1. I though the video of this was NSFW xD
2. Blue combo color is nowhere in the BG to be seen, how about a light violet one?

1. 00:07:544 (1) - Add whistle?
2. 00:09:044 (2) - Make this a slider? to support the bass guitar and drums
3. 00:39:044 (2) - Ctrl+J?
4. 00:46:544 - Why skipping the cymbals here? these are strong "3
5. 00:49:544 (1) - I think 3/2 reverse suits more here
6. 01:12:044 (2) - Add whistle?
7. 01:21:044 (2) - ^
8. I really idolized your easy diffs ^_^ big fan <3

1. 00:01:356 (3) - How about replacing this with 3/2 and a circle cuz 00:01:919 - piano sound here is really dominant
2. 00:03:044 (1) - Put clap at the slider end?
3. 00:03:981 (2) - Whistle to support the guitar?
4. 00:04:544 (1,2,3,4) - I was expecting a 1/2 beats here imo to follow the trumpet. Seems kinda lame if you just wanna follow the drum here, the trumpets are really happy
5. 00:19:544 (1) - Clap?
6. 00:21:981 - I'm so sad you ignore the drum hits here
7. 00:24:231 - Add a note here?
8. 00:28:356 (6) - You can remove these circle since there is no distinct sound here neither vocals or instrumental
9. 00:32:294 (2) - I would be happy if you make this 1/2 slider xD
10. 00:33:794 (5) - Make it a 1/2 reverse please don't ignore drums xD
11. 00:35:856 (3) - Place it at 281|14 for better transition?
12. 00:36:231 - I'm really sad atm this is soooooo importantttttttttt
13. 00:38:669 (2) - Use the custom sampleset 2 and add clap?
14. 00:45:044 (4,5) - Drumerinos please xD
15. 00:53:106 (2) - Make this clickable? like you did at 00:54:044 (3,4,5) -
16. 00:56:106 (2) - ^
17. 00:59:106 (2) - Yeeah same there is a drumerinos and vocalinos here so I don't agree that they are only at the slider tick xD
18. 01:01:544 (1,2,3) - Try this rhythm? http://puu.sh/pUoae/6b80fcbe99.jpg
19. 01:13:544 (1,2) - fix blanket?
20. 01:21:231 (5) - Make this 1/2?

1. 00:02:856 (1) - Remove NC
2. 00:04:262 (4) - Add drum clap and 00:04:356 (5) - Add drum finish
3. 00:05:669 (4) - Ctrl+H?
4. 00:07:544 (1) - Whistle?
5. 00:09:044 (1) - ^
6. 00:21:794 (2) - Split into 1/2 and a circle from drum

• There is no video on Hard and Kisses' Insane (or AIBat is trolling me, since a refresh fixed them lol. Just check to be sure)
  
  I would also like to point out that your current combo colors are a bit too strong imo for the BG (and the palette may be a little improved too)
  
  Combo Colors suggestion

  
  

  [Colours]
  Combo1 : 146,146,201
  Combo2 : 255,128,192
  Combo3 : 234,138,106
  Combo4 : 238,204,87

  (notice how Janpai literally read my mind LOL)
  PS: the video is fine
  

• 00:00:606 (2) - once I saw this I had an enlightenment *^* what about a Ctrl + g? First, it creates a nice drop on the next slider, second it resembles better the next pattern which is really similar to this one
  
  00:04:544 (1) - you're gonna hate me, but the movement on this one feels forced. What about a thing like this? (it isn't in the screen, but it's also blanketing 00:05:482 (4) - )
  
  00:07:356 (5,1) - maybe it's just me, but I feel like these 2 notes are the same, therefore I would stack 5 on top of 1 (maybe also move 1 a bit to the bottom if you do that) (maybe curve a little 1's shape to make it more cute)
  
  00:19:356 (5) - whistle? .-. I would have used it on 00:18:981 (4) - 's tail but idk...
  
  00:23:481 (4) - something that won't change a thing probably, but I feel that if you stack this under 2 you get more emphasis on the trump at 00:23:669 (5) -
  
  00:25:169 (6) - feels a bit too plain xd Suggestion
  
  00:34:544 (1,2,3) - triggered by the spacing inconsistency
  
  00:35:294 (4,7) - I would have followed the trumpet once again, since it's the one taking the stage more than other instruments
  
  00:36:981 (5,6) - 1/1 slider feels better, also for the fact you place a finish hitsound on 00:36:981 -
  
  00:37:919 (3) - by removing this beat you give more attention to the bass beats, which are the ones taking the stage this time. A 1/1 slider like this is what I meant.
  
  00:54:419 (3) - circles ;w; Vocals are pretty strong here and using always the basic rhythm feels boring
  
  00:56:856 (1) - I guess you relly like this movement, huh... my bad
  
  01:01:731 (2,3) - ctrl + g?
  
  01:06:981 (1) - why NC here? It's the first time you break down the combo like this
  
  01:11:856 (6,1) - long note starts from 6 tho ;w;
  

Sonnyc wrote:

Not bad, but Insane seems to need much more work to get this considered being ranked. It currently lacks technique skill too much in my view.

• 00:00:044 (1,2) - this movement is particularly stiff, since you literally have to stay still on the first one. Imo you should make it that there is a drop of some sort on the next slider instead. Something like this may work but there are also other options
  
  00:11:856 (1,2) - once I see this it's hard to think of it as a 1/2 snap, because you used even greater spacing for 1/4 snaps before: 00:10:731 (2,3) - 00:02:106 (6,7) -
  
  00:15:606 (2) - this is probably one of those iffy parts were there is good flow but not so good aesthetics. For example you could have used the same shape for both since it's literally the same vocal, like this, even if there's no blanket it still looks fine for the shape association here, but anything could go there as long as there is a structure
  
  00:17:106 (2) - wasting the white tick like that is a bit sad and also strange. Something like this maybe? It's just to avoid that random overlapped slider there in the end so anything can go well probably
  
  00:25:169 (6,1) - I'm still trying to understand what kind of spacing is 1/4 tbh .-.
  
  00:33:044 (1,2) - why not stack properly here? Or was it a mean to try to confuse players and make them think it's a 1/4 snap again?
  
  00:36:231 (2,3,4) - nice
  
  00:40:731 (2,3) - I guess you really love this kind of movement (where the first slider is just a stand still) but in gameplay is like a dead point since the player has nothing to do. Nothing "exciting" to do. Also, due to slider leniency it becomes a really cramped space here
  
  00:43:544 (1) - what about x336 y76? The zig-zag movement doesn't create a nice emphasis on it tbh
  
  00:47:481 (4) - x346 y133? Kinda same reasoning of above ^
  
  00:48:044 (1,2,3) - Big spacing and then 00:48:794 (3,4) - boom, low spacing. Why ;w;
  
  00:49:731 (2,3) - still hard to read 1/4 snaps lol. For this part you could have used some slider shapes you didn't use anywhere else. For example 3 3/4 straight sliders with relative 1/4 jumps like this or any other distinguishable pattern that lets the player know "this is a 1/4 jump which happens only on THIS kind of rhythm" works
  
  00:53:106 (3,6) - maybe stack their heads just for aesthetics :')
  
  00:54:981 (3,4) - again the zig-zag movement, zzz. If you hear, 00:54:794 - and 00:54:981 - have the same sound (on drums) so what I thought of was something like this once I heard this part
  
  00:56:106 (2,3) - maybe use the same shape to make it look cleaner, but I would have used circles instead of 3 tbh
  
  00:59:669 (5) - maybe stack on 6? The fact you don't have much spacing doesn't let you do a proper jump on 00:59:856 (6) - to begin with, so a stack is usually what fixes spacing inconsistencies, since it's like a sort of "reset button" for the spacing
  
  01:00:606 (2) - you mapped differently this when it was at 00:54:606 (2,3) - . I know it may become boring if you use too much the same pattern, but there are some parts in the song that have that "something" special that makes you think "oh, I know this part, it should be played like this". This pattern is one of them, due to the triple drum beat which plays only in few parts of the song
  
  01:03:231 (2) - circles work way better, trust me. Check this for reference of what I meant
  
  01:03:794 (5,6,1) - this is not really a suggestion, but just a way to point out what worried Sonnyc (probably). The fact you use so many different shapes and directions in a close interval of time makes the map look a bit random: music is all about constant rules being applied and imo maps should resemble that. Finding and expressing the basic structure of music in mapping it's the mapper's job here, that's why Sonnyc probably told you that, but this is just my theory.
  
  01:05:669 (5) - x151 y39 ? Again, the pattern looks a bit too cramped there, so let's try to spread it a little more
  
  01:06:606 (2,4) - ugh /w\ I know that using the same shape is not really cool all the times and may make you a sort of 2010 mapper, but using so different shapes it just tells me the mapper didn't think too much before using those objects at all
  
  01:07:544 (1) - the spacing from this to 2 is a bit cramped again and imo circles would better emphasize vocals. Since the vocals are doing a sort of build up I came up with this for example
  
  01:11:856 (5,1) - 1/4 snap /w\ If you convert 01:12:231 (1,2) - into a slider and change the next slider into a repeat slider like this you should be able to create a nice drop on the next long slider (PS: stack 01:11:856 (5,3) - them properly :p)
  
  01:13:544 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - this. is. cool.
  
  01:18:419 (2) - ctrl + g?
  
  01:25:544 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - also nice
  

• 00:23:106 (2,3,1) - the flow here is a bit cramped I guess. Try rotating 3 like this. It keeps a nice circular flow from the previous slider, while creates a good drop on the next one imo
  
  00:26:856 (5,1) - this is something similar to the above one: the flow is kinda "jagged" (idk if this word exists). What about stacking 5 on top of 4?
  
  00:35:294 (3) - this one is similar to the first one I pointed out. Here I guess something like this could work probably
  
  00:44:856 (1,2,3,4) - uhhh... I find this a bit confusing tbh. 00:44:294 (3) - you first used the vocals on this one, while the yellow combo is totally on drums. What happens here is that the player will most likely try to follow vocals again, since that's what he hears the most.
  I do have a suggestion here, but it changes the original pattern totally so idk if you'll like it: link
  
  01:02:106 (2,3) - this movement is again a bit strange here. What about something like this, to make it less cramped?
  
  01:04:544 (1) - uh, just minor stuff, but by curving this one like this you can better follow the jump from the previous object and also blanket the next slider
  
  01:18:606 (2) - try using x284 y236 for this object. I find it cooler since it also gives a nice emphasis on 01:18:794 (3) -
  
  01:26:481 (4) - I would do a ctrl + g on this and move it to x292 y116, like this to make the player understand you used the same slider but in a different way than before
  

• 00:28:356 (6,1) - maybe make this passage more smooth by doing something like this
  
  01:03:794 (3,4) - what about a repeat slider instead? This rhythm looks kinda complex for this level
  
  01:25:544 (1,2,3) - it looks like it is intended but it's really forced. Those slider shapes point to a direction, yet the circle is elsewhere
  

• 00:54:044 (3,4) - I would have made 3 a repeat slider tbh, since it should carry also the vocal besides the drum imo.
  OR, you could always turn 00:54:794 (4) - into circles
  
  01:15:794 (4) - missing clap on tail?
  01:21:044 (2) - same
  
  01:22:544 (1,2,3,4,5,1) - this last part feels a bit too random compared to the rest. part1 part2 (ok, it's still a bit random, but imo it's a bit cleaner, above all in the second part. I just tried to use the current placements to avoid major reworks)