00:15:909 (15909|3,15909|0,15909|4,15909|1) - now this is more impactful than 00:16:364 (16364|0,16364|1,16364|4,16364|3) - so use a [234] chord for the latter instead or any other triple chord usage besides a [135]
Considering the suggestion, fixed the pattern here00:20:682 (20682|4,20682|0,20796|3,20796|1,20909|2,20909|4,20909|0) - and 00:21:591 (21591|1,21591|3,21705|0,21705|4,21819|3,21819|1,21819|2) - are mirrors of each other, might as well mirror 00:21:137 (21137|4,21137|1,21250|0,21250|2,21364|1,21364|4,21364|3) -
Nice, Fixedthough its inconsistent, might as well ditch the ln at 01:19:546 (79546|3) - by making it a normal note and chart the sounds at 01:19:546 (79546|3) -
youre missing out on the sound at 01:21:705 - so i did this
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5555780 The sound you caught is not drum, and my intention was to follow drum.try 01:49:091 - x0,01 and 01:50:000 - some steady speedup here
Hmmm..!02:05:000 - i think a descending pattern works better here
Fixed02:24:319 (144319|1,144319|0,144432|0,144432|1) - is waaaay different from 02:24:773 (144773|4,144773|3,144887|4,144887|3) - i suggest following the squiggly sound
Not pretty much different, besides they are positioned in different columns, e.g) Low pitch at left, and relatively high pitch at right02:28:637 - idk i like LNs
https://osu.ppy.sh/ss/5555805 Hmmm I'll consider this02:31:591 - another one of those squiggly sounds to change
02:33:750 - should be a [45] 1/4th LN, if i somehow missed this sound earlier, please apply it there
02:33:296 - Same here, intentionally removed.02:38:864 - another squiggle, wont point out anymore of these
03:04:546 - i dont see a reason to have such a long 1/2 trill here
Another variation could work, but my intention was to follow both the drum and the synthesizer sound. Besides, if you compare patterns dividing by sections, they got pretty much consistent and different pattern.progression nitpick
02:49:091 - short LN layer was looped once while 03:03:637 - long LN layer was only used for one bit then it transitions to no-LN which is also a single section
so what i would like to see is an extension of what layering is the hardest for the last two musical section repetition with the easer layers introduced early on. What is hard is up to you. But what is what should be repeated for the last part. Kinda hard to explain D: but ill try to make an easier explanation
so let the short LN layer be A
let the Long LN layer be B
and the no LN layer be C
You had a A-A-B-C progression. It should be something like let's say A-B-C-C. What it is repeated in the end must be what you think is the hardest layering. Hope this simplified explanation made it easier to understand D:
I do consider the consistency of the overall view of the pattern throughout the whole map, but what I actually intended was to have different pattern for every section. By every section I mean the 4 division of the kiai (or the verse) part. Every 4 part has different pattern, therefore I intentionally ignored the consistency. Those longnotes 02:49:319 - starting from here is the delayed sound of the synthesizer.04:04:091 - care to map the stuff here?
Hmmm OK
04:07:728 - same and so on
i personally think 04:30:114 - and 04:30:341 - should be charted to have that nicer transition into the dense section
04:43:637 - like my earlier SV suggestion
No, because it has introducing part05:29:091 - uhhhh you should map the extra stuff here
It was intended to end there
#1 By Kawawa
By juankristal
