forum

Magway - Scramble Nine [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
22
Topic Starter
Yuzeyun
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on dimanche 14 février 2016 at 15:51:45

Artist: Magway
Title: Scramble Nine
Tags: stepmania hopscotch mix
BPM: 120
Filesize: 3010kb
Play Time: 01:27
Difficulties Available:
  1. Futsuu (1,73 stars, 121 notes)
  2. Kantan (0,94 stars, 81 notes)
  3. Muzukashii (2,25 stars, 168 notes)
  4. Oni (2,9 stars, 254 notes)
Download: Magway - Scramble Nine
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Raiden
Hi.

[>>Kantan<<]

00:24:000 (16,17,18,19,20) - dude make kats all of these the sound is definitely NOT DON

01:11:000 - i'd say fill the gap, it's the kiai and there are more than enough breaks throughout the song

01:19:000 - same ^

01:27:500 - you can add a kat here, sounds empty

[>>Futsuu<<]

HP8, let's have a decent spread shall we

00:55:500 (71) - how about finisher (for all diffs)

01:27:500 - same as kantan

[>>Muzu<<]

HP8-7

00:55:500 (91) - le finisher

01:21:500 (146) - i'd say make it 3/4, sounds kind of weird after the previous one :|

01:23:500 (150) - ^

01:25:500 (154,158) - ^

[>>Oni<<]

HP7-8

00:25:250 - fill the gaps here ;___; (and on every beat aka 00:27:250 - etc)

00:34:375 - fill with a don?

00:38:375 - ^ etc etc

00:55:500 (120) - finisher desolée dessert

you can make the kiai denser you know like adding dons on 00:58:375 - and stuff

01:14:000 - eeehhhhhhhhhhhh this rhythm change sounded a bit weird to me sadansf

01:16:750 - add a kat or something lol five 1/1 gaps in a row in an Oni o_o

01:17:000 (191) - mapppppppppppppp
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Topic Starter
Yuzeyun

Raiden wrote:

Hi.

[>>Kantan<<]

00:24:000 (16,17,18,19,20) - dude make kats all of these the sound is definitely NOT DON ITS SOFT SOUND. AS SOFT AS THE VOICE OF A CUTE LOLI. SO.

01:27:500 - you can add a kat here, sounds empty the song stops on a 3/4 spot, 1/1 is dumb

[>>Futsuu<<]

HP8, let's have a decent spread shall we keeping 9

01:27:500 - same as kantan ass drug bag fuck

[>>Muzu<<]

HP8-7 nein

changed a bit kiai so it fills better the spread as oni has a drastic change in notes

[>>Oni<<]

HP7-8 8.5 because it has 11111110 notes

lol i forgot if i applied everything
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Raiden
i almost fell asleep modding this
Okoratu
how bout making this a jpg and using it as a bg

futsuu
00:49:250 - 00:51:250 - i don't really think it fits the nature of this part to map these weak sounds. like the song drops a lot of instruments so sticking to the more dominant sounds in 00:51:000 - and 00:49:000 - would feel less forced, probably

oni
00:37:125 - would consider moving to the next blue tick in 00:37:375 - since that's where the drum actually is more pronounced?
01:19:000 - kkk sounds spammy how bout kkd

uhh i think im fine with the rest but can't find the place you took your metadata from
Topic Starter
Yuzeyun

Okoratu wrote:

how bout making this a jpg and using it as a bg done

futsuu
00:49:250 - 00:51:250 - i don't really think it fits the nature of this part to map these weak sounds. like the song drops a lot of instruments so sticking to the more dominant sounds in 00:51:000 - and 00:49:000 - would feel less forced, probably don't really feel the need to move notes, current patterning makes this part less dull than plain 1/1.

oni
00:37:125 - would consider moving to the next blue tick in 00:37:375 - since that's where the drum actually is more pronounced? that was a dumb move
01:19:000 - kkk sounds spammy how bout kkd guess it's ok
metadata:

taken from the .sm of the stepchart from hopscotch mix
Okoratu
k
meii18
this page looks like a BN spam o.o
Anyway congratz!
__Hatsune_Miku
How can ? XD
haha :P congratz~
shionelove
congratz
Nardoxyribonucleic
The speedrank is real. :o
Congrats~
Topic Starter
Yuzeyun
Actually, what just happened
Raiden
You got a map qualified.

You can thank me later
Charlotte
gratz gezo ;)
lolcubes
OD9 pls.

grats ╭( ・ㅂ・)و
Topic Starter
Yuzeyun

lolcubes wrote:

OD9 pls.

grats ╭( ・ㅂ・)و
CS9 AR9 OD9 HP9 SV9 x9 ╭( ・ㅂ・)و
DakeDekaane
OCD is killing me here. Probably OCD is wrong.

[ Kantan]
  1. 00:11:000 (5) - I think this note shouldn't be here looking at the next pattern.
  2. 01:03:000 - This is literally the only pattern break in the kiai, make it consistent for the rest of the song (by removing some notes.)
[ Muzukashii]
  1. 00:33:500 (47) - This note isn't used in later patterns. Is this intentional?
[ Oni]
  1. 00:27:500 (55) , 00:31:500 (66) - These notes doesn't have a nice relation with the previous patterns, it feels like they are there just to fill this space, move them 1/2 backwards so they follow something in a cool way, please.
I can qualify this if you catch this weekend.
Topic Starter
Yuzeyun

DakeDekaane wrote:

OCD is killing me here. Probably OCD is wrong. using the word OCD triggers my OCD

[ Kantan]
  1. 00:11:000 (5) - I think this note shouldn't be here looking at the next pattern. It is within this pattern, which lasts until the 4/1 break.
  2. 01:03:000 - This is literally the only pattern break in the kiai, make it consistent for the rest of the song (by removing some notes.) Was more in favor of adding this note.
[ Muzukashii]
  1. 00:33:500 (47) - This note isn't used in later patterns. Is this intentional? It...is? This 8sec long part has two instances of the same rhythm.
[ Oni]
  1. 00:27:500 (55) , 00:31:500 (66) - These notes doesn't have a nice relation with the previous patterns, it feels like they are there just to fill this space, move them 1/2 backwards so they follow something in a cool way, please. I prefer keeping it my way, it was done to have 1/1 breaks. 3/2 breaks don't really belong to this part IMO :[ I could have used the excuse that the stpemania chart is even worse rhythmically because it doesn't even have any 1/4 at this part but it is not a valid excuse and who cares about stepmania, right?????
I can qualify this if you catch this weekend.
DakeDekaane
Oni notes are baka.
Qualified!
Nwolf
guess I'm late

01:20:000 - ONI: Why does the density randomly go down again here



uhm gratz
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply