about 6 hours ago
This chart is surprisingly good. Short mod because I'm not feeling too well (I actually haven't been feeling too well for a while haha, but it doesn't matter too much)
[Duty to God]
shenanigans
Add "incurso" to the tags. Album title. Not too fond of the difficulty title, I think Duty of God is slightly more appropriate and rolls off the tongue slightly nicer. Your choice though.
Ok for incurso, gonna ask peoples about the title but I kinda prefere "to"Chart
00:56:319 - Not sure if I particularly agree with this layering scheme, while I know that the jumptrill is going to the louder bass drum, the guitar is far more prominent and you should do something to capture the difference. I was thinking of something like [12]3[12]4[12] but the problem is that the four chords before it are doubles. The jumptrill as a whole feels a bit unnecessary to me though, I think it's better to just accentuate the guitar and less so the louder bass drum. This goes for other sounds like this.
Ok i've change it to something like you said, it flows better now01:11:194 - The doubles in this section can create jacks if you want. I think it's a bit silly to not create any jacks in this section except for the hidden 1/2 jacks in the broken dense jumpstreams. Especially since you created jacks in 01:13:069 - .
Done01:32:569 - Guitar vibrato is a little too faint to be a trill. You can use a split roll instead for this.
Reworked the pattern01:33:444 - Trill should change here, but I can see why you wouldn't want to change it. Guessing that's intentional.
^03:23:440 - This section seems layered too little for its own good, I feel. You should probably layer it a bit more (there's a very faint bass guitar which you could follow and add 1/2s). I think I understand your intention of doing this (creating tension) but since early misses can't happen here unless you royally fuck up one of the LNs, which shouldn't happen. In any case, I think layering this section a bit more should be fine. It just feels too empty as it is.
So applied and I have to approve this, the bass flow really well with some bass kick hitsound03:51:946 - I think [34]2[34]2[34]2 is more appropriate, I don't think a jumptrill is appropriate because there are sounds that are far more intense and are captured as jumptrills instead.
It's because of the 2 differents trills of this section who don't sounds the same : one is 1/2 hi hat but this one is 1/4 so I mapped it like this. But it's true this look overmapped as truck, I nerfed it.04:28:286 - Noticeably denser than the section before it, but I think it lacks a certain structure. I think it's better to accentuate certain parts of the chart - what I mean is that you could keep the same layering, but you change patterns around so that the player will have to deliberately focus on the patterning. You can particularly accentuate parts like 04:28:646 (268646|1,268766|2,268766|3,268886|0,269006|3,269006|1,269126|0,269246|1,269246|2,269366|3,269486|2,269486|0) - . You can do something like this to accentuate the chords for example. Alternatively you can layer it more, but I don't particularly agree with layering it more because the section right after is more intense and layered only slightly more. This applies up to 04:34:886 - .
Ok applied thanks for the tips, I put some jacks on the sections you pointed out, I looks great and fun to play04:31:046 - Try this maybe? The guitar is definitely very loud here and it'd be odd to not capture this.
04:34:886 - More appropriate as a triple, for the reason above.
04:35:126 - ^
05:06:086 - A double would be appropriate here.
05:06:326 - A triple would be more appropriate than a double, it feels odd to not capture that very prominent sound (not sure what it is but it's not the cymbal crash)
05:06:746 - Double.
ALL THE DOUBLE/TRIPLE ARE APPLIED ^ + this one05:09:206 - I don't think the growl has that much prominence to ignore the other instruments in this section. It'd be better to layer it the same way you layered 05:13:046 - .
It's not the first time someone point this LN out... Guess i'm gonna change it so. That being said, 05:13:046 - should be a triple.
Yup06:00:014 - Really sudden use of LNs here, especially since the density is halved. Not too fond of that part... you can keep the triples but I think something like this would be far more appropriate. This goes on for the rest of the section.
Remapped with 1/2 now, yup it's harder 
06:12:014 - The parts with LNs feel a bit too light, placing 1/2s with the LNs would be fine. This applies up to 06:22:237 - .
Uh, dunno if it's really cool to play but i'm gonna add them.06:18:237 - You can be kinda mean and put 1/4s here, but I'm not sure if that's a good idea. Probably not, since you'd have to delayer some sections. Just a minor suggestion though.
I don't really want to overload this part, theses LNs are here for a quick "pause" between each chord sections. It's fine like this.06:35:951 (395951|0,395951|3,395951|2,396058|1,396165|2,396272|3,396379|0,396487|1,396594|2,396701|3) - Ctrl-H for pitch relevancy purposes. You have to shift some notes before and after it, but it's minor.
Ok07:56:772 - The piano is still prominent in this section, so I think you should layer that. You don't have to create doubles with this, just have some 1/2s.
It's actually something like 3 notes if you don't create double lol, added anyway08:18:147 - Think the LN should be shorter, feels way too long considering that this section feels like a panic attack anyway.
okayThat's pretty much it. Might've missed some things here and there but this covers most of it. Good song, good chart, some minor things that could be changed. You should give sections with LNs less room sometimes.
:DGood luck with getting this ranked, would like to see this ranked.
Thanks for the mod Shoe, I really really appreciate it, really helpful mod (I applied the most as you can see). Anyway the map is now ready for bubble imo, so let's try to rank it 
