1. Advanced (2,58 stars, 175 notes)
2. Hard (3,27 stars, 251 notes)
3. Insane (4,35 stars, 340 notes)
4. Normal (1,94 stars, 133 notes)
5. Xexxar's Epilogue (4,9 stars, 349 notes)

EchoingFury wrote:

Quotes taken from a chatmod / smalltalk mix, so excuse me for not posting the whole log.

Prologue Insane

23:27 EchoingFury: 00:36:772 (1) -
23:27 EchoingFury: I wouldn't place this so close
23:27 EchoingFury: Rather keep it like the normal ds
23:28 EchoingFury: Since the piano note there is relatively loud
23:28 EchoingFury: In comparison to the rest
23:29 Anxient: i made 4 into a repeat slider
23:29 Anxient: http://puu.sh/mBDJE/743c5eac0a.jpg
23:29 Anxient: i always find a way

23:09 EchoingFury: 00:39:596 (6,7,1) -
23:09 EchoingFury: This is ass
23:09 Anxient: ugh okay fine
23:09 Anxient: youre the third person to complain about that
23:09 EchoingFury: Yeah
23:09 EchoingFury: The slider is too long to hold the spot
23:10 EchoingFury: And then the jump back feels inconsistent considering the other slider end triplets
23:10 Anxient: any better? http://puu.sh/mBCD7/29dffcf84c.jpg

23:11 EchoingFury: 00:43:831 (6) -
23:11 EchoingFury: This could be blanketed around 4
23:11 EchoingFury: This is just my opinion that this would create a better flow
23:11 EchoingFury: Since the angle is not as sharp
23:11 Anxient: i want a more solid back and forth flow actually :l
23:11 Anxient: since the entire diff revolves around back and forths
23:12 Anxient: *more like my mapping style but w/e
23:12 EchoingFury: You can leave it as it is for consistency, It's just a personal preference

23:14 Anxient: 00:45:596 (1) - i might need to make this 1/2
23:14 Anxient: for consistency
23:15 EchoingFury: It's fine, I mean, you can leave it, I would map it 1/2
23:15 Anxient: noice http://puu.sh/mBCUz/0da0718a28.jpg

23:16 EchoingFury: 00:56:890 (1) -
23:16 EchoingFury: This is a strong beat
23:17 EchoingFury: You might make a triangle out of this
23:17 EchoingFury: Like http://puu.sh/mBD2O/86ae016b9f.jpg
23:18 EchoingFury: And yeah
23:18 EchoingFury: Your 1/2 is fitting
23:18 EchoingFury: Since it also creates some back and forth kinda flow which you obviously like and then circles around into 00:57:243 (3) -
23:19 Anxient: i remapped it
23:20 Anxient: yeah you can imagine how it went http://puu.sh/mBDdl/0a292c4aad.jpg
23:20 EchoingFury: LOL
23:20 EchoingFury: #Justanxientthings

23:29 EchoingFury: 01:20:007 (3,4) -
23:29 EchoingFury: This blanket ._.
23:31 Anxient: but DS
23:31 Anxient: ugh i made it 1.1x
23:31 Anxient: now its perfect
23:31 Anxient: http://puu.sh/mBDQS/225184d28f.jpg
23:31 Anxient: UGH

Hard

23:43 EchoingFury: 00:08:890 (1,2) -
23:43 EchoingFury: I would put a repeat slider
23:44 EchoingFury: And a circle here
23:44 EchoingFury: If you listen to it, somehow I want to click the 2 slider end
23:45 Anxient: i think its fine as is :l
23:45 EchoingFury: I mean you can leave it
23:45 Anxient: ok
23:46 EchoingFury: But you see that the slider end 2 is a very strong vocal
23:46 Anxient: yeah
23:46 EchoingFury: tsu TOOOOH
23:47 Anxient: my sty;e is so rigid fkc
23:47 Anxient: how would you fix it?
23:48 Anxient: nvm
23:49 Anxient: fixed ut
23:49 Anxient: it
23:49 Anxient: hell yeah
23:49 EchoingFury: http://puu.sh/mBEXq/7674e37065.jpg
23:49 EchoingFury: move 5 down and right
23:49 EchoingFury: and 1 right
23:49 EchoingFury: And then repeat
23:50 Anxient: http://puu.sh/mBF1Z/931d53ea2b.jpg
23:50 Anxient: and then i brought everything up
23:50 Anxient: so the stacking makes sense
23:50 Anxient: http://puu.sh/mBF3m/fe52da6077.jpg
23:50 EchoingFury: Straight line
23:50 EchoingFury: ANXIENT is strong in this one

23:51 EchoingFury: 00:15:596 (1,2,3,4) -
23:51 Anxient: i asked modhelp about this
23:51 Anxient: they said its fine
23:51 EchoingFury: It is fine
23:51 EchoingFury: But not the best it could be
23:51 EchoingFury: I wouldn't use that much ds
23:51 EchoingFury: And angle it in relation to the slider
23:52 EchoingFury: http://puu.sh/mBFa9/ff4694f478.jpg
23:52 EchoingFury: Maybe a bit less on the angle
23:52 Anxient: 0.8 DS
23:53 Anxient: and then i moved everything downwards so DS makes sense
23:53 Anxient: #basedAnxient

23:54 EchoingFury: 01:11:008 (1,2,3,4,5) -
23:54 EchoingFury: NO
23:54 EchoingFury: Dunno, but it feels strange
23:55 EchoingFury: http://puu.sh/mBFmu/1e25da514f.jpg
23:55 EchoingFury: Maybe?
23:57 Anxient: simplified it
23:57 Anxient: http://puu.sh/mBFrE/9feb946feb.jpg
23:57 Anxient: im a bit worried about 1 tho
23:57 Anxient: is this http://puu.sh/mBFuN/8a5a0e8948.jpg
23:57 Anxient: ds
23:57 Anxient: too large
23:57 EchoingFury: from 5 to 1
23:58 EchoingFury: Hmm
23:58 EchoingFury: It's borderline fine
23:58 Anxient: 1 has emphasis
23:58 Anxient: im okay with this
23:58 Anxient: i even made sure the DS is good
23:58 EchoingFury: Yeah

00:00 Anxient: 01:28:125 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2) - this will raise some questions
00:04 EchoingFury: 01:28:125 (1,2,1,2,3,1,2) -
00:05 EchoingFury: why is 1 behind it?
00:05 EchoingFury: If you just swap 1 and 2 it's very good
00:05 EchoingFury: And maybe space 1 a bit more
00:07 Anxient: i went with something more simple http://puu.sh/mBG7b/8773de66b4.jpg

Good job on the diffs, Looking forward to the Xexxtra

~Fury

Xexxar wrote:

offset is obv wrong but its ur mapset so deal wit dat urself nerd

Xexxar wrote:

just cause I noticed:

00:46:133 (3) - make that drum-whistle on slider start - done

make the map ar 9

thx

also i think 428 is wrong, 418 is probably better, do that for now

Exa wrote:

Easy:

00:24:417 (1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - This is too difficult for an easy difficulty. Not only it's in the middle of nowhere and therefore possesses the element of surprise, but it's also constant 1/2 rhythm using a 1/2 rev slider which makes the whole thing really confusing. On top of that there are 3 taps following up that require additional reading ability even though that's where you should let the player recover from the hard pattern. Simply replacing the reverse slider with another with another normal 1/2 slider would fix the issue. You would also be consistent with (4) since they will be representing the same sound using the same rhythm. - made into 1/1. all of it. yes.
00:32:888 (3,4,1) - Another rhythmical inconsistency that really stands out here. The gap between (3,4) is the exact same as the sliderbody of (1). Mapping the same thing in different ways screws up your stack pattern's consistency as well so I suggest picking either note+slider (which is recommended since that's what you have been doing up until now) or simply a slider filling in the gap I told you about. - i made it more consistent coz its kinda hard to understand that line of text yo
00:38:535 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1,2,1) - Boring as it might be, you should stick with a constant rhythm that repeats every 4 or 8 1/1 beats since nothing in the actual music changes. Currently you are using notes out of nowhere and without a particular reason. Then there are rhythms like 00:44:182 (1,1) that are again weird and inconsistent so yeah. Stick with a specific rhythm. - stuck to one rhythm -circle, circle slider-
00:49:829 (1,2) - Your stacks before had a 6/4 time gap but now it has a 8/4. This might be confusing since newbies don't have a sense of rhythm and don't really know when they should hit the circle. - nah i think its fine.
01:00:065 (3,1) - I am afraid most players won't fully follow the sliderbody and leave from it early to transit into the next slider, breaking their combo as a result. - if there are more complaints about this ill change it, but as for now, its staying.
01:04:653 (2) - Ctrl+H and reposition it where it was. They look asymmetrical (I know they aren't) and ugly. It's like they are trying to mimic each other but failing at it. - meh fine. looks fine as it was, but i changed it so that newbs can have a easier time reading this.
01:05:712 - Taken that a new line of vocals starts here, it would be best if the player tapped. This is a bit subjective but please consider using a more impactful object. - made it more impactful
- Then basically remove every combo that had a 2-object-combo before it. - i tried.
- Use AR=4, build AR up like 4 -> 6 -> 8 -> 9 -> etc - k
- Use OD=3, mostly because of the stacks. - k
-also used cs 3

Normal:

00:05:182 - 6/4 slider start please, try to follow the little piano notes here since both the song and the difficulty level allows you to.
00:08:888 (1,2,3,1,2,3,1) - Damn ask a BN about these stacks cause I am really not sure if newbies will be able to read them properly, especially with this such leniency. - remapped coz it looks seriously random. with less stacks and more sense!
00:29:182 (2,3) - Used the exact same pattern at about the same place. This is just a kick from me to persuade you to be more creative and diverse! - ?
00:30:594 (1,2,3) - See you mapped these piano notes afterwards. Don't worry about being inconsistent by adding a slider on the start of the song since you can justify the different use of rhythm by saying "Vocals are different and I have already created high tension, so dumbing it now with a huge slider would be stupid". - .... i have a feeling that im supposed to feel guilty...
00:36:770 (3) - Use a 1/1 slider here so the player doesn't have to tap where the music literally stops. - added that 1/1 slider, but im not sure if i can fix it like this. mind looking at it?
00:45:594 (1,2) - The positioning of the slider and note here allows for the player to not even follow 1/10 of slider and still complete the pattern. Do you really want it to play like that? - made it more you-must-complete-the-dogdamn-slider-ish
00:51:947 (3,1,2,3,4,5,6,1) - Again ask a BN about the stacks. At least increase SL. -
he isnt sure tho, so ill just say if too many people complain about it, ill change it.
- Why is the combo-ing so much better here? Use it on Easy accordingly! - >.<
- Use AR=6.
- Use OD=5.

Hard:

00:22:653 (1) - I expected a note to be here which would be consistent with the rhythm that you've used for these sounds before like 00:19:300 (3,4) or 00:16:476 (2,3). - well the song is approaching a new song area, so i figured that ill change the rhythm :l
00:30:594 (1,2,3,1,2,3,4) - Pretty pattern and all but I don't see why you used sliders for representing the "really prominent" piano notes but used circles to represent less tense 1/2 beats afterwards. The tension handling here is objectively wrong since you use impactful objects to represent sounds that do not support them. - ok dad. fixed it dad. happy dad? DAD?! DAAAAAAAAAAAD
01:01:829 (4,5,3,4) - These are kinetically inconsistent even though using a different slider for (4) or (5) and doing Ctrl+G on them could very well provide you with the same cursor movement. - what is kinetically inconsistent?
01:05:359 (1) - This is (and will be even if you change the patterns before it) still spatially inconsistent with 01:02:535 (1). Even though I don't see a way of fixing that by altering your current pattern, you could poorly justify it's use by saying "I am building up tension", but please don't do that because the song doesn't do that either. - i think its fine tho. idk how to build tension from a song that doesnt do it from that slider anyway :l ill just say that the lyrics is held. "kiiiiiii"
01:06:770 (1,2,3,4,5) - That...
01:08:182 (1,2,3,4,5) - And that should use the exact same rhythm since they are basically the same. - 01:06:770 (1) - zuuto, 01:08:182 (1,2) - to na ri. can i base my argument off that pls
01:20:888 (1,2,3) - I would much more rather see sliders here... - me too tbh
01:21:947 (6) - And notes here. This way you still have the same slider/circle balance but now you also build up the heat towards the end of this pattern, where the vocals and music climax. - i decided to be monstrata and add triangles. idk who Monstrata is.
- Be rhythmically and kinetically consistent when you must! It's really important on harder difficulties since an important factor in playing std is muscle memory! Not to mention that you are mapping a song; if the song is consistent, so should your map be. - k

Prologue Insane:

00:05:712 (4,5,6) - Please don't use horizontal movement on the bottom-right corner, it's extremely uncomfortable for every right handed person Move (6) at 356,234 (and adjust your patterns afterwards accordingly). - only moved the slider coz the hitcircles after it needed empahsis anyway.
00:14:535 (7) - A bit subjective since your pattern is "ok" but you could avoid the overlap and use familiar movement (if you applied my previous suggestion) by moving (7) at 269,154. - remapped the entire pattern lmao
00:17:359 (1,2) - I would expect to see that on a snappy dubstep beat since the movement produced here is either really brutal (if the player actually follows the slider) or really weird/boring since almost every person would simply stay in the middle instead of going backwards (or just do a slight move towards the right, according to where the next object is), denying themselves the movement - and therefore the tension - that the sound you are mapping deserves. Adding up, it's pretty clear that the slider will not be played as intended and therefore should be changed. If you simply curved the slider like so most of the problem would be solved. - the alternative you provided looks terribad imho so i just made a blanket to 1. flows pretty well.
00:19:123 (2,3) - Again pretty brutal, taken that you are forcing the player to go exactly backwards compared to where the previous slider was going. At least do Ctrl+H and reposition it where it was to give a sense of circular-wannabe movement. Else, simply find another way to make a nice forth-and-back pattern. (You've done that before and on other difficulties, I believe in you!) - *seeing that Exa is believing in you, IT FILLS YOU WITH DETERMINATION
00:19:300 (3,4,5) - Dramatically changing spacing using linear flow is as comfortable as sitting on a stool for 4 hours straight (..not). It might be a bit subjective but the people I forced into testplaying this agreed. - its not linear anymore.
00:23:182 (2,3) - Same as 00:19:123 (2,3). Imma not point out every single pattern of the same nature from now one. It's really easy to find them by yourself and change them however you see fit. (If you actually change them). - made a backnforth ff
00:26:535 (1,2,3) - Why use such low spacing when you are in the middle of a buildup? - i think kicksliders are tension enough :L
00:27:065 (4,1) - I also find this too be way too weird. I get you are trying to "lower spacing because the song gets more calm" but the player is required to cut down on speed way too suddenly, probably breaking his combo as a result. Furthermore, you are dramatically changing spacing using linear movement, but in this case, you decrease. This also makes it weird/uncomfortable because of [see above]. - tl;dr. too long for me but i get your point. i made it more people friendly.
00:29:535 (4,5,6,7,8,1,2,3) - Exact same thing just like on hard. Why do you use circles for not-so-prominent sounds and then sliders on piano notes that basically BEG to be mapped with circles! - i kept the previous circles coz ma do ni, but i changed the sliders after that to circles.
00:43:653 (5) - Move it at about 133,323 so it make a triangle with 00:42:770 (1,2) and 00:43:123 (3,4) and it's also between 00:42:947 (2,3) AND you also avoid the ugly overlap that you make for no apparent reason. - OK DAD
00:44:535 (3,4) - I said I won't point them out anymore but here's a heads up! - OK MOM
00:53:182 (3,4) - I don't see the reason to deny movement here, you could simply stack (3) with 00:54:065 (1) and you would be set. - changed some parts too but appplied.
01:07:123 (2,3) - Heads up, again! - " I won't point them out anymore" this one is fine tho
01:09:065 (4,5) - #Modhelp quiz should give you the reason to change the spacing here. Strong beats = Not less spacing! - asdfasdfasfixed
01:10:123 (3,4) - I don't see why you deny the player movement here either. You could just move (3) at about 512,100 but I would personally move the slider as well somewhere close to 438,52 to avoid making a crampy pattern. - i shouldve read the rest of the mod before remapping the entire section
01:18:770 (4,5) - Remember the sliders who wanted to mimic each other back in Easy? Yeah same thing. - i dont remember
01:21:065 (2,3) - Please tell me why you stack because you did that again before and I pointed it out but I really see no reason what-so-ever to prevent the cursor from moving. Especially when you are in a buildup section! - made a slider. the antijump was supposed to increase tension but w/e.
01:24:770 (6,7) - Left the buildup but kept doing it. - wot
01:28:829 (1,2,3) - God no! Not at the end of the map, don't do it! Use snappy movement which is more comfortable and don't force the player to go into a corner. Go out with a bam and let the player have their last bit of fun place (3) 313,118 which will make it symmetrical to 01:28:476 (1) and also create a nice, comfy snappy pattern. - i made it back and forth coz im so good at it.

General:

- Offset should be 421
- Disable Widescreen support in all difficulties. - done
- It is recommended that the kiai time is consistent throughout the whole mapset. - done
- soft-hitwhistle.wav has a delay of more that 5 seconds! - wot
- No hitsounding problems.

Exa wrote:

Xexxar's Epilogue:

00:00:506 - Here is where the vocals start and here is where the spinner should also start. Just like in every other difficulty. ok
00:05:712 (7,8) - This whole beginning part is strongly based on the vocals. Stopping the cursor movement when vocals are really prominent is a bad idea, especially since you've never done this afterwards. Why not simply stack with 00:05:359 (5)? You make a nice (repeating) triangle that leads well into the next slider. by putting an anti jump it makes the vocals feel more distinguished from the piano. intentional and not necessary to change
00:08:888 (4) - Start a new combo here since there is great alternation in the use of vocals. applied
00:08:888 (4,5,6,7) - This...
00:10:300 to 00:11:006 - And this part are the exact same and should be represented with the same rhythm. that's not required... variety is perfectly fine
00:15:770 (3) - Ctrl+J this and reposition it since provides potential of circular movement. In comparison to what you have now, it can be less snappy and also somewhat "guides" the player properly into the next slider according to how it's positioned. To get my point across better, behold my perfect illustrations: Current | New. As you can see the "new" pattern provides the player with more freedom of movement and a much more fun away to go about this pattern since it transits much better into (1). nice, applied
00:19:123 (2,3) - I wen't though why this is generally not a pleasant pattern to play on the insane diff but here: First and foremost the music is not tense/hardcore enough to support such forceful and snappy movement. Not only that, but nobody will actually follow the slider across it's whole body, resulting in an unwanted way of dealing with this. they are forced to follow the slider based on the position of the following note. working as intended.
00:21:947 (2,3) - But this is a much better alternative... And another reason to change the previous batter since it creates kinetic inconsistency.
00:29:888 (5,1) - Stack nicely. applied
00:31:123 (5) - Nazi but should be at 317,257. applied i guess.
00:31:300 (1,2) - Please use the same slider (preferably the curved one) since these two are supposed to be parts of the same pattern.In this case trying to be diverse only result in a not-so-good-looking and asymmetrical pattern when it could have been so much better! i dont really agree with that logic. 00:31:653 (2,3) - are curved, 00:31:300 (1,4) - are straight. this was what i wanted so i dont see why i should change it. looks fine this way.
00:33:770 (3,4,5) - Shouldn't (4) be of 1.6 DS from (3,5) just like 00:29:535 (3,4,5) here? applied, i didnt like the angles of having equal snap though
00:35:888 (2,3,4,5,6) - You could have used any other pattern following basic rules of symmetry (rotate everything by 120 etc) and it would turn out so much better. Use the same slider since they are part of the same pattern. Another reason to persuade you to use keen objects is that on the same sounds, you end up with different flow and transitions from each object to another, which simply does not follow the song and doesn't make sense in the long run. i dont think theres any problem with variety in slider design here.
00:47:006 (1,1) - Either stack or move it completely in the sliderbody, I noticed this while testplaying so other people will probably notice it as well. good catch i like this alot better now thanks
01:06:417 (4,1,2,3) - Even though neither the music or the vocals stop, you force the player to pause here and then follow up with almost a vertical screen jump, don't you think this is too much/weird? the jump there is fine and pauses to emphasize the vocals.
01:06:770 (1,2,3) - This...
01:08:182 (2,3,4) - And this are fundamentally the same thing with the only difference being the content of the vocals. Therefore, they should be represented with the same rhythm. no problem with variety in mapping rhythms.
01:17:712 (6,7,8,9,1,2,3,4) - Horizontal jump on the bottom-right corner-part of the map, covered by a stream is probably much harder to read than any other pattern you've used up until now. It's pretty clear that it negatively impacts the relevant difficulty of this beatmap. the pattern is not difficult to read, there is more than enough time before 4 so the note should be easily visible.
01:24:770 - Wow don't skip that! It's far too prominent to be skipped and you've never implied that you plan on not mapping the actual beats! it may be prominent if you explicitly listen to it but the forced emphasis on 3 with the cymbal makes the note after alot weaker. utilizing 1/1 breaks makes it more isolating and powerful.
- In general I feel like the difficulty of this beatmap feels forced as there are many spacial/rhythmical and kinetic inconsistencies, all poorly contributing into making it diverse and somewhat interesting. However the constant use of hard to read/play jumps and the forever-changing flow along with the misuse of basic patterns makes this beatmap dull and inevitably aesthetically lacking. sucks

Anxient wrote:

Exa wrote:

Normal:

00:36:770 (3) - Use a 1/1 slider here so the player doesn't have to tap where the music literally stops. - added that 1/1 slider, but im not sure if i can fix it like this. mind looking at it? It's much better, just make sure the head of the next slider is exacly in (3)'s sliderbody.

Hard:

01:01:829 (4,5,3,4) - These are kinetically inconsistent even though using a different slider for (4) or (5) and doing Ctrl+G on them could very well provide you with the same cursor movement. - what is kinetically inconsistent? It's the way you make the player move their cursor throughout certain parts. Click me! As you can see even though these two represent the same rhythm and contain the exact same tension but they are kinetically inconsistent since they provide diversity in movement. I wouldn't be pointing that out if it wasn't for the fact that the whole thing is really easy to fix since most maps are extremely incosistent nowadays anyway!

Prologue Insane:

01:18:770 (4,5) - Remember the sliders who wanted to mimic each other back in Easy? Yeah same thing. - i dont remember Click me!

General:

- soft-hitwhistle.wav has a delay of more that 5 seconds! - wot than* this is an unrankable issue and should be taken care of.

Battle wrote:

m4m drain match

[General]
Preview unsnapped - gdi

[Easy]
Despite you know, it having 1/2 in it it's generally fine
01:15:950 (2,3,4,5) - Just going to point out this pattern because it can potentially be confusing because low are plus players might go 3 -> 5 instead of 3 -> 4, pointing out this since this seems the most ambiguous - made it more noob friendly

[Normal]
00:24:950 (2,1) - This is a normal so, you know why I'm pointing this out lol - removed double on 2, added hitcircle.
01:12:420 (1) - Why whistles all of a sudden starting at this point, editing this on the default skin made it just start sounding awkward lol - why is why i used custom hitsounding which sounds great
01:16:303 (3,1) - Maybe try - naaaah

SPOILER

[Hard]
00:24:068 (5,2) - Usually I'm all for overlaps but this just looks messy, maybe try lowering it down? - i tried.
00:38:891 (2,3,4) - Very questionable spacing, after removed notes, it's noticeable that 00:38:891 - is similar to 00:39:244 - in terms of that drum(?) sound, so having it where 1 -> 2 is ds'd but 4 is a jump makes no sense - i also tried.
00:47:362 (2,3,4) - Very similar in terms of 2 and 4, they're basically the same sound but are spaced very differently - rohit is going to fucking kill me.
00:51:420 (2,4) - Not a super fan of this overlap either, maybe try putting 4 below 2 instead, it shouldn't be too big of a movement from 4 -> 1 after repositioning because pause there - im keeping this one tho :l
Same thing with awkward whistles at the end lol - maybe you should turn on custom hits :c
01:27:597 (4) - Remove finish here and put it on 01:27:773 (5) - instead - im keeping it coz it sounds actually better lmao

mkay bye - cya

Anxient wrote:

tank

Battle wrote:

Anxient wrote:

tank

u

ouranhshc wrote:

mod4mod

[Epilogue]
Overall, I feel that the difficulty on this diff is forced. Some of the patterns that are used are okay; however, i feel that spacing within the patterns themselves make the map unnecessarily harder than it has to be. you didnt really complain about spacing in your mod cept once. The intentional use of notes that force the player to retract on a slider was intended and plays fine.

00:21:068 (5,6,7,8) - Feels forced and unneccesary maybe to you, fits the tone to me
00:26:538 (1,2,3,4) - ^
00:46:832 (5,1) - ^
For Example:
01:11:538 (3,4,5,6,1,2,1) - is it neccessary to have the large spacing. One can shrink the spacing and still have the same feel in the map. spacing is fine here, the part is very intense so having spacing that reflects it is appropriate

01:18:597 (4) - I'd suggest moving this somewhere more visible because when i play the map, it feels like (5) is where (4) should be or could be. since someone else complained about this I have slightly adjusted

SPOILER

It's poor flow to have (4) basically behind everything like that.
01:20:715 (8) - like same here, is the placement of (8) really that intuitive? perfectly fine, the angle creates a nice jump onto 1.

I understand that you want to emphasize certain parts of the song; however, the patterns/spacing that you use should still be intuitive.