1. Cup (1.25 stars, 127 notes)
2. Easy (1.23 stars, 92 notes)
3. EZ - 4Key (1.24 stars, 262 notes)
4. Futsuu (1.75 stars, 184 notes)
5. Hard (2.33 stars, 193 notes)
6. HD - 4Key (2.13 stars, 550 notes)
7. Kantan (1.1 stars, 95 notes)
8. Muzukashii (2.12 stars, 271 notes)
9. NM - 4Key (1.54 stars, 357 notes)
10. Normal (1.77 stars, 155 notes)
11. Platter (2.52 stars, 211 notes)
12. Salad (1.91 stars, 177 notes)

1. Nishiura Tomohito - Omoide no Teien {CtB}
2. Nishiura Tomohito - Broken Promise (Orgel Version) {CtB}
3. Nishiura Tomohito - Moonlight Tango {CtB}

METADATA STUFF

Artist - 西浦 智仁 / Nishiura Tomohito
Dark Cloud 2 OST disc. 2 - Track 6: ガンドラダ大工房 / Gandorada Daikoubou

Listing on Amazon.co.jp

SEXY MODDERS AND SUPPORTERS

Ascendance - Mod + 1
Raiden - 1
Sc4v4ng3r - 2 Mods + 5
Aihuro - Mod
LittlePigRMX - Mod+ 1
Mythax - Mod
Mekelemembe - Mod
Tyrell - Mod
Absolute Zero - Mod
Surono - Mod + 1
Arphimigon - 2
guineaQ - Mod
LuckyLemon - Mod
NlHIL - Mod
Skeuddy - Mod
DominikWW - Mod
Ster - Mod
Riari - Mod
GH40z - 1
puxtu - 2 Mods
WildOne94 - Mod
- Magic Bomb - - 10 , 3 Mods + +
Riari - 1
-Sh1n1- - Mod
Jaltzu - Mod
BoberOfDarkness - Mod +
Krfawy - Mod +
bananannian - Mod
Nwolf - Mod
xtrem3x - Mod
newtoniorock8 - Mod
Nitsches - 2
newyams99 - 2 Mods +
jonawaga - Mod
PnX - Mod
arcwinolivirus - Mod
Protastic101 - 3 Mods +
- Ly0572 - - Mod
Electoz - Mod

Raiden wrote:

`_J`

remap taiko

kd thanks

bye

Raiden wrote:

poke me when u get some tako mods

I need more people to fall into the trap of trying to rank taiko

1. Pretty sure, soft-finish is having delays more than 5ms. Tell me if this is correct.
2. It looks fine other than that.

1. 01:13:590 (1,2,3) - Well I can give credibility to the seagulls' wings looking like pattern, but this kind of flow may kind of confuse beginners at first, as (1) is somewhat pointing at (2) instead of (3), thus potentially making them click (3) first. Well, not really a must to change as it is not really serious, but just throwing it out there.
2. Well a clean Easy, I liked it a lot

1. Hmm... Now I've notices the CS spread is 3>4>5... I'm not sure if that is viable, as technically ENH spread should be somewhere close to 'beginner-friendly' (like you've mentioned), and CS 5 is definitely not really that close to it ;-; You may want to consider using 3>3.5>4 instead. Or maybe I'm just getting things wrong.
2. 00:02:574 (5) - This slider doesn't sound that good, as there are almost no sound (other than a really faint one) that does really justifies the tail of the slider... Removing the repeat on this slider will give a nice 1 beat pause towards the next note, and also will remove the weirdness of this slider. Also applies to all other similar sliders.
3. 00:24:371 (4,1) - Ok this is a bit more of a serious issue then the one mentioned in Easy, (4) is literally pointing towards (1). Since this is a ENH spread you could expect lots of newer players to play Normal judging by the star rating on it. You may want to re-arrange the pattern. There are few more present in the difficulty, look over for them.
4. I mean, other than those issues up there, looks fine for me.

1. 00:22:496 (6,7,1) - The overlap with (4) is avoidable if these notes were at the bottom of 00:22:027 (5) - , the overlap may reduce the readability for few players and that will be bad.
2. 00:23:433 (2,3) - Comparing the distances(not using the DS value) between these 2 notes and 00:23:902 (3,4) - these 2 notes, these notes definitely have way lesser DS than those 2, which is kinda messy. You could bring (3) down bit more to equate the distance between those 2 sets of notes for the sake of aesthetics.
3. 01:10:308 (3,4,1) - Wo this caught me off-guard while I was testplaying o.o I don't really know how to explain this... But maybe you would want to play it safe and stack these notes, like you did for all others to not catch people off-guard. Just my opinion, not really a must to change it I guess.
4. 01:31:871 (1) - Don't really get why a NC is placed here, it is not like there is any SV changes on this note, nor it is justifying any confusing patterns out of the blue... it should be removed to keep the consistency.
5. Well everything flows well IMO, good difficulty

1. 00:20:152 (1) - I don't really get why this downbeat distance is the same as 00:17:340 (1) - when this downbeat isn't that strong compared to 00:17:340 (1) - . You could possibly lower the distances for these kind of downbeats to express the song better, maybe.
2. 00:41:246 (3,4) - Pretty much a nitpicky point, the distance between these 2 notes could be lower as the instrument that these are emphasizing on aren't on the same strength like 00:35:621 (3,4) - .
3. 00:55:308 (3) - Don't really get why this note's distance is lower than 00:21:558 (3) - this when both of them are emphasizing on the same instrument and the strength.
4. Well I've found nothing else, you know me when it comes to CtB modding.

[Sc4v4ng3r] wrote:

Surprise! pretty sure this kept you from ranking my set Technically I didn't have time to mod your set because I was away on a business trip and didn't have time to sit down and do proper mods. Throwing a few notes down isn't too labour intensive though so I did this to pass the time lol

You should know what does red and bold means in my mod posts :^)
And I lost all my mod progress for STD ;-; D:

[General]

1. Pretty sure, soft-finish is having delays more than 5ms. Tell me if this is correct. I only see a delay of 1ms (see below) which I'll fix anyway. The buildup into the sound is gradual, but I wouldn't call it a "delay". Will see what others think
   
2. It looks fine other than that.

[Easy]

1. 01:13:590 (1,2,3) - Well I can give credibility to the seagulls' wings looking like pattern, but this kind of flow may kind of confuse beginners at first, as (1) is somewhat pointing at (2) instead of (3), thus potentially making them click (3) first. Well, not really a must to change as it is not really serious, but just throwing it out there. No it's a valid suggestion and I agree with you on it's potential to confuse. I Ctrl+J'ed 01:13:590 (1) and moved down so the slider is pointing more towards (2)
2. Well a clean Easy, I liked it a lot <3

[Normal]

1. Hmm... Now I've notices the CS spread is 3>4>5... I'm not sure if that is viable, as technically ENH spread should be somewhere close to 'beginner-friendly' (like you've mentioned), and CS 5 is definitely not really that close to it ;-; You may want to consider using 3>3.5>4 instead. Or maybe I'm just getting things wrong. I'll change this if I absolutely have to, but I feel the current settings create a unique touch not found in other maps and I don't see why slightly higher CS than normal can't be acceptable here due to the low BPM and reasonably simplistic rhythms
2. 00:02:574 (5) - This slider doesn't sound that good, as there are almost no sound (other than a really faint one) that does really justifies the tail of the slider... Removing the repeat on this slider will give a nice 1 beat pause towards the next note, and also will remove the weirdness of this slider. Also applies to all other similar sliders. I don't find these to be weird at all, there's a guitar sound that extends to this tick in each case (and often a synth/drum sound too) so I feel they're justified
3. 00:24:371 (4,1) - Ok this is a bit more of a serious issue then the one mentioned in Easy, (4) is literally pointing towards (1). Since this is a ENH spread you could expect lots of newer players to play Normal judging by the star rating on it. You may want to re-arrange the pattern. There are few more present in the difficulty, look over for them. Will ask for some more opinions on this before changing, as with the current AR there's plenty of time to read the next note in each case and I don't think this should be too problematic
4. I mean, other than those issues up there, looks fine for me. <3

[Hard]

1. 00:22:496 (6,7,1) - The overlap with (4) is avoidable if these notes were at the bottom of 00:22:027 (5) - , the overlap may reduce the readability for few players and that will be bad. This would create a really sharp direction change or more awkward overlaps, which I feel are more problematic in this case. Continuing the circular flow feels natural here, so I'll keep this
2. 00:23:433 (2,3) - Comparing the distances(not using the DS value) between these 2 notes and 00:23:902 (3,4) - these 2 notes, these notes definitely have way lesser DS than those 2, which is kinda messy. You could bring (3) down bit more to equate the distance between those 2 sets of notes for the sake of aesthetics. Fair enough, moved 00:23:902 (3) down and to the left slightly
3. 01:10:308 (3,4,1) - Wo this caught me off-guard while I was testplaying o.o I don't really know how to explain this... But maybe you would want to play it safe and stack these notes, like you did for all others to not catch people off-guard. Just my opinion, not really a must to change it I guess. Decided to unstack in the kiai (and here, just before) to add a touch of difficulty and variety, to make this section distinct from the rest of the map. I'll see what others think before changing anything
4. 01:31:871 (1) - Don't really get why a NC is placed here, it is not like there is any SV changes on this note, nor it is justifying any confusing patterns out of the blue... it should be removed to keep the consistency. Just felt like a large distance to cover considering the elevated DS and 1/1 timeline spacing but sure, consider it removed
5. Well everything flows well IMO, good difficulty <3

[Cup]

1. 00:20:152 (1) - I don't really get why this downbeat distance is the same as 00:17:340 (1) - when this downbeat isn't that strong compared to 00:17:340 (1) - . You could possibly lower the distances for these kind of downbeats to express the song better, maybe. It's still pretty prominent, but I did reduce these types of jumps a little
2. 00:41:246 (3,4) - Pretty much a nitpicky point, the distance between these 2 notes could be lower as the instrument that these are emphasizing on aren't on the same strength like 00:35:621 (3,4) - . Nice touch, done
3. 00:55:308 (3) - Don't really get why this note's distance is lower than 00:21:558 (3) - this when both of them are emphasizing on the same instrument and the strength. Fixed with the first point
4. Well I've found nothing else, you know me when it comes to CtB modding.

Man I feel tired to be summoned by my professor 5 times when I was modding this ;-; I'm so tired now... I'll be coming back to mod the rest of the spread.
GL!

Aihuro wrote:

Hii! M4M from my queue :3
I will try to do my best
Well, here goes nothing.

Easy:

1. 00:03:277 (1) - Why don't you do the same like you did here: 00:08:902 (1,2,3) - ? Just shorten this slider: 00:03:277 (1) - until here: 00:03:746 - and add a note here: 00:04:215 (2) - . When I testplayed it, I just liked the flow better~ Nice suggestion, keeps things consistent
2. 00:14:527 (1) - Mm, it's fine but imo this will be better. Just move that slider: 00:14:527 (1) - to X: 136 Y: 32 (More or less) and then just stack 00:15:933 (2) - 's head on 00:13:121 (2) - 's tail. Just feels neater, lol. Decided to do something slightly different and made a triangle with 00:13:121 (2,1,2)
3. 00:29:996 (2,2) - Don't really like that overlap there. Just move 00:32:340 (2) - to X: 268 Y: 188 and just to make a nice triangle, move 00:32:808 (3) - to X: 236 Y: 272. Just a suggestion though, but I just looks neater. Not really noticeable during play, but fixed anyway
4. 00:34:215 (1) - If you follow my suggestion above just stack 00:32:340 (2) - on that slider's head. (I'm sure you would have done it anyways) Actually decided to make another triabnle here with 00:32:340 (2,3,1) since the curve on (1) can blanket the circle (2) which is a nice effect I think
5. 00:35:621 (2) - I suggest you lenghten that slider a bit. End it here at: 00:36:558 - . It fits better with the music imo or it just can be me with my dumb old ears. There's a synth "boop" sound (best description ever I know xD) on the red tick which is way more prominent than the guitar and drum sounds, which is why I only made it a 3/2 slider
6. 00:38:433 (2) - I don't really like where you placed that slider. Maybe just move it to X: 180 Y: 348. I checked and it isn't off the screen. Also, like I suggested above. Maybe end the slider here: 00:39:371 - Did extend this slider since the syth was weaker here and made it symmetrical with the previous slider
7. 00:46:871 (2,2) - Maybe stack these two notes on each other? Made another triangle instead, personal preference (:
8. 01:06:090 - Feels kinda empty here. . . maybe add a note here instead? I like the pause effect as it gives more emphasis to the prominent note at 01:06:558 (2) but I'll consider changing this with future mods
9. 01:20:621 (3,3) - These notes aren't stacked properly. Just move 01:20:621 (3) - a bit downwards. Good spot, fixed
10. Seems like a nice diff :3 Good job JB!!!~ <3

Normal:

1. 00:00:465 (1,2,3) - Mm, the flow is fine but I think this flow will work better: Just delete this note: 00:00:465 (1) - and move this slider: 00:00:933 (2) - in his place and then delete this note: 00:01:402 (3) - and add a slider which begins here: 00:00:933 - and ends here: 00:01:402 - . If my english is very bad (lol) It must look like this: http://puu.sh/kzpmX/6a4a66e814.jpg I actually think the current rhythm fits the music better since 00:00:933 (2) is a shorter guitar sound and so requires a shorter slider. The long sound is on the first circle (didn't use a slider for variety with the next combo
2. 00:16:636 (4) - I found a rhythem that will fit better: Add a note here: 00:16:636 (4) - and add a slider here: 00:16:871 - which ends here: 00:17:105 - When I testplayed it, it just felt better. Done at 00:22:261 (4,5) and similar alternating combos, will keep this for the purpose of variety. The repeat sliders fir to the guitar well enough so I feel they're justified
3. 00:36:324 - Okay, remove the reverse-slider and add a note here: 00:36:793 (6) - Again, fits better with the music. I could do this to map the synth "boop", but the current pattern fits the guitar nicely so I prefer to keep this
4. 00:53:199 (5) - Same here, like I mentioned above. Remove reverse-slider and add a note here: 00:53:668 (6) - Back to my variety tricks again - as in the first "chorus", I'm alternating this pattern with the one you're describing, such as at 00:56:011 (4,5)
5. 01:14:527 - Instead of just a note, maybe use a slider here instead. Just end it here: 01:14:761 - This flute sound is really prominent, I feel it really deserves to be clickable since the intensity is the same as the head of 01:14:996 (3)
6. 01:22:730 (2) - Just for something else maybe Ctrl+H? Sure, also rotated about 30 degrees anticlockwise to maintain a nice flow into and out of the pattern
7. 01:41:011 (4) - Move this slider to X: 376 Y: 168.? Why not, symmetry does look nicer here
8. Very nice diff >w</ I could barely find anything!~ <3

I will end my mod here~ Hope it was useful though!
Good Luck with this map of yours and thanks for the mod+GD

LittlePigRMX wrote:

Hello from queue, A very small mod.

Hard
HP Drain rate must be at least 6 You got it, also increased HP on Normal to 4.5 for an even balance of 3/4.5/6

That's it really, but im also gonna shoot a star at this..

1. 00:13:824 (4,5,6) - You could have give a nice reducing-of-distance effect like in 00:25:074 (3,4,5) - , as the instrument(idk, ocarina?) is reducing in pitch.
2. 00:21:558 (4) - Well, since the instrument is pretty strong here, and considering it is a 1/2 rhythm, you may want to increase the distance for just a bit like around, 1.5x? (Or 1.7x if it is possible) After all, you did make a big distance between notes on pitches like this.
3. 01:12:183 (4) - I kinda expected a bigger dash here, as it is a downbeat having a guitar, and the notes before this were having bigger distance than this, it kinda misleads players (?) (maybe, I don't play CtB much)
4. 01:38:668 - Just my personal taste, there is a nice drum snare to map on this point.

1. 00:58:121 (1) - Being nitpicky again, the distance here is lower than 00:24:371 (1) - when both of them are emphasizing on the same instrument and strength. God I hate mentioning the same things for all difficulties ;-;
2. 00:58:824 (2,3,4) - Don't really know why you can't give a reducing-of-distance effect on Platter when Salad could.

[Sc4v4ng3r] wrote:

Let me just double post with the continuation of my mod. No kds for this post.

[Salad]

1. 00:13:824 (4,5,6) - You could have give a nice reducing-of-distance effect like in 00:25:074 (3,4,5) - , as the instrument(idk, ocarina?) is reducing in pitch. At a low AR such as this, the spacing reduction I'm prepared to follow doesn't really have much of an effect. Coupled with the dash to 00:14:527 (1) this pattern feels stuttered and kinda awkward to play,l so no change
2. 00:21:558 (4) - Well, since the instrument is pretty strong here, and considering it is a 1/2 rhythm, you may want to increase the distance for just a bit like around, 1.5x? (Or 1.7x if it is possible) After all, you did make a big distance between notes on pitches like this. I used 1.7x on 00:55:074 (3,4) which is a similar sound, so I'll do the same thing here
3. 01:12:183 (4) - I kinda expected a bigger dash here, as it is a downbeat having a guitar, and the notes before this were having bigger distance than this, it kinda misleads players (?) (maybe, I don't play CtB much) Increased a little
4. 01:38:668 - Just my personal taste, there is a nice drum snare to map on this point. Oops I missed this, fixed

[Platter]

1. 00:58:121 (1) - Being nitpicky again, the distance here is lower than 00:24:371 (1) - when both of them are emphasizing on the same instrument and strength. God I hate mentioning the same things for all difficulties ;-; And I hate making the same errors on all difficulties ;-; - fixed
2. 00:58:824 (2,3,4) - Don't really know why you can't give a reducing-of-distance effect on Platter when Salad could. Done

Well that is all from me, and have some stars
GL! I'm still waiting for my heart