forum

kamome sano - plasma (2015 rework) [Taiko]

posted
Total Posts
36
Topic Starter
Charlotte
This beatmap was submitted using in-game submission on 2015年11月7日 at 18:59:56

Artist: kamome sano
Title: plasma (2015 rework)
Tags: Sayaka- archive001:reworks+
BPM: 176
Filesize: 8231kb
Play Time: 05:27
Difficulties Available:
  1. Inner Oni (5.34 stars, 2222 notes)
Download: kamome sano - plasma (2015 rework)
Information: Scores/Beatmap Listing
---------------
Inner Oni - Completed
K-2
これ難しいなwwwwwwwwww


  • ■ 00:28:333 (142,143) - kd
    ■ 00:31:061 (150,151) - dk
    ■ 00:39:924 (182) - k
    ■ 01:04:128~01:05:151 - I think From 01:03:958 (23), at once speed change is better. When I play, this part make me confused.
    ■ 01:05:492 (35) - D
    ■ 01:48:788 (367) - Um, 01:43:674 (317) ~ 01:47:765 (357) this part is good. It's fun. But, I think this is too faaaassst. At least, x2.0 is good
    ■ 03:22:878 (1060,1061) - kd
    ■ 03:28:333 (1080,1081) - kd
    ■ 03:34:469 (1100) - k
    ■ 03:36:515 (1108,1109,1110) - ddk (Its descending rhythm starts 03:36:685)
    ■ 03:38:219 (1) - D
    ■ 03:59:697 (194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - It makes player confused. I think it will be changed like 01:04:128~01:05:151
    ■ 05:05:492~05:16:401 - If you make this equivalent pattern intentionally, I don't touch it. But It's too monotonous. You can change pattern such as this "05:08:986 - add d" "delete 05:09:413 and add 05:09:327 05:09:498 k"
頑張って!
Kurokotei

[Ni-Sokkususu] wrote:

これ難しいなwwwwwwwwww


  • ■ 01:04:128~01:05:151 - I think From 01:03:958 (23), at once speed change is better. When I play, this part make me confused. I prefer progressive SV here, it looks weird with only one SV change
    ■ 01:05:492 (35) - D it doesn't need a finisher imo since I'm only following the amen break
    ■ 01:48:788 (367) - Um, 01:43:674 (317) ~ 01:47:765 (357) this part is good. It's fun. But, I think this is too faaaassst. At least, x2.0 is good hmm, x2 is too slow imo, will keep x3 for now, but I'll maybe change it if other people tell me to do it so
    ■ 03:38:219 (1) - D same as the other one
    ■ 03:59:697 (194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - It makes player confused. I think it will be changed like 01:04:128~01:05:151 well it doesn't look good without SV changes imo
    ■ 05:05:492~05:16:401 - If you make this equivalent pattern intentionally, I don't touch it. But It's too monotonous. You can change pattern such as this "05:08:986 - add d" "delete 05:09:413 and add 05:09:327 05:09:498 k" as you said, it was intentional so I'm not going to change it lol
頑張って!
No changes, but thanks for the mod anyway!
Topic Starter
Charlotte

[Ni-Sokkususu] wrote:

これ難しいなwwwwwwwwww わかる!


  • ■ 00:28:333 (142,143) - kd fixed
    ■ 00:31:061 (150,151) - dk ^
    ■ 00:39:924 (182) - k ^
    ■ 03:22:878 (1060,1061) - kd ^
    ■ 03:28:333 (1080,1081) - kd ^
    ■ 03:34:469 (1100) - k ^
    ■ 03:36:515 (1108,1109,1110) - ddk (Its descending rhythm starts 03:36:685) fixed.I removed notes.
頑張って!
Thank you mod :)
ManP
hi! from my queue :3

  1. 00:26:288 (134,135) - ctrl+g?
  2. 01:05:492 (35) - 01:16:401 (133) - add finish?
  3. 01:48:702 - I think this is so fast(x3.00) How about 2~2.5?
  4. 02:31:572 (734) - move to 02:31:657 - ?
  5. 03:03:276 changeb to d?
  6. 03:38:219 (1) - add finish?
  7. 04:27:055 (443) - delete?
  8. 04:27:310 (445) - add finish?

That's all! nice map~~ Good luck :3 :)
Kurokotei

ManP wrote:

hi! from my queue :3

  1. 01:05:492 (35) - 01:16:401 (133) - add finish? okay added since previous mod also asked me to do it so
  2. 01:48:702 - I think this is so fast(x3.00) How about 2~2.5? changed to x2.5
  3. 03:38:219 (1) - add finish? added
  4. 04:27:055 (443) - delete? deleted
  5. 04:27:310 (445) - add finish? hmm, I don't see any reason to put a finisher here

That's all! nice map~~ Good luck :3 :)
Thanks for the mod!
Topic Starter
Charlotte

ManP wrote:

hi! from my queue :3

  1. 00:26:288 (134,135) - ctrl+g? fixed
  2. 02:31:572 (734) - move to 02:31:657 - ? fixed
  3. 03:03:276 changeb to d? nope.

That's all! nice map~~ Good luck :3 :)
Thank you mod :)
Ploenar
難しいのは見てもよく分からないので役に立たないかも知りません。

[Charlotte]
  1. 00:11:118 (62) - Change to k following your style?
  2. 00:31:401 (152,154) - よく聞けば152をkにするより154をkにするのが曲に合うと思います。
  3. 01:57:991 (440,441) - kd? down melody.
  4. 02:10:264 (546,547) - Swap these? 547 is higher sound imo.
  5. 03:25:947 (1070,1072) - Same as 00:31:401.
  6. 03:37:026 (1113) - k?
[Sayaka-]
  1. 04:40:861 (566) - Remove before starting long stream? it would be not bad feeling imo.
Overall nice map. Good luck!
Kurokotei

Ploenar wrote:

[Sayaka-]
  1. 04:40:861 (566) - Remove before starting long stream? it would be not bad feeling imo. well the synth plays a sound here so no
Overall nice map. Good luck!
No changes, but thanks for the mod anyway!
Surono
`L__` wat de, choco just want me mod him parts... hi, weh

Choco Parts
00:00:208 (2) - change this.. kat, *00:00:378 - same pitch*
00:02:253 - ^ this too
00:26:458 - nice flow if this kat, *00:25:094 - and this don is fit with flow like this*
00:27:822 - 00:29:185 - 00:33:276 - ^ kat, de cat
01:57:310 - choco.. this change kat, is nice for pattern kkkd, still have same flow
no again.. try my mod before from 3 min, dem nice mapping with flow lol. GLuck!1! (◑‿◐)
Jona
Hey Charlotte! Mod as requested through PM (REALLY sorry for the late mod, I was really busy this week :( )

[plasma]
  1. 00:40:776 - add note?
  2. 01:15:549 - k
  3. 02:15:293 - k
  4. 03:35:322 - add note? (same as first point)
  5. 03:36:941 - k
  6. 03:58:589 - Remove
  7. 03:58:930 - Add d
  8. 04:21:515 - k

GL!! 8-)
Kurokotei

Jona wrote:

Hey Charlotte! Mod as requested through PM (REALLY sorry for the late mod, I was really busy this week :( )

[plasma]
  1. 01:15:549 - k keeping d helps to emphasize the snare
  2. 03:58:589 - Remove there is a beat here
  3. 03:58:930 - Add d added
  4. 04:21:515 - k keeping d to emphasize the next note's pitch better

GL!! 8-)
Thanks for the mod!
@Charlotte: can you apply the mod for me please (just add a d at 03:58:930 - )
Chiswell
plasma
00:29:185 (145) - change to k

03:23:731 (1063) - ^

03:28:333 (1080) - change to d?

03:36:685 (1109) - ~ 03:37:878 (1123) - http://puu.sh/kc0g6.png ?



03:59:697 (194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - hmmmmmmm

nice map
good luck :3
Kurokotei

Blonde Hair wrote:

03:59:697 (194,195,196,197,198,199,200) - hmmmmmmm lol I'll maybe change it if more people tell me to do it so

nice map
good luck :3
Thanks for the mod!
Topic Starter
Charlotte

Ploenar wrote:

難しいのは見てもよく分からないので役に立たないかも知りません。

[Charlotte]
  1. 00:11:118 (62) - Change to k following your style?
  2. 00:31:401 (152,154) - よく聞けば152をkにするより154をkにするのが曲に合うと思います。
  3. 01:57:991 (440,441) - kd? down melody.
  4. 02:10:264 (546,547) - Swap these? 547 is higher sound imo.
  5. 03:25:947 (1070,1072) - Same as 00:31:401.
  6. 03:37:026 (1113) - k?

    All fixed
Overall nice map. Good luck!

Surono wrote:

`L__` wat de, choco just want me mod him parts... hi, weh

Choco Parts
00:00:208 (2) - change this.. kat, *00:00:378 - same pitch* fixed
00:02:253 - ^ this too eh? kat now.
00:26:458 - nice flow if this kat, *00:25:094 - and this don is fit with flow like this* nope.fine now.
00:27:822 - 00:29:185 - 00:33:276 - ^ kat, de cat ^
01:57:310 - choco.. this change kat, is nice for pattern kkkd, still have same flow ^
no again.. try my mod before from 3 min, dem nice mapping with flow lol. GLuck!1! (◑‿◐)

Jona wrote:

Hey Charlotte! Mod as requested through PM (REALLY sorry for the late mod, I was really busy this week :( )

[plasma]
  1. 00:40:776 - add note? nope.I think no need.
  2. 02:15:293 - k nope.
  3. 03:35:322 - add note? (same as first point) nope.I think no need.
  4. 03:36:941 - k fixed

GL!! 8-)

Blonde Hair wrote:

plasma
00:29:185 (145) - change to k fixed

03:23:731 (1063) - ^ ^

03:28:333 (1080) - change to d? nope.

03:36:685 (1109) - ~ 03:37:878 (1123) - http://puu.sh/kc0g6.png ? fixed

nice map
good luck :3

Thank you mod :)
Nofool
o/

aw i did not notice that it was a collab lol...
hmm pretty good overall x_x i almost found nothing. Really consistent diff, even tho some parterns looked random in the editor it plays pretty well lol..

nice work on SV etc

[plasma]
- 00:40:776 - d ? you usually follow these sounds.
- 00:59:526 - maybe add ddk or kdk 1/2 here ? a bit like - 00:48:617 - or - 00:53:901 -, sounds different tho, np if you want to keep a break.
- 01:03:788 - 01:05:407 - this part feels too dense compared to the previous one, i suggest you to delete a lot of notes to make a better transition with the next part, example :

- 03:35:322 - refer to - 00:40:776 -.
- 03:57:225 (172) - SV x1.35, - 03:57:310 (173) - SV x1.40 and then - 03:57:395 (174) - SV x1.41 lol ? SV + 0,05 and then + 0,01 x_x weird to read. Try to make it smoother by increasing the SV a bit earlier or decrease the general stream's SV.
- 03:59:697 - 04:00:038 - ^ same, weird to read x_x. Lower SVs would make it much cooler to read imo, try (from - 03:59:668 -) SV x1,12 => 1,10 => 1,08 => 1,06 => 1,04 => 1,02 => 1.00 ?
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

good luck'
Kurokotei

Nofool wrote:

o/

aw i did notice that it was a collab lol...
hmm pretty good overall x_x i almost found nothing. Really consistent diff, even tho some parterns looked random in the editor it plays pretty well lol..

nice work on SV etc

[plasma]
- 00:59:526 - maybe add ddk or kdk 1/2 here ? a bit like - 00:48:617 - or - 00:53:901 -, sounds different tho, np if you want to keep a break. I'm following the piano so I think it's okay to leave a break here
- 01:03:788 - 01:05:407 - this part feels too dense compared to the previous one, i suggest you to delete a lot of notes to make a better transition with the next part, example :
wow that looks actually cool, changed
- 03:57:225 (172) - SV x1.35, - 03:57:310 (173) - SV x1.40 and then - 03:57:395 (174) - SV x1.41 lol ? SV + 0,05 and then + 0,01 x_x weird to read. Try to make it smoother by increasing the SV a bit earlier or decrease the general stream's SV. I changed 03:57:140 (171,172) - to x1.38-x1.39
- 03:59:697 - 04:00:038 - ^ same, weird to read x_x. Lower SVs would make it much cooler to read imo, try (from - 03:59:668 -) SV x1,12 => 1,10 => 1,08 => 1,06 => 1,04 => 1,02 => 1.00 ? changed to your suggestion
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

good luck'
Thanks for the mod!

http://puu.sh/kAG6P/51502aa332.osu
tasuke912
hello there. M4M.
テストプレイの時既に提案済みなので軽めに見ます。
[ General]
  1. Diff名に不安感。 p/4422562
  2. 04:00:038 (1) - 小節線とdノートが別の速度で流れています。修正してください。
[ plasma]
  1. 02:44:612 (839,840,841,842) - kiai後のパターンの変化と一貫させるためにkdkkに変更を推奨します。この後の配置も同様にリバース。もしくはkiai後パート側のパターンを変更でも大丈夫です。kdkk→kddkからいきなりkddk→kdkkパターンに変わるのはプレイヤーにミスを誘いかねません。
  2. 01:52:282 (388,389) - kd. (389)は(387)より低い音なのでkdの方がよりfitすると思います。


  3. 04:03:191 (29,30) - kd would more fit to melody, since (30) is lower pitch sound than (28) . same suggestion as charlotte part lol
  4. 04:49:043 - add d here? just suggestion.
  5. between 05:05:492 (556) - and 05:16:401 (636) -, this part is too monotone. consider to make another pattern than d-k-dk-kd-kkd-k. e.g.) d-k-dk-kd-k-ddk-, d-k-dk-kd-kdd-k-, etc.
Call me back when you are done. :D
Kurokotei

tasuke912 wrote:

  1. 04:03:191 (29,30) - kd would more fit to melody, since (30) is lower pitch sound than (28) . same suggestion as charlotte part lol yeah but 29 has a lower pitch than 30 so I think dk is okay
  2. 04:49:043 - add d here? just suggestion. I don't think it's needed since I want to emphasize the beat
  3. between 05:05:492 (556) - and 05:16:401 (636) -, this part is too monotone. consider to make another pattern than d-k-dk-kd-kkd-k. e.g.) d-k-dk-kd-k-ddk-, d-k-dk-kd-kdd-k-, etc. changed some patterns
Call me back when you are done. :D
Thanks for the mod!

http://puu.sh/kJVuz/3e1053867e.osu
Topic Starter
Charlotte

tasuke912 wrote:

hello there. M4M.
テストプレイの時既に提案済みなので軽めに見ます。
[ General]
  1. Diff名に不安感。 p/4422562
  2. 04:00:038 (1) - 小節線とdノートが別の速度で流れています。修正してください。fixed.
[ plasma]
  1. 02:44:612 (839,840,841,842) - kiai後のパターンの変化と一貫させるためにkdkkに変更を推奨します。この後の配置も同様にリバース。もしくはkiai後パート側のパターンを変更でも大丈夫です。kdkk→kddkからいきなりkddk→kdkkパターンに変わるのはプレイヤーにミスを誘いかねません。同様に反転させました。
  2. 01:52:282 (388,389) - kd. (389)は(387)より低い音なのでkdの方がよりfitすると思います。fixed.

Call me back when you are done. :D
Thank you mod :)
show more
Please sign in to reply.

New reply