1. Easy (0,99 stars, 202 notes)

1. This is the very first song I've ever wanted to map.
2. This is currently the easiest approved difficulty ever.
3. Easies were my first difficulties I've mapped.
4. Metadata is a pain to find. Thanks Satellite and alacat!
5. Irreversible is bae.
6. Stjpa is bae.
7. MrSergio is bae.

Mao wrote:

Best marathon ever.

Okoratu wrote:

02:12:547 - warum is kiai hier aus

I was just having a nice soliloquy when suddenly you wrote something D: not writing in code so the timestamps work

23:17 Bonsai: k ich mach einfach hier, you ready? oder soll ich mal drauflos spammen :^)
23:21 Bonsai: Also ganz generell find ichs ungünstig alles mit x0,6 zu snappen, weil ja Anfänger eeeigentlich den ZUsammenhang zwischen zeitlichem Abstand und Spacing lernen sollen, und das fuckt einen da halt ziemlich up bei den 1/1- und 2/1-Stellen
23:24 Bonsai: Stellen wie 00:30:947 - oder 00:37:347 - ganze leer zu lassen find ich auch komisch, weil es einfach keinen Sinn macht später erst wieder anzufangen, da da nix iwie auf einmal wichtiger wird, und da die map ja noch viel denser wird brauchts echt keine 8/1-Pausen imo ^^
23:24 Bonsai: da würd ich eher Sachen wie 00:41:347 (3) - rausnehmen
23:25 Bonsai: 00:42:147 (1) - dunno was du da genau gemappt hast?.?
23:25 Bonsai: 00:48:547 (1,1) - bei der Diff braucht man sicher mehr recovery time nach nem Spinner :^^^) jk
23:28 Bonsai: 01:14:147 (2,3) - ich vermute mal der Slider is da um quasi nen Spinner zu ersetzen? fänd ich aber besser wenn der nicht reversed sondern auf 01:17:347 - ein zweiter slider beginnt, da ja der whoosh-sound sich ja bis 01:18:947 (3) - aufbaut, dass grad am Schluss, DEM HÖHEPUNKT DIESER SPANNENDEN STELLE, nix is is komisch imo
23:30 Bonsai: 01:21:347 (2) - makes no sense to me. random vorschlag: diesen slider auf 01:22:547 - enden lassen und am ursprünglichen tail noch nen circle? dann würde das rhythmisch zumindest bissi mehr Sinn machen, trotzdem komisch den downbeat auszulassen
23:31 Stefan: Also eh
23:31 Bonsai: 01:36:547 (2) - das is halt einfach random, und geht auf Kosten der schlussendlich wichtigeren beats
23:31 Stefan: Ich bin im IRC aber..
23:31 Bonsai: oh dachte schon ich könnt hier einfach ein Selbstgespräch führen und das dan im thread posten lol
23:31 Bonsai: *dann argh
23:31 Stefan: Ich fotografier das Bild einfach
23:31 Bonsai: lolwut
23:32 Stefan: Bin auf dem Tablet
23:32 Bonsai: soll ich einfach weitermachen und als schlecht formatierten forum-mod verkaufen? ^^
23:33 Stefan: Bitte
23:34 Bonsai: oklidokli also noch zum vorigen Punkt: Wo ein so kurzer repeat-slider bissi Sinn machen würd wär zB wenn er auf 01:44:547 - startet, weil dann auf 01:45:347 - enden würde und diese Pause im Song auch durch einen starken Unterschied in der note density ausdrücken würde
23:35 Stefan: Okay
23:35 Bonsai: 02:05:347 (1) - wieder das mit dem Spinner-Ersatz, vllt geht auch einfach nochmal repeaten lassen? fänd ich schmuck
23:37 Stefan: Ich meine, dass du im Forum weitermachen sollst xD
23:37 Stefan: Wirkt nicht so stumpf
23:37 Stefan: Und nach einem Selbstgespräch
23:37 Bonsai: 02:16:547 (2) - wenn der 2/1 früher wär würd das imo mehr Sinn machen, weil dann passt das zumindest halbwegs zur Struktur zum Song, also das vor 02:18:147 (3) - , welches ja eig der wichtigste beat is, wieder eine Pause is und dem beat so wieder mehr emphasis gibt
23:37 Bonsai: oh
23:37 Bonsai: uhm
23:38 Bonsai: ok i guess ^^
23:38 Stefan: Sorry x:
23:38 Bonsai: np ^^
23:38 Stefan: Gute Nacht o/
23:38 Bonsai: Nacht lol
23:38 Bonsai: (lässt mich da schuften und geht schlafen..)

1. Just wanna point again out for the record that I don't think using x0,6 is a good idea as it doesn't really 'teach beginners the correlation between timing and distance'
2. 02:30:947 (4) - NC here? I mean the NCs are pretty random anyways, but here it would make sense to stick to the general measure since that's not the only 4/1-interval
3. 02:47:747 (2) and 03:00:547 (2) - same thing as in the previous ones, but I'll explain it again so it doesn't look like I'm just randomly hating things >:D Leaving out the major downbeat just doesn't make any sense to me since this doesn't highlight any special rhythm or something of that sort in the song, so I see no benefit of doing that, but it breaks the general rhythm of the song. If you wanted to have a slidertail on 03:02:147 to emphasize the break that is in the song there I'd just recommending replacing that slider with a 2/1-repeat-slider, or, y'know, just a circle and a 2/1-slider :^)
4. 03:28:547 (1,2,3,4) - One 'structural unit' of the song is that the measures are always in pairs - What I mean with that is that the importance of the beats is like the order of the colored tics Having a break between (3) and (4) gives (4) more emphasis. The break would make more sense at 03:30:947 (2) - since that gives emphasis according to the song. Also, when taking 8/1 as one unit, the 'general importance' (I can't find a fitting word lol) decreases in this unit until it suddenly peaks at the next 8/1 again - what I'm saying is that 03:30:947 feels less important than 03:32:547 lol
   Applies to more sections than just this, but I won't point it out again (but I can if you don't get what I'm trying to say ^^)
5. 03:39:747 (2,3,1,2,3) - this is pretty dense all of a sudden, though nothing's really changed in the music. Especially in contrast to 03:44:547 (3,1,2,3)
6. 03:52:547 - maybe a slider until 03:54:147 (1) would fit nicely here? Just a suggestion
7. 04:19:747 (1,2,3,1,1,1) - this doesn't make any sense to me at all, feels just very unstructured. And also takes away the 'peculiarity' of 04:38:947 (1) which should represent the whoosh again I guess
8. 04:59:747 (1,2) - what do these sliders represent?.?
9. 05:30:947 - this is the only time this beat gets left out in this Kiai
10. The whole ending seems extremely random - first it's generally 4/1 (and the 2/1-slider inbetween is unfitting bc of the thing I didn't want to point out again), then 5 2/1-beats, followed by a 8/1-break and -slider

1. Except of some sliders I indeed used simple pattern and slider shapes. The reason behind is that I want to keep the difficulty as minimalistic as possible. That also explains the amount and usage of hitobjects.
2. The difficulty is SUPPOSED to be easier than Easy (or Beginner Difficulties these days).
3. 0.6x may looks very crumbled but I already tried to work with higher distance snaps and they all seems to make it worse. And 0.80x is fantastic as SV so I won't change the SV under any circumstances.

1. Increased density in some parts.
2. Fixed some spacing errors.
3. Added missing hitsounds and green lines.
4. Changed Difficulty name to Easy. That's not worth being called as Baby Difficulty..

Okoratu wrote:

If you get this approved I'll map a full spread and get it ranked

pishifat wrote:

soft sliderslide is unused

ZZHBOY wrote:

Sorry for delay.
I just took a look at your map and I think it's too boring if a player have to playing this Easy diff with random rhythm, placing under ds for about 6 minutes. Why people always do an Insane or Extra map for a song more than 5min? Because it will be fun, and moreever, a map has 4-5 star rate usually can express the song well.
Maybe new players can enjoy this map, but this map can't meet the demand of experienced players. That's why rc has several rules about difficult spread, a qualified map can be played by most people, and one Easy diff is impossible to achieve that.
It's no doubt this map is safe for rank, but I don't think it's qualified.
why don't you collab with oko?