18:55 ProfessionalBox: since this is such a chill song it's easily misread imo xd
18:55 ProfessionalBox: 02:09:493 (2,3) - blanket
18:56 ProfessionalBox: 02:10:485 (2) - same
18:56 Fuccho: you think so? do you have a suggestion?
18:56 ProfessionalBox: 02:26:683 (1,2,3) - uh this is weird
18:56 ProfessionalBox: a suggestion hmm
18:58 Fuccho: then I again, I think it reads just fine that part xd
18:58 ProfessionalBox: http://puu.sh/rSSR5/9419d75ce8.jpg first one that comes to mind
18:58 Fuccho: because of NCs and such
18:59 ProfessionalBox: I pointed it out because it's inconsistent with the spacing in the rest of the map
18:59 ProfessionalBox: and as such might be a silly miss for people who are enjoying the song more than focusing on reading
18:59 Fuccho: ahok
19:00 ProfessionalBox: 02:26:683 (1,2,3) - But this one you should definetly stack normally imo since right now it looks like you only have to click twice
19:00 ProfessionalBox: xd
19:00 Fuccho: sure, your suggestion works fine
19:00 ProfessionalBox: well
19:00 ProfessionalBox: idk
19:01 Fuccho: okay, everyone's been mentioning that part...
19:01 ProfessionalBox: I just try to think of that pattern from a players perspective
19:01 ProfessionalBox: like
19:01 ProfessionalBox: Imagine being a player who plays this because it suits their skill level
19:01 ProfessionalBox: and then they see that
19:01 ProfessionalBox: it's just confusing for them imo
19:01 Fuccho: okok
19:01 Fuccho: 02:26:683 (1,2,3) - but yea, these...
19:01 Fuccho: I might just change them xd
19:02 Fuccho: since no one seems to really like them but me xddd
19:02 ProfessionalBox: It's a nice unique touch and I wouldn't even point them out if this wasn't a 4,5 star map
19:02 ProfessionalBox: but the context they're being used in isn't the best imo
19:03 Fuccho: do you think moving the first circle a bit to make a manual overlap would work?
19:03 Fuccho: instead of autostack
19:03 Fuccho: or do you suggest just not trying anything weird xd
19:03 ProfessionalBox: manual overlap was what I had in mind
19:04 ProfessionalBox: just make it clear that there are 3 objecccts
19:04 Fuccho: okokok
19:04 ProfessionalBox: :D
19:04 ProfessionalBox: rip my c button
19:04 ProfessionalBox: it broke from playing osu and now it is annoying
19:05 ProfessionalBox: press it once for 1-3 c letters xd
19:06 Fuccho: 3 objects = objecccts
19:07 ProfessionalBox: 03:38:749 (3,4) - http://puu.sh/rSTeY/f6993c81e9.jpg consider this rhythm to map the fun piano accent
19:07 ProfessionalBox: if you map it then make sure to add it here too 03:47:344 (2,3,1) -
19:08 Fuccho: ah.. idunno
19:08 ProfessionalBox: 04:35:774 (1) - this curve on the tail is a tiny bit too strong xd
19:09 Fuccho: that be a lot of change to a pattern I already really like
19:10 ProfessionalBox: I think it would add more fun to the song since it's something unique and not too hard
19:10 Fuccho: It also ends up feeling more like a triplet or something
19:10 ProfessionalBox: but it's your call obviously
19:10 ProfessionalBox: 04:53:625 - oh boi the fake ending
19:11 Fuccho: should I add break time?
19:11 ProfessionalBox: 05:00:071 (3) - consider NC to be more consistent with your usage of them in this part
19:11 Fuccho: so the warning pops up
19:12 ProfessionalBox: not needed imo since players will know it isn't over because the background will stay dimmed
19:12 ProfessionalBox: and they see hp drain continue
19:12 Fuccho: ok
19:13 ProfessionalBox: 05:39:245 (2,4) - stack fix
19:13 ProfessionalBox: 05:45:195 (3) - NC here imo
19:14 Fuccho: hmmmm ok!
toybot
hi!! i always thought it was called sing a song

  1. offset sounds a little bit late. i'd try somewhere ~ 2043
  2. 00:50:141 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - don't you usually use 1/1 sliders for this kind of stuff :] if you were to do this, you should make similar parts about the same density
  3. 01:21:380 - having a finish every half beat sounds overdone, the song isn't so intense that you'd need to do so. if you take off every 2nd finish, it sounds a lot more.. refreshing? idk, it just gets tiring to hear. maybe you could leave it for 04:57:579 - , since the voices do make it more intense then the rest of the song
  4. 01:53:116 (2) - NC this instead? signifies the start of a new phrase more, like at 03:28:322 -
  5. 02:26:670 (1,2,3) - i don't really hear the little trill for this pattern tbh, but whatever
  6. 03:24:864 (2) - ctrl+g to emphasize the snare?
  7. 04:01:050 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - increasing the spacing to reflect the intensity would be cool
  8. 04:17:248 (3) - bring this closer? it looks too far away and disconnected from the pattern
  9. 04:29:645 (1) - how about placing this at 348|288? that little pull feeling is fun and better than a simple stack imo
  10. 04:41:215 (3) - make this curved the same way as (1), looks a lot nicer and would reflect 04:39:727 (1,2) - too
  11. 05:12:785 (1) - stack on tail? the previous slider would imply it flowing to there
  12. 05:45:182 - i wish artists would make a proper ending instead of a boring fade away
nice map! good luck
Topic Starter
melon boy

toybot wrote:

hi!! i always thought it was called sing a song I thought so too. However, after speaking with kwan it's pretty clear that this is the correct romanization looking at the music videos for the song.

  1. offset sounds a little bit late. i'd try somewhere ~ 2043 Wow, yea, that's a lot better.
  2. 00:50:141 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7) - don't you usually use 1/1 sliders for this kind of stuff :] if you were to do this, you should make similar parts about the same density I just felt like this part called for some 1/3 tapping. But I do think I managed to make a pattern that has the same low intensity as any other part.
  3. 01:21:380 - having a finish every half beat sounds overdone, the song isn't so intense that you'd need to do so. if you take off every 2nd finish, it sounds a lot more.. refreshing? idk, it just gets tiring to hear. maybe you could leave it for 04:57:579 - , since the voices do make it more intense then the rest of the song Love it!
  4. 01:53:116 (2) - NC this instead? signifies the start of a new phrase more, like at 03:28:322 - Fixed and changed the pattern a bit as well for it to fit better.
  5. 02:26:670 (1,2,3) - i don't really hear the little trill for this pattern tbh, but whatever There's the constant 1/6 in the background but I didn't want to map all of it so I thought making triples just before the most important downbeats would work!
  6. 03:24:864 (2) - ctrl+g to emphasize the snare? Nah, I like the flow of the current pattern and I don't have a set spacing for snares to begin with.
  7. 04:01:050 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - increasing the spacing to reflect the intensity would be cool yes!
  8. 04:17:248 (3) - bring this closer? it looks too far away and disconnected from the pattern Fixed
  9. 04:29:645 (1) - how about placing this at 348|288? that little pull feeling is fun and better than a simple stack imo Like the idea but I put it under instead of over the slider.
  10. 04:41:215 (3) - make this curved the same way as (1), looks a lot nicer and would reflect 04:39:727 (1,2) - too ok!
  11. 05:12:785 (1) - stack on tail? the previous slider would imply it flowing to thereFixed
  12. 05:45:182 - i wish artists would make a proper ending instead of a boring fade away xd
nice map! good luck
Thanks dude!
Underforest

Fuccho wrote:

Cute map meant to put a smile on your face :>
agree

m4m response, sorry for big late

01:01:053 (2) - maybe do this?
02:26:673 (1,2,3) - 02:28:656 (1,2,3) - 02:34:606 (1,2,3) - are you sure about this? this would be very hard to follow
04:18:904 (1,2) - decrease spacing a 0.15-0.20x to do consistence with 04:19:235 (1,2,1,2) - and do a beautiful pattern
04:53:615 - break
04:56:590 (1,2,1,2) - maybe do the hitsound: dclap-dclap-dclap, dfinish-dfinish-dfinish instead of dclap-dclap-dfinish 2 times
05:45:268 - a spinner would fit here until fading out end

sorry for shit + short mod, your map is pretty well polished
i like this song so have an star ^^ good luck
Topic Starter
melon boy

Underforest wrote:

Fuccho wrote:

Cute map meant to put a smile on your face :>
agree

m4m response, sorry for big late

01:01:053 (2) - maybe do this? I've messed quite a lot with this pattern already and I think it works fine as it is even if it might not look it.
02:26:673 (1,2,3) - 02:28:656 (1,2,3) - 02:34:606 (1,2,3) - are you sure about this? this would be very hard to follow yes. I wanted these to be a bit more special than just some triples and this is what I'm sticking with.
04:18:904 (1,2) - decrease spacing a 0.15-0.20x to do consistence with 04:19:235 (1,2,1,2) - and do a beautiful pattern I actually prefer it with varying DS's.
04:53:615 - break I've tried with and without and definitely prefer without.
04:56:590 (1,2,1,2) - maybe do the hitsound: dclap-dclap-dclap, dfinish-dfinish-dfinish instead of dclap-dclap-dfinish 2 times Changed it around a bit.
05:45:268 - a spinner would fit here until fading out end hrm.. no. A spinner can feel super straining and it definitely isn't what I want for this calm outro.

sorry for shit + short mod, your map is pretty well polished
i like this song so have an star ^^ good luck
Thanks!!
Spaghetti
Nomination #1.

Awesome song! Good luck. :3
Underforest
forget this post
RevenKz
is the metadata right? o.o
Topic Starter
melon boy

IamKwaN wrote:

Unicode Title: シンガソン
Romanised Title: singason
Artist: Various Artists (common practice in this game)

References:
http://www.nicovideo.jp/watch/sm21597186
http://puu.sh/rSGHG/a03d17729d.jpg
http://puu.sh/rSGIO/b71170f932.jpg
It sure is however odd it may seem.
Kibbleru
hey
03:38:243 (1,2) - nazi - spacing too close?
02:26:673 (1,2,3) - why cant u just use a normal stack here lol
02:28:656 (1,2,3) - ^
04:18:904 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - shouldnt the NCing be in 3's here?
05:34:771 (2,2) - maybe u cn like blanket or something

optional, u cud put a spinner at the end?


call me back when u get ur bubble #2
Sonnyc
02:17:251 (1) - The beat here in the song is pretty vague. Removing this object would suit the song better.
02:39:730 (4) - You'll want this setted as a finish since the instrument sound is the same with 02:38:739.
03:12:954 (2,1) - This kind of overlaps rarely appears in this map, and never appeared in other similar parts of the song. Removing this overlap is recommended.
03:32:788 (2,1,2) - Having such a similar spacing concept made the 1/3 rhythm of (1,2) unintuitive. Using a different spacing concept to indicate the different rhythm is recommended.
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply