Kencho wrote:

水了一貼

[nORMAL]

1. 00:23:104 (5) - DS1.25x了，誤差不要超過+-0.05 fixed
2. 02:31:104 (4) - 這都1.30x了 fixed
3. 02:33:993 (3) - 1.14x fixed
4. 02:44:215 (1) - 1.28x fixed

[hARD]

1. 如果主難度沒改HP，Hard用HP5.5比較好，如果主難度改成了HP6，那Hard就改成HP5。 [lUNATIC]
   
   1. 這個NC頻率和物件密度來說，HP6比較好 [color=#4080BF'>HP6太简单了...真的，HR都不存在难度
2. 00:10:215 (9) - ctrl+G可能會好點 这个位置玩家的机械记忆应该不会变，改了的话有点憋屈。
3. 01:37:549 (4,5) - 換個位置會好打點 个人觉得这里暂时没问题
4. 01:55:327 (6,7) - 感覺有點太遠了 我就怕别人说远了，但是实际上这些地方都不难，毕竟这才是135bpm的曲子，再跳也跳不过哪里去。我总不可能做个Ex来摆起来看对吧
5. 02:48:437 (4) - 在我的審美角度來說這個改成像02:48:882 (5) - 的直滑條會比較好看 fixed,可以可以
   大多數梗都是用同樣的方式和順序放的，也沒什麼可以摸的

GL~

Streliteela wrote:

人家才不是来送水摸的呢哼(╯^╰)

确定要开咩=。= 开呀，反正不影响。而且我不想动setup，因为会改标题。

[lUNATIC]

1. 00:25:326 (1) - 强迫症表示请转-8°，感觉弧度和00:24:437 (9) - 这里能对应得更舒服一些 中心翻转看看？这里应该我更强迫症一点。
2. 00:44:437 (6) - 这个建议ctrl+g，因为结合00:43:104 (1,2,3) - 来看这里你用的是逆flow，而且后面00:46:660 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - 相同节奏的这里是连续用的两个逆flow，只有这里太顺了一些反而有些不统一了 fixed
3. 01:54:215 (1,3) - 我觉得这两个换一下位置会更舒服一些，正好顺时针就转下来了 我感觉..不是很适合..
4. 02:35:771 (4,5,6) - 这三个要不要加个drum hitnormal，我觉得这里音乐是有鼓点的 fixed
5. 03:47:104 (3) - 感觉漏了一个drum normal在这里 fixed

[hARD]

• 
  不是很懂这个喵里喵气的风格，思考 要怎样啦o3o

1. 00:24:437 (3) - 虽然不想nazi但是这里还是建议能稍稍和00:23:993 (2) - 的尾巴blanket一下，或者至少弧度大一些。现在这个位置总看着很尴尬 不是很想这么做
2. 00:49:326 (5,6,7,1) - 并不是很懂这三个东西不等距的意义何在，建议把00:49:771 (6,7) - 移到 x5|y117 单纯想突出啪啪两声，应该没啥问题
3. 01:32:437 (4) - 总觉得这位置好尴尬啊，移到 x208|y20让01:31:104 (1,2,3,4) - 凑个小对称或者 x248|y16凑个小三角都行，反正你前面01:31:549 (2,3) - 的ds都在2以上了这里大点也不过分 那就小三角吧 fixed

nm看你改了就不摸了，ez挺好，这喵外喵气的风格我喜欢
哼，才不会射星呢(╯^╰)

Spotty wrote:

eZ

00:14:660 (1) - I would make a curved slider here ~ fixed
00:18:215 (1) - I think this note is not necessary It doesnt feel good when delete it
02:27:993 (4,5,6,1,2,3) - I don't know, but I think this part is quite hard for an Easy level a bit, but it's in control and I think it's fine

nORMAL

01:24:882 (3) - I think it could be good if this slider is curved a bit :3 not to me this time ;w;
02:25:771 (4,1,2) - This part is a little bit "hard" for a Normal imo it spreads out well, should have no problem with it.
02:36:882 (1) - Isn't that out of the grid? D: Out of grid is fine, while out of edge(screen) is wrong
03:37:326 (1,2,3,4,5,6) - A bit hard here imo D: I think we should regard Easy as Normal, Normal as Hard, Hard as Insane... in this mapset. I want to do a balanced spread, then this is the result.

I also give you a kudo, even if you don't need it, just because I like the map ♥
Good luck Frey !

Ataraxia wrote:

Hii
from my queue

Easy

00:49:771 (5,1) - I think this forced in a easy, you should use a reverse! based on the low bpm (135 should be low enough), I think it's fine to use proper 1/2s in such Easy diff.
02:50:660 (6,7) - I Don't belive this is good in a Easy, its suddenly fixed, change it into a slider

Normal

Its all good for me :3

Hard

00:03:104 (2) - Think is better if are 2 same sliders, not a straight and a curved umm, fixed, I decrease the angle

Lunatic

I Think the NC's Are incoerent, any upbeat needs to have NC, you should fix this in the map lyrics as 01:29:326 (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) - , they are in the same sentence, for an Insane, I think we have more freedom to use the NC.

Are not much to say, the map just great !

good luck with the rank !

6th wrote:

Hello ! m4m

[Easy]
01:13:326 (3) - Use circles as you did for 00:02:215 (3,4) - and 01:27:549 (3,4) - ? Fits better imo 01:13:326 (3,4) - but those look better to me
02:58:215 (1,2) - Those curves really feel like incoming flow is circular when playing but it isn't yeah.. but hard to change this place..

[Normal]
I'd increase AR a bit, like 5,5-ish 5 is enough to play
01:13:326 (1,2) - I think this could be improved. Try curving (2) ? Combining straight slider with curved slider, seems more balanced
02:27:549 (4,1,2) - This looks a bit harsh to play. You should try moving (2) up not to me, and it hurts the spacing.

[Hard]
00:15:549 (4) - Minor but I feel like this spacing is exagerated compared to 00:18:882 (4) - Just regard this Hard as a Light Insane. It seems like the only way that I can keep the balanced spread/
01:20:215 (5) - It would be nice if it could be placed at (x;64) x64?
01:43:104 (4) - I'd have placed it a bit further fixed
03:37:326 (1) - ^ fixed

[Lunatic]
01:46:882 (2,3,4) - This spacing looks a bit exagerated since you stacked this 02:01:104 (2,3,4) - 01:46:882 (2,5) - the stack trick looks cool to me, I want to keep it.

Nice map ! Good luck, sorry if I couldn't help a lot

1. Uncheck widescreen support because you don't have a storyboard...or are you planning to have one?
2. I just found the album of this song: BACKFLASH Audibility
   You might want to add the album name in tag.

1. 00:07:104 (1,2,3,4) - Would be better if you NC on downbeat (specifically on slider 4) instead on circle 1 (which is not downbeat). NC works best if applied on downbeats.
   
2. 03:16:437 (2,3) - Maybe it's just me, but the flow feels weird if stacked because the others (03:16:882 (4,5,6,7)) is unstacked.

1. 00:02:215 (1,2) - I think it would be better if slider 1 has a curve similiar to slider 2. Or the other way around, making slider 2 straight like slider 1.
2. 00:19:993 (1,2) - Looks blanket-able for me. Just saying.

1. 1.4 SV... In my opinion, 1.2 would be better.
2. 00:52:660 (3,4) - The blanket could be improved, I think.
3. 02:07:549 (4) - It would be better if the downbeat (big white tick) has a clickable object. For this one, try this:
   
4. 03:47:104 (3) - Same as above.

1. Wanna try 1.0 SV?
2. 00:05:771 (3,4) - Looks blanket-able for me.

Nelka714 wrote:

hi there
mod4mod here

SPOILER

[General]

1. Uncheck widescreen support because you don't have a storyboard...or are you planning to have one?
2. I just found the album of this song: BACKFLASH Audibility
   You might want to add the album name in tag. ok

[lUNATIC]

1. 00:07:104 (1,2,3,4) - Would be better if you NC on downbeat (specifically on slider 4) instead on circle 1 (which is not downbeat). NC works best if applied on downbeats. I want to avoid two digits and want to limit the sentence of lyrics in one combo color, so that is the result.
2. 03:16:437 (2,3) - Maybe it's just me, but the flow feels weird if stacked because the others (03:16:882 (4,5,6,7)) is unstacked. fixed

Other than that is mostly the NC issues. Take it to your preference. NC in high levels couldn't be called a issue, unless it's NC spam or you can't read it cuz of the NC.

[hARD]

1. 00:02:215 (1,2) - I think it would be better if slider 1 has a curve similiar to slider 2. Or the other way around, making slider 2 straight like slider 1. copy&paste looks poor and every mapper likes it, I just want to avoid it.
2. 00:19:993 (1,2) - Looks blanket-able for me. Just saying. not to me...

[nORMAL]

1. 1.4 SV... In my opinion, 1.2 would be better. it‘s 1.2x right?
2. 00:52:660 (3,4) - The blanket could be improved, I think. 2hard2fixit
3. 02:07:549 (4) - It would be better if the downbeat (big white tick) has a clickable object. For this one, try this:
4. 03:47:104 (3) - Same as above.

Other than that is mostly the downbeat issues. Take it to your preference. It will be poor if every downbeat is clickable in lower diffs

[eAZY]

1. Wanna try 1.0 SV? I don't want to remap it, sorry but no
2. 00:05:771 (3,4) - Looks blanket-able for me.

I guess you mean 00:04:882 (2,4) - , but I still don't want it
Other than that is mostly some blanket-able notes. Take it to your preference.

that's all i can do
i hope it's helpful