1. Let your name resonate (6,51 stars, 1685 notes)

Musty wrote:

COUCOU XENOK

[Let your name resonate]

Disable le countdown !!! !! Ok quand tu la joue avec le countdown activé il s'affiche pas, je l'ai enlevé, j'avais jamais remarqué xD

00:05:255 (1) - quelle est la raison de ce NC? En fait pour moi tu finis juste le rythme précédent donc y a pas d’intérêt à NC C'est vrai, fixed
00:08:676 (5,1,3) - HahHAHAHAHAHAH FIX UR BLANKET MATE XDdD (promis je le refais plus)fixed, il était laid D=
00:08:676 (5,1,3) - pour moi, le NC est inutile parce que le "turuduruduru" est pas fini, qqchose de plus consistent comme ici ( 00:08:018 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - ) fixed aussi, même si un combo de 8 me parait grand sur cette map :c
00:10:650 (1) - Ici, soit tu retires le NC, soit tu en rajoutes un 00:11:702 (2) - ici. Parce que tu les marques pas de la même manière alors qu'ils sont similaires J'ai rajouté au deuxième
00:21:176 (6) - là tu vois j'aurais retiré le NC encore une fois parce que c'est plus dans la continuité du jump (et aussi du coup pour avoir les followpoints) Indeed ça follow mieux la guitare on dirait sans NC
00:29:860 (5) - je l'aurais placé à un autre endroit plutôt que de l'overlap ici, parce que je ressens pas vraiment grand chose quant au fait de revenir là ou je suis déjà allé Juste, d'ailleurs tu m'as enfin fait fix cet endroit je comprenais jamais pourquoi c'était pas naturel
00:33:281 (1) - encore une fois un NC que je juge un peu inutile ^^
00:35:386 (1) - de même ici J'ai fixé les deux et à chaque fois que je faisait ça et que je pense pas nécessaire finalement
00:38:742 (3) - cette note me paraît en trop, après, je pense que tu peux la laisser mais juste éventuellement en la plaçant mieux, parce que stacké avec le slider d'après c'est pas très intuitif je trouve de savoir qu'il faut directement la taper (même si en vrai quand tu joues tu vas la taper...) Je l'ai un peu déplacée vers le slider en espérant que ça soit plus intuitif c:
00:47:886 (2) - faut que tu curves un peu ce slider je trouve que ça fait plus joli xD Curved.
01:02:097 (3,4,5) - un peu confus comme spacing je trouve même si on devine bien le pattern Je le laisse, on devine bien le pattern c:
01:06:176 (1) - j'aurais pas mis de NC ici parce qu'elle fini son mot par rapport à l'autre NC J'ai pas trop compris, mais j'ai enlevé le NC à 01:05:913 (6) - comme ça elle finit son mon, je sais pas si c'est ce que tu voulais dire xD
01:28:281 (2) - j'aurais CTRL+G ce slider même si en vrai du coup ça rend le spacing encore plus grand J'ai pas ctrl+g mais j'ai changé le pattern un peu
01:40:057 (3) - encore une fois, j'aurais pas stacké cette note Unstacked
01:45:518 (1) - à cause du slider suivant, j'aurais foutu la note plus comme ceci: http://puu.sh/qTMK7/b492a9f064.jpg Jolie pattern ça c:
02:19:334 (1) - en vrai tu veux NC super souvent sans que je trouve ça vraiment judicieux, là par exemple pour moi ça a aucun intêret (y a pleins d'endroits par la suite ou je trouve pas ça très judicieux également) Sans NC ici le jump pue :c

j'adore le second kiai arigato o/

03:30:781 (4) - vu que la note est pas incliné de la même manière que le (2), je te conseille de "curver" un peu le slider Je sais pas trop, avec le (1) qui a presque la même forme ça rend le pattern pas ouf je trouve :c
03:34:992 (2,1,2,3) - je pense que niveau flow ça pourrait être mieux, je suis pas sur que le slider avant soit une bonne idée J'ai incliné le slider avant vers le pattern en espérant que ça règle le problème de flow

j'adore le dernier kiai aussi ^^ cimer ;w;

04:48:018 (1,1,1) - je trouve que ça se joue bien mieux comme ça http://puu.sh/qTN46/2a88c0612b.jpg J'ai essayé j'aime pas trop :c


cette map est g é n i a l e La tienne aussi est cool \o/

1. Your background image is at a resolution of 1267x768 which differs from the recommended size of 1366x768 i.e. your bg is unrankable

1. correct offset is 662

1. Check!

• 
  Most of what i say here can be applied to the rest of the mod, since i wont just pick out same stuff constantly

1. 00:11:702 (1) - you could place this where 00:10:650 (1) - this is exatcly, and then blanket the slider 00:11:176 (1) - around that, in that case you will get 2 notes blanketed nicely
2. 00:19:860 (2,3) - try to avoid overlaps like this they look kinda nasty, if you place the note at x:14 y:123 it will overlap with the slider and it will look much nicer, then you could just re-arange other notes to fit your ds
3. 00:21:044 (5) - right so em remove this note it doesnt go with anything and try this. If you do this nc this note 00:21:176 (5) - for better readability reasons
4. 00:22:360 (4,5,6) - the section is getting much quieter so pls make the spacing decrease repectably too, this works much better
5. 00:36:702 (2,3) - again try to avoid these, you could really place this somewhere else
6. 00:52:097 (2,2) - this may very well be blanketed to get rid of the overlap yo
7. 01:03:413 (1) - place this at x:264 y:32, flows way better than current state
8. 01:03:676 (3,2) - overlap ting, wont mention this again, scan your map for these since there is a lot of those and make sure you fix most of them since overlaps like these make your map look really unpolished, which isnt nice
9. 01:05:781 (5) - ctrl g this since all the other sliders are facing down this one is up, also it flows horibly since the other sliders flow nicer this one feels off, Also if you do ctrl g the slider01:05:913 (6) - move this somewhere else so that it doesnt touch it, placing it at x:275 y:194 isnt a bad idea
10. 01:06:176 (1) - whats this nc for? remove this
11. 01:06:702 (3) - ^ same here, NC's are something that can really show off emphasis here. Where i pointed out you used it really wrong since there is no change of sound on 01:06:176 (7) - still the same as 01:05:913 (6) - yet it got a nc, dont do that same with the jumps, the new section starts here 01:06:965 (1) - yet 01:06:702 (3) - this one got the NC you have to be really careful when placing nc's since wrong placement can read to some serious problems
12. 01:07:755 (3) - ^ just read above and apply all the nc's that you think are wrong. Look for section that don't change yet the notes are getting a nc
13. 01:09:728 (4,5) - never stack 2 strong sounds, it feels weird and off putting considering you didnt stack any of these sounds before you gave them jumps, if it was all stacks before this it would have been a different story but since it isnt, give this circle some space
14. 01:10:386 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - this is fine since they are somewhat representing some high spacing jumps and strong welcoming into a new section
15. 01:44:465 (4) - this note has barelly any sound to it yet it has a 2,6 ds, deleting this note would actually be a good idea since then 01:44:597 (5) - wiykd get the emphasis it deserves
16. 01:47:623 (1,2,3) - be careful with this later on you give much larger jumps to the same sounds that are here, be consistent \o/

C00L wrote:

Right
Check! - Means it's been checked and nothing wrong has been found
Please ignore my note/slider placement on the timeline, i do that to show make my point more clearer

[General]

1. Your background image is at a resolution of 1267x768 which differs from the recommended size of 1366x768 i.e. your bg is unrankable

well you're telling me it's recommended and then you say this is unrankable, osu! does it itself when you drag a bigger image in it. still changed

[Timing]

1. correct offset is 662

changed

[Hitsounds]

1. Check!

[Name too long to write out xd]

• 
  Most of what i say here can be applied to the rest of the mod, since i wont just pick out same stuff constantly

1. 00:11:702 (1) - you could place this where 00:10:650 (1) - this is exatcly, and then blanket the slider 00:11:176 (1) - around that, in that case you will get 2 notes blanketed nicely It's already doing how you're mentioning
2. 00:19:860 (2,3) - try to avoid overlaps like this they look kinda nasty, if you place the note at x:14 y:123 it will overlap with the slider and it will look much nicer, then you could just re-arange other notes to fit your ds I actually am blanketing the stream here, so it totally works. I still moved the 3 at 104-184
3. 00:21:044 (5) - right so em remove this note it doesnt go with anything and try this. If you do this nc this note 00:21:176 (5) - for better readability reasons Works I guess
4. 00:22:360 (4,5,6) - the section is getting much quieter so pls make the spacing decrease repectably too, this works much better yes
5. 00:36:702 (2,3) - again try to avoid these, you could really place this somewhere else since it has 1/4 timing spacing, I won't make it different to make it readable as an element being 1/4
6. 00:52:097 (2,2) - this may very well be blanketed to get rid of the overlap yo good
7. 01:03:413 (1) - place this at x:264 y:32, flows way better than current state nice
8. 01:03:676 (3,2) - overlap ting, wont mention this again, scan your map for these since there is a lot of those and make sure you fix most of them since overlaps like these make your map look really unpolished, which isnt nice moved on
9. 01:05:781 (5) - ctrl g this since all the other sliders are facing down this one is up, also it flows horibly since the other sliders flow nicer this one feels off, Also if you do ctrl g the slider01:05:913 (6) - move this somewhere else so that it doesnt touch it, placing it at x:275 y:194 isnt a bad idea there is no flow question here since you don't have to move over to 300 this slider, it work how it is because the voice is going this efect
10. 01:06:176 (1) - whats this nc for? remove this because it follow the logic of the next pattern, just being a slider to avoing singletaping 7 notes here
    
11. 01:06:702 (3) - ^ same here, NC's are something that can really show off emphasis here. Where i pointed out you used it really wrong since there is no change of sound on 01:06:176 (7) - still the same as 01:05:913 (6) - yet it got a nc, dont do that same with the jumps, the new section starts here 01:06:965 (1) - yet 01:06:702 (3) - this one got the NC you have to be really careful when placing nc's since wrong placement can read to some serious problems You don't see why I'm NCing here? it's totally following the voice rythme, it's here to point an intense part of the song, even hitsounds are more recurents in this part
12. 01:07:755 (3) - ^ just read above and apply all the nc's that you think are wrong. Look for section that don't change yet the notes are getting a nc same argument ^
13. 01:09:728 (4,5) - never stack 2 strong sounds, it feels weird and off putting considering you didnt stack any of these sounds before you gave them jumps, if it was all stacks before this it would have been a different story but since it isnt, give this circle some space unstacked
14. 01:10:386 (1,2,1,2,1,2) - this is fine since they are somewhat representing some high spacing jumps and strong welcoming into a new section so it's fine
15. 01:44:465 (4) - this note has barelly any sound to it yet it has a 2,6 ds, deleting this note would actually be a good idea since then 01:44:597 (5) - wiykd get the emphasis it deserves It's following a regular rhythm, also, the 2,6 ds doesn't really mean something since it's from a sliderend that you will get without having to follow the slider
16. 01:47:623 (1,2,3) - be careful with this later on you give much larger jumps to the same sounds that are here, be consistent \o/ Changed

[Final Words]
Yea i think thats it tbh, what i said above can really be used for the rest of the map too, i find nothing else wrong apart from the points above which appear more than 3 times so i dont want to mention, pls dont be mad i just dont like repeating the same thing over and over again x) But i do really respect this map tbh with you, I think its really well made by a beginner at this, honestly nice mapping !!
Good Luck!!

I don't really know how to take it, since yeah there are mistakes, but I don't see why you wouldn't mod the whole map since I modded 3 diffs of the map you said me to mod, so I had to mod 3 time the same music, which is almost what you just said above. Even if what I had to mod was different on each diff, it's totally comparable. I spend time to mod 6 mins map when you only did 1:47, which isn't really fair imo. And so, your words about "by a beginner" are totally out of place since the map you asked me to mod had a ton of beginner mistakes too. Well, gl for ranking your map, I hope for the next mappers that will spend time on your maps will deserve a full mod at least.

1. 01:56:188 (2,3) - You're placing this at a weird angle to hit 01:56:451 (1) - it feels really weird to hit. Ctrl+g these notes would improve flow much much beter imo
2. 02:40:135 (4,5) - fix blanket xd
3. 03:15:135 (1) - remove this nc the section is still the same
4. 03:19:346 (1) - same here
5. 03:26:188 (1,1) - you are giving these the same shape yet they are 2 different sv's thats really off putting dude and will cause easy misses
   Spoke about some nc's
6. 04:46:714 (1) - another nc ting
7. 04:48:951 (1) - touches hp bar, therefore unrankable

C00L wrote:

1. 01:56:188 (2,3) - You're placing this at a weird angle to hit 01:56:451 (1) - it feels really weird to hit. Ctrl+g these notes would improve flow much much beter imo Tried it and it don't please me :c
2. 02:40:135 (4,5) - fix blanket xd Fixed
3. 03:15:135 (1) - remove this nc the section is still the same It's ugly this way and I did this the whole map
4. 03:19:346 (1) - same here ^
5. 03:26:188 (1,1) - you are giving these the same shape yet they are 2 different sv's thats really off putting dude and will cause easy misses got's testplays on it (kynan / musty) and they hitted it without problem :c
   Spoke about some nc's
6. 04:46:714 (1) - another nc ting Changed
7. 04:48:951 (1) - touches hp bar, therefore unrankable Changed

rhytmly its good, if you got those nc's fixed then that would be perfect, i see nothing else wrong here so plz dont flame me aaaa

ill shoot you a star too thx for star dude :'c
Good Luck and sorry again (no kds remember)

• [Something about a name]

1. 00:10:662 (1,2,3,4) - IMO, ctrl + Ging this looks better since the stack is kinda unexpected
   
2. 00:18:161 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - What is this following?
   
3. 00:19:083 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Again, why?
   
4. 00:36:319 (4,2,3) - This looks not good, blanket 3 and 4 with 2
   
5. 00:37:767 (1,2) - Increase the spacing on this, no intensity change to warrant that low spacing
   
6. 00:38:425 (2,1,3) - Delete these, they go to nothing and only add difficulty that isn't needed
   
7. 00:40:267 (4,2,1,2) - Center this
   
8. 01:02:898 (1,2,3) - This pause is so awkward, just make 3 a slider
   
9. 01:05:925 (6,1) - NC on 6 and take out the NC on 1
   
10. 01:20:004 (3) - same note about the slider
    
11. 01:48:885 (6,8) - Delete these
    
12. 02:27:635 (4) - Having this slider go over the white tick isn't good, just have it repeat on 02:27:767 -
    
13. 02:43:951 (1,2,3) - Same thing as above
    

FoxyGrandpa wrote:

m4m, I'm only going to mod about 3 minutes because of the drain time of my map

• [Something about a name]

1. 00:10:662 (1,2,3,4) - IMO, ctrl + Ging this looks better since the stack is kinda unexpected The flow goes really bad doing this
   
2. 00:18:161 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - What is this following? Trying to add map variety, will remove if noticed more
   
3. 00:19:083 (4,1,2,3,4,5,6) - Again, why? ^
   
4. 00:36:319 (4,2,3) - This looks not good, blanket 3 and 4 with 2 Changed
   
5. 00:37:767 (1,2) - Increase the spacing on this, no intensity change to warrant that low spacing Changed a bit
   
6. 00:38:425 (2,1,3) - Delete these, they go to nothing and only add difficulty that isn't needed add some variety and this isn't really hard tbh
   
7. 00:40:267 (4,2,1,2) - Center this really nice thx
   
8. 01:02:898 (1,2,3) - This pause is so awkward, just make 3 a slider why? this just follow the song
   
9. 01:05:925 (6,1) - NC on 6 and take out the NC on 1 It was like that before and some mod told me to change it, back to it, it please me more x)
   
10. 01:20:004 (3) - same note about the slider Changed but not stacked
    
11. 01:48:885 (6,8) - Delete these Same as 2nd arg
    
12. 02:27:635 (4) - Having this slider go over the white tick isn't good, just have it repeat on 02:27:767 - k
    
13. 02:43:951 (1,2,3) - Same thing as above Same thing as above

All and all, aesthetics need a lot of work, some parts look really bad where others look nice, go back and try to find as much inconsistencies as you can Yeah maybe if I didn't changed aesthetics it's because it's not obvious to me

Good luck!