ADADADADADADADA :v (M4M)
[General]
Wouldn't it make more sense for the diff names to not be all caps since the song title is not all caps? The exclamation marks work tho
[Black Chocolate]
01:12:087 (6) - This is probably for variety but I think it plays better as two notes and in that way it can make the transition to 01:12:360 (1) - more impactful as it's been in the rest of the map. I'd probably say the same for 01:16:451 (6) - if applied. Or even one or the other it's fine for variety.
01:50:405 (5,1) - This is fun counterflow I wish there was more of this (but others dont like this) :v
02:04:724 (1) - Here you could do something similar to 02:09:224 (1,2,3) - since there's the guitar sound plus there's the other sound with the uh...synth? instrument thing playing 1/2 as well. In that case it could be something like
this. Not wrong the way you have it though
02:31:792 (4,5,6,7,8) - If you rotate this slightly higher it will make it so (1) isnt so squished lol
02:37:587 (1,2) - I don't see an issue with this but I think if (1) was stacked with 02:37:178 (4) - it'd better represent the small pause in the music.
03:03:769 - aa idk how to explain this but this kinda feels boring and not cuz of the music I mean the 1/1 single tap is fine but the jumps don't really mean anything here. I think maybe it'd be better to do like 2 note or 4 note stacks instead or do very low ds single tap.
03:30:360 (3) - 03:31:451 (3) - etc. I think for these it'd be better to follow the 1/2 rhythm as the 1/1 notes get a bit boring as an outro. They could be for example 1/2 sliders with reverse arrows or note and 1/2 slider or 3 jump notes etc but just for these the others better follow the guitar. I say this because the you have the single notes like 03:33:087 (5) - and 03:37:451 (5) - which pause and that just really takes away from following the guitar and feels empty so in this way you end up only using 1/1 sliders for the guitar and then 1/2 for the rest. Feels better for the overall difficulty.
[Expert Chocolate]
00:48:496 (1,1) - Meh. I know its consistent but I think the 1/2 slider and then note is better than a repeat here. Especially for 00:48:496 (1) - If you were to change it it could be a mirror of 00:49:042 (2,3) - and looks more impactful that way. But anyway if you do change it you'd probably have to change it for all the others so meh. Probably not worth it xd
01:01:314 (5,6) - You should emphasize the jump to (6) and to (1) more like you did at 00:56:951 (5,6) - maybe something like
this 01:39:633 (1,2) - I like this more than 00:55:996 (1,2) - but obviously you can't do them both :/
01:44:951 (5,6,1) - Personally really don't like 3 note 1/2 stacks feels pretty boring on such a fast paced rock kind of song. I'd prefer something like
this for more movement.
03:05:951 - Like this is better imo here than in the highest diff :v
[Extra Chocolate]
Use more triplets instead of 1/4 kick sliders :/// like 00:11:814 (3) - 00:16:178 (3) - would be nice places to do it etc.
00:48:496 (1,2,3,1,2,3) - I like how you did it in the highest two diffs because when she says the first thing at 00:48:496 - 00:49:587 - it matched the pattern same for 00:49:042 - 00:50:133 - but here it doesn't and that doesn't make sense to me. Since the vocals are the same it'd be cool to have the same either reverse slider or 1/2 slider note for those.
00:57:224 (1) - Space this out more for example 00:52:860 (1) - 01:01:587 (1) - the spacing is considerably bigger which better clarifies the 1/1 pause in gameplay.
01:35:678 (3,4) - I would love you so much if you ctrl+g this. It's amazing cuz then your cursor goes left to right as she says...ne-ma? idk wtf she says lol but the snaps feel so good ;-;
01:37:042 (2) - ctrl+g, resnap to 01:35:542 (2) - then ctrl+g back. You probably already know that trick tho xd
01:43:588 (4) - I think this was stacked under 01:43:996 (1) - at one point? idk but it might look nicer that way. Unimportant though
02:28:860 (1,2,3,4,5) - See I'm triggered cuz you have 5s bursts but no 3's in the beginning or anywhere ;-;
03:16:587 (5) - maybe this could be instead a mirrored copy of 03:16:042 (2) - ? kinda like 03:20:405 (2,5) -
[Insane Chocolate]
AR8.5 would be better considering the BPM.
00:48:496 - Tr1gg3r3d lol. I guess it's fine I'd rather see a 1-1-2-2 pattern consistency than 1-2-2-1 in the extra xd
03:29:405 (1,2) - I suppose this is fine. I can see ppl misreading this I know I definitely would back in the day (damn you natsumerin) so if that concerns you I'd move 03:29:405 (1) - down more.
No real issues
[Hard Chocolate]
00:42:496 (2,3) - I think you could do the same pattern you did at 00:38:133 (2,3) - since it's the same beat in the stanza so it would match.
03:12:496 - Considering it's the final kiai I kind of expected a bit more single 1/2 tapping like the previous two but most of it is sliders :/
03:47:269 - I'd rather this one be clickable so maybe change 03:46:996 (7) - to the 1/2 slider then finish with a note that way.
[Normal Chocolate]
03:05:951 (1,3) - These could look a bit nicer and make a nicer diamond shape playing around with them a bit. Since it's not as good as it could be you have this .95x spacing from 03:07:042 (3) - to (4).
No real issues
[Easy Chocolate]
For a diff like this I think 16/1 NC patterns would work better seeing as most combos are 3 notes at most. It sounds a bit weird but also considering the bpm 16/1 isn't that much time.
00:13:587 (1) - You might wanna move this a bit more to the left since the space between the bodies looks pretty close and newer players are likely to think its the same spacing as 00:10:178 (2,1) - for example. Maybe tweak the angles a bit to keep the 1.0x space consistency too.
02:37:587 (1,2) - 02:40:860 (3) - I'm sure you're one of those ppl that think slider shapes should be very straightforward for easies but when I hear a sound like this I wanna see some sort of zig zag ;-;
No major issues.
Solid. Hope this helps. Good luck!
DD
General
